The New York Times 2024-08-16 12:10:38


Middle East Crisis: Gaza Cease-Fire Negotiators Meet Amid Threat of Wider Conflict

Top News

No breakthrough emerges, but the talks are expected to continue on Friday.

Mediators and Israeli negotiators met into the night on Thursday in Qatar, trying to find a formula for a cease-fire in Gaza even as the Middle East braced for an anticipated retaliation against Israel by Iran and its allies that could ignite a broader armed conflict.

The Biden administration and its allies had called for the meeting last week, seeing a Gaza cease-fire agreement as the best hope to avert or curb the expected Iranian-led reprisals for the recent assassinations of Ismail Haniyeh, the political leader of Hamas, and Fuad Shukr, a top Hezbollah military commander.

Officials from the United States, Qatar and Egypt met with an Israeli delegation in hopes of finding a way to bridge the significant differences between the two sides remaining after months of on-again-off-again talks. Hamas leaders, accusing the Israeli government of negotiating in bad faith, had said they would not participate, though Qatari officials were expected to bring them any new proposals from the Israeli side.

There was no immediate breakthrough on Thursday, but no breakdown in the talks either. An Israeli official briefed on the negotiations said that the Israeli delegation would remain overnight in Doha, Qatar’s capital, and that the talks were expected to continue on Friday in an attempt to bring the sides closer.

A White House national security spokesman, John F. Kirby, called the talks a “promising start” and said the United States also expected them to go on for a second day.

A Hamas political official, Hussam Badran, put out a statement restating the group’s long-held positions that any agreement must include a full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and a permanent cease-fire.

International pressure has been rising for months for some kind of deal to end the suffering in Gaza and allow for the release of hostages. The Gazan Health Ministry reported on Thursday that the Palestinian death toll in the war had surpassed 40,000. The ministry’s figures do not distinguish between combatants and civilians. Israel’s military spokesman, Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari, said on Thursday that Israeli forces had killed more than 17,000 combatants.

But prospects for a breakthrough still appear remote, leaving the Middle East facing a precarious moment. The United States has sent stealth fighter jets, a carrier group and a guided-missile submarine to the region in anticipation of an Iranian-led attack.

The issues still unresolved include who will control the Gazan side of the enclave’s border with Egypt and how Israel can prevent armed Hamas fighters from returning to northern Gaza, which has been largely depopulated during the war.

Hamas officials have said Mr. Netanyahu’s government is not genuinely interested in reaching a cease-fire, pointing to the assassination of Mr. Haniyeh in Tehran and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s toughened stands on several points. “Hamas believes the Israeli occupation is trying to buy time with more negotiations,” said Ibrahim al-Madhoun, an Istanbul-based analyst close to Hamas.

In Israel, Mr. Netanyahu’s far-right coalition allies continue to insist that Israel rule Gaza indefinitely and have already denounced the latest Israeli proposal as tantamount to surrender. If Mr. Netanyahu moves ahead with the deal, his governing coalition could splinter, potentially ending his political career.

Mr. Netanyahu himself has equivocated, saying he supports the three-stage proposal even as he promises the Israeli public an “absolute victory” over Hamas. Relatives of hostages held in Gaza have argued that the prime minister has prioritized his hold on power over signing a deal to free their loved ones.

Yaron Blum, a former Israeli security official who previously led the country’s effort to bring home hostages, said that even if the current talks were successful, they would be just the start of a protracted process of hashing out the details of a deal. But if the talks go poorly, the region could descend into a wider confrontation, he said.

“If everyone doesn’t work in the coming days until white smoke comes out, I don’t see it coming together going forward,” said Mr. Blum. “But there’s still a chance now, because every side realizes that they need to advance.”

Mr. Kirby said the American delegation was led by the C.I.A. director, William J. Burns, and President Biden’s Middle East envoy, Brett McGurk. Israel’s delegation is being led by the head of Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency, David Barnea. The other principals in the talks are the head of Egyptian intelligence, Abbas Kamel, and Qatari prime minister, Mohammed bin Abdulrahman al-Thani.

The stakes at the talks are particularly high for the families of the remaining Israeli hostages in Gaza. Over 40 of the 115 hostages are now presumed dead, according to the Israeli authorities.

“Every second there are hostages held in captivity is a severe risk to their lives,” said Jon Polin, the father of Hersh Goldberg-Polin, 23, one of eight Israeli-American hostages. Three of them have been declared dead by the Israeli authorities.

In Gaza, most of the enclave’s more than two million people have been displaced, many repeatedly, and are living in tents or temporary lodgings. Finding enough food and safe drinking water is often a daily struggle, and swaths of the coastal enclave have been reduced to rubble.

Anas al-Tayeb, who lives in Jabaliya, just outside of Gaza City, said many there rejoiced in July, the last time mediators said cease-fire talks were progressing. But just a few days later, the Israeli military again stormed neighborhoods in Gaza City.

Mr. al-Tayeb said Israel and Hamas were both responsible for the failure to reach a deal. He wondered why Hamas had declined to accept any of the previous Israeli cease-fire proposals, which have broadly adhered to the three-stage framework.

“Those same conditions were offered before in previous rounds of negotiations,” said Mr. al-Tayeb. “So why didn’t they take it then?”

Rachel Goldberg-Polin, Hersh’s mother, said she believed it was time for everyone to agree to a “true compromise.”

“Not everyone is going to agree,” she said. “But everyone has interests and everyone gets a little bit of the interests they’re looking for. Let’s make that happen and move forward.”

Key Developments

Abbas tells Turkey’s Parliament that he intends to visit Gaza, and other news.

  • The Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas pledged to visit the Gaza Strip “even if it costs my life,” using a speech to Turkey’s Parliament on Thursday to renew criticism of Israel. It was not immediately clear whether such a visit was feasible, and Mr. Abbas, who leads the Palestinian Authority, which controls parts of the Israeli-occupied West Bank, has not been to the enclave since Hamas seized power there in 2007. Israeli officials could not immediately be reached for comment. Mr. Abbas, who was wrapping up a two-day visit to Turkey, received a standing ovation from lawmakers. Both he and President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey, a harsh critic of Israel’s approach to the war in Gaza, entered the chamber wearing scarves bearing the Palestinian and Turkish flags.

