Great Wall of China may be centuries older than previously thought

Archaeological excavations in eastern China‘s Shandong province suggest that some of the oldest sections of the Great Wall were built 300 years earlier than previously thought.

Recent digs in the Changqing area show that the engineering marvel wasn’t a single construction project, but a series of fortifications built during multiple dynasties.

The Great Wall was built to secure ancient China’s northern borders against nomadic groups from the Eurasian Steppe. Historical records suggest the construction of the Unesco World Heritage monument spanned centuries. However, extant documentation of the wall lacks details that could reveal its true origins.

It was believed that the largest portions of the first walls were constructed around the 7th century BC and joined together under the Qin dynasty around the third century BC.

However, new excavations undertaken last year and covering over 1,000 square meters found sections of the wall dating back to the late Western Zhou Dynasty, which ruled from 1046BC to 771BC, and to the early Spring and Autumn Period of 770-476BC.

The findings shed light on advanced engineering of the ancient Chinese to expand the wall to about 30 meters at the peak of Qi State likely during the Warring States Period.

Some ancient texts suggest that sections of the wall went through many phases of development, use, sometimes collapse and abandonment, and attempts at restoration.

Researchers reportedly used a multidisciplinary approach to date these sections of the wall, including analysis of traditional artefacts collected at the site as well as specimens of plant remains and animal bones.

Archaeologists found buried sections of roads, house foundations, trenches, ash pits, and walls at the site, Zhang Su, the project leader from the Shandong Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, told Global Times.

One particularly well-preserved section was built during the Warring States Period from 475BC to 221 BC and is the best preserved, researchers said.

This section is the “earliest known Great Wall in China”, said Liu Zheng, a member of the Chinese Society of Cultural Relics.

The latest research also establishes the proximity of the Great Wall of this time to the ancient Pingyin city mentioned in historical texts, suggesting the wall was not just a fortification against invasion but also served a strategic role in controlling trade and transportation.

Hadi Matar guilty of trying to kill Salman Rushdie in knife attack

A New York jury has convicted Hadi Matar of trying to kill Salman Rushdie, a Booker Prize-winning novelist who was seriously wounded and blinded in one eye in a harrowing knife attack two-and-a-half years ago.

Matar, 27, learned his fate Friday, nearly two weeks after the trial began on February 10.

He looked down when the verdict was read, and said, “Free Palestine,” as he was led out of the courtroom in handcuffs, WGRZ reports.

The jury deliberated for less than two hours.

The attacker was also found guilty of assault for injuring a man onstage with Rushdie.

The New Jersey man had pleaded not guilty to both charges. He faces up to 25 years in prison, and his sentencing hearing is set for April 23.

“We had a number of different angles to show the jurors,” District Attorney Jason Schmidt told reporters after the verdict. “It really is as compelling as it can possibly get.”

The Independent has contacted Rushdie’s representatives for comment.

Matar’s defense told CBS News he was disappointed by the jury’s decision but had been preparing for that possibility.

Matar’s trial took place at Chautauqua County Court in western New York, a short distance from the Chautauqua Institution, where the knife attack unfolded on August 12, 2022.

Rushdie was about to speak in front of an audience at the amphitheater when a masked man rushed at him onstage, stabbing and slashing him more than a dozen times.

On the second day of the trial, Rushdie, now 77, faced Matar for the first time as he calmly told a jury about the frenzied moments of the attack, revealing that he believed he was going to die.

“It occurred to me that I was dying. That was my predominant thought,” the renowned author said, adding that the people who subdued the assailant likely saved his life.

The celebrated Indian-born British–American author has faced death threats since his 1988 novel The Satanic Verses was declared blasphemous by Iran’s then-supreme leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.

“I became aware of a great quantity of blood I was lying in,” Rushdie testified in court. “My sense of time was quite cloudy, I was in pain from my eye and hand, and it occurred to me quite clearly I was dying.”

During the trial, jurors watched chaotic footage of the assault that showed the attacker quickly striking the author over and over before being tackled by bystanders and pinned to the stage.

“I want you to look at the unprovoked nature of this attack,” Schmidt said in court on Friday of the videos during his closing argument. “I want you to look at the targeted nature of the attack. There were a lot of people around that day but there was only one person who was targeted.”

