Security expert wonders why CEO was alone on NYC street, without any security
As New York investigators continue their work to locate the alleged suspect behind the fatal shooting of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, a former private detail leader for Thompson is raising red flags around a “completely unusual” security aspect.
“What stands out most to me is the inability to provide him security in New York City while he’s going to give a speech to many mad stockholders and possibly mad clients of the health care company,” Klein Investigations CEO Philip Klein said Friday on “Fox & Friends First.”
“Did he deny security and say, ‘Look, I don’t want security around me?’ Because he does run one of, if not, the biggest health care industry in the world,” the security expert posited. “Or secondarily, does the health care company not provide him security?”
The New York City Police Department is asking for the public’s help in apprehending the unidentified gunman who allegedly shot and killed Thompson outside the Hilton Hotel in Midtown Manhattan early Wednesday morning, decrying what investigators deemed a “premeditated, pre-planned attack.”
WHO WAS BRIAN THOMPSON, UNITEDHEALTHCARE C.E.O.?
The Hilton Hotel was hosting the UnitedHealthcare annual investors meeting, and police said Thompson had been in town from Minnesota since Monday and was staying across the street.
When evaluating potential motives, there were reports that the executives were accused of insider trading and fraud, and last year the Department of Justice launched a probe into whether the nation’s largest insurer was unfairly restricting competitors and running a monopoly. It is not clear if Thompson was part of that investigation before his murder.
“I don’t know of one Top 20 company that does not have private security or personal security inside their house. What I mean by house is, inside their company that does not have agents that either escort their principal or their CEO from point A to point B, or travel with him or go wherever they go,” Klein explained. “This is completely unusual.”
Thompson’s wife told police and the media that her husband was receiving threats in the weeks leading up to the fatal shooting. Klein claimed that’s not uncommon in today’s tech and political climates.
“My phone rang off the wall yesterday with people in the food service industry. Their CEOs are getting death threats for, ‘My eggs cost too much. My milk costs too much,’” he said.
“These guys are getting threats every day now, every day of the week,” Klein added. “And so they’re getting personal security.”
GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE
At one time providing personal protection for Thompson, Klein remembered the first time he and his team met the slain CEO at the Dallas Fort Worth International Airport.
“I can tell you, there’s not one member of our team that didn’t look at each other after it was over and say, ‘That guy’s going somewhere.’ He was nice to us, shook our hands, told us to be careful of all things. And he was just a great guy.”
READ MORE FROM FOX BUSINESS
FBI agents arrest Dem city official in federal corruption investigation
FBI special agents in Boston arrested City Councilor Tania Fernandes Anderson Friday morning on public corruption charges.
Fernandes Anderson was under investigation by federal authorities and FBI agents were seen outside her home in Dorchester this morning as she was taken into custody, according to WCVB.
She is facing five counts of wire fraud and one count of theft concerning programs receiving federal funds, a court filing by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts says.
Federal prosecutors allege that in late 2022, Fernandes Anderson hired a staff member that was related to her and then defrauded the city by proposing an arrangement in which the person would receive “additional compensation but would kickback most of this bonus pay.”
ANOTHER MAJOR BLUE CITY DOUBLES DOWN ON VOW TO OBSTRUCT TRUMP’S MASS DEPORTATIONS PLAN
“From in or about early to mid-2023, Fernandes Anderson was facing personal financial difficulty, which included missing monthly rent and car payments, an impending $5,000 civil penalty from the Ethics Commission, and incurring bank overdraft fees, which resulted in Fernandes Anderson maintaining low daily bank balances,” read the filing, which was obtained by the Boston Globe.
“On or about June 9, 2023, at approximately 4:11 p.m., Staff Member A texted Fernandes Anderson, “Bathroom” to let Fernandes Anderson know that Staff Member A was waiting in the bathroom to hand the $7,000 cash to Fernandes Anderson,” the court document continued. “Within seconds, Fernandes Anderson texted Staff Member A, “Ready” to confirm that Fernandes Anderson was ready to accept the $7,000 cash kickback from Staff Member A.
“Shortly following these texts, Staff Member A handed Fernandes Anderson approximately $7,000 in cash at a bathroom in City Hall.”