  • More than 40,000 Palestinians have been killed in the war in Gaza, including women and children, the Gazan Health Ministry said on Thursday. The ministry’s figures do not distinguish between combatants and civilians. Asked about the reported toll, Vedant Patel, a State Department spokesman, told reporters that any number of civilian deaths “above zero” was troubling and reiterated a U.S. call for restraint. Also Thursday, Israel’s military spokesman, Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari, said that the Israeli military had killed more than 17,000 combatants in the enclave since the war’s start, but he did not say how the military had arrived at that number, or how it had distinguished combatants from civilians.

  • Marking 100 days since the Israeli closure of the Rafah border crossing between Gaza and Egypt, the Gaza government press office said at a news conference on Thursday that the closure had severely hurt Gaza’s health care system. The closure is preventing the entry of medical supplies and aid, and blocking critically ill patients from receiving necessary treatment abroad, a spokesman for the office said. The office estimated that more than 1,000 people had died because they could not leave through the crossing in southern Gaza. The Israeli military seized the crossing when it moved into the city of Rafah in May, calling it an important step in reducing Hamas’s control over the territory.

  • The United States imposed new sanctions on Thursday intended to cut off financing to Iranian-backed militias. The measures targeted several companies, individuals and vessels involved in shipping Iranian commodities to finance its proxy groups, Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen, the U.S. Treasury said.

Israeli settlers storm a West Bank village, drawing rare rebukes from Israeli officials.

Israeli settler attacks on Palestinians have surged in the West Bank, but a riot on Thursday in the village of Jit stood out for drawing rapid and unusual rebukes from Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whose coalition government includes West Bank settlers in top positions.

“Dozens of Israeli civilians, some of them masked, entered the town of Jit and set fire to vehicles and structures in the area, hurled rocks and Molotov cocktails,” the Israeli military said in a statement. The military said that its forces, along with Israeli Border Police, were dispatched to the scene and dispersed the riot by firing shots into the air and “removing the Israeli civilians from the town.”

The Palestinian Authority said that one Palestinian was shot dead during the attack on the village and that another was critically injured. The Israeli military said it was “looking into” reports of a fatality and that it had opened an investigation with other security agencies into what it called “this serious incident,” adding that one rioter was arrested and transferred to the police for questioning.

The prime minister’s office issued a statement saying that Mr. Netanyahu “takes seriously the riots that took place this evening in the village of Jit, which included injury to life and property by Israelis who entered the village.” The statement vowed to find and prosecute those responsible for “any criminal act.”

The Israeli military condemned “incidents of this type and the rioters, who harm security, law, and order,” and accused those involved in the violence of diverting troops and security forces “from their main mission of thwarting terrorism and protecting the security of civilians.”

The riot came as the war in Gaza between Israel and Hamas has stretched into its 11th month, a period that has also seen increased Israeli military activity against what it terms suspected terrorism in the occupied West Bank, as well as a surge in violent settler attacks there against Palestinians.

At the same time, far-right ministers in Mr. Netanyahu’s government — particularly Bezalel Smotrich, the finance minister, and Itamar Ben-Gvir, the minister of national security, who are both West Bank settlers — have espoused divisive rhetoric and advanced policies to expand Israel’s hold on the territory.

The West Bank is home to about 2.7 million Palestinians and more than 500,000 settlers. Israel seized control of the territory from Jordan in 1967 during a war with three Arab states, and Israelis have since settled there with both tacit and explicit government approval, though the international community largely considers settlements illegal, and many outposts also violate Israeli law.

The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, which tracks violent incidents in the West Bank on a weekly basis, said in its latest update on Wednesday that Israeli settlers had perpetrated 25 attacks against Palestinians in the previous week. Since the Hamas-led attack on Israel on Oct. 7 that set off the war in Gaza, the agency has recorded around 1,250 attacks by Israeli settlers against Palestinians and their property.

“There has been an uptick in vigilante attacks by a minority of settlers,” David Makovsky, director of the Koret Project on Arab-Israel relations at the Washington Institute, said in an interview. “The West Bank is a tinderbox. It’s not the front you look at, but this is another front in the war.”

Few, however, have generated the kind of immediate approbation from Israeli officials that followed the storming of Jit.

In July, an outgoing Israeli general issued a harsh rebuke of the government’s policies in the West Bank and condemned rising “nationalist crime” by Jewish settlers. Retired Maj. Gen. Yehuda Fuks, the former chief of Israel’s Central Command, said in a speech at his departure ceremony that the actions of a violent minority threatened Israel’s security, undermined Israel’s reputation internationally and sowed fear among Palestinians — and he argued that it did not reflect his understanding of Judaism.

Israel’s president, Isaac Herzog, expressed a similar sentiment on Thursday in response to the riot in Jit. “This is not our way and certainly not the way of Torah and Judaism,” Mr. Herzog said in a post on social media that accused an “extremist minority” of settlers of harming Israel’s standing in the international community during an “especially sensitive and difficult time.”

Aaron Boxerman and Johnatan Reiss contributed reporting.

Here is a timeline of Gaza cease-fire talks.

Israel’s war with Hamas in the Gaza Strip has lasted more than 10 months, with only one weeklong pause in fighting, in late November. That temporary cease-fire led to the return of 50 Israeli hostages captured during the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel in exchange for 150 Palestinian prisoners — and raised hopes among mediators and the international community that another deal would follow.

Those hopes were dashed repeatedly over many months of unsuccessful efforts by mediators. In the interim, tensions in the Middle East have risen, particularly in recent weeks after the assassinations of a Hezbollah commander in Lebanon and a Hamas leader in Iran, prompting vows from Iran and Hezbollah to retaliate against Israel.

World leaders eager to avert a wider full-scale war believe that an agreement between Israel and Hamas could prevent an escalation. Still, even the most vocal champions of a cease-fire admit that closing a deal will be tough. President Biden on Tuesday told reporters he was “not giving up” on an agreement but that it was “getting harder” to remain optimistic.

On Thursday, negotiators are meeting in Doha, Qatar, to try to reach an agreement. Here’s a timeline of recent talks:

May: President Biden calls for an end to the war.

Declaring Hamas no longer capable of carrying out a major terrorist attack on Israel, Mr. Biden on May 31 pressed for hostilities in Gaza to end and endorsed a new cease-fire plan that he said Israel had offered to win the release of hostages.