Four videos, each shot from different angles, show only glimpses of the severely injured Rushdie, who fell to the stage near the attacker.

Each man is surrounded by people, one group holding Matar down and the other tending to Rushdie’s wounds. Someone brings a stack of towels and another elevates his legs.

Henry Reese, the co-founder of City of Asylum Pittsburgh, a safe haven for persecuted authors and artists, was set to interview Rushdie on stage as part of the lecture. He was also injured in the attack.

Investigator Scott Mills testified that he took a statement from Rushdie and a DNA swab 10 days later, when the author was still hospitalized in Erie, Pennsylvania.

Rushdie had been stabbed and slashed in the head, eye, neck, torso, leg and hand, and spent 17 days at the hospital and more than three weeks at a New York City rehabilitation center.

The attacker’s defense argued that prosecutors didn’t prove Matar wanted to kill the author, a core component of the attempted murder charge.

“You will agree something bad happened to Mr. Rushdie, but you don’t know what Mr. Matar’s conscious objective was,” assistant public defender Andrew Brautigan told jurors. “The testimony you have heard doesn’t establish anything more than a chaotic noisy outburst that occurred that injured Mr. Rushdie.”

They also claimed Rushdie’s celebrity caused Matar to face unduly severe charges for the attack.

Matar did not testify during the trial, and his defense did not call any witnesses on his behalf.

The 2022 attack is the subject of Rushdie’s memoir Knife: Meditations After an Attempted Murder.

Matar was also indicted on federal terrorism charges related to the stabbing. A trial date for those charges has yet to be confirmed.

The terror indictment alleges Matar was motivated by a Hezbollah leader’s 2006 endorsement of Khomeini’s decades-old fatwa.

The original 1989 edict sent Rushdie into hiding for years, but the author of Midnight’s Children and Victory City traveled freely over the past quarter century after Iran announced it would not enforce the fatwa.

South Korea’s Yoon booked for obstructing execution of arrest warrant

South Korean police have booked impeached president Yoon Suk Yeol for obstructing the execution of a warrant issued for his arrest over a failed attempt to impose martial law late last year.

The police were attempting to formally build a case against Mr Yoon on the suspicion that he had blocked the execution of the warrant since around 3 January, a spokesperson said.

He was suspected of using the presidential security service to block his arrest, state news agency Yonhap reported on Friday. His security guards had prevented investigators from arresting Mr Yoon last month, triggering a tense standoff.

Preventing the execution of an arrest warrant is a crime punishable by up to five years in jail.

The warrant against Mr Yoon was issued by the Seoul Western District Court at the request of the Corruption Investigation Office on 31 December and extended a week later.

Investigators launched a pre-dawn operation on 15 December to arrest Mr Yoon – their second attempt – triggering a nearly three-hour standoff between the president’s supporters and more than 3,000 police officers. Later the same day, hundreds of law enforcement officers stormed the presidential residence in Seoul and arrested Mr Yoon.

Meanwhile, in his testimony to the Seoul court trying the impeached president for insurrection, ousted premier Han Duck Soo claimed on Thursday that he had “expressed my opposition” to Mr Yoon’s declaration of martial law on 3 December 2024.

He and his fellow ministers “believed such a declaration would put South Korea in serious difficulty”, Mr Han claimed, and they were “concerned and trying to dissuade it”.

Mr Yoon walked out of the court five minutes after the proceedings started. His lawyer said it was inappropriate for the president to be in the same courtroom with Mr Han “or for the president to watch the prime minister testify”.

“It is not good for the nation’s prestige,” his lawyer quoted Mr Yoon as saying.

Prosecutors called for speedy proceedings considering the “gravity” of the matter, but Mr Yoon’s lawyers said they needed time to review records.

Mr Yoon had “no intention to paralyse the country”, one of his lawyers told the court, adding that the martial law decree was meant only to inform the public of the “legislative dictatorship of the huge opposition party”.

The next hearing is set for 24 March.

Criminal investigations were launched against Mr Yoon after he shocked the world by imposing martial law last December. His martial law decree, the country’s first in 40 years, ended after just six hours when the National Assembly voted to withdraw it, despite attempts by armed soldiers to prevent lawmakers from assembling.

