The Guardian 2025-01-19 12:13:18


Benjamin Netanyahu said that the first stage of the ceasefire deal was temporary, adding: “If we must return to fighting, we will do that in new, forceful ways.”

Netanyahu, who also said that Israel’s “campaign is not over yet”, added that both Donald Trump and Joe Biden back Israel’s “right to resume fighting if the second stage is fruitless”.

The Israeli prime minister’s comments on Saturday evening come as a ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas is set to take place on Sunday at 6.30 GMT.

As part of the deal, 33 of the 98 remaining Israeli hostages kidnapped by Hamas are expected to be freed in this phase, according to Reuters. In exchange, Israel will release approximately 2,000 Palestinians currently detained across multiple prisons.

‘I’ll kiss the ground’: chaos feared amid Gaza ceasefire as families head home

Hundreds of thousands are now set to return to whatever remains of their houses or to claim bodies from the rubble

Aid agencies in Gaza are bracing for chaotic scenes this week as hundreds of thousands of people try to return to homes in the territory after the expected implementation of a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas on Sunday.

Before the ceasefire, which is due to begin at 8.30am local time, Israel has continued to carry out attacks inside Gaza. The local health ministry claimed on Saturday that 23 Palestinians had been killed in the previous 24 hours, while the Israeli army said it had conducted strikes on 50 “terror targets” on Friday.

The deal, for which both the outgoing US president, Joe Biden, and his successor, Donald Trump, have claimed credit, was finally ratified by Israel’s cabinet in the early hours of Saturday morning.

In a sign of the precarious nature of the deal, the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, said on Saturday evening that the ceasefire would not come into force until Hamas had revealed the names of the hostages it intended to hand over.

The far-right national security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, announced his intention to resign from the government on Saturday and withdraw his party from the coalition on Sunday in protest at the deal.

In a press conference on Saturday evening, Netanyahu said Israel retained the “right to return to fighting if needed” in Gaza and claimed to have Trump’s support.

The prime minister said the US had promised Israel would have the weaponry it needed to return to fighting if necessary, and would do so “in new ways and with very great power”.

Three Israeli hostages are set to be returned on Sunday, while about 95 Palestinian prisoners will be released in the first of several rounds of swaps set to take place over the coming six weeks.

Under the terms of the agreement, the Israel Defense Forces will not withdraw from Gaza until all hostages are returned, a process that is likely to take months. But Palestinian residents, most of whom have been displaced after 15 months of war, will be allowed to return to the north.

Many will be searching for missing relatives, or seeking to retrieve the remains of family members who have been buried under rubble – sometimes for several months.

Muhammad Alyan, 57, was forced from his home in Beit Lahiya, northern Gaza, early in the conflict. A previous attempt to return to his house ended when many of his family were killed. “We heard the news of the ceasefire with joy mixed with sadness for the dead and wounded,” he said.

“I am waiting for the moment when we are able to get back to northern Gaza so that I can get my two daughters and my wife out from under the rubble of our house and bury them with dignity. Forty days have passed since they were targeted, and this is a very difficult and unbearable feeling,” said Alyan, who is living in the central city of Deir al-Balah.

More than 46,700 Palestinians, mostly civilians, have died since the Israeli offensive began 15 months ago, according to the local health ministry. Hamas militants killed about 1,200 people, the majority of them civilians, and took approximately 250 hostages during the raid into Israel on 7 October 2023 that triggered the war.

Local health authorities have said about 12,000 people may remain unburied in rubble left by bombardments and clashes. There is no independent confirmation of the figure, but humanitarian officials in Gaza judge it “credible”.

There will be intense monitoring of the deal, with the mediators keeping “constant communication lines open” to protect the agreement. The ceasefire in late 2023 was violated by both parties, but mediators managed to prevent escalation to a level that collapsed it. They are on standby to do the same now if needed, aiming to ensure that the already tense negotiations about the next phase are not jeopardised by events on the ground.

A key condition of the first phase of the ceasefire-for-hostages deal approved by Israel and Hamas is free movement for Palestinians within Gaza. But during the first of the ceasefire’s three phases, Israeli forces will maintain their system of checkpoints throughout much of the territory – especially those along what is known as the Netzarim corridor, which cuts Gaza into a northern and southern half.

The corridor is heavily defended by Israeli strongpoints and has blocked movement within the territory for many months. Aid agencies have frequently struggled to cross it, or even to bring vital supplies to hospitals in the north or evacuate wounded.

Aid officials say they anticipate growing numbers will be on the move if the ceasefire holds. About 90% of the 2.3 million prewar population has been displaced, many of them several times. Israel’s campaign of intense aerial bombing and mass demolitions has levelled swathes of Gaza and left whole neighbourhoods barely habitable. Nine out of 10 homes have been damaged or destroyed, the latest UN figures reveal. “Some people know their homes are completely gone but there are thousands upon thousands who know the building is still standing but will want to go and find out if it is habitable,” said a humanitarian official in Gaza.

The biggest movement is expected from southern Gaza to the north, but also elsewhere as people head from the coast towards Rafah or Khan Younis in the south. Aid agencies believe many families will first send someone to establish what is left of their home and whether it has been occupied by other people.

“The challenge will be the scale of the movement and how easy it will be for people to cross the Netzarim checkpoint. We don’t have precise details at the moment of how that will happen and it is likely to be very crowded,” said Sam Rose, director in Gaza of the UN relief and works agency (Unrwa), the main refugee organisation for Palestinians.

“Most families will want to keep a foothold in the south; most who know there is something left will want to send family members back to secure the property and eventually rebuild. This will all be happening when the roads will be full of aid trucks.”

Although prices of basics such as flour have dropped by as much as two-thirds since the news of the ceasefire broke last week, many people still cannot afford fresh vegetables and fruit, with aid agencies saying that malnutrition is widespread. Few children in Gaza now have shoes.

Muhammad al-Hebbil, 37, said he was hoping to return to Beit Lahia from the tented camp that has been an uncomfortable makeshift home with his family in Gaza City. “When the ceasefire starts, I will be the first to set off for Beit Lahia. I will kiss the ground of my beloved city and whatever is left of our houses, and inspect our homes, our belongings. Maybe I can find something to remind me of our lives before,” he said.

Others were hoping to reunite with relatives they have not seen for months. “The first thing I will do after the start of ceasefire is to go back to see what happened to every place I knew and loved. I want to see my friends for the first time in 15 months,” said Eman, 19, a first-year medical student from Jabaliya, a northern neighbourhood that has been the scene of an Israeli blockade and fierce fighting.

Fulla Masri, a 33-year-old, wanted to see the family of her husband, who was killed in November 2023. Twenty relatives and friends were also killed, and her house destroyed, later in the war. “What matters most to me now is to know my relatives are safe … We are very eager to return to the north and reunite with them,” said Masri.

“God willing, the beautiful days will return and God will compensate us for what we have lost.”

Explore more on these topics

  • Israel-Gaza war
  • The Observer
  • Gaza
  • Israel
  • Middle East and north Africa
  • Palestinian territories
  • United Nations
  • Aid
  • news
Share

Reuse this content

Most viewed

  • Guy Pearce: ‘My ex-wife was the greatest love of my life, but I’ve moved on now’
  • An American tragedy: how Biden paved the way for Trump’s White House return
  • LiveIsrael-Gaza war live: Netanyahu says ‘if we must return to fighting, we will do that’, citing support from Biden and Trump
  • ‘A small act of patriotism’: Canada’s anti-Maga hats go viral
  • Suicides, new tactics and propaganda iPads: details from captured North Koreans expose new foe in Ukraine

More than 70 arrested at London protest against Israel’s war in Gaza

Thousands gather in Whitehall and allegedly break through police line to advance to Trafalgar Square

More than 70 pro-Palestinian demonstrators were arrested in central London on Saturday on suspicion of breaching protest conditions after some allegedly broke through a police line as they marched from a rally in Whitehall.

Thousands of people had gathered to protest Israel’s 15-month war in Gaza, a day after a ceasefire deal was agreed with Hamas, with signs saying “Stop arming Israel” and “Free Palestine”.

The crowds were initially blocked from marching up Whitehall towards Trafalgar Square by a line of police, but some protesters broke through to advance toward the London landmark.

Footage posted on X appeared to show the former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and former shadow chancellor John McDonnell among the protesters passing by officers as the crowd moved towards Trafalgar Square.

The Metropolitan police said a total of 77 people were arrested.

According to the PA news agency, police blocked entrances in and out of the square to contain the protest.

The Muslim Association of Britain criticised the Met’s decision to block the march, calling it “an outrageous assault on democracy, freedom of assembly, and freedom of expression”.

Earlier, seven people were arrested, four on suspicion of public order offences, and two others on suspicion of breaching conditions for the protest, according to the Met. One of the conditions prevents those participating from entering a specific area around Portland Place.

A seventh individual was also arrested on suspicion of holding a placard suggesting support for banned organisations, the Met said.

One of those arrested was a member of the Stop the War coalition, the peace group said. It called for the release of Chris Nineham, the chief steward of the national Palestine marches.

The group said 10 police officers came to the front of the march on the pretext of discussing the march with Nineham and then jumped on him, forcing him on the ground, while protestors attempted to defend him.

Stop the War said: “This is an outrageous assault on the Palestine movement. It is an unacceptable assault on civil liberties. Chris Nineham must be released without charge. We refuse to be intimidated.”

The Met did not comment in response to the allegation.

Met commander Adam Slonecki, who led the policing operation, said: “This is the highest number of arrests we have seen, in response to the most significant escalation in criminality.

“We could not have been clearer about the conditions in place. Protesters were to remain in Whitehall with no march towards the BBC.

“Our relationship with protest organisers has to be based on trust and good faith. If they say they will act responsibly and lawfully we need to be able to know those are genuine assurances.”

Slonecki added: “I am quite confident this was a coordinated breach with the intention being to reach the BBC at Portland Place in defiance of the conditions. There is video footage of one of the organisers clearly inciting the crowd to join a march and one of the organisations involved has released a statement this evening confirming as much.

“At the same time as the group was attempting to force its way past police lines, camera crews were seen arriving in Portland Place. It is unlikely that the timing was simply a coincidence.”

At the rally, The Crown actor Khalid Abdalla said in an address: “Tomorrow phase one of the ceasefire begins. It remains to be seen if the ceasefire will hold or if the blood shed since it was announced augurs what it will become.

“But still we will have cause to celebrate whatever its shape for the respite in this genocide, for the return of the hostages, for the release of prisoners.”