“It’s time for this war to end, for the day after to begin,” Mr. Biden said that day. Calling it “a decisive moment,” Mr. Biden put the onus on Hamas to reach an agreement, saying, “Israel has made their proposal. Hamas says it wants a cease-fire. This deal is an opportunity to prove whether they really mean it.”

June: U.N. Security Council passes a cease-fire resolution.

The United Nations Security Council on June 10 adopted a cease-fire plan backed by the United States, with 14 nations in favor and Russia abstaining. Linda Thomas-Greenfield, the American ambassador to the United Nations, said that the United States would work to make sure that Israel agreed to the deal and that Qatar and Egypt would work to bring Hamas to the negotiating table.

The resolution followed the same framework that Mr. Biden had endorsed, outlining a three-phase plan that would begin with an immediate cease-fire, the release of all living hostages in exchange for Palestinians being held in Israeli prisons, the return of displaced Gazans to their homes and the full withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza. The second phase called for a permanent cease-fire with the agreement of both parties, and the third phase consisted of a multiyear reconstruction plan for Gaza and the return of the remains of deceased hostages.

July: Talks in Cairo, Doha and Rome.

When American negotiators met in Doha for talks with Egyptian, Qatari and Israeli officials in early July, some American officials were hopeful that progress was being made. Their optimism persisted when talks continued July 12 in Cairo.

The discussions included two contentious issues: whether Israel would agree to end the war, withdraw from Gaza and respect a permanent cease-fire; and whether Hamas would agree to give up control of the enclave. Both Israel and Hamas were wary about whether the other side was ready to make concessions.

On July 28, negotiators reconvened in Rome. The meeting came as Israel fired on southern Lebanon, responding to a rocket strike from Hezbollah the previous day that killed 12 children in the village of Majdal Shams in the Israeli-controlled Golan Heights.

Even as fears intensified that a regional war could escalate, negotiators remained stuck over a few key issues, particularly the extent to which Israeli forces would remain in Gaza during a truce and the length of any halt to the fighting. Hamas wanted a permanent truce, while Israel sought the option to resume fighting.

As the month ended, the crisis in the Middle East deepened. Hezbollah confirmed that one of its senior commanders, Fuad Shukr, was killed in an Israeli strike on a suburb of Beirut, the Lebanese capital, and Hamas accused Israel of killing its political leader, Ismail Haniyeh, while he was in Tehran for the inauguration of Iran’s new president. Iranian officials and Hamas would say later that Israel was responsible for the assassination, an assessment also reached by several U.S. officials, but Israel has not acknowledged involvement.

John F. Kirby, a White House spokesman, said on July 31 that it was “too soon to know” what impact the developments might have on negotiations but noted that the United States was still in contact with Egypt and Qatar.

August: A ‘final’ proposal.

President Biden and the leaders of Egypt and Qatar on Aug. 8 said that they were prepared to present a “final” cease-fire proposal and called on Israel and Hamas to return to the negotiating table. In a joint statement, they declared that “the time has come” and insisted that the negotiators meet again on Thursday.

“There is no further time to waste nor excuses from any party for further delay,” they said, adding, “As mediators, if necessary, we are prepared to present a final bridging proposal that resolves the remaining implementation issues in a manner that meets the expectations of all parties.”

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel agreed to the meeting, though it was not clear if he would agree to a deal.

According to documents reviewed by The New York Times, Israel relayed a list of new stipulations in late July to American, Egyptian and Qatari mediators. Mr. Netanyahu’s office on Tuesday rejected that characterization, saying he sought only to clarify ambiguities. His office accused Hamas of demanding numerous changes.

Hamas’s willingness to compromise is unclear. The group requested its own extensive revisions throughout negotiations and ceded some smaller points in July. On Tuesday a Hamas official said the group would not participate in the new round of negotiations.

Hamas’s absence does not signal that the talks will be fruitless. Its leaders have not met directly with Israeli officials during the war, relying instead on Qatar and Egypt to relay proposals. Vedant Patel, a State Department spokesman, told reporters in a briefing on Tuesday that Qatar had assured the United States that Hamas would be represented at the meetings.

The talks are likely to include top intelligence officials from Egypt, Israel and the United States, as well as the Qatari prime minister. Mr. Netanyahu’s office said in a statement on Wednesday that he had approved the departure of the Israeli delegation to Doha and its mandate to negotiate.

A new Israeli settlement in the West Bank will encroach on a World Heritage Site, activists say.

A new Israeli settlement planned for construction in the occupied West Bank will encroach on Palestinian land recognized by UNESCO as a World Heritage site, Israeli peace activists say.

Much of the international community views Israeli settlements in the West Bank as illegal, and many were established illegally under Israeli law, but tolerated by the government.

Bezalel Smotrich, the far-right finance minister and a settler himself, gave preliminary approval to the new settlement, Nahal Heletz, in June, and the country’s planning authorities signed off on it on Wednesday.

But the area designated for the settlement was much bigger than what was shown in a plan the government published in July, according to an Israeli advocacy group, Peace Now, which closely tracks settlements. The new plan claims over 150 acres rather than the 30 acres announced previously, and all of it is on UNESCO-designated territory, the group said.

Mr. Smotrich, who is part of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s governing coalition, has pushed for measures that would expand Israeli settlements in the West Bank in exchange for the release of funds withheld from the Palestinian Authority, which partly administers the territory.

Peace Now accused Mr. Smotrich of disregarding the UNESCO Convention in a statement on Wednesday. Israel is a party to the World Heritage Convention, though it left UNESCO in 2019, accusing the multilateral organization of trying to minimize Jewish ties to the land of Israel. It also objected to the organization’s acceptance of Palestine as a member state in 2011.

Peace Now said that the Israeli authorities were accelerating new claims over West Bank land in an effort to prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state.

Tor Wennesland, the United Nations’ special coordinator for the Middle East peace process, said in June that signs of expedited settlement expansion — and the retroactive legalization of West Bank outposts initially established in violation of Israeli law — undermine prospects for a two-state solution.

That is one of Mr. Smotrich’s stated goals. In a post on social media on Wednesday about the newly approved settlement, he said he would continue to fight what he called “the dangerous idea” of establishing a Palestinian state.