Mr Yoon subsequently became the first sitting South Korean president to be indicted on charges of leading an insurrection. He was then impeached by the National Assembly.

This breakthrough therapy could save lives from nuclear fallout

A breakthrough new therapy has enabled mice to survive exposure to acute radiation, according to a new study that may lead to safer cancer treatment and save lives in the event of a nuclear war.

Acute ionising radiation, such as from nuclear fallout, can severely damage DNA, arresting cell division and hampering activation of the body’s immune system.

Studies have suggested that more people could die from exposure to radiation fallout than directly from an atomic explosion in the event of a nuclear war. That is because exposure to high radiation doses long after the explosion can still trigger DNA damage and mass cell death, killing people down the generations.

High radiation exposure can lead to GIS, or gastrointestinal syndrome, a complex condition in which the inner-lining cells of the intestines break down. Patients undergoing high-dose radiotherapy for pelvic and abdominal tumours have been found to experience GIS as well, but there is no treatment currently to protect people against such consequences of radiation exposure.

The new study, conducted by Chinese researchers and published in the journal Cell Death and Differentiation, found exactly how a key set of genes crucial for promoting cell death respond to radiation exposure.

The “stimulator of interferon genes”, or Sting, promotes cell death in response to DNA damage caused by acute radiation.

The researchers found that knocking out the function of Sting in mice increased their survival rate from 11 per cent to 67 per cent after exposure to harmful levels of radiation.

The study found normal mice experienced more severe abdominal injuries than those that had had their Sting proteins knocked out.

“Overall, our study revealed a novel pathway through which Sting regulates ionising radiation-mediated cell death,” scientists wrote.

Further analysis showed the rate of cell death in mice with Sting knocked out dropped from 45 per cent to 12 per cent after radiation exposure.

The researchers looked especially at tiny, hair-like projections in the mice intestines called villi which help absorb nutrients from food. They found that the height of individual villi in mice with muted Sting was “significantly greater” by around 2.3 times than in other mice, suggesting their guts were resisting radiation better.

Researchers said the findings could lead to therapies for controlling GIS upon exposure to high doses of ionising radiation or radiation therapy for tumours. “The therapies developed based on the new discovery of Sting proteins have shown great potential in protecting against radiation injury, enhancing cancer radiotherapy, and improving cancer treatment,” study lead author Sun Yirong told China Science Daily.

Boy, 10, dies after choking on gummy candy

A 10-year-old boy in Malaysia died after choking on an eyeball-shaped gummy, his family said.

Mohamad Fahmi Hafiz, a fourth grader, was admitted to the intensive care unit of a local hospital after he collapsed at his school in Penang state on the northwest coast of peninsular Malaysia.

His aunt, Siti Farhani Mohamad Fikri, said in a Facebook post on Wednesday that her nephew had purchased the candy from a shop near the school and choked on it shortly after consuming it, The Straits Times reported.

The incident occurred at about 2.30pm on Tuesday. The boy was walking with his classmates to the toilet when he suddenly lost consciousness and collapsed, North Seberang Perai police assistant commissioner Anuar Abdul Rahman said.

The classmates informed their teacher, who performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation on the pupil but was unable to bring him to consciousness.

Police said it was only after he arrived at the Seremban Jaya Hospital that the candy was removed from Fahmi’s throat. The boy had slipped into a coma by then.

He was referred to the Penang General Hospital where he was in the intensive care unit for two days before being declared dead on Thursday night.

The boy’s father, Mohamad Fakhruddin Mohamad Fikri, 35, broke down as he told local news outlet Bharian that he couldn’t believe his son was gone.

He said his son went away as if “he was asleep”.

Police said they would investigate the death.

The incident sparked anger over the unregulated sale of such candies near school premises with many calling on educational institutions to keep a watch.

The Consumers Association of Penang, a local nonprofit, said such candies were sold in bright packaging to appeal to children, with few checks on expiry dates and levels of sugar and other toxic ingredients such as food colouring and flavour enhancers.

The organisation demanded stricter regulation to prevent the sale of junk food to children.

In January last year, a three-year-old child in California, US, was left permanently paralyzed after choking on a gummy candy. The parents later filed a lawsuit against Frankford Candy Co of Pennsylvania and Hasbro toy company of Rhode Island for allegedly failing to warn of choking hazards.

