Secret video reveals gas chamber deaths of egg industry hens
Secretly recorded footage reveals hens apparently writhing in distress and desperately trying to escape as they are suffocated to death to provide meat for supermarkets including Tesco.
In what’s thought to be the first-ever video of its kind, the birds are seen twisting their necks as they are killed with carbon dioxide. They are also heard gasping for breath and emitting high-pitched shrieks.
The recording – which activists say was made at an abattoir endorsed by RSPCA Assured – shows hens being lowered into the gas chamber and dying over the course of several minutes.
Critics said the scenes laid bare the “horrors” behind egg production in the UK, including the fate of even free-range and organic hens.
Hens whose egg production has declined are dubbed “spent”, before they are killed and their carcasses are packaged for meat.
Animal-lovers have for years objected to the gassing of pigs with carbon dioxide, warning the animals “burn from the inside out” and suffer immensely in the last minutes of their lives.
Last year 99 per cent of “spent” hens were stunned and slaughtered with CO2; and 77 per cent of meat chickens were killed this way, according to government figures.
In recent years carbon dioxide as a slaughter method has gradually replaced electrical water bath stunning, which raised concerns over the inconsistency of stuns.
The footage, taken with hidden cameras, shows hens – female chickens used for laying eggs – twisting in distress as they die, and some birds apparently trying to escape.
The floor of the gas chamber was littered with dead birds that had jumped out of the crates, according to activist, filmmaker and vegan advocate Joey Carbstrong, who installed the cameras.
Mr Carbstrong and other activists say they shot the video at an abattoir in West Yorkshire run by HCF Poultry. The company denies it was shot at its premises.
HCF supplies Cranswick Foods, one of the UK’s largest meat producers, which processes the hens into chicken-meat products widely sold in Britain.
There is no suggestion of wrongdoing by either Cranswick or the abattoir as using CO2 is an entirely lawful way to slaughter chickens. However, Mr Carbstrong said the video exposed “the callous treatment of free-range hens when they are no longer profitable”.
“This footage dismantles the industry’s carefully curated image of ‘happy hens’ and reveals the horrifying truth of how these sensitive birds are discarded,” he said.
“The public are being misled by labelling and have a right to know the reality behind what they are buying.”
Mr Carbstrong added: “Egg-laying hens have been genetically manipulated to produce around 300 eggs per year – far beyond the 10 to 15 eggs naturally laid by their ancestor, the red junglefowl.
“This excessive egg production takes a severe toll on their bodies in multiple ways. Regardless of whether they are free-range, barn-kept or caged, most hens are crammed by the tens of thousands into filthy sheds, where disease runs rampant and cannibalism of dead and dying birds is widespread.
“After just 18 months of relentless exploitation, they are forced to experience a terrifying and agonising death, before being processed into food products.”
The Independent has previously revealed one case of hens being kept in “cruelly overcrowded” cages with insufficient water and another when sick and dying hens were found alongside living ones at a free-range egg farm supplying leading supermarkets as well as Marks & Spencer.
Around 35 million “spent” hens a year are killed for their meat, figures show. HCF can process 10,500 birds per hour, according to a document from 2018, the latest available.
Jenny L Mace, an associate lecturer in animal welfare at the University of Winchester, wrote in a report on the footage that the most concerning findings were the high-pitched shrieks, gasping, collisions with equipment, and chickens falling against one another and out of the crates.
“Without use of a significantly less aversive gas or gas mixture, it is difficult to see how this method equates to a viable (high-welfare) replacement to the former slaughter method of shackling chickens upside down and stunning in a water bath, and a humane death,” she wrote.
She said CO2 caused respiratory distress, adding that describing it as an anaesthetic “may be misleading” because of the distress inhaling it causes.
“There is no suggestion of this case being a ‘bad apple’; this is standard practice and in accordance with legislation,” she wrote.
Andrew Opie, of the British Retail Consortium, said on behalf of Tesco and other supermarkets: “Our members know how important animal welfare is to their customers and take their responsibilities to animal welfare very seriously to ensure that expected standards are being met.”