The territory being claimed for the Nahal Heletz settlement is adjacent to the West Bank village of Battir and encroaches on its surrounding area, which UNESCO has designated a World Heritage site because of its terraced farming, irrigation system and architecture, according to the agency’s website.

The World Heritage Convention is the most widely accepted international conservation treaty. There are nine World Heritage sites in Israel.

“UNESCO is closely following the state of conservation of the World Heritage property,” the UNESCO World Heritage Center said in a statement in response to a query about the planned new settlement.

Last month, the governing body of the organization took note “with concern of the reports of ongoing illegal constructions, settlements and other developments within the property and its buffer zone” and asked “all parties to avoid any action that would cause damage to the property.”

Vedant Patel, a State Department spokesman, responding to a question about the new West Bank settlement plans at a news briefing on Thursday, said the United States “certainly” opposed the advancement of settlements in the West Bank. “The Israeli government’s settlement program — we find that to be inconsistent with international law,” he said.

In July, the International Court of Justice issued a nonbinding opinion declaring that Israel’s occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem, and its settlements there, violated international law. The court called for Israel’s presence in the territories to end “as rapidly as possible” and said that Israel was obligated to provide full reparations for the damage it had caused. Mr. Netanyahu dismissed the opinion as “absurd” in posts on social media, saying: “The Jewish people are not occupiers in their own land.

Who’s Up Next in Japan? Here Are 5 Potential Leaders.

When Prime Minister Fumio Kishida announced plans to step down on Wednesday, he vowed that his departure would clear the way for a new leader who could bring change to Japan’s long-ruling Liberal Democratic Party.

The party has managed to keep a stranglehold on power despite deep public dissatisfaction over political scandals and economic stagnation — and despite repeatedly steering away from candidates popular with the public.

Here are five politicians likely to figure in the party’s deliberations over whom to promote to prime minister next month.

Mr. Kono, 61, is a popular and somewhat unconventional figure who could significantly shake up Japan’s governing party.

Mr. Kono, a graduate of Georgetown University, is Japan’s digital minister. He came within a hair’s breadth of becoming prime minister in 2021, narrowly losing a runoff vote to Mr. Kishida despite a surge of public support for his more progressive stance on issues like legalizing same-sex marriage.

However, Mr. Kono’s outspoken nature, left-leaning views and popularity on social media have not endeared him to the party’s conservative elders.

As digital minister, Mr. Kono has gone to war against Japan’s reliance on outdated technologies like fax machines and floppy disks.

While Mr. Kono has not formally indicated he would run in this year’s election, for months he has told government officials that he was strongly considering it.

Mr. Ishiba, 67, is the only candidate who has officially declared his intention to run in the upcoming L.D.P. election. Before Mr. Kishida’s decision to step aside, several polls showed Mr. Ishiba as the public’s favorite to become prime minister.

Through much of his career, Mr. Ishiba has been criticized by fellow lawmakers for his abrasive, populist style. Still, he is popular, known for what some describe as a “nerdy” enthusiasm for manga, trains and pop songs from the 1970s.

In recent months, Mr. Ishiba has argued for policies that would help rein in the inflation squeezing Japanese households and tackle widening income disparities in Japan that he asserts are the foundation of the country’s declining birthrate.

In a book published this month, Mr. Ishiba said that Japan should revise the pacifist clause of its Constitution to permit it to retain military forces.

Mr. Ishiba has held several senior positions, including those of defense minister, agriculture minister, and L.D.P. secretary general. He ran for the leadership four times in the past, narrowly losing to Shinzo Abe and Yoshihide Suga in 2012 and 2020.

Mr. Motegi, 68, is the secretary of the Liberal Democratic Party, and he served as economy minister from 2012 to 2014 and foreign affairs minister from 2019 to 2021. He was first elected to Japan’s House of Representatives in 1993 after working for the consulting firm McKinsey. He is a graduate of the University of Tokyo and Harvard’s school of public policy.

Known for his short-tempered, commanding personality, Mr. Motegi has been nicknamed “Moteking.” Following tough negotiations with the United States on a new trade pact in 2019, local news media also began referring to him as “Japan’s Trump whisperer.”

Like other prominent candidates, Mr. Motegi has called on the Bank of Japan to raise interest rates to stabilize the yen. He also champions deregulation, including a complete lifting of Japan’s longstanding ban on ride-sharing services, and the use of government subsidies to support economic growth and lift incomes.

Ms. Takaichi, 63, is Japan’s economic security minister, and has served as the minister of internal affairs and communications. She came in third in the party’s runoff in 2021, and if elected this time, she would be the party’s first female leader.

She has positioned herself as a right-wing champion, supporting policies like requiring married couples to share a surname.

Ms. Takaichi argues that Japanese atrocities during World War II have been overstated, and she regularly visits Yasukuni Shrine, a memorial in Tokyo honoring Japan’s war dead that is a flashpoint for historical sensitivities in China and South Korea. She has criticized past L.D.P. prime ministers as being indecisive leaders.

Mr. Koizumi, 43, would represent another potential candidate of change if the party chooses him.

He is the son of a former prime minister, Junichiro Koizumi, and holds a master’s degree in political science from Columbia University. Mr. Koizumi was one of the youngest lawmakers to join Japan’s cabinet when he was appointed environment minister by late former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in 2019.

During his stint as environment minister, Mr. Koizumi gained global recognition for promoting renewable energy and criticizing Japan’s continued use of fossil fuels. At a United Nations summit in 2019, Mr. Koizumi said that taking on big issues like climate change needed to be “fun,” “cool,” and “sexy, too.”

While Mr. Koizumi has not indicated he plans to enter the running for leadership, he is seen as a favored candidate of former Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga. This week, Mr. Koizumi told reporters that the upcoming party election would be a chance to change the Liberal Democratic Party and restore the public’s trust.

Closed for Months, a Gateway for Aid to Famine-Stricken Sudan Swings Open

Sudan’s military announced Thursday it would reopen a major border crossing with Chad whose closure had become a major obstacle to increasingly urgent efforts to reach millions of starving people in Sudan.