The demonstrations, which began days after the 7 October attack in 2023 and have continued weekly as the war stretched on – becoming one of the biggest protest movements in recent British history – have called for the end of the conflict that has killed more than 46,000 Palestinians inside Gaza by Israeli attacks, according to health officials in the territory.

“For 15 months we have marched, we have rallied, we have protested in towns and cities across the UK with one of our central demands being that there be a ceasefire and now we stand on the brink of a ceasefire that promises to bring an end to the immediate, catastrophic killing of the Palestinian people,” said the Palestine Solidarity Campaign director, Ben Jamal.

On Friday, the Israeli government ratified a ceasefire deal to exchange dozens of hostages held by Hamas for Palestinians in Israeli jails and to pause the war for an initial six weeks. The deal will take effect on Sunday.

Last week, the Met banned the march from gathering outside the BBC’s London headquarters, owing to its proximity to a synagogue. Protesters were planning to gather outside Broadcasting House before marching to Whitehall.

The Palestinian Forum in Britain said they “categorically rejected” a Met attempt to relocate the protest to Russell Square, with threats of arrest for individuals assembling elsewhere. The organisations said after “immense public pressure” the protest was able to proceed at Whitehall as planned.

Explore more on these topics

  • Israel-Gaza war
  • Gaza
  • Palestinian territories
  • Middle East and north Africa
  • Israel
  • London
  • Protest
  • news
Share

Reuse this content

Most viewed

  • Guy Pearce: ‘My ex-wife was the greatest love of my life, but I’ve moved on now’
  • An American tragedy: how Biden paved the way for Trump’s White House return
  • LiveIsrael-Gaza war live: Netanyahu says ‘if we must return to fighting, we will do that’, citing support from Biden and Trump
  • ‘A small act of patriotism’: Canada’s anti-Maga hats go viral
  • Suicides, new tactics and propaganda iPads: details from captured North Koreans expose new foe in Ukraine

‘Finally it’s happening. I know he’s still alive’: Families of Israeli hostages await nervously the return of their loved ones

The fate of captives held by Hamas is in the balance until they are finally swapped for Palestinian prisoners

For over a decade the world seemed to have forgotten Avera Mengistu.

An Israeli Jew of Ethiopian heritage, who reportedly had mental health issues, Mengistu was 28 when he entered the Gaza Strip voluntarily on 7 September 2014 after a dispute with his mother.

Mistaken for an Israeli soldier and spy, Mengistu was captured by Hamas and detained in a prison within the territory. Since then, his whereabouts remained a mystery, with him appearing sporadically in Hamas videos, calling for his release. His family claimed the Israeli army and government never really tried to bring him home.

That all changed on 7 October 2023, when Hamas launched a brutal attack, killing 1,200 people in Israel and abducting another 250. Since then, Mengistu’s family, who never ceased their fight for his release, has joined forces with the families of other Israeli hostages taken by Hamas.

On Friday, after the approval by the Israeli government of a ceasefire deal to exchange 33 hostages held in Gaza for Palestinians in Israeli jails, and pause a 15-month war for an initial six weeks, a list containing the names of those who will be freed by the militant group has been circulating on the main Israeli news sites. The list included Mengistu’s name.

I can’t even remember the last thing we talked about or even the last time we met,” his cousin, Gil Elias, told the Observer. “My heart is beating 200bpm, my stomach is flipped. For 10 years we have been waiting for this moment to come, but it never did. And now finally it’s happening. I know he’s still alive.”

He should have been here a long time ago,” added Elias. “But he is not because of negligence from the government.”

Caught between hope and despair for the past 15 months, Elias’s expectations – and those of the relatives of the other hostages – have been raised and dashed numerous times since the October 2023 attack. Over the course of these those months, every time the agreement seemed close, it was promptly derailed.

The government didn’t work hard enough on bringing him back when they actually could do it,” said Elias. “They didn’t want to pay the price for bringing him back and at the time we couldn’t put pressure on the government because of the censorship, so we weren’t allowed to talk about it at all.”

In recent weeks, the families of Israeli hostages have voiced cautious optimism their loved ones may soon be freed as Israel and Hamas appeared to edge closer towards a deal.

“It’s been like this in the past where we were lured by the tantalising prospect of an imminent deal and then having it snatched away, having our hopes raised to stratospheric levels and then dashed on the rocks of despair,” said Adam Ma’anit, whose cousin Tsachi Idan, 50, was taken hostage from the Nahal Oz kibbutz.

Every weekend and for over a year, the relatives of those held captive in Gaza have been taking to the streets of Israel’s major cities, calling on Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister, to bring their loved ones home.

However, their return, which was supposed to be the primary goal of the conflict from the outset, had gradually become less of a focus, the families argued. Instead, Netanyahu’s government carried out one of the bloodiest wars in recent history, with the aim of eradicating Hamas.

The Israeli military operations and bombings not only caused the deaths of more than 46,500 Palestinians, but have also put at risk the lives of the hostages trapped in Gaza, some of whom have died at the hands of the Israeli military.

In November 2023, Hamas released 105 of the hostages in return for 240 Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails, during a brief ceasefire. Of the 251 hostages kidnapped by Hamas, 94 are still believed to be held in Gaza. Israeli and western intelligence services estimate that at least a third of them have died.

“Every day you fear the worst,” Moshe Emilio Lavi – whose brother-in-law, Omri Miran, is among the hostages – told the Observer. “Time ran out a long time ago. The international community completely failed. Our government failed by not prioritising their release enough.”

A significant turning point was reached as the inauguration day of US President-elect Donald Trump approached, who made it clear from the start that a ceasefire agreement needed to be reached before he took office. The will of Trump, and that of the administration of the current President Joe Biden, who has worked for over a year to find an agreement, has thus pushed both sides to accelerate the process towards a deal.

Finally, on Friday, after an unexpected delay that sparked fears that last-minute disagreements between Israel and Hamas might scuttle the deal, the Israeli government ratified the agreement. Netanyahu warned on Saturday that a ceasefire would not go ahead unless Israel receives the names of hostages to be released, as had been agreed.

Under the first phase of the deal, which is to last 42 days, Hamas has agreed to release 33 hostages including children, women (including female soldiers) and men aged over 50, in exchange for hundreds of Palestinians held in Israeli jails.

The releases will be staggered. On Sunday, three Israeli hostages are expected to be released, followed by four more on the seventh day, and again at the end of each week of the ceasefire.

Mengistu and Hisham al-Sayed, another mentally ill Israeli man who entered Gaza a decade ago and has since been held hostage by Hamas, will be released in exchange for 30 prisoners.

In the second phase, the remaining living hostages would be sent back and a corresponding ratio of Palestinian prisoners would be freed, and Israel would completely withdraw from the territory. The specifics are subject to further negotiations, which are due to start 16 days into the first phase.

The third phase would address the exchange of bodies of deceased hostages and Hamas members, and a reconstruction plan for Gaza would be launched. Arrangements for future governance of the strip remain hazy.

Analysts and political observers remain sceptical that all stages of the ceasefire deal will be fully implemented. Families are painfully aware that the long-awaited agreement for the return of their loved ones is still fragile, with every misstep having the potential to plunge Gaza back into turmoil and leave them in limbo.

“We urgently call for swift arrangements to ensure all phases of the deal are implemented, and emphasise that negotiations for the next phases must begin before day 16,” the committee of families said in a statement on Thursday. “This is just the first step – we won’t stop until the last hostage returns.”

Relatives of those still held captive in Gaza fear the deal may be hindered by the far-right parties of Netanyahu’s coalition that refused to accept a deal until Hamas is completely defeated.

Far-right members of the Israeli coalition government have already threatened to resign, potentially derailing months of work to end the conflict.

Before the vote on Friday, Itamar Ben-Gvir, Netanyahu’s hardline national security minister, issued a last-minute plea for other parliamentarians to vote against the agreement. “Everyone knows that these terrorists will try to harm again, try to kill again,” he said.

Israeli media have reported that Ben-Gvir and Israeli finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich, the head of one of the hardline nationalist religious parties in the ruling coalition, might at some point during the ceasefire derail the agreement and push Netanyahu to resume the bombings. Ben-Gvir has threatened to resign on Monday.

“They are exploiting the hostage deal because they have other interests, like re-establishing settlements in northern Gaza,” Lavi said. “I just hope the government is not going to make an unwise decision this time.”

Meanwhile, Sunday will not merely be a day of celebration for the families of the hostages. Hundreds of relatives of Palestinian prisoners, held in Israeli jails, wait in anticipation for their loved ones to finally be released.

About 100 of the Palestinian prisoners slated for release are serving life sentences for violent attacks on Israelis; others were jailed for lesser offences, including social media posts, or held in administrative detention, which allows for the pre-emptive arrest of individuals based on undisclosed evidence.

Israel’s ministry of justice issued a partial list of 95 prisoners who will be released in the first phase of the deal.

According to a copy of the agreement seen by the Observer, nine ill and wounded Israelis will be released in exchange for 110 Palestinians serving life sentences in Israeli jails.

Men aged over 50 on the list of 33 hostages will be released in return for prisoners serving life sentences at a ratio of 1:3, and 1:27 for other sentences.

According to figures published by Israeli NGO HaMoked, as of January 2025, there were 10,221 Palestinians in Israeli prison. About 3,376 of them are held under administrative detention, while 1,886 are classified as “unlawful combatants”, which also allows detention without charge or trial. The Israel Defense Forces and Israeli government say the measures comply with international law.

Palestinians have long alleged that imprisonment is a key element of Israel’s 57-year-old occupation: various estimates suggest that up to 40% of Palestinian men have been arrested at least once in their lives.

Ahmed Mahmoud Abu Ghulous, 66, is the father of Ahmed Abu Ghulous, who was arrested over the 2004 murder of an Israeli in a Jerusalem settlement, in an attack claimed by Hamas.

“My son was 18 years old at the time; he has been in prison for 21 years,” his father said. “Every hour and minute we follow the news.”

Abu Ghulous added: “I hope all the Palestinian prisoners will be released, as well as the Israeli hostages, and get to see their loved ones. I am a father and I know exactly what it means to live apart from your children. Every human being is valuable to his loved ones.”