Man caught with 51 grams of heroin gets last-minute stay of execution

A Malaysian man convicted of trafficking 51 grams of heroin was granted a last-minute reprieve from execution by a Singapore appeals court on Wednesday.

Pannir Selvam Pranthaman, 37, was granted a stay of execution just a day before he was set to be hanged by the Singapore Prison authorities on Thursday, human rights activists fighting against his capital punishment said.

He was arrested in 2014 for carrying 51.8 grams of diamorphine, some strapped to his groin and some concealed in his motorcycle, into the city state. He was sentenced to death in 2017 by a high court judge, who said he was the “courier” involved in transporting the prohibited drug inside Singapore.

Singapore has a zero-tolerance policy for drug-related offences and regards them as the “most serious crime”. The government says the death penalty is a deterrent against drug trafficking and that most of its citizens support capital punishment.

However, critics say the law only targets low-level traffickers and couriers.

The appeals court allowed the stay of execution at the eleventh hour on the grounds that there is an ongoing constitutional challenge by other death row prisoners to a section under the drug law, said Kirsten Han, a Singaporean anti-death penalty activist.

While Pannir is not directly involved in the case, he has argued in the court that this case could potentially change the outcome of his conviction.

The appeals court also allowed his bid to mount another appeal against his conviction.

“This is a huge relief and very good news, but a stay of execution is not a complete stop,” Ms Han said. “What Singapore needs now is an immediate moratorium on the use of the death penalty, with a view to full abolition. Pannir lives tomorrow, but as Singaporeans we must keep fighting to make sure no one is killed in our names ever again.”

Pannir claimed he didn’t know he was carrying drugs, but the court had to sentence him to death as prosecutors refused to issue the Malaysian man a certificate of substantive assistance stating he had helped their investigation which would have spared him the noose.

Singapore carried out nine executions between 1 October 2024 and 7 February 2025, including eight of individuals convicted of drug trafficking.

Who is Delhi’s unexpected new leader Rekha Gupta?

Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has named Rekha Gupta, a former student leader, as Delhi’s chief minister after winning the legislative assembly election earlier this month.

The prime minister’s party returned to power in Delhi after 27 years, taking 48 of the state’s 70 legislative seats to oust the Aam Aadmi Party of Arvind Kejriwal.

Ms Gupta is set to be sworn in as chief minister on 20 February. “It is a miracle, it is a new motivation and a new chapter. If I can be the CM, this means ways are open for all the women,” Ms Gupta told the news agency ANI on Thursday.

Ms Gupta secured a decisive victory in this month’s assembly election, her first, winning the Shalimar Bagh constituency by 29,595 votes over AAP’s Bandana Kumari.

She thanked her party and pledged to work diligently to address Delhi’s many challenges such as air and river pollution and an urban infrastructure in urgent need of improvement.

In its campaign manifesto, the BJP promised to upgrade Delhi’s public schools, provide free healthcare and electricity and give a monthly stipend of Rs 2,500 ($29) to underprivileged women in the capital.

“There is only one priority: the commitments we have made to Delhi, the dream PM Modi has for Delhi, fulfilling it is my first and foremost priority,” Ms Gupta said. “We have staked claim to form government. Every single promise made to people of Delhi will be fulfilled in a time-bound manner.”

She also promised to combat corruption in government. “Anyone who has been corrupt will have to give an account of each and every rupee,” she said.

Ms Gupta, 50, was born in Nandgarh village of northern Haryana state’s Jind region and moved to Delhi with her parents when she was two. Her father worked for the State Bank of India.

Ms Gupta started her political career in 1993 at Daulat Ram College where she joined the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad, the student wing of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, the mothership of Hindu nationalist organisations including the BJP.

She went on to serve as the general secretary of the Delhi University Students Union from 1995 to 1996, and as its president from 1996 to 1997.

After leaving university with a master’s in management and arts, she formally joined the BJP and went on to serve as the general secretary of its Delhi chapter’s Mahila Morcha, or women’s wing. She was later appointed vice chairperson of the party’s national Mahila Morcha.