Until just a few days ago, the military was insisting it had to keep the border closed at Adré, in eastern Chad, to prevent weapons being smuggled to the Rapid Support Forces, the powerful paramilitary group it has been fighting in Sudan’s vicious civil war since April 2023.

But the six-month closure throttled the flow of U.N. trucks carrying vital relief aid at a time when Sudan is plunging into a famine that experts warn could be the world’s worst in decades.

In an unexpected reversal, Sudan’s military-dominated Sovereign Council announced Thursday that it would immediately reopen the Adré crossing for three months. U.N. and aid groups, caught unaware, welcomed the decision, with one U.N. official saying it could make a “significant difference” to relief efforts. But those providing aid were also seeking clarification from the Sudanese authorities about any potential restrictions.

The sudden decision followed weeks of growing international criticism of Sudan’s military for the border closure. It also coincided with the start of an American-led effort to revive peace talks in Switzerland aimed at halting the civil war ripping apart one of Africa’s biggest countries.

Adré is the main gateway from Chad into Darfur, the region in western Sudan that suffered a genocide two decades ago, and which is now the center of a famine that threatens the entire country.

A famine, the world’s first since 2020, was officially declared on Aug. 1 in the Zamzam camp in Darfur. Across the country at least 26 million people, over half Sudan’s population, are in a food crisis, the world’s leading body of hunger experts estimates.

At the United Nations Security Council last week, James Kariuki, Britain’s deputy permanent U.N. representative, accused the Sudanese military of obstructing aid by shutting the Adré crossing, which he called “the most direct route to deliver assistance at scale.”

At least 100 people are dying from hunger every day in Sudan, Mr. Kariuki added, calling the famine “entirely man-made.”

Aid workers and U.N. officials in Adré repeated those assessments during a visit by a New York Times reporter and a photographer last month. Nearly 200,000 people are crammed into a crowded camp around the city. But U.N. aid trucks were forbidden from driving into Sudan because of the shuttered border.

The Rapid Support Forces, which controls most of Darfur, has also been accused by rights groups and American officials of obstructing humanitarian aid and using starvation as a weapon of war. Since the war started in April 2023, R.S.F. fighters have attacked aid convoys and burned a factory that makes baby food, officials say.

Adré is key to scaling up aid deliveries because it offers relatively easy access to the parts of Darfur where the hunger crisis is greatest. Until February, aid trucks filled with food could easily cross.

After the Sudanese military closed the crossing in February, it directed the United Nations to send its trucks through Tine, Chad, a remote crossing 150 miles by road to the north. But that alternative route proved slow, expensive and dangerous, allowing just a fraction of the needed aid to get through.

And then Tine closed entirely in recent weeks as heavy seasonal rains made local roads impassable.

Sudanese commentators said the military may have reopened the border to direct attention away from its refusal to attend the American-led peace talks in Geneva, which the R.S.F. is attending.

The military’s decision will increase pressure on the international aid community to do more for Sudan at a time when money is scarce. The United States, which gives more than any country, announced another $204 million for Sudan last month.

But the United Nations says it has received just $1 billion of the $2.7 billion it needs to deal with the growing famine.

Enjoy unlimited access to all of The Times.

6-month Welcome Offer
original price:   $3sale price:   $0.50/week

Learn more

A Mob Attack on a Toppled Party Shows Bangladesh’s Dangerous Vacuum

The tables had turned: Yesterday’s victims of brutal suppression were today’s perpetrators of brutal revenge.

Mobs wielding bamboo sticks and pipes thrashed supporters of Bangladesh’s toppled ruling party on Thursday, preventing their first major gathering since their leader, Sheikh Hasina, fled the country last week.

The sticks arrived in sacks on the back of electric rickshaws, the pipes as flagpoles that soon became weapons as their flags were removed. The attackers were largely supporters of opposition parties that had endured abuse and violence from the former prime minister’s party, the Awami League. They beat anyone they suspected of belonging to the party, flogging their legs before dragging them with shirts ripped and faces bloodied.

The student protesters who rallied to oust Ms. Hasina have become de facto police officers on the streets. But on Thursday, they were mostly on the sidelines, and their unanswered pleas for calm laid bare what they have called one of their chief concerns.

Into the vacuum, they worry, will walk the established political opposition, not only to unleash revenge, but also to restore the kind of dynastic politics that defined Ms. Hasina’s party, too. Breaking the cycles of vengeance that have afflicted Bangladesh through many turbulent periods is a monumental task for the interim government now running the country.

The purging of her party from the government has continued over the week and a half since Ms. Hasina was toppled and fled to India. Protesters are calling for the former prime minister to face justice for the deaths of about 500 people during the monthlong uprising, most of them in the crackdown that she unleashed.

At least two senior members of Ms. Hasina’s government were arrested by the security forces on Tuesday as they tried to flee the country by boat. When they appeared in court on Wednesday, their opponents prevented their lawyers from defending them, local news media reported, continuing a pattern of injustice that had long bent to those in power.

The chief of Bangladesh’s army also appeared to confirm reports that some leaders of Ms. Hasina’s party were being housed in its quarters, saying the military would shelter anyone facing the threat of “extrajudicial action.”

“We have given shelter to those whose lives are under threat,” the army chief, Gen. Waker-uz-Zaman, told reporters on Tuesday. “No matter what party, religion or opinion, we will do this.”

Officials in the interim government, which is led by the Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, said they were facing multiple crises while trying to carry out a more fundamental overhaul of the state.

The caretaker government has struggled to get police officers to return to work after they had vanished in the face of retaliatory mob violence for their role in the protesters’ deaths. The country’s long-persecuted Hindu minority has been gripped by fear of increased attacks.

The economy, largely reliant on the garment export industry, has also been on a downward spiral, with foreign reserves dwindling.

Bangladesh’s interim leaders have said the country needs “a strong element of reconciliation” to avoid falling into the usual violent cycle. But what shape such a reconciliation might take is still being figured out by an overwhelmed week-old government.

“We have formed this advisory board standing on the dead bodies of no less than 500 people,” said Rizwana Hasan, a member of the cabinet and a spokeswoman for the interim government. “It’s no easy task. It’s very depressing.”

The interim government must pick up the pieces of a state in near-total collapse, while also preparing for an election that the organized political parties will soon be demanding. Establishing security is a prerequisite, and that has been made more difficult by the retreat of the country’s 200,000-strong police force, which was deeply politicized under Ms. Hasina.