Jamal Risheq contributed to this report

Explore more on these topics

  • Israel-Gaza war
  • The Observer
  • Hamas
  • Israel
  • Gaza
  • Palestinian territories
  • Middle East and north Africa
  • features
Share

Reuse this content

Most viewed

  • Guy Pearce: ‘My ex-wife was the greatest love of my life, but I’ve moved on now’
  • An American tragedy: how Biden paved the way for Trump’s White House return
  • LiveIsrael-Gaza war live: Netanyahu says ‘if we must return to fighting, we will do that’, citing support from Biden and Trump
  • ‘A small act of patriotism’: Canada’s anti-Maga hats go viral
  • Suicides, new tactics and propaganda iPads: details from captured North Koreans expose new foe in Ukraine

Two judges shot dead in Iran’s supreme court building, state media say

Unnamed gunman killed Ali Razini and Mohammad Moghisseh before shooting himself, Mezan reports

Two judges have been killed in a shooting on Saturday at the supreme court building in Tehran, Iranian state media have reported.

“This morning, a gunman infiltrated the supreme court in a planned act of assassination of two brave and experienced judges. The two judges were martyred in the act,” the judiciary’s Mizan Online website reported.

Mizan said the assailant killed himself after the “terrorist” act. The state news agency, IRNA, said one other person was wounded.

The two slain judges have been identified by Mizan as Ali Razini and Mohammad Moghisseh, both of whom handled cases “fighting crimes against national security, espionage and terrorism”.

The judiciary spokesperson Asghar Jahangir said on state television that “a person armed with a handgun entered the room” of the two judges and shot them.

“Individuals have been identified, summoned or arrested in connection with the incident,” he added, without providing further details.

The motive behind the killings was not immediately clear, but Mizan said the assailant was not involved in any cases before the supreme court.

Authorities said an investigation into the attack was under way.

President Masoud Pezeshkian expressed his condolences over the deaths, calling on the authorities to act swiftly.

He said: “I strongly urge the security and law enforcement forces to take the necessary measures as soon as possible by examining the dimensions and angles of this reprehensible act and to identify its perpetrators.”

Moghisseh, 68, was sanctioned by the US in 2019 for having “overseen countless unfair trials, during which charges went unsubstantiated and evidence was disregarded”, according to the US Treasury.

Razini, 71, held several important positions in Iran’s judiciary and was previously targeted in a 1998 assassination attempt by assailants “who planted a magnetic bomb in his vehicle”, according to Mizan.

Though attacks targeting judges are rare, Iran has seen a number of shootings targeting high-profile figures in recent years.

In October, a Shiite Muslim preacher was shot dead in the southern city of Kazerun after leading Friday prayers.

In April 2023, a powerful cleric identified as Abbas Ali Soleimani was shot dead at a bank in the northern province of Mazandaran.

Explore more on these topics

  • Iran
  • Middle East and north Africa
  • news
Share

Reuse this content

Most viewed

  • Guy Pearce: ‘My ex-wife was the greatest love of my life, but I’ve moved on now’
  • An American tragedy: how Biden paved the way for Trump’s White House return
  • LiveIsrael-Gaza war live: Netanyahu says ‘if we must return to fighting, we will do that’, citing support from Biden and Trump
  • ‘A small act of patriotism’: Canada’s anti-Maga hats go viral
  • Suicides, new tactics and propaganda iPads: details from captured North Koreans expose new foe in Ukraine

An American tragedy: how Biden paved the way for Trump’s White House return

To admirers, Biden will remain one of the most consequential one-term presidents in US history – to detractors, he was undone by a fatal flaw

His back straight, his voice steady, Joe Biden stood at the US Capitol just days after a violent insurrection and declared: “Democracy has prevailed.” Fast forward three and a half years and America’s president cut a different, diminished figure. “We finally beat Medicare,” he muttered in confusion in Atlanta, Georgia.

From the soaring hopes of inauguration day to that grim debate night against Donald Trump, the very public decline of the 46th president had the makings of an American tragedy that paved the way for the return of Trump to the White House.

To his admirers, Biden will remain one of the most consequential one-term presidents in US history, having rescued the nation from a pandemic, steered major legislation through a divided Congress and created nearly 17m jobs. But he was assailed by high inflation, illegal immigration and the inexorable march of time.

To his detractors, this was a stubborn octogenarian undone by a fatal flaw: having promised to be a transitional figure, he did not know when to let go. And when he finally did, it was too late.

Charlie Sykes, a conservative author and broadcaster, said: “It’s hard to escape the conclusion that, as Biden is leaving office, he’s less transformational figure than historical parenthesis because ultimately he failed to meet the political moment or the essential mission of his presidency. The prime directive of Joe Biden’s presidency was to prevent Donald Trump’s return to power and his failure to do that is likely to be his lasting legacy.”

When Biden departs Washington on Monday at the culmination of a career spanning more than half a century as senator, vice-president and president, the old maxim that all political lives end in failure will hover over him. He will be 82, the oldest president in US history and the first great-grandfather to hold the office. Democrats will long agonise over why his age and fitness for office did not become a political emergency until it was too late.

It is easy to forget now the malaise that Biden inherited. In that inaugural address in January 2021, he spoke of four crises: the coronavirus pandemic, climate, economy and racial justice. Standing on the spot where just two weeks earlier a pro-Trump mob had sought to overturn his election win, Biden also promised to restore the soul of America.

It would be, in many respects, a presidency of two halves. Biden hung a portrait of Franklin Roosevelt above the fireplace in the Oval Office and acted with a scale and speed that delighted progressives and knocked opponents back on their heels.

In March 2021, he launched $1.9tn in pandemic aid, creating a series of new programmes that temporarily halved child poverty, halted evictions, accelerated vaccination rates and contributed millions of jobs.

Even then there were warning signs. Inflation ticked up and by June Biden’s approval rating was down from 61% to 39%, according to the AP-Norc Center for Public Affairs Research. In August a botched military withdrawal from Afghanistan, which saw the Taliban march into Kabul and the deaths of 13 US service members, inflicted another blow from which his standing would never recover.

But Biden pressed on and later that year signed a $1.2tn bipartisan infrastructure package that not only replaced ageing roads and bridges but improved internet access and prepared communities to withstand the climate crisis. Then, in 2022, he followed up with two measures that reinvigorated the future of manufacturing.

The Chips and Science Act provided $52bn to build factories and create institutions to make computer chips domestically, ensuring that the US would have access to the most advanced semiconductors needed to power economic growth and maintain national security.

The Inflation Reduction Act aimed to tackle rising prices through measures such as lowering healthcare costs, reforming tax policies to ensure corporations and high earners pay more, and investing in clean energy. It was the most significant climate legislation ever passed.

Biden also signed the first major federal gun control legislation in nearly 30 years, focusing on enhanced background checks for younger buyers and support for states implementing red flag laws.

It was by any measure an impressive legislative legacy but much of it will bear fruit only in years and decades to come.

James Clyburn, a Democratic congressman from South Carolina and close ally of Biden, said: “When people are writing the history books, they don’t write about talk and walk. They write about substantive things and, on substance, I defy anybody to show me an administration that has been more impactful on the general public than Biden has been since, I suspect, Lyndon Johnson.”

While Biden’s critics blamed him for falling short on voting rights and student loan debt, Clyburn noted that it was the supreme court that blocked his efforts. “I don’t think it’s going to take that long for people to see how impactful this president has been in a very positive way.”

Biden had done it all with only narrow majorities in Congress and in age of partisanship and rancour. But he struggled to communicate his successes to the public or reap credit for them.

While Trump continued to dominate the public imagination, Biden’s empathy and ability to connect with voters seemed to desert him. He failed to convey a sense of urgency in handling the southern border with Mexico as illegal border crossings rose and were hyped by rightwing media.

Bill Galston, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution thinktank in Washington DC, added: “The administration for reasons that I can understand but still regret lost touch with the actual feelings of the people. While the administration was talking about Bidenomics in glowing terms, people were up in arms about the high prices for basics.

“It’s bad politically when you’re seen to be worse than wrong, namely out of touch. In the area of prices and also immigration the administration conveyed the impression of believing its own talking points and being out of touch with experiences that millions of Americans were having. The party paid a big price for that.”

Even so, Biden would defy the odds again in the 2022 midterm elections. But it was that very success that would lead him to overreach. Previous Democratic presidents had suffered what Barack Obama called a “shellacking” in midterms. Despite predictions of a “red wave”, Democrats overperformed, retaining the Senate and only narrowly losing the House of Representatives.

Paul Begala, a former White House counsellor to Bill Clinton, said: “The odd thing is the midterms for Biden were far better than they were for Clinton or Obama. When you lose like they did you recalibrate, you right the ship, voters are telling you something. The voters were not as clear in 2022 in telling Biden to recalibrate.

“Plus Clinton could move to the centre; Obama could move the centre; Biden couldn’t move to being 45 again. He was simply too old in the mind of the overwhelming majority of Americans – the majority of Democrats – and that was existential. It wasn’t practical, it wasn’t political and his failure to confront that and his team’s failure to confront that is going to hurt his legacy.

The midterm results strengthened Biden’s position and shored up his determination to run for re-election while brushing aside Americans’ fears that he was too old for the job. He had beaten Trump before and insisted he was singularly capable of doing so again.

But some Democrats continued to worry that Biden, flattered by comparisons with giants such as Roosevelt and Johnson, had lost sight of how dangerous the moment was – and how severe the consequences would be of getting it wrong.

Dean Phillips, a Minnesota congressman, announced that he would challenge Biden in the party primary, citing poll numbers and the president’s age as reasons to pass on the torch to a new generation. He told the Washington Post newspaper: “We’re at grave risk of another Trump presidency. I’m doing this to prevent a return of Donald Trump to the White House.”

In public, Phillips was ridiculed. In private, others shared his concerns. Larry Sabato, director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia, recalled receiving a call from a Democratic senator in late January or early February 2024.

“I said, ‘Is there any particular reason why you called me? I’d like to know.’ He said, ‘You do realise, off the record, that Joe Biden is not going to be our nominee?’ I was stunned. I said, ‘What, how, why?’ He said, ‘I just was at a meeting with him with several other senators and he couldn’t even function. We can’t run him.’

Sabato added that the senator in question tried to raise the issue, which angered the White House. “He was punished, as several of them were. They gave him the cold shoulder for a while. The point is that a lot of people had figured it out but they didn’t care. I’m stunned that they got away with it and have produced term two for Trump and it’s going to be the longest four years of our life.”

The administration continued to play down concerns about Biden’s age and gave short shrift to any journalist who dared raise it. No source interviewed by the Guardian perceived a deliberate conspiracy but more likely a case of collective wishful thinking in a fast-paced work environment that leaves little room for perspective.