FEDERAL COMPLAINT TARGETS BOSTON SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR WHITES-ONLY TEACHER TRAINING ON RACISM
The filing also says Boston City Councilors were not allowed to hire immediate family members to their paid staff, yet in 2022, Fernandes Anderson hired two such individuals.
Prosecutors say Fernandes Anderson later fired those two employees and was informed by the Ethics Commission of a $5,000 fine relating to that incident.
Then last month, Massachusetts’ Office of Campaign and Political Finance informed her campaign that it took contributions over the legal limit and failed to file deposit information in a timely manner, WCVB reported.
“Her behavior, as alleged in today’s indictment, is a slap in the face to the hardworking taxpayers in the city of Boston who have every right to expect that the city’s funds are in good and honest hands,” Special Agent in Charge Jodi Cohen said in a statement. “This case illustrates how the FBI, and our partners, are working hard every day to battle public corruption and the corrosive damage it does to people’s faith in government.”
Anderson represents District 7, which includes the Boston neighborhoods of Roxbury, Dorchester, Fenway and a portion of the South End.
“Councilor Anderson was elected to the Boston City Council on November 2, 2021, becoming the first African immigrant and Muslim-American elected to the Boston City Council,” reads a bio of her on the City of Boston’s website.
“Before serving as Councilor, Tania was the Executive Director of Bowdoin Geneva Main Streets, a parent advocate with the Boston Public Schools, program manager for a homeless women’s shelter, a business owner, and a child social worker. She has also been a foster mom to 17 kids while raising two biological children,” the bio added.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Anderson is expected to appear in federal court in Boston later this afternoon.
Analyst suggests Biden will pay steep price as ‘really annoyed’ Democrat donors get last laugh
Political analyst and best-selling author Mark Halperin said that President Biden’s presidential library may become more of a “bookmobile” as donors stew about his loss.
Democrats are still reeling weeks later from the loss of the 2024 election to President-elect Donald Trump, as well as the more recent blanket pardon of Biden’s son Hunter Biden. The pardon has been particularly controversial because Biden appears to have hidden his intention to pardon as a political tactic when running against Trump.
As a result, President Biden appears to have fallen from the Democratic Party’s good graces, to the point where some frustrated Democrats are reportedly considering withholding donations to President Biden’s future presidential library over his pardon of Hunter.
Halperin suggested to Fox News’ Jesse Watters that Biden may not be getting a full-fledged library as a result.
2 TIMES BIDEN SAID HE WOULD NOT PARDON SON HUNTER BIDEN
“I mean there will be some version, maybe more like a bookmobile than an actual library,” he told Watters. “But this is not a surprise. He’s never been a good fundraiser and the donors are really annoyed.”
Halperin argued that the donors themselves, along with the liberal media, are partly to blame.
“But I will say that the donors and the democratic officials who are now so outraged about the conduct – as you said, the press knew all this – so did they,” he said. “They stood silent when Joe Biden’s operatives crushed Bobby Kennedy and Dean Phillips and rigged the rules. They stood silent as he stayed in the race and decided he was going to run for another term. They stood silent when Kamala Harris was given the nomination without a shot being fired.”
Halperin suggested now might be a time of reflection for Democrats.
“I get why they are mad at Joe Biden, but I think a lot of them need to turn the clock back and imagine what they might have done differently, and Joe Biden might be in a place to raise the money,” he said. “So I think he will raise some money, but as I said, he’s never been a good fundraiser, it’s the kind of work he doesn’t like to do and the donors blame him more than themselves.”
HUNTER BIDEN SAYS HIS MISTAKES WERE ‘EXPLOITED’ FOR POLITICAL SPORT, SAYS HE WON’T TAKE PARDON FOR GRANTED
Halperin argued that Biden’s purported mental decline has been obvious since 2017, but a combination of factors have shielded him from criticism.
“It’s some combination of Trump Derangement Syndrome and not wanting to be ostracized for doing anything that might help Donald Trump win,” Halperin said. “The irony is the reason Joe Biden has been left in the position he’s in, the reason Donald Trump was reelected, there are plenty of reasons, but a big reason is the silence in the media. I think it’s one of the biggest scandals of any sort in American history and certainly one of the biggest media scandals.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
He continued, “People say ‘Oh, they didn’t see behind the scenes.’ All you needed was a C-SPAN subscription to know there was a level of mental decline, and they stood silent,” he said. “And not just the press, but the donors, the donors were spending time with him in living rooms. They saw it, Clooney eventually came out and said it, but far too late.”