“Police has also lost its confidence to do policing — that’s the reason they could not even come out of barracks, because they thought the people would bash them to death,” said Muniruzzaman, a retired general in the Bangladesh Army and the president of the Bangladesh Institute of Peace and Security Studies. “And the people have lost the trust.”

He said the interim government needed to convince the political parties that crucial reforms must be carried out before a free, credible election could be held.

Moving forward will be difficult for a nation still coming to terms with its past.

Much of the action in recent days has been around the home of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the country’s founding leader and Ms. Hasina’s father. Four years after Bangladesh’s independence from Pakistan in 1971, Sheikh Mujib was killed at this house in a military coup, along with much of his family. Bangladesh’s short history since then has been marked by coups and counter-coups.

The reign of Ms. Hasina over the past 15 years was increasingly shaped by revenge for the massacre of her family. Everything she did was in the name of her father, whose face was plastered everywhere.

In the hours after Ms. Hasina fled the country, a mob believed to have been led by her political opponents vandalized the house, looted it and set it on fire.

Since then, the home has become a sad museum for the country’s layered trauma. The staircase where Sheikh Mujib was killed in 1975, with nine bullet holes marked on the wall, is now covered in soot from recently lit fires.

The student protesters tried to distance themselves from the vandalism, arriving in large numbers to clean the house and collect what was left of the family archives. They handed to the army scraps of diplomatic correspondence, a deck of antique cards with naked pictures, and the packaging of an old shampoo that declared “Really Does Clear Dandruff.”

“I am feeling very sorry,” Mohammed Haroun Rashid, 69, said as he held back tears while going through the burned house. “This is barbaric.”

He said that Ms. Hasina had done a great deal for the development of the country, but he admitted that “she had lost it” by turning autocratic. Another older man, a senior court lawyer, was shaking in anger at the sight of the damage. He also highlighted Ms. Hasina’s development work.

Aahir Amin, 18, who had on plastic gloves and was helping with the cleaning, listened quietly. He said nothing as the men finished their monologues.

“We are not denying the development,” he said after they left. “But you can’t deny everything else she did.”

He added: “He is entitled to his free speech.”

On Thursday, the scenes unfolding in Dhaka, the capital, weren’t so understanding.

The Awami League demonstrators had planned to gather at Sheikh Mujib’s old house to mark 49 years since his assassination. But as they tried to mobilize on Thursday morning, the roads leading to the site were blocked by the mobs of people, who sought to prevent journalists from documenting the violence that ensued.

Mohammad Shamsuddin, a member of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party — one of the parties long repressed by the ousted government — said its followers would not let the Awami League gather while the blood from Ms. Hasina’s crackdown was still fresh. He said Ms. Hasina must face trial.

“Everyone has the right to protest,” he said. “But no one can protest on the side of the killers.”

The situation began to calm down in the afternoon, as the mobs were replaced by the student protesters, many of whom had patrolled the streets late into the night and had just awakened around noon. The tense scenes of earlier in the day yielded to a dance party not far from Sheikh Mujib’s home.

Young men danced under a large banner that read “Dictator-Free Day.” The music they danced to was further salt on the wounds: The singer of many of the songs was a former lawmaker in Ms. Hasina’s now-toppled party.

Russia Sentences U.S. Citizen to 12 Years in Prison on Treason Charges

Want to stay updated on what’s happening in Russia and Ukraine? , and we’ll send our latest coverage to your inbox.

A court in Russia sentenced a dual citizen of Russia and the United States on Thursday to 12 years in prison on accusations that she committed treason by donating money — about $50 — for Ukraine’s armed forces.

The court, in the city of Yekaterinburg, claimed to have found that the funds donated by the woman, Ksenia Karelina, 32, “were subsequently used to purchase tactical medicine, equipment, weapons and ammunition” for Ukraine.

The prosecution nearly always gets its way in treason cases in Russia’s stage-managed judicial system, but her lawyer, Mikhail Mushailov, said he would still appeal to try to get her sentence reduced.

“I was not surprised by the prison sentence or the way the trial was conducted,” Mr. Mushailov said by telephone from Yekaterinburg.

The conviction of Ms. Karelina, also known as Ksenia Khavana, was the latest in a series of treason and other cases by Russia against citizens of Western countries. The surge in such cases in recent years has raised concerns that the Kremlin views the accused as valuable assets to be traded for high-profile Russians held by the United States and other countries in the West.

Mr. Mushailov said that in addition to appealing Ms. Karelina’s sentence, he would be “taking all the legally required actions” to make her part of any future prisoner exchange between Russia and the West.

Russian investigators accused Ms. Karelina of donating $52 to Razom for Ukraine, a New York-based nonprofit that sends assistance to Ukraine, according to Perviy Otdel, a group of Russian lawyers who specialize in cases involving accusations of treason and other politically charged issues.

A Razom for Ukraine spokeswoman said on Thursday: “We are a New York-based nonprofit providing humanitarian aid and assistance to Ukraine. We do not provide weapons to Ukraine’s military.”

Ms. Karelina, who is from Yekaterinburg and lives in Los Angeles, pleaded guilty, according to Mr. Mushailov and the court.

He has not disclosed further details about the case, because it is classified.

Ms. Karelina, whose trial began on June 20, was arrested in February while visiting Yekaterinburg, an industrial city about 850 miles east of Moscow. Her case was heard by the same judge who presided over the trial of the Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich, who was freed this month in a prisoner swap after receiving a 16-year sentence in July.

That prisoner swap was the largest between Russia and Western countries since the Cold War. President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia and President Aleksandr G. Lukashenko of Belarus, his ally, released 16 prisoners, including Mr. Gershkovich, the Russian American journalist Alsu Kurmasheva and Paul Whelan, a former U.S. Marine. They were exchanged for a convicted assassin and seven other Russians, including hackers and spies.

But Russia still has several Americans in its prisons. One is Marc Fogel, a history teacher who worked for almost a decade at the Anglo-American School of Moscow. In 2021, when trying to enter Russia, Mr. Fogel was arrested and accused of smuggling drugs after customs officers found a small amount of medical marijuana in his luggage. His relatives have said it was to treat severe pain.