All White House staff prefer a sense of control and tend to be protective of the principal, so it was hardly surprising they limited Biden’s exposure: he gave far fewer press conferences than his predecessors. When he did misspeak, the defence was that he was merely being true to his gaffe-prone self.

Galston, a former policy adviser to Clinton, said: “On the one hand I find it difficult to believe that they didn’t know. On the other hand I find it easy to believe that, in the heat of ferocious political combat, you see what you want to see and you either don’t see what you don’t want to see or you underestimate its impact and its significance.”

In June, however, the game was up. The first presidential debate took place far earlier than in a typical election cycle. Standing on stage with Trump in Atlanta, Biden looked all his 81 years as he misspoke, struggled to complete sentences and, when it was his opponent’s turn, stared into the middle distance with mouth agape.

Begala commented: “That debate was the worst performance in modern American history, maybe in all American history. I can’t think of anybody as bad. We all talk, oh, Nixon had bad makeup and hadn’t shaved. Biden couldn’t complete a sentence and talked about how we finally beat Medicare.”

Panic swept through the ranks of a Democratic party unified by its shared desire to block Trump’s return. Obama, former speaker Nancy Pelosi and others reportedly let it be known they had lost confidence in Biden’s ability to beat Trump. He resisted the pressure until it became overwhelming.

Biden announced in July that he would not seek re-election and would endorse his vice-president, Kamala Harris, instead. Clyburn, who described the debate performance as a “one-off” caused by “preparation overload”, said: At the time, I thought he was making the right decision. Looking back now, I don’t think it was the right decision. But you never know about these things until most times it’s too late to find out.”

Seen as a political liability, Biden played little part in Harris’s election campaign and witnessed her crash to defeat in both the electoral college and popular vote. He was forced to welcome Trump, whom he had characterised as an authoritarian and demagogue, back to the White House.

Having once praised Biden for his selfless decision to step aside, Democrats now turned on him for not having done so earlier. But Ron Klain, his first White House chief of staff, defends the president and his team. He said via text message: “There was no cover-up. A Democratic congressman ran against him in the primary in 2024, with age as the only issue, and voters overwhelmingly voted for Biden.

“He left the race to accommodate the wishes of party leaders – not because he could not run. We don’t know if he would have beaten Trump or not – he stepped out – but we do know that the replacement candidate did not beat Trump.”

Then Biden abruptly pardoned his son Hunter, sparing him a possible prison sentence for federal felony gun and tax convictions despite past promises not to do so. Allies such as Clyburn insisted it was a reasonable move by a parent to protect his child from likely persecution by the vengeful Trump administration.

But Wendy Schiller, a political scientist at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, said: “The Hunter Biden pardon will be the biggest black mark on his presidency because he promised and he gave his word that he wouldn’t do it and then he did it. He was always known, if you liked him or hated him, as someone who kept to his word. And he broke his word.”

Biden came to office steeped in foreign policy but his record was mixed. He rallied western support for Ukraine to prevent Russian domination. He also remained resolutely behind Israel after the 7 October 2023 attack by Hamas, disappointing some Democrats who wanted to see a greater effort to protect Palestinian civilians.

Only a quarter of Americans say Biden was a good or great president, according to the latest poll from the Associated Press-Norc Center for Public Affairs Research. That is lower than the view of the twice-impeached Trump when he left office soon after the deadly January 6 attack on the US Capitol.

Biden had sought to show that Trump was an aberration; instead it is Biden who is a mere interregnum. When he leaves the White House for the last time on Monday, many will rue how a presidency that promised so much shrivelled into anticlimax. The relief they felt when Biden defeated Trump in 2020 will be replaced by piercing dread of a second American carnage.

Sabato said: “Joe Biden reminds me of students I’ve had that I expected to give an A to and I got the final exam in the term paper and I’ve realised the best I can do is B-minus, C-plus. He was so disappointing in the end and he should have known better. The fact that he was running for re-election is just inexcusable.

“If Kamala Harris or any other Democrat had a normal campaign, two years of runway, they would have gotten airborne and could have overtaken Trump’s plane. But she didn’t have the chance and no one would have. Biden has just had his greatest achievement wiped out. He saved us from Donald Trump and now he restored Donald Trump. How do you grade that?”

Democrats in denial over Trump defeat, voters say: ‘Haven’t learned the lessons’

Voters in swing-state Michigan unimpressed with party’s election critique and say fundamental shift is needed

The meeting was billed as an opportunity for the voters of Saginaw, Michigan to ask elected Democrats difficult questions about why Donald Trump, and not Kamala Harris, is moving into the White House on Monday.

Vincent Oriedo, a biotechnology scientist, had just such a question. What lessons have been learned, he asked, from Harris’s defeat in this vital swing county in a crucial battleground state that voted for Joe Biden four years ago, and how are the Democrats applying them?

As the town hall with Michigan’s secretary of state, Jocelyn Benson, and the local representative in the state legislature, Amos O’Neal, came to an end, Oriedo said he was disappointed with their answers, which amounted to bland statements about politicians “listening” to the voters.

“They did not answer the question,” he said.

“It tells me that they haven’t learned the lessons and they have their inner state of denial. I’ve been paying careful attention to the influencers within the Democratic party. Their discussions have centred around, ‘If only we messaged better, if only we had a better candidate, if only we did all these superficial things.’ There is really a lack of understanding that they are losing their base, losing constituencies they are taking for granted.”

Trump’s decisive victory in Saginaw, a bellwether county that he won in 2016 and then lost four years later, came as a shock to the local Democratic party but not to many of its supporters.

Community leaders in some of the poorest parts of Saginaw, where voter turnout dropped, repeatedly warned that the Harris campaign’s focus on attacking Trump as unfit for office and winning the support of middle class white women, particularly over abortion rights, was alienating a large part of the Democratic constituency simply struggling to pay the bills and looking for economic reform.

Carly Hammond, a Saginaw city councillor and former trade union organiser who campaigned for Harris, said she sees little evidence the Democratic party has learned the lessons of her defeat, let alone how to apply them. She said the party’s national leadership does not understand that it is facing a generational political realignment n places such as Saginaw across the US.

“It’s hard to find a good way to look at it. I’ll say the national Democratic party has really put themselves in a position of loss for a generation because I believe that this election was securing, not just starting but securing, a political realignment that’s been happening for decades now,” she said.

“We have set ourselves up for generational loss because we keep promoting from within leaders that that do not criticise the moneyed interests. They refuse to take a hard look at what Americans actually believe and meet those needs.”

After the meeting, O’Neal told the Guardian that he believes Harris lost in Saginaw because her campaign was too focused on abortion rights which was less of an issue in Michigan after voters amended the state constitution in 2022 to protect access.

“We already fought the race of women’s rights. What we missed were the table top issues that people were dealing with. They couldn’t afford to go into the grocery store, can’t buy food, trying to make ends meet. We didn’t talk about that economics. We missed it,” he said.

O’Neal blamed the national party for failing to listen to local voices.

“The policy was decided nationally. I’ve been in politics for over 20 years and I didn’t get much communication from them. Just using myself, for example, I could have been much more impactful. Had I been engaged early, I could have been out and been a voice and advocating for the message,” he said.

Hammond said that is partly the result of the Democrats’ reliance on polling over policy.

“The problem is that the consultant class has led every politician to believe that if they just have the right formula, they can put in any candidate, churn them through the machine, and people will vote for that candidate. And that’s not true,” she said.

“The Democrats have shown that they don’t have any principles, that they will follow the polls, that if they just talk about the economy and kitchen-table issues in such a way that they don’t actually have to promise anything, then they’ll win next time. But they will lose.”

Hammond said that the Democratic leadership erroneously thought it could gloss over core issues, such as anger over the Biden administration’s support for Israel’s war in Gaza, and a thirst for structural economic change which helped drive support for Trump. That’s a view backed by a YouGov poll released on Wednesday, which found that 29% of people who voted for Biden in 2020 but not for Harris last year said the Gaza war was the main reason why. Another 24% cited economic policy.

Pat Parker, who has campaigned for Democratic presidential candidates in Saginaw through five elections, is one of those who is trying to forge a change in the party’s electoral strategies by forcing it to listen to local voices.

“We were screaming locally at the Harris campaign: ‘This isn’t working. We’re putting a lot of energy in, and there’s something off.’ We had a huge team working really hard, but they might have been just throwing dirt in a new pile. It didn’t produce the desired result at all,” said Parker, a clinical social worker.

“The things Harris said, like she was going to give $25,000 for people to buy their first home, there were a lot of people said she was giving their money away to people who didn’t deserve it. It cost her votes. We were trying to tell her that.”

In the weeks since Trump’s victory, Parker gathered together groups sidelined by the Democratic establishment, including Black community leaders, trade unions and local party activists in an attempt to drive a bottom up approach to future elections. She said the local party leadership has engaged with them.

But Hammond is not optimistic that the national leadership will listen.

“I think that the Liberal ideology, with a capital L, is what is being revolted and rebelled against at a very fundamental level by a majority of America. But the Democrats can’t see it,” she said.

“A lot of people on the ground level, a lot of community organisers, a lot of people who were giving the warnings are exhausted of trying to save the Democratic party from itself. They’re the ones who have been shown the door long ago as the party systematically excised criticism from its midst. The leadership actually don’t want a big tent, they want a very top down small tent.”

Hammond said there is one other legacy of the campaign that the Democrats may come to regret for more than just failing to get Harris elected.

A large part of the Harris ad blitz in Michigan was dedicated to attacking Trump as a convicted criminal and a front for Project 2025, the authoritarian plan to impose rightwing control across the entire US government.

“The national party has made it so that they’ve set up a standard where if Donald Trump doesn’t literally ruin democracy in a very visible way that people feel, then they’re proven wrong. It wasn’t as bad as we thought, so they’re liars again. They have set themselves up for failure,” said Hammond.

Explore more on these topics

  • Michigan
  • Deadlocked: dispatches from an election battleground
  • US politics
  • Republicans
  • Democrats
  • Donald Trump
  • Kamala Harris
  • features
Share

Reuse this content

Most viewed

  • Guy Pearce: ‘My ex-wife was the greatest love of my life, but I’ve moved on now’
  • An American tragedy: how Biden paved the way for Trump’s White House return
  • LiveIsrael-Gaza war live: Netanyahu says ‘if we must return to fighting, we will do that’, citing support from Biden and Trump
  • ‘A small act of patriotism’: Canada’s anti-Maga hats go viral
  • Suicides, new tactics and propaganda iPads: details from captured North Koreans expose new foe in Ukraine

Giorgia Meloni to join far-right figures at Donald Trump inauguration

Italian PM’s office confirms she will join foreign politicians including France’s Éric Zemmour in Washington

Italy’s prime minister, Giorgia Meloni, will attend Donald Trump’s inauguration as US president, joining other European far-right figures including Éric Zemmour, a one-time French presidential candidate known for his xenophobia.