Trump’s message to every American after receiving major honor at Patriot Awards
President-elect Donald Trump accepted the “Patriot of the Year” award Thursday night at Fox Nation’s sixth annual Patriot Awards.
“We’re going to get things straightened out in this country,” Trump said, accepting the honorary award.
Trump’s year has been marked by a series of legal battles, two assassination attempts and a historic campaign that resulted in his victory in the 2024 presidential election against Vice President Kamala Harris.
SEAN HANNITY ‘EXCITED’ TO HOST FOX NATION’S PATRIOT AWARDS, SAYS IT WILL CELEBRATE AMERICA’S ‘UNSUNG HEROES’
“We had just a spectacular election. They were thinking it was going to be close, and it wasn’t close,” he said.
During his remarks, Trump also reiterated his campaign commitment to addressing immigration, the economy and national security.
“We’re going to achieve it again and very fast. It’s going to be very fast because we have no choice. But we’re going to do something that I’ve been talking about for eight years. We’re going to do it again. We have to do it again. We’re going to make America great again.”
The incoming president was honored alongside other notable recipients across the nine categories.
Other awards include the “T2T Stephen Siller Back the Blue Award,” “Young Patriot,” “Salute to Service,” “FOX Weather Ultimate Patriot,” “Service to Veterans,” “Culture Warrior,” “Bravery” and “Courage.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
The annual Fox Nation Patriot Awards is a night to bridge political gaps, unite behind a love of America and celebrate America’s everyday heroes. For more patriotic content and to stay in-the-know for future awards, join Fox Nation today.
Legal expert pours cold water on Biden admin’s argument in high profile SCOTUS case
A legal expert is skeptical that the Biden administration will be able to convince the U.S. Supreme Court that Tennessee’s ban on transgender medical procedures for minors violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, saying that legal argument “will fail.”
“The argument opposing the law has to create a parallel between the puberty blocker Tennessee law and previous Supreme Court precedent that involved a higher or tougher legal standard,” Thomas Jipping, senior legal fellow for conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation, told Fox News Digital.
“That’s what they’re trying to do because the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upheld the [Tennessee] law under a very deferential standard. If that’s where it stays, Tennessee will win in the Supreme Court.”
On Wednesday, the high court heard oral arguments in U.S. vs. Skrmetti, a high profile case which could pose challenges to the more than two dozen other state laws banning transgender medical procedures for minors.
SUPREME COURT TO WEIGH STATE BAN ON TRANSGENDER ‘MEDICAL TREATMENTS’ FOR MINORS
At the center of the case is Tennesee’s SB1, which prohibits medical procedures for minors when the specific “purpose” is to “enable a minor to identify with or live as a purported identity inconsistent with the minor’s sex or treat purported discomfort or distress from a discordance between the minor’s sex and asserted identity.”
Tennessee Solicitor General Matthew Rice defended the state law, saying the restrictions on minors are based on medical purposes, not a patient’s sex. He also warned these treatments can cause “irreparable” harm and have “unproven benefits.”
The Biden administration’s Justice Department and the ACLU, who first challenged the law, argued it discriminates based on sex and thus violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson seemed receptive to that claim. At one point during the two-and-a-half hours of oral arguments, Jackson said she saw a “parallel” and “potential comparison” between the laws banning transgender care for minors and laws banning interracial marriages.
SOTOMAYOR COMPARES TRANS MEDICAL ‘TREATMENTS’ TO ASPIRIN IN QUESTION ABOUT SIDE EFFECTS DURING ORAL ARGUMENTS
“Interesting to me that you mentioned precedent, because some of these questions about sort of who decides and the concerns and legislative prerogatives, etc., sound very familiar to me,” Jackson said. “They sound in the same kinds of arguments that were made back in the day—50s, 60s—with respect to racial classifications and inconsistencies. I’m thinking in particular about Loving v. Virginia, and I’m wondering whether you thought about the parallels, because I see one as to how this statute operates and how the anti-miscegenation statutes in Virginia operated.”
The landmark Loving v. Virginia case of 1967 struck down state laws banning interracial marriages based on the 14th Amendment.