Ms Gupta entered electoral politics in 2007, winning the Municipal Corporation of Delhi election and becoming chair of its women’s welfare and child development committee. She was re-elected in 2012 and became vice-chairperson of the corporation’s key financial decision-making body.

From 2012 to 2013, she also held the role of education secretary of the New Delhi Municipal Council.

Ms Gupta will be Delhi’s fourth woman chief minister, a milestone in Indian politics where women in senior leadership roles are rare. There’s currently only one other woman chief minister in the country – All India Trinamool Congress party leader Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal.

The BJP’s decision to pick Ms Gupta as chief minister over frontrunner Parvesh Verma surprised pundits and party members, the Business Standard reported.

In spite of being a first-time legislator, Ms Gupta has considerable political experience as student leader and municipal councillor which helped her selection, the paper noted.

At the same time, Mr Verma’s political lineage – he is the son of former chief minister Sahib Singh Verma – may have worked against him given the BJP’s stance on dynastic politics.

After Ms Gupta’s selection was announced, an old clip of her seemingly vandalising property inside the Municipal Corporation of Delhi office began circulating on social media.

“She just became the new CM of Delhi. Good luck to the people of Delhi,” a user mocked.

Hong Kong’s oldest pro-democracy party is shutting down

Hong Kong’s largest pro-democracy party took an initial step toward dissolving Thursday, in the latest sign of the Chinese territory’s narrowing space for civil society groups following Beijing’s crackdown on dissent.

The Democratic Party’s central committee decided to set up a task force to look into the procedures involved in dissolving the party. A final decision would require approval of the party’s members.

Party chairperson Lo Kin Hei said at a news conference late Thursday that party leaders made the decision based the current political situation and social climate, and said the party did not have any acute financial burdens.

“When we have to move toward this direction, we, of course, feel it is a pity. I believe every member cherishes the existence of the Democratic Party in Hong Kong,” he said.

Founded in 1994, the Democratic Party is one of the few pro-democracy parties in Hong Kong, where political activism has faced a stern crackdown from China‘s central government in Beijing following anti-government protests by Hong Kongers in 2019.

Its prominent party members include Martin Lee, nicknamed the city’s “Father of Democracy,” Albert Ho, former leader of a now-defunct group that organised Tiananmen vigils, and journalist-turned-activist Emily Lau.

Over the years, the party has long been seen as a moderate opposition party that once maintained friendly relationships even with Beijing officials. Some of its former members had become top government officials, while radical members had criticized the party for being too mild.

But following the massive protests that rocked the Chinese territory in 2019, the city’s political environment changed drastically. Months of social unrest triggered Beijing to impose a national security law, which authorities insist is necessary for the city’s stability.

Since the law took effect in 2020, dozens of civil society groups have shut down, including the city’s once second-largest pro-democracy party and a decades-old group that organized the annual vigil to commemorate Beijing’s Tiananmen crackdown in 1989. Many leading activists were prosecuted under the law, including members of the Democratic Party. Others were forced into self-exile or silenced.

Last year, some of the party’s former lawmakers were convicted and sentenced over their roles in an unofficial primary election in the city’s largest national security case. That verdict drew criticism from foreign governments though Beijing defended it.

In recent years, the party has had limited influence over the city’s politics after the authorities overhauled the electoral rules in changes they said ensured that “patriots” administered Hong Kong, and that effectively barred pro-democracy candidates from running for seats in district councils.

Despite the changing climate, the party pressed on with its work. It continued holding news briefings on livelihood issues and even submitted opinions on proposed national security legislation to the government before the law was enacted last March.

In Thursday’s news conference, Mr Lo said disbandment would require support from 75 per cent of the attending members of a general assembly. The party now has 400 members, but typically not all members attend general meetings. In the past, the party has had both successful and failed attempts to secure enough votes to change its constitution, he said.

When the former British colony was returned to China‘s rule in 1997, the governing principle of “one country, two systems” was supposed to guarantee Western-style civil liberties and autonomy not enjoyed by mainland Chinese territories.

But Mr Lo said his party’s interpretation of this governing principle may differ from that of the Beijing government. He said he hoped these different views could remain in society, saying that societies improve only with diverse voices.

“The path to democracy is always difficult,” Mr Lo said. “I have confidence in Hong Kongers and Hong Kongers can always find ways to handle different matters.”