Meloni’s attendance at the event in Washington DC on Monday was confirmed by her office and will be seen as further cementing relations with the US president-elect.

The Italian leader made a flying visit to Trump’s Mar-a-Lago golf club in Florida earlier this month, during which Trump described her as “a fantastic woman” who is “really taking Europe by storm”.

The pair first met in Paris in early December for the reopening of Notre Dame Cathedral. Meloni, who leads Brothers of Italy, a party with neofascist origins, has been a longtime supporter of Trump. Before coming to power in October 2022, she regularly travelled to his political gatherings and praised his brand of politics as a model for Italy.

She was also savvy in building good relations with Joe Biden and bolstering Italy’s Atlanticist credentials. During a recent press conference, she said she had a “very solid relationship” with Trump and an “excellent relationship” with Biden. “But having two conservative leaders can further strengthen convergence. It’s added value for Italy and the EU,” she said.

Observers have said that common views on issues ranging from immigration to abortion, alongside Meloni’s strong relationship with Trump’s billionaire ally Elon Musk, could result in her becoming his main interlocutor in Europe.

Trump broke with tradition by inviting several foreign leaders to his inauguration ceremony, which will take place inside the Capitol due to cold temperatures.

From Europe, Meloni will be joined by Zemmour, an ultranationalist, xenophobic polemicist who has convictions for hate speech and is an exponent of the far-right “great replacement” theory, as well as Tom Van Grieken of Belgium’s far-right Vlaams Belang party, and Mateusz Morawiecki of Poland’s national-conservative Law and Justice party (PiS).

The attendance of Tino Chrupalla, a co-leader of Germany’s far-right Alternative für Deutschland (AfD), was confirmed by the party on Thursday. The invitation followed Musk’s endorsement of the party and a discussion with the co-leader Alice Weidel on his social media platform, X, which raised further concerns about his ambition to influence European politics.

Nigel Farage, the leader of the UK anti-immigration Reform party, will also be present. Hungary’s nationalist prime minister, Victor Orbán, another Trump supporter, was invited but will not be attending, while Argentina’s populist leader, Javier Milei, who visited Rome in December for Atreju, the annual festival organised by Meloni’s Brothers of Italy, will be there.

During the recent press conference, Meloni defended both Trump and Musk. Asked about Trump’s remarks on Greenland and the Panama canal, Meloni said she believed they were intended as messages to other global powers rather than hostile claims against the two countries.

In response to the attacks by Musk on several European leaders, in particular the British prime minister, Keir Starmer, and the German chancellor, Olaf Scholz, Meloni rejected a suggestion that his comments constituted “dangerous interference”.

“The problem is when wealthy people use their resources to finance parties, associations and political exponents all over the world to influence the political choices of nation states,” Meloni said. “That’s not what Musk is doing.”

Explore more on these topics

  • Donald Trump inauguration
  • Giorgia Meloni
  • Italy
  • Donald Trump
  • The far right
  • Europe
  • Brothers of Italy
  • news
Share

Reuse this content

Most viewed

  • Guy Pearce: ‘My ex-wife was the greatest love of my life, but I’ve moved on now’
  • An American tragedy: how Biden paved the way for Trump’s White House return
  • LiveIsrael-Gaza war live: Netanyahu says ‘if we must return to fighting, we will do that’, citing support from Biden and Trump
  • ‘A small act of patriotism’: Canada’s anti-Maga hats go viral
  • Suicides, new tactics and propaganda iPads: details from captured North Koreans expose new foe in Ukraine

‘You can’t be pro-billionaire and pro-working class’: Biden’s labor chief on return of Trump

Julie Su, acting labor secretary, fears many of Biden’s pro-worker policies will be undone by the new administration

Even as Donald Trump says he will battle for America’s workers, the acting secretary of labor, Julie Su, is voicing fears that Trump will undo many of Joe Biden’s pro-worker policies, which include protecting workers from extreme heat and extending overtime pay to millions more workers.

In an interview with the Guardian, Su said that Trump might fall far short on delivering for workers considering the first Trump administration’s many anti-worker policies and in light of his having Elon Musk and other billionaires advising him. “It’s one thing to say you’re pro-worker, and it’s quite another thing to do it,” Su said. “You can’t be pro-billionaire and pro-working class. You can’t be pro-Elon Musk and pro-worker.”

Musk, who has become one of Trump’s top advisers, is vehemently anti-union and seeking to have the National Labor Relations Board declared unconstitutional. He once said: “I disagree with the idea of unions.”

Su expressed concern that the Trump administration, with all its billionaires and business magnates, might give short shrift to poor and working-class Americans. “When you look at the track record of some of the people in the next administration, and then you look at the lack of representation of working-class and middle-class folks, I’m worried that the perspectives of those who struggle, of those who rely on government to act not just in the interest of the privileged, are not well-represented – while union-busters are.”

Su – who became acting labor secretary nearly two years ago after serving as deputy labor secretary – voiced pride in the Biden administration’s accomplishments for workers. She pointed to the $1tn infrastructure bill, Biden’s strong backing of unions, the regulation to protect workers’ lungs from silicon dust, the increase in factory jobs and the first-ever regulation to protect workers from dangerous heat. (With the senator Joe Manchin opposing her, she never got a Senate majority to confirm her as labor secretary.)

As for other achievements, Su pointed to her behind-the-scenes role in helping secure good union contracts for Boeing workers and dock workers on the east and west coasts. She also cited her department’s enforcement efforts – since Biden took office, it has collected more than $1bn for workers victimized by wage theft.

“This president has prioritized working people in everything that he’s done,” she said. “This president has had a very strong commitment to unions.”

Su warned that the second Trump administration might be as anti-union as the first. “The first time they were here, they had a virulently anti-union NLRB,” Su said. “In order to do what they said they’re going to do this time, which is to be pro-worker and pro-union, they’re going to have to do a 180-degree U-turn from what they did last time.”

Peter Robb, who served as the NLRB’s aggressively pro-business general counsel during Trump’s first term, is heading Trump’s transition efforts for the labor board. Trump’s pick for labor secretary, Lori Chavez-DeRemer, has had far more support from unions than most Republicans; several unions endorsed her last fall when she ran unsuccessfully for re-election to Congress from Oregon.

Su had some advice for her successor: “The American people need and deserve a strong labor department. There are places in this country where vulnerable workers depend on this department to breathe life into labor laws, and there are 15,000 career people who wake up every day and want to do that work. Having the support of the labor secretary to do that and use the full authority they’ve been given to make life better for workers, is really important. It’s also important to be a voice for workers.”

As for Musk’s ambitious plan to make $2tn in budget cuts, Su said her department already did not have enough money and further cuts would undermine its mission. “We do not have the resources that we need for this department’s important mission after the cuts of the last Trump administration,” Su said. She added that the department needed adequate resources “when workers tell us they weren’t paid the $7.25-an-hour minimum wage, when 13-year-olds work in dangerous jobs and 16-year-olds work on dangerous equipment, when firefighters seek workers comp after a whole career of saving people’s lives, but are denied it”.

Su fears that Trump’s appointees will scrap the Biden administration’s first-ever national regulation to protect workers against extreme heat. Similarly, she worries that the Trump administration will reverse a rule that makes it harder for businesses to misclassify construction workers and others as independent contractors, often to skirt overtime and other laws.

Su, who won high praise for her innovative policies as California’s labor commissioner, vigorously denied that Biden’s loss in November meant that voters had rejected his pro-worker policies. Su said policies to ramp up manufacturing, build clean energy and rebuild infrastructure will take years to complete, and many voters didn’t yet feel the benefit. “We needed more time,” she said.

“President Biden wanted to fundamentally change the playbook of how the economy works for working people,” Su said. “He called the lie on the decades-old con of trickle-down economics.”

As labor secretary and as California’s top labor official, Su often devoted herself to helping the most vulnerable workers. “Too many workers continue to struggle, and a lot of those are workers of color and immigrants,” she said. “The rhetoric about immigrants, the flat-out lies about what immigrants and immigrant communities bring and contribute – those lies are terribly damaging. Anti-immigrant policies are anti-worker.”

Su condemned Trump’s talk of mass deportations: “You can’t be behind a mass-deportation policy and be pro-worker. Those policies make workers afraid and much more exploitable.”

Discussing the Los Angeles wildfires, Su – who grew up in Los Angeles county – said immigrant workers usually do the work cleaning up and rebuilding after hurricanes, fires and other disasters. “There is going to be a herculean effort needed in light of the devastating fires that are still raging in my home state,” she said. “Those workers who have done cleanup and rebuilding before are going to be the ones we rely on, and they, like all workers, should be treated with the dignity and respect they deserve.

“A policy of mass deportations,” she added, “will get in the way of that important work and make the people doing that work more vulnerable.”

If Trump is serious about helping workers, Su maintained, he should continue her department’s efforts to enforce labor laws aggressively, whether minimum wage, child labor or occupational safety laws.

“The last administration slashed the Department of Labor’s enforcement capacity. You can’t eliminate and slash [the Occupational Safety and Health Administration] and wage-and-hour and mine inspectors and keep workers healthy and safe,” Su said. Trump’s nominees “say we’re going to cut red tape and regulation, but the people who rely on strong regulation are the most vulnerable people in our communities, including working people,” she said.

Su voiced frustration that conservative judges have overturned labor department regulations, including Biden’s rule extending overtime pay to 4 million more workers. She complained that those who “benefit from the gap between the rich and the poor” have “figured out a way to stymie progressive and worker-friendly actions”.

She talked of one worker she met who said that thanks to Biden’s overtime expansion, she was going to receive a pay increase that would enable her to pay her rent and have a little left over for her daughter. But a federal judge in Texas, a Trump appointee, overturned Biden’s overtime expansion.

“Much of what we put in place are fundamental policies to lift up people who are struggling to get by,” Su said. “I think about these people who think it’s a game to strategize and take away these kinds of protections. It’s a tragedy.”