Jackson’s remarks drew backlash on social media, with thousands of comments expressing outrage at the comparison.
“Yes, because banning a White person from marrying a Black person is the same thing as cutting off a 10-year-old’s gen*tals,” co-owner of Trending Politics Collin Rugg wrote.
Jipping surmised that Jackson was trying to illustrate that if the Tennessee law did classify based on sex, it could be subject to a heightened standard that would be tougher for the state to defend.
“They’re trying to shoehorn Tennessee’s law into a slot that makes it tougher for the state to defend its law,” he said of the Biden administration’s argument.
“If a law is discriminatory based on sex, then the legislature has to jump over what’s called an intermediate standard. If the law is based on race, then it has to try to get over a very, very high standard,” he continued to Fox News Digital.
Jipping didn’t see this argument holding water.
“The Tennessee law, the way it’s written, doesn’t set either a parallel to sex discrimination or a parallel to interracial marriage. And so, as a legal argument, it’s going to fail,” he continued.
“The ways that the U.S. Solicitor General tried to shoehorn this into sex discrimination simply doesn’t work on the face of the statute. It simply doesn’t work. She was trying to argue it was based on a statute that was different from what Tennessee actually enacted. So I don’t think the Supreme Court is going to buy it.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
The challenge to Tennessee’s law was first pursued by the ACLU, who sued on behalf of parents of three transgender adolescents and a Memphis doctor.
SB1 also takes aim at health care providers in the state who continue to provide sex-reassignment treatments to transgender minors, opening them up to fines, lawsuits and other liability.
The court’s ruling could have sweeping implications for other legal fights over transgender rights, including bathroom access and participation in scholastic sports. It could also serve as a legal template for future disputes involving the LGBTQ+ community, and whether sexual orientation is a “protected class” that deserves the same rights that involve a person’s race and national origin.
A ruling in U.S. vs. Skrmetti is expected by July 2025.
Over two dozen states have enacted similar bans restricting minors from accessing transgender medical treatment.
GOP lawmaker scorches Musk after praising Fetterman for putting ‘country over party’
Business magnate Elon Musk said in a post on X that it is “Hard not to like” Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa.
“He puts country over party,” Musk added.
He made the comments in response to footage of Fetterman saying that he admires Musk, who is “involved in very important parts of American society” such as artificial intelligence and SpaceX.
Fetterman said that Musk is “on a different team, but that doesn’t make me an enemy.”
FETTERMAN SAYS TRUMP CASE IN NEW YORK WAS POLITICALLY MOTIVATED, CALLS FOR PARDON ON ‘THE VIEW’
The Democratic senator said that Musk has “made our economy and our nation better.”
Rep. Derrick Van Orden, R-Wisc., fired back at Musk on X.
“Bulls—. It is hard to not like what @SenFettermanPA what he says, it is easy to hate how he really votes. Do not fall for this.”
FETTERMAN HITS PARTY’S LOSSES AMONG YOUNG MALE VOTERS: ‘IT’S UNDENIABLE THAT DEMOCRATS HAVE LOST A LOT’
President-elect Donald Trump has tasked Musk and former GOP presidential primary contender Vivek Ramaswamy, who self-identifies as a “small-government crusader,” with working on the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
The two entrepreneurs aim to place Washington D.C.’s profligate spending in the crosshairs.
“If we don’t tackle the exponential growth in national debt, there will be no money for anything, including essential services!” Musk warned in a tweet.
In a Wall Street Journal opinion piece last month, they noted, “We will serve as outside volunteers, not federal officials or employees. Unlike government commissions or advisory committees, we won’t just write reports or cut ribbons. We’ll cut costs.”
Ramaswamy and Musk met with lawmakers in D.C. on Thursday.
‘WE’RE GOING TO GUT THE FISH’: REPUBLICANS GIVE DETAILS FROM CLOSED-DOOR MEETINGS WITH DOGE’S MUSK, RAMASWAMY
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“Great discussion today with @elonmusk on his goals for the @DOGE. Looking forward to working together to improve government efficiency and get America back on track,” Senate Republican Leader-elect John Thune, R-S.D., said in a Thursday post on X.
“Excellent discussion about solving the national debt crisis,” Musk responded.