In June 2022, Mr. Fogel, a native of western Pennsylvania, was sentenced to 14 years in prison for drug smuggling. In Russia, people convicted of murder have often received shorter sentences.

Another American in Russian custody is Michael Travis Leake, a rock musician who was sentenced last month to 13 years after prosecutors accused him of organizing a drug-trafficking ring.

Perviy Otdel, the legal group, said that Ms. Karelina’s case revolved around $52 donated to Razom for Ukraine, a New York-based nonprofit group that sends assistance to the country.

According to Ms. Karelina’s profile on VK, a Russian social network, she became a United States citizen in 2021. Her profile, which identified her as a student at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, said that she had graduated from Ural Federal University in Yekaterinburg in 2014.

The number of state treason cases in Russia has been growing steadily since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in early 2022. Last year, about 50 people were accused of the offense, according to Perviy Otdel, including high-profile critics of the Kremlin and a student accused of photographing Russian Army formations in his town.

Oleg Matsnev contributed reporting.

Enjoy unlimited access to all of The Times.

6-month Welcome Offer
original price:   $3sale price:   $0.50/week

Learn more

37 Square Feet That Show Brazil’s Racist Past

Ana Beatriz da Silva still remembers her first home: a tiny room behind the kitchen of a beachfront apartment in Rio de Janeiro, where her mother worked as a maid.

The room was barely bigger than a closet, hot and stifling, she said, with only a small window for air. Ms. Silva shared the cramped space with her mother and older brother until she was 6.

“We lived like that — stuffed in a cubicle,” said Ms. Silva, 49, a geography teacher.

The experience convinced Ms. Silva that she could never have a maid’s room in her own home. So when she rented an aging apartment in a middle-class area of Rio, she swiftly turned the servant’s quarters into an office.

“The maid’s room is our colonial heritage,” Ms. Silva said. “It’s shameful.”

Many Brazilians increasingly feel the same way.

Maid’s rooms have been a fixture in Brazil’s homes for generations, a vestige of its long history of slavery and a tangible marker of inequality in a country where, after abolition, many affluent families relied on low paid, mostly Black domestic workers to clean, cook and care for children. Some worked around the clock for pennies; others toiled only in exchange for room and board.

But Brazil is undergoing a reckoning with its legacy of enslaving people and how this painful past has shaped everything from the economy to architecture.

The debate has spilled over to the maid’s room, which many say is a racist, classist relic with no place in modern homes.

“Architecture only reflects what society says is normal,” said Stephanie Ribeiro, an architect and designer who has been studying the maid’s room for over a decade. “And, for many people, the maid’s room doesn’t make sense anymore.”

Unlike their parents’ generation, younger people are calling out inequities in Brazil, which has a majority Black population.

The face of the country’s middle class is changing, too, as Black and mixed-race Brazilians make economic strides but reject some markers of affluence, like maids.

A raft of labor laws — a guaranteed 44-hour workweek, a standardized minimum wage and sick pay — have made live-in maids more costly, pushing what was once a symbol of financial success out of many Brazilians’ reach. As a result, fewer domestic workers live in their employers’ homes.

Some people say having a dedicated space is useful for maids to store belongings or take a lunch break. Others argue that the rooms provide essential housing for domestic workers who move to urban centers from distant rural areas, or those living on the poorer fringes of the city, hours away from their employer’s homes.

But many disagree.

“There’s no need for this worker to spend the night,” said Luiza Batista, coordinator of the National Federation of Domestic Workers, a union representing about 14,000 maids. “This person works all day. She needs a decent place to rest. She needs to be able to clock out.”

Ms. Batista, 68, said she started working as a live-in maid when she was 9 and spent decades cleaning, cooking and caring for wealthy families. In one home, Ms. Batista and another worker shared a room filled with cleaning supplies, construction material and a gas canister.

“You spent the night,” Ms. Batista recalled, “breathing in cleaning products.”

Maid’s rooms still often double as storage closets, crammed with everything from broken appliances to spare tools, she said. “This space is never just a place for the worker to rest.”

Maid’s rooms, of course, are not unique to Brazil; they are often built into the homes of wealthy families across Asia, Africa and the Middle East.

In Latin America, they have gradually disappeared from countries like Chile and Argentina, where worker protections have made live-in maids less affordable. But they persist elsewhere, including Colombia, Bolivia and Mexico, despite pushback from labor activists.

Now, as Brazilians sour on maid’s rooms, they are turning them into libraries, lounges and walk-in closets.

Rising real estate prices in Brazil’s major cities mean more developers are building smaller apartments without maids’ rooms, and home buyers are choosier about how to use their shrinking square footage.

“Brazilian architecture is seeking a new identity,” said Wesley Lemos, an architect who has designed luxury homes across Brazil. “So the maid’s room is disappearing from blueprints.”

The idea of a servant’s room always made Diogo Acosta uncomfortable. The maid who worked for his family would sometimes spend the night in a cramped room behind the laundry room of their spacious home, in Rio’s wealthy Leblon neighborhood.

“It was so small, the room basically only fit her mattress,” said Mr. Acosta, 34, a professional saxophone player. “Even as a child, I thought it was so strange.”

Once he moved out, Mr. Acosta lived in a string of rentals where he turned the maid’s rooms into something else. In one apartment, it was a study. In another, a brightly painted guest bedroom.

And when he moved into a new apartment two years ago, the designated maid’s room measured just 37 square feet and lacked a window, which both horrified him and made the room perfect for a soundproof music studio.

“It’s sad to think that, before this, someone slept here,” he said.

The renovation was more than just practical. For Mr. Acosta, who hires a worker to clean his home once a month, reimagining the maid’s room also carried a symbolic meaning. “When we give it other uses, we are not just changing an apartment,” he said, “we are changing social relations, too.”

Historians trace the maid’s room back to slave quarters, known as senzalas in Portuguese, attached to the slave owner’s house. Brazil abolished slavery in 1888, later than any other country in the Western Hemisphere.

But many freed people — lacking financial means — remained on these same properties, serving families that once enslaved them in exchange for room, board and a small salary.

When industrialization fed a wave of migration to cities, wealthy families translated the idea of servants quarters for an urban setting: In Rio, sprawling oceanfront apartments were built in the 1930s and ’40s with tiny, windowless rooms for maids.