Su decried the repeated efforts by Republicans, business lobbyists and conservative thinktanks to block efforts to raise the federal minimum wage, which has been frozen at $7.25 for 15 years.

Industry lobbyists continually challenge policies that are good for working people,” Su said. “You can’t say you’re pro-worker and support them. It’s unconscionable to stand in the way of policies that put more wages into workers’ pockets.”

Explore more on these topics

  • Biden administration
  • US politics
  • Trump administration
  • Elon Musk
  • US unions
  • news
Share

Reuse this content

Most viewed

  • Guy Pearce: ‘My ex-wife was the greatest love of my life, but I’ve moved on now’
  • An American tragedy: how Biden paved the way for Trump’s White House return
  • LiveIsrael-Gaza war live: Netanyahu says ‘if we must return to fighting, we will do that’, citing support from Biden and Trump
  • ‘A small act of patriotism’: Canada’s anti-Maga hats go viral
  • Suicides, new tactics and propaganda iPads: details from captured North Koreans expose new foe in Ukraine

Seventy killed in central Nigeria after fuel tanker flips over and explodes

Those who died had scrambled to take the fuel, which has rocketed in price amid an economic crisis

A fuel tanker exploded after flipping over in central Nigeria on Saturday, killing 70 people who had scrambled to take the fuel.

Kumar Tsukwam, the head of the Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC) in Niger State, said a truck carrying 60,000 litres of gasoline had an accident at about 10am at the Dikko junction on the road linking the capital city, Abuja, to the northern city of Kaduna.

“Most of the victims were burnt beyond recognition,” Tsukwam said. “We are at the scene to clear things up.”

An FSRC statement said a “large crowd of people gathered to scoop the fuel [when] suddenly the tanker burst into flames, engulfing another tanker.

“So far 60 corpses recovered from scene, the victims are mostly scavengers,” it said.

In 2023, President Bola Tinubu abolished a fuel subsidy, sending prices of essentials and other goods soaring, triggering protests.

The price of gasoline has increased fivefold in 18 months, leading many to risk their lives to recover fuel during tanker truck accidents, which are common in Africa’s most populous country.

The Niger state governor, Umaru Bago, said in a statement that the explosion was “worrisome, heartbreaking and unfortunate”.

He said an undisclosed number of people also experienced various degrees of burns.

In October, more than 170 people died in a similar incident in Jigawa State, in northern Nigeria.

In 2020, the FRSC listed 1,531 fuel tanker accidents, which claimed more than 535 lives.

Explore more on these topics

  • Nigeria
  • Africa
  • news
Share

Reuse this content

Seventy killed in central Nigeria after fuel tanker flips over and explodes

Those who died had scrambled to take the fuel, which has rocketed in price amid an economic crisis

A fuel tanker exploded after flipping over in central Nigeria on Saturday, killing 70 people who had scrambled to take the fuel.

Kumar Tsukwam, the head of the Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC) in Niger State, said a truck carrying 60,000 litres of gasoline had an accident at about 10am at the Dikko junction on the road linking the capital city, Abuja, to the northern city of Kaduna.

“Most of the victims were burnt beyond recognition,” Tsukwam said. “We are at the scene to clear things up.”

An FSRC statement said a “large crowd of people gathered to scoop the fuel [when] suddenly the tanker burst into flames, engulfing another tanker.

“So far 60 corpses recovered from scene, the victims are mostly scavengers,” it said.

In 2023, President Bola Tinubu abolished a fuel subsidy, sending prices of essentials and other goods soaring, triggering protests.

The price of gasoline has increased fivefold in 18 months, leading many to risk their lives to recover fuel during tanker truck accidents, which are common in Africa’s most populous country.

The Niger state governor, Umaru Bago, said in a statement that the explosion was “worrisome, heartbreaking and unfortunate”.

He said an undisclosed number of people also experienced various degrees of burns.

In October, more than 170 people died in a similar incident in Jigawa State, in northern Nigeria.

In 2020, the FRSC listed 1,531 fuel tanker accidents, which claimed more than 535 lives.

Explore more on these topics

  • Nigeria
  • Africa
  • news
Share

Reuse this content

Yoon supporters storm Seoul court after his detainment period is extended

Protesters smash windows after officials cite concerns the impeached president could destroy evidence if released

A South Korean court has extended the detention of the impeached president Yoon Suk Yeol on Sunday citing concerns he could destroy evidence linked to his martial law declaration, enraging his supporters, who attacked the court building.

Hundreds of pro-Yoon protesters smashed windows and broke down doors to enter the court after the decision was announced, chanting the name of the president, who plunged South Korea into its worst political chaos in decades with his bid to suspend civilian rule.

AFP reporters saw hundreds of police entering the building, and one officer from Seoul’s Mapo district separately told AFP it was an “unfolding” situation.

Footage showed protesters blasting fire extinguishers at officers guarding the front entrance before they swarmed inside, destroying furniture and computers.

Police, who restored order a few hours later, said they had so far arrested 46 protesters.

“We will track down till the end more of those who committed illegal acts or instigated and assisted,” the Seoul Metropolitan Police said in a statement.

There were around 40 minor injuries sustained during the chaos but no serious injuries reported, an emergency responder near the court said.

Yoon had argued that he be released from custody before a court in Seoul. The Seoul western district court said it approved the detention warrant requested by the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials (CIO).

The reason for the approval was “concern that the suspect may destroy evidence”, the court said in a statement. Under the new warrant, Yoon can be detained for up to 20 days. He is being held at the Seoul detention centre.

So far, Yoon has stonewalled efforts by the CIO to interrogate him, refusing to attend questioning. It was unclear if Yoon will cooperate with investigators during his extended detention.

His appearance at the Seoul western district court caused chaotic scenes in nearby streets, where thousands of his fervent supporters rallied for hours calling for his release.

They clashed with police, who detained about 40 protesters, including about 20 who climbed over a fence in an attempt to approach the court. At least two vehicles carrying anti-corruption investigators were damaged as they left the court after arguing for Yoon’s arrest.

Yoon has been in detention since being seized in a large law enforcement operation at his residence on Wednesday. He has been accused of orchestrating a rebellion after his declaration of martial law in December last year, which triggered South Korea’s most serious political crisis since its democratisation in the late 1980s.

Yoon’s lawyers said he spoke for about 40 minutes to the judge during the nearly five-hour closed-door hearing. His legal team and anti-corruption agencies presented opposing arguments about whether he should be held in custody. The lawyers did not share his specific comments.

Yoon was transported to the court from a detention centre in Uiwang, near Seoul, in a blue justice ministry van escorted by police and the presidential security service.

The motorcade entered the court’s basement parking space as thousands of Yoon’s supporters gathered in nearby streets despite a heavy police presence. Some protesters broke through the police lines and tapped on the windows of his van approaching the court. Yoon did not speak to reporters.

After its investigators were attacked by protesters, the anti-corruption agency asked media companies to obscure the faces of its members attending the hearing.

It had not been clear whether Yoon would attend the hearing on Saturday but he appeared to have accepted advice from his legal team to appear before the judge in person.

Seok Dong-hyeon, one of Yoon’s lawyers, said the court’s decision was “really hard to understand” but asked supporters to be calm.

“Such expressions of anger are understandable, but if they go too far and continue to be violent, they could be caught up in targeted attacks or counter-attacks by leftist forces,” he said. “We need to stay calm,” he said in a Facebook post.

Yoon’s ruling People Power party called the court’s decision a “great pity”. “There’s a question whether repercussions of detaining a sitting president were sufficiently considered,” the party said in a statement.

The major opposition Democratic party called the court’s approval on the warrant a “cornerstone for rebuilding the collapsed constitutional order”.

Nine people, including Yoon’s defence minister, police chief, and several top military commanders, have been arrested and indicted for their roles in the enforcement of martial law.

Under South Korean law, orchestrating a rebellion is punishable by life imprisonment or the death penalty.

Yoon’s lawyers have argued there is no need to detain him during the investigation, saying he does not pose a threat to flee or destroy evidence.

Investigators responded that Yoon had ignored several requests to appear for questioning, and that the presidential security service blocked an attempt to detain him on 3 January. His defiance has raised concerns about whether he would comply with criminal court proceedings if he was not under arrest.

AFP, Reuters and Associated Press contributed reporting

Explore more on these topics

  • Yoon Suk Yeol
  • South Korea
  • Asia Pacific
  • news
Share

Reuse this content

Most viewed

  • Guy Pearce: ‘My ex-wife was the greatest love of my life, but I’ve moved on now’
  • An American tragedy: how Biden paved the way for Trump’s White House return
  • LiveIsrael-Gaza war live: Netanyahu says ‘if we must return to fighting, we will do that’, citing support from Biden and Trump
  • ‘A small act of patriotism’: Canada’s anti-Maga hats go viral
  • Suicides, new tactics and propaganda iPads: details from captured North Koreans expose new foe in Ukraine

Ten people hurt, two seriously, after ski lift collapse at Spanish resort

Emergency services say 30 people were involved, of whom 10 were taken to hospital, at Astún in the Pyrenees

Ten people have been hurt, two of them seriously, after a ski lift collapsed at a resort in north-east Spain, hurling dozens of passengers into the snow below.

Although initial reports said 35 people had been injured on Saturday at the Pyrenean resort of Astún, in the Aragón region, the figures were later revised down.

By 4pm local time, the regional emergency services said 30 people had been involved in the accident, of whom 10 were taken to hospital. They said two people had been badly injured, two others had required urgent attention, and six more were being treated. Twenty others were given the all-clear at the accident site.

Miguel Ángel Clavero, the head of Aragón’s emergency services, said the accident appeared to have been caused by “a failure in the ski lift return system, which produced a breakdown in tension”.

Clavero said rescuers were still on the scene, trying to get stranded people down. “In the first instance, as people are still on the lift, Guardia Civil officers, firefighters and ski station workers are trying to get them down and to safety,” he told Aragón TV.

Clavero added that the ski station was closed and asked everyone “to leave the centre so as to leave the car park free”.

Some of those involved in the accident told reporters how they had crashed into the ground beneath them.

“Suddenly we heard a sound and we fell straight to the ground, inside the chair,” María Moreno told the public broadcaster TVE. “We bounced up and down about five times and our backs were quite sore or we were hurt, but there were people who fell out of the chairs.”

Moreno added that she thought some people must have been seriously injured because “the chair hit them directly” when it collapsed.

“It’s like a cable came loose and suddenly all the chairs started to bounce and people went flying,” a young man told TVE.