Rob Lowe finally embracing the nickname he was given in the 1980s
Rob Lowe is embracing the famous Brat Pack label after previously slamming the nickname, saying it was “designed to belittle us.”
David Blum of New York Magazine first coined the term Brat Pack in 1985, when he compared a group of then rising stars in their 20s, including Lowe, to the famous Rat Pack. Though the cohort disliked the label, it became popular with fans, and its members are still known by the nickname almost four decades later.
During an interview with the Wall Street Journal published Tuesday, Lowe, now 60, explained that he now views the label in a more favorable light.
“All of us should feel lucky to have been given a name for what we contributed as actors and that fans still care 40 years later,” Lowe said.
‘BREAKFAST CLUB’ STAR ANTHONY MICHAEL HALL REFLECTS ON BRAT PACK FAME: ‘I DIDN’T ANTICIPATE ANY OF THAT’
The Brat Pack, who came of age in the 1980s with movies like “St. Elmo’s Fire,” “The Breakfast Club,” “About Last Night…,” “Sixteen Candles” and “Pretty in Pink,” defined a generation’s teen angst and became a pop culture touchstone.
Along with Lowe, the Brat Pack members include Emilio Estevez, Judd Nelson, Demi Moore, Andrew McCarthy, Ally Sheedy, Judd Nelson, Molly Ringwald, Anthony Michael Hall, Estevez and Jon Cryer, among others. However, which actors fit into the group has not always been clear.
In Blum’s New York Magazine article, titled “Hollywood’s Brat Pack,” the journalist designated Lowe, Estevez and Nelson as members of the Brat Pack, though he named other young stars including Tom Cruise, Sean Penn and Nicolas Cage as potential members.
“This is the Hollywood ‘Brat Pack,'” Blum wrote. “It is to the 1980s what the Rat Pack was to the 1960s—a roving band of famous young stars on the prowl for parties, women, and a good time.”
During an August interview with People magazine, Lowe expressed his disdain for Blum’s story and the label.
“The article was horrible,” he said. “It was a hit piece, there’s no doubt about it. It was designed to belittle us, make us look small, with that journalistic trick of plausible deniability.”
In a 1987 Los Angeles Times article, Blum defended himself against the backlash that he received from the actors he deemed the Brat Pack in his New York Magazine story.
Blum wrote that the article originated as a profile on Estevez during the filming of “St. Elmo’s Fire.” He revealed that he came up with the Brat Pack moniker after spending a night out with Estevez, Lowe and Nelson.
“I wouldn’t call it an inspiration exactly. I did think it was pretty clever,” Blum wrote. “It also seemed like an excellent way to describe the actors I’d gotten to know ever so slightly through my reporting.”
He continued, “They had acted like — well, I might as well say it — brats, which is not to say that I would not have acted precisely the same way if I were 23 years old, famous and rich. I might have. I might have been worse. But these guys definitely fit the bill.”
Lowe told People magazine that experiencing the aftereffects of Blum’s article “was no fun.” However, he noted that the author’s portrayal of him in the story was not as negative as those of the other actors.
“I actually came out okay in it,” he said. “It was the one night I went home early. What a rarity. So somebody was looking out for me.”
In the New York Magazine story, Blum pointed to the murkiness surrounding which actors were considered part of the Brat Pack.
ROB LOWE REVEALS THREE SECRETS TO HIS 31-YEAR MARRIAGE
“Everyone in Hollywood differs over who belongs to the Brat Pack,” he wrote. “That is because they are basing their decision on such trivial matters as whose movie is the biggest hit, whose star is rising and whose is falling, whose face is on the cover of Rolling Stone and whose isn’t. And occasionally, some poor, misguided fool bases his judgment on whose talent is the greatest.”
“All of us should feel lucky to have been given a name for what we contributed as actors and that fans still care 40 years later.”
Blum went on to claim that, unlike the Rat Pack’s Marlon Brando, James Dean, Robert De Niro and Al Pacino, none of the Brat Pack members had accumulated years of acting study. He also noted that the Brat Pack actors were not college graduates.
In the WSJ article, Lowe recalled how he fell in love with acting at a young age after watching the musical “Oliver!”
When Lowe was 12, his family moved to Malibu, California, where he began filming movies using a Super 8 camera with Sean Penn’s late brother Chris Penn and other kids, some of whom would later rise to stardom.