“Maid’s rooms are the modern-day slave quarters,” said Joyce Fernandes, a historian, rapper and writer who shot to fame after sharing her own experiences as a third-generation maid.

In Brazil, where the gap between rich and poor is wider than anywhere else in South America, the rooms went unquestioned for decades.

When the country’s capital, Brasília, was built from scratch in the late 1950s, renowned architects like Oscar Niemeyer designed buildings with servant quarters, maid’s bathrooms and service elevators, cementing historic inequalities into a modernist landscape.

In the 1980s and ’90s, popular television soap operas featured wealthy, white families being served by mostly Black maids who lived in rooms tucked away inside luxurious mansions. In the early 2000s, Brazil’s most popular children’s shows featured maids who never left the kitchen.

“Even the poor, who often worked in these jobs, dreamed of one day becoming rich and having someone serving them,” said Joice Berth, an urbanist and architect.

Still, some people, even domestic workers, believe there remains a place for a servant’s room.

Rosângela de Morais, 48, a domestic worker in the Brazilian city of Salvador, started working as a live-in maid when she was just 10.

Ms. Morais no longer lives in the homes where she works. But, as maid’s quarters disappear, she says domestic workers are left with no place to change into uniforms, store belongings or take a lunch break.

While she considers maid’s rooms in their traditional form inhumane, she doesn’t think removing them altogether is the answer. “It would be better to keep this space, so we have a corner of our own,” she said. “A clean, airy room with a window, where you can rest with dignity.”

Letícia Carvalho, 34, a lawyer from the city of Aracaju, employs four domestic workers, one of whom lives in her home.

“She can’t go back and forth every day,” Ms. Carvalho said.

Still, Ms. Carvalho wanted a different kind of maid’s room. She made it bigger than usual, with a large window, air-conditioning and a hot shower. “We wanted to bring a bit more comfort to the people working for us,” she said.

Even as Brazil shifts away from maid’s rooms, social divisions persist in other ways. Most homes still have service bathrooms reserved for workers. And most buildings have separate entrances and elevators for maids, nannies, dog walkers and food delivery workers, though some are also moving to remove those divisions.

Still, Ms. Silva, the teacher, sees the vanishing maid’s room as evidence that Brazil is grappling with its painful past.

When Ms. Silva made a down payment on her first home this year, she was happy to discover that it didn’t have a maid’s room.

“It’s freeing, not to have this heavy history,” she said. “Instead, I’ll have a really big kitchen.”

Enjoy unlimited access to all of The Times.

6-month Welcome Offer
original price:   $3sale price:   $0.50/week

Learn more

Medic’s Killing Fuels Protests and Walkouts in India

After a long shift last Thursday, a junior doctor went to sleep in a seminar room at the Kolkata hospital where she worked. The next morning, her colleagues found her dead, her body showing signs of rape and extreme physical brutality.

The killing, at R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, has stirred angry protests over entrenched misogyny and violence against women and led thousands of doctors to walk out of major public hospitals across India to demand a safer working environment.

Attacks on doctors in hospitals are common in India. Last month, doctors in New Delhi went on strike after an assault on a hospital by dozens of people, many of them relatives of a woman who died during surgery after giving birth.

In the days after the killing of the junior doctor, a 31-year-old physician trainee whose name may not be published under Indian law, intense anger boiled over into nationwide outrage. On Wednesday night, thousands of women protested on the streets of Kolkata, the largest city in West Bengal.

Outrage among doctors has also continued to build, with many government hospitals suspending all but emergency treatment as medical workers protest to demand better protection from such violence.

After protests by doctors, the head of R.G. Kar Medical College stepped down from his position, but hours later he was reassigned to another hospital by the state government. On Tuesday, a top court in Kolkata asked him to go on leave.

As the women marched, in another part of the city a mob stormed the R.G. Kar hospital, attacking protesting doctors and ransacking its emergency area. Videos from the clash showed the police using batons and firing tear gas.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the rising discontent on Thursday during an event to mark the anniversary of India’s independence, without directly mentioning the killing in Kolkata. As a society, he said, Indians should “seriously think about the kind of atrocities which are taking place against our mothers, sisters, daughters.”

“There is anger about that in the country. Common masses are angry. I am feeling that anger,” Mr. Modi said. “Our nation, our society and our state governments need to take that seriously. Crime against women should be investigated more urgently.”

During the initial investigation, the police arrested Sanjoy Roy, a volunteer at a police post within the hospital. Mr. Roy, who was in police custody, could not be reached for comment.

However, Subarna Goswami, an official with the Federation of Government Doctors’ Associations, a nationwide doctors’ organization, said evidence described in a postmortem report “indicates a strong possibility of the involvement of multiple persons.”

Unsatisfied with the investigation, doctors have accused the police of a coverup.

The chief of the Kolkata police, in response to protesters accusing officers of shielding other suspects, said the police had never indicated that there was only one person responsible in the case.

As the protests continued, a top court in Kolkata transferred the murder case from the local police to the Central Bureau of Investigation, India’s premier federal investigations agency.

The protesting doctors are demanding a more stringent law to protect them from violence, including by making any attack on a doctor an offense with no bail. In 2019, a draft bill was floated among lawmakers by the government but never gained traction. Federal health ministry officials have now assured doctors they would consider introducing separate legislation in Parliament specifically prohibiting violence against them.

In India, about 75 percent of doctors say they have experienced violence, and a majority of them feel stressed by the profession, according to a 2019 study in The Indian Journal of Psychiatry. Shashi Tharoor, a lawmaker, alluded to this data in urging stronger protection for medical workers before the Indian Parliament, a doctors’ association said.

Many doctors’ organizations have said their members will not return to work until the law to curb attacks on doctors is passed in both houses of Parliament.

Shreya Shaw, a postgraduate medical student at R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, said she could no longer work night shifts, and that it was deeply unsettling to watch doctors who were protesting peacefully being attacked by mobs inside the hospital on Wednesday night.

“We can’t do emergency, night duties anymore,” she said. “We can’t rely on the hospital security, we cannot rely on the police.”

Enjoy unlimited access to all of The Times.

6-month Welcome Offer
original price:   $3sale price:   $0.50/week

Learn more