Five helicopters, 14 ambulances and a mobile medical centre were scrambled to the resort as soon as news of the accident was received.

Jorge Azcón, the regional president of Aragón, said he was travelling to the site, while Spain’s prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, offered his thoughts and assistance.

“Shocked by the news of the accident at the Astún resort,” he wrote on X. “I’ve spoken to Jorge Azcón to offer the government’s full support. “We send all our love to the injured and to their families.”

Explore more on these topics

  • Spain
  • Europe
  • Skiing holidays
  • news
Share

Reuse this content

Most viewed

  • Guy Pearce: ‘My ex-wife was the greatest love of my life, but I’ve moved on now’
  • An American tragedy: how Biden paved the way for Trump’s White House return
  • LiveIsrael-Gaza war live: Netanyahu says ‘if we must return to fighting, we will do that’, citing support from Biden and Trump
  • ‘A small act of patriotism’: Canada’s anti-Maga hats go viral
  • Suicides, new tactics and propaganda iPads: details from captured North Koreans expose new foe in Ukraine

Shutdown at Mexico toxic waste plant after Guardian investigation revealed pollution in nearby homes

Mexican officials ordered facility to shut down after report on very high levels of pollutants in surrounding neighborhood

  • Revealed: US hazardous waste is sent to Mexico – where a ‘toxic cocktail’ of pollution emerges

Authorities ordered the shutdown of a Mexican recycling plant that processes hazardous waste exported from the US, after an investigation by the Guardian and Quinto Elemento Lab that revealed heavy metals contamination in nearby homes and schools.

The federal agency described the closure as “temporary”, and said it would conduct an inspection lasting several days that would verify the factory’s compliance with environmental regulations. Days earlier, a state government agency said it had identified problems with the plant’s emissions control equipment.

These actions follow a story published on Tuesday that traced how US steel companies ship contaminated dust left over from recycling scrap metal to the Zinc Nacional plant, where it is processed in furnaces to reclaim zinc.

The reporting team collaborated with Martín Soto Jiménez, a toxicology researcher at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (Unam), who took soil and dust samples in homes and schools surrounding the plant, in a heavily populated part of the Monterrey metropolitan area.

Samples showed high levels of lead, cadmium and arsenic – including one elementary school that had 1,760 times the US action level for lead dust in its window sills.

Zinc Nacional’s own emission reports to the federal government show the company emits these same heavy metals into the air.

Environmental regulators from the federal agency in charge of environmental inspection and enforcement, known by its acronym, Profepa, arrived at the plant on Friday. The shutdown was announced on Saturday, when Profepa said in a statement that the plant did not have authorization for 15 pieces of equipment that control emissions into the atmosphere. It said its inspection was occurring “as a result of information that has been made public through a journalistic investigation”.

A team from the environmental agency of the Mexican state of Nuevo León had visited the plant on Thursday.

During the visit, officials found evidence of “deficiencies in the emission control systems” and dust from the plant in soil, said the agency in a press release. It ordered the shutdown of two furnaces “as a precautionary measure”.

Zinc Nacional did not respond to questions from the Guardian and Quinto Elemento Lab, a non-profit reporting group, about the shutdown and other reactions in Monterrey to the study findings. In a press release shared with reporters after the initial shutdown of two furnaces, the company said: “Oversight by state and federal authorities, along with various independent audits conducted by customers, suppliers, and international certifiers, demonstrate Zinc Nacional’s compliance with applicable regulations and the implementation of the international standards under which it operates.”

It said: “In the event that areas for improvement are identified in our operations, we shall make the necessary adjustments to strengthen the work safety conditions for employees, collaborators and neighboring communities.

The Guardian and Quinto Elemento Lab investigation has been featured prominently in the local and national press, generating front page stories in a major regional newspaper, El Norte, for the last four days.

The director of regional nursery schools – which included one school where Soto Jiménez found high levels of arsenic – called for a government health investigation.

Residents from the municipality of San Nicolás de los Garza, the Monterrey-area municipality where the plant is located, are organizing a signature-gathering drive for a complaint about the pollution.

“The objective is simply to stop the pollution because the lungs and health of San Nicolás residents and those in surrounding areas are not for sale,” said Roberto Chavarría, a neighbor who lives near the plant and is helping organize neighbors. He said a peaceful protest was planned for Friday, 24 January.

“We are not the garbage dump of the United States or anyone else.”

Susana de la Torre Zavala, the mother of two children who attend a school next to the Zinc Nacional plant, said the company invited parents to visit the facility for a tour and meeting on Thursday. But she said the company provided little concrete information.

“No one showed us any data; they just limited themselves to telling us, ‘It’s not true, everything is fine,’” said Torre Zavala. “We need certainty, transparency – we need extra studies.”

Explore more on these topics

  • Mexico
  • Pollution
  • Health
  • Americas
  • news
Share

Reuse this content

Most viewed

  • Guy Pearce: ‘My ex-wife was the greatest love of my life, but I’ve moved on now’
  • An American tragedy: how Biden paved the way for Trump’s White House return
  • LiveIsrael-Gaza war live: Netanyahu says ‘if we must return to fighting, we will do that’, citing support from Biden and Trump
  • ‘A small act of patriotism’: Canada’s anti-Maga hats go viral
  • Suicides, new tactics and propaganda iPads: details from captured North Koreans expose new foe in Ukraine

Shutdown at Mexico toxic waste plant after Guardian investigation revealed pollution in nearby homes

Mexican officials ordered facility to shut down after report on very high levels of pollutants in surrounding neighborhood

  • Revealed: US hazardous waste is sent to Mexico – where a ‘toxic cocktail’ of pollution emerges

Authorities ordered the shutdown of a Mexican recycling plant that processes hazardous waste exported from the US, after an investigation by the Guardian and Quinto Elemento Lab that revealed heavy metals contamination in nearby homes and schools.

The federal agency described the closure as “temporary”, and said it would conduct an inspection lasting several days that would verify the factory’s compliance with environmental regulations. Days earlier, a state government agency said it had identified problems with the plant’s emissions control equipment.

These actions follow a story published on Tuesday that traced how US steel companies ship contaminated dust left over from recycling scrap metal to the Zinc Nacional plant, where it is processed in furnaces to reclaim zinc.

The reporting team collaborated with Martín Soto Jiménez, a toxicology researcher at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (Unam), who took soil and dust samples in homes and schools surrounding the plant, in a heavily populated part of the Monterrey metropolitan area.

Samples showed high levels of lead, cadmium and arsenic – including one elementary school that had 1,760 times the US action level for lead dust in its window sills.

Zinc Nacional’s own emission reports to the federal government show the company emits these same heavy metals into the air.

Environmental regulators from the federal agency in charge of environmental inspection and enforcement, known by its acronym, Profepa, arrived at the plant on Friday. The shutdown was announced on Saturday, when Profepa said in a statement that the plant did not have authorization for 15 pieces of equipment that control emissions into the atmosphere. It said its inspection was occurring “as a result of information that has been made public through a journalistic investigation”.

A team from the environmental agency of the Mexican state of Nuevo León had visited the plant on Thursday.

During the visit, officials found evidence of “deficiencies in the emission control systems” and dust from the plant in soil, said the agency in a press release. It ordered the shutdown of two furnaces “as a precautionary measure”.

Zinc Nacional did not respond to questions from the Guardian and Quinto Elemento Lab, a non-profit reporting group, about the shutdown and other reactions in Monterrey to the study findings. In a press release shared with reporters after the initial shutdown of two furnaces, the company said: “Oversight by state and federal authorities, along with various independent audits conducted by customers, suppliers, and international certifiers, demonstrate Zinc Nacional’s compliance with applicable regulations and the implementation of the international standards under which it operates.”

It said: “In the event that areas for improvement are identified in our operations, we shall make the necessary adjustments to strengthen the work safety conditions for employees, collaborators and neighboring communities.

The Guardian and Quinto Elemento Lab investigation has been featured prominently in the local and national press, generating front page stories in a major regional newspaper, El Norte, for the last four days.

The director of regional nursery schools – which included one school where Soto Jiménez found high levels of arsenic – called for a government health investigation.

Residents from the municipality of San Nicolás de los Garza, the Monterrey-area municipality where the plant is located, are organizing a signature-gathering drive for a complaint about the pollution.

“The objective is simply to stop the pollution because the lungs and health of San Nicolás residents and those in surrounding areas are not for sale,” said Roberto Chavarría, a neighbor who lives near the plant and is helping organize neighbors. He said a peaceful protest was planned for Friday, 24 January.

“We are not the garbage dump of the United States or anyone else.”

Susana de la Torre Zavala, the mother of two children who attend a school next to the Zinc Nacional plant, said the company invited parents to visit the facility for a tour and meeting on Thursday. But she said the company provided little concrete information.

“No one showed us any data; they just limited themselves to telling us, ‘It’s not true, everything is fine,’” said Torre Zavala. “We need certainty, transparency – we need extra studies.”

Explore more on these topics

  • Mexico
  • Pollution
  • Health
  • Americas
  • news
Share

Reuse this content

Most viewed

  • Guy Pearce: ‘My ex-wife was the greatest love of my life, but I’ve moved on now’
  • An American tragedy: how Biden paved the way for Trump’s White House return
  • LiveIsrael-Gaza war live: Netanyahu says ‘if we must return to fighting, we will do that’, citing support from Biden and Trump
  • ‘A small act of patriotism’: Canada’s anti-Maga hats go viral
  • Suicides, new tactics and propaganda iPads: details from captured North Koreans expose new foe in Ukraine

Chrystia Freeland’s campaign to lead Canada starts with humblebrag: ‘Trump doesn’t like me’

Former deputy prime minister kicks off run for top job with video of Trump disparaging her for being tough negotiator

Chrystia Freeland, Canada’s former deputy prime minister, kicked off her bid to lead Canada by boasting: “Donald Trump doesn’t like me very much” in a campaign video that quickly went viral.

For Freeland, who led Canada’s re-negotiation of the North American Free Trade agreement (Nafta) with the United States and Mexico during Trump’s first term, video of Trump disparaging her for being a tough negotiator is a selling point.

Trump’s plans to impose massive tariffs, and open musing about incorporating Canada into the United States, has stirred nationalist resentment across the political spectrum in the country, with even the Conservative leader of Ontario, Doug Ford, recently photographed wearing a “Canada Is Not For Sale” cap.

Continuing the theme, Freeland said later in the video that Pierre Poilievre, the Conservative leader she would face as Liberal party leader in a general election this year, would “bow down to Trump, and sell us out”.