“The group that was into acting included Chris’s brother Sean Penn and Charlie Sheen and his brother, Emilio Estevez. I eventually got to know them, and I made my own movies with Charlie,” “The Floor” host recalled.
He continued, “In classes at Santa Monica High School, I always sat in the front row and raised my hand with the answer. I was that guy. But I wasn’t in school plays. By then, I had an agent and was going on auditions.”
Lowe explained that his early career success led him to postpone college and reflected on how he learned his craft.
“At 15, I had already co-starred in my first network TV sitcom—ABC’s ‘A New Kind of Family.’ By my senior year, I was cast in Francis Ford Coppola’s ‘The Outsiders.’ I had to choose between going to film school at UCLA or USC or making the movie,” Lowe remembered.
“I figured film school could wait,” he added. “Then came two movies a year and I never went to college. I learned to act by watching more experienced actors on sets and by doing the job. Later, I began working with an acting coach.”
During his interview with People magazine, Lowe said that being known as members of the Brat Pack “probably didn’t help our credibility … in the industry.”
While appearing on “Good Morning America” in June, McCarthy, who directed the Hulu documentary “Brats,” said that all the actors in the group “hated” the Brat Pack nickname at the time.
“Who wants to be called a brat when you’re a kid? Particularly when you’re a kid and you think you are a brat, so you don’t want to be called it, and you don’t want to be a member of a pack and all that, and we felt it affected our lives, you know?” he said.
During an interview with People magazine that same month, McCarthy said that while the nickname was popular with fans, it detrimentally affected the industry’s perception of the actors.
LIKE WHAT YOU’RE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWS
“It had professional ramifications,” the “St. Elmo’s Fire” star explained. “The public embraced us, but the business reacted to it in a negative way.”
In his New York Magazine article, Blum claimed that the Brat Pack members made disparaging comments about each other.
He wrote, “For actors so imbued with the ensemble spirit, the Brat Pack members are out for themselves. ‘Sean is crazy with all of his role preparations, becoming the character in every way,’ one says. And of Andrew McCarthy, one of the New York–based actors in ‘St. Elmo’s Fire,’ a co-star says, ‘He plays all his roles with too much of the same intensity. I don’t think he’ll make it.’”
“The Brat Packers save their praise for themselves,” Blum added.
In Susannah Gora’s 2011 book, “You Couldn’t Ignore Me If You Tried: The Brat Pack, John Hughes, and Their Impact on a Generation,” Blum said that Lowe, Estevez and Nelson felt betrayed by his portrayal of them and the article led them to part ways with each other.
Sheedy told Gora that Blum’s article “just destroyed” the friendships within the group.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER
“I had felt truly a part of something, and that guy just blew it to pieces,” she said.
McCarthy’s documentary “Brats,” which was released in June, explored the impact that the Brat Pack label had on the actors’ lives and careers.
While most of the actors appeared in the documentary, Nelson, Ringwald and Hall decided not to participate in the film. However, Blum agreed to take part and was interviewed by McCarthy.
In a June article for Vulture, titled “I Called Them Brats, and I Stand by It,” Blum wrote “McCarthy’s cleverly edited film, even while purporting to portray the Brat Pack as put-upon by the phrase, manages to smooth over the fact that no real animus exists anymore between the Brat Pack actors and me.”
He continued, “At the end of our interview, McCarthy and I even hugged it out, sitcom style. At the Bratspremiere, Demi Moore introduced herself to me, and clasped my hands in hers as though greeting an old friend.”
In his August interview with People, Lowe pointed out that though the Brat Pack nickname was negatively perceived in Hollywood, fans embraced the moniker.
“The public — at the end of the day, that’s all that matters — never got that memo. They’re like, ‘That sounds cool,'” the “Austin Powers” star noted.
“I think I realized that probably quicker than the rest of the [group of actors], that it was a good thing,” he said of coming to terms with the moniker.
Lowe also praised the “Brats” documentary, noting, “The Brat Pack is having a moment.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“Andrew McCarthy’s documentary has a lot to do with it, and it couldn’t make me happier,” he continued.
“It was a seminal point for me becoming comfortable in the space I occupied as an actor, for lack of a better term, and the beginning of a real rocket-ship ride.”