Freeland, a former journalist who also led Canada’s tough trade talks with the European Union, in English and French, made her anti-Trump humblebrag the centerpiece of her case to French-speaking Canadian voters as well.

Both the English and French versions of the campaign video amplify the patriotic theme by closing with a graphic that renders the candidate’s name as “Free Land” in the red and white of the Canadian flag, with the shadow of a maple leaf over the letter A.

Explore more on these topics

  • Canada
  • Donald Trump
  • Americas
  • news
Share

Reuse this content

Most viewed

  • Guy Pearce: ‘My ex-wife was the greatest love of my life, but I’ve moved on now’
  • An American tragedy: how Biden paved the way for Trump’s White House return
  • LiveIsrael-Gaza war live: Netanyahu says ‘if we must return to fighting, we will do that’, citing support from Biden and Trump
  • ‘A small act of patriotism’: Canada’s anti-Maga hats go viral
  • Suicides, new tactics and propaganda iPads: details from captured North Koreans expose new foe in Ukraine

Man charged with attempted murder after allegedly setting woman on fire at home south of Brisbane

Premier says alleged Kingston domestic violence incident has ‘rocked’ Queensland as woman, 34, remains in hospital

  • Get our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcast

A Queensland man has been charged with attempted murder for allegedly setting fire to a woman in a horrific act of domestic violence in a home south of Brisbane.

After being treated by paramedics at the scene in the Logan suburb of Kingston on Saturday morning, the 34-year-old woman was rushed to the Royal Brisbane and Women’s hospital in a serious condition. Police say she sustained serious burns.

  • Sign up for Guardian Australia’s breaking news email

The 36-year-old Kingston man was charged with attempted murder on Saturday night, as well as common assault and breach of domestic violence.

Police said authorities were called to the Kingston Court house at about 7.45am with reports of an “altercation” between a man and a woman, where they found the woman with burns to her body. They will allege the man had “produced a lighter and lit [her] on fire”.

The property where the woman was found was declared a crime scene, police said, with “secondary” crime scenes at Gould Adams Park on Kingston Road and the Kingston train station.

Police opposed bail and the man is expected to appear in Beenleigh magistrates court on Monday.

The Queensland premier, David Crisafulli, addressed the alleged murder attempt, telling reporters on Sunday that while the allegations may yet be contested before court, Queensland was in a state of sorrow for the young woman who remains in hospital.

“To everyone, to her family, to her neighbours, to the first responders, to every Queenslander: these are the kind of incidents that rock communities, and our thoughts and prayers are with everyone involved,” Crisafulli said.

The alleged attempted murder came as the Queensland government announced a number of measures aimed at cracking down on domestic violence, including GPS tracking of perpetrators with a history of breaching domestic violence orders.

The prevention of domestic and family violence minister, Amanda Camm, stood beside the premier at Parliament House on Sunday morning to announce that work had begun on that pledge the LNP government took to the October election, which it won on the back of a tough on crime campaign.

Camm committed to rolling out 150 GPS trackers this year before meeting its target of up to 500 ankle monitors on the highest risk offenders in the state.

“It is used to really front-load the system to ensure that there are 24/7 eyes on perpetrators so that they know that there is constant accountability to their whereabouts, to their interactions with victims and to make sure that they are following the letter of the law,” the minister said.

She said the system was modelled on a Tasmanian program and would help Queensland police who were “overwhelmed with the demand in domestic violence”.

Camm said the state’s DV connect crisis line was also “not meeting the demand”, with reports of calls going unanswered or not being followed up.

The minister said she had commissioned a report into the service with an interim report due in March, as well as an expert panel to oversee and guide domestic and family violence reforms that sought to put a “focus on perpetrators and perpetrator accountability”.

Explore more on these topics

  • Queensland
  • Domestic violence
  • news
Share

Reuse this content

Most viewed

  • Guy Pearce: ‘My ex-wife was the greatest love of my life, but I’ve moved on now’
  • An American tragedy: how Biden paved the way for Trump’s White House return
  • LiveIsrael-Gaza war live: Netanyahu says ‘if we must return to fighting, we will do that’, citing support from Biden and Trump
  • ‘A small act of patriotism’: Canada’s anti-Maga hats go viral
  • Suicides, new tactics and propaganda iPads: details from captured North Koreans expose new foe in Ukraine

‘Discovered’ diaries of British socialite Unity Mitford reveal Hitler relationship

Diaries, believed to be genuine, chronicle 139 pre-war meetings between antisemitic aristocrat and Nazi leader

The diaries of an antisemitic British socialite who was obsessed with Adolf Hitler and struck up a personal relationship with the Nazi leader have been discovered, according to the Daily Mail.

The leather-bound journals, which had been lost to historians and unseen for eight decades, appear to reveal the extent of Unity Mitford’s relationship with the dictator.

Despite the infamous “Hitler diaries” incident, in which Sunday Times journalists were duped into publishing forged accounts, several historians believe this discovery is genuine.

Speaking to the Daily Mail, which claims to have unearthed the journals, the historian Andrew Roberts said: “It is extremely rare in modern times for the diaries of a well-known figure of the Nazi movement to be discovered and published.”

One of the world’s foremost scholars on Unity Mitford, David Pryce-Jones, said: “I am confident they are genuine.”

The diaries detail how the aristocrat harboured a fascination with Hitler and stalked him when she moved to Munich at the age of 20. The handwritten entries expose Unity – one of the well-known Mitford sisters – as a Nazi worshipper, sharing Hitler’s hatred of Jewish people.

Spanning the years between 1935 and 1939, she recorded an account in February 1935 as “the most wonderful day of my life” when Hitler summoned her to join his table at the Osteria Bavaria restaurant.

She wrote: “Lunch Osteria 2.30. THE FUHRER comes 3.15 after I have finished lunch. After about 10 minutes he sends the Wirt [owner] TO ASK ME TO GO TO HIS TABLE.

“I go and sit next to him while he eats his lunch and we talk. THE MOST WONDERFUL DAY OF MY LIFE. He writes on a postcard for me. After he goes, Rosa [waitress] tells me he has never invited anyone like that before.”

Born in London, Mitford managed to integrate herself into Hitler’s inner circle to such an extent that her presence reportedly caused Hitler’s lover, Eva Braun, to grow jealous of their relationship.

In total, the journals chronicle 139 meetings with the Nazi leader, whom she consistently refers to as “the Führer”. She later describes him as “very sweet and gay”.

Her final entry in the diary is on 1 September 1939, the day Germany invaded Poland, with war declared two days later. Unity – then 25 – later attempted suicide.

Apparently distraught at the prospect of Britain and Nazi Germany going to war against each other, she shot herself in Munich’s English Garden park.

The attempt was unsuccessful but Unity was left brain-damaged and the bullet remained lodged in her skull. She returned to Britain, where she died in 1948, aged 33.

Explore more on these topics

  • The Mitford sisters
  • Adolf Hitler
  • Nazism
  • Germany
  • Europe
  • Second world war
  • news
Share

Reuse this content

Most viewed

  • Guy Pearce: ‘My ex-wife was the greatest love of my life, but I’ve moved on now’
  • An American tragedy: how Biden paved the way for Trump’s White House return
  • LiveIsrael-Gaza war live: Netanyahu says ‘if we must return to fighting, we will do that’, citing support from Biden and Trump
  • ‘A small act of patriotism’: Canada’s anti-Maga hats go viral
  • Suicides, new tactics and propaganda iPads: details from captured North Koreans expose new foe in Ukraine

Bob Dylan’s drafts for Mr Tambourine Man sell for more than £400,000

Notes among 60 items associated with the singer auctioned off in Nashville

Bob Dylan’s typewritten drafts for his 1965 song Mr Tambourine Man sold for more than £400,000 at auction on Saturday.

The two yellow sheets of paper contain three progressive drafts of the lyrics with annotations on the third draft of the song.

They went under the hammer in Nashville, Tennessee, with an estimated price tag of $400,000 to $600,000, eventually selling for $508,000 (£417,000).

The lyrical drafts were among 60 items that were up for sale in the dedicated auction for the singer at the Musicians Hall of Fame and Museum, with 50 pieces from the personal collection of American music journalist Al Aronowitz.

In March 1964, Aronowitz awoke to find Dylan, then 22, asleep on his sofa and the lyrics to Mr Tambourine Man crumpled up in his bin.

He had spent the night writing and rewriting his new song on a typewriter at Aronowitz’s home in New Jersey before discarding the early drafts.

A 1968 oil painting created and signed by Dylan went for $260,000. The artwork, which depicts a figure in bold colours and a cubist style, was produced by the American songwriter at the beginning of his artistic endeavours after his first wife, Sara, gave him oil paints for his 27th birthday.

The executive director and co-founder of Julien’s Auctions, Martin Nolan, described it as a “fantastic auction with outstanding sales”.

Nolan added: “We’re honoured to highlight this truly unique collection with so many historic Bob Dylan items from the grandfather of rock journalism, Al Aronowitz.

“Today’s white glove auction just reinforces the extraordinary impact and everlasting love that people have for Dylan, which transcends generations.”

Among the other high value lots was a 1983 Fender Telecaster electric guitar that was owned and played by Dylan before he gave it to famed amplifier technician and musician Cesar Diaz.

The instrument surpassed its estimate of $80,000 to $120,000 to sell for $222,250.

A number of sketches by Dylan also soared past their estimated price tags, including one of a hand on a memo pad from the Plaza hotel in New York City.

It was expected to sell for $1,500 to $2,500 but was eventually sold for $88,900.

A Levi’s denim jacket hand embellished with velvet, lace and other patches worn by the singer in the 1987 musical drama film Hearts of Fire went for $25,400.

The sale also included a 1963 handbill from his first major headline performance at Town Hall in New York City, early vintage photographs and a signed harmonica.

The collection of 60 items brought in nearly $1.5m in sales, according to Julien’s Auctions.

Explore more on these topics

  • Bob Dylan
  • news
Share

Reuse this content

Most viewed

  • Guy Pearce: ‘My ex-wife was the greatest love of my life, but I’ve moved on now’
  • An American tragedy: how Biden paved the way for Trump’s White House return
  • LiveIsrael-Gaza war live: Netanyahu says ‘if we must return to fighting, we will do that’, citing support from Biden and Trump
  • ‘A small act of patriotism’: Canada’s anti-Maga hats go viral
  • Suicides, new tactics and propaganda iPads: details from captured North Koreans expose new foe in Ukraine