RSPCA Assured said the birds in the footage were already unconscious and were not in pain.
A spokesperson said the footage was deeply upsetting but that carbon dioxide was permitted under RSPCA welfare standards, adding: “However, RSPCA standards set requirements that go above the law to ensure a more humane process.
“Due to their physiology, when birds lose consciousness their brains no longer have control over their bodies, which can cause involuntary movements as seen in the footage. This can be incredibly difficult to watch but the birds are actually unconscious when this happens, and are not experiencing pain.”
Cranswick Foods did not respond to a request to comment.
Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner ignite a rivalry that can change tennis forever
Witnessing tennis history – and the longest French Open final of all time – was both a privilege and the ultimate test of bladder endurance. But thank you, Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner, for the five hours and 29 minutes of astonishing athleticism, spell-binding shot-making, remarkable resilience and drama of the highest order in producing a match that will forever be in the discussion for the greatest of all time. I’m not going to pretend that I saw Bjorn Borg defeat John McEnroe in the 1980 Wimbledon final, while, on a personal level, Rafael Nadal’s epic triumph over Roger Federer and the fading light on Centre Court to win the 2008 Wimbledon final will forever be tinted by a certain nostalgia that heightens the emotions.
But one of the joys of witnessing what Alcaraz and Sinner produced on Sunday and feeling every point is that it is, retrospectively, impossible to properly summarise all the moments of magic and astonishing twists, as the two young rivals pushed themselves and their electric rivalry into another galaxy. I have a Google Doc that will forever now be enshrined with the title “Alcaraz and Sinner draft”, where I was making game-by-game notes, piecing together a running narrative of the final, and formulating dual intros to cover both outcomes. It reached nearly 4,000 words– the majority of which was rendered completely useless by the time Alcaraz had saved three match points to stay alive and then Sinner climbed off the canvas to force the fifth-set tiebreak.
Sitting inside Court Philippe-Chatrier, you could not help being swept up by the irresistible force of Alcaraz, as the 22-year-old raised his level and took off on a staggering surge that surely no player in the sport’s history could subdue. Perhaps that’s a big claim, but like his epic comeback over the most successful men’s player of all time, Novak Djokovic in the 2023 Wimbledon final – another all-time classic – Alcaraz played his best tennis after being backed into a corner. It’s a unique quality, and a gift: the deeper the hole Alcaraz was in, the harder he fought to dig himself out. With the crowd on his side and Alcaraz riding the wave of his own momentum, it felt as if the Spaniard was unlocking new shots. Afterwards, he could barely believe where it got him. “The level was insane,” he said.
But boy was it hard not to feel for the 23-year-old Sinner, who had pushed Alcaraz to go there. When he is across the net from Alcaraz, Sinner’s own qualities are even more evident: the clinical precision of his crunching groundstrokes, the awesome, effortless power he produces on both sides, and the sharpness of his movement across the baseline. His more reserved, considered personality is reflected, too, against the fire of Alcaraz on the other side of the net. There is also an aura around Sinner, though, when he walks into a room – a focus that convinces you that he will be in a position to win every grand slam title over the next 10 years. Or at least there was in Paris before Alcaraz shattered it. The world No 1 was understandably broken when he came into the media theatre an hour or so after the final. “This one hurts,” Sinner said.
There is every chance that this defeat becomes a defining moment in Sinner’s career and those closest to him will have an important role to play in the coming days. But the Italian, from a small German-speaking Alpine town near the northern border, is kept grounded by his family. His dad, who is a chef at a mountain restaurant, missed the French Open final due to work. “We are just very simple family, you know,” Sinner said. “Nothing of our success changes in the family.”
He remains the dominant world No 1, who had won 31 consecutive grand slam sets before Alcaraz forced the fourth, and who has won 47 of the 50 matches he has played since August. The problem remains Alcaraz, who is responsible for all three of those defeats, and has now won five matches in a row against his young rival, including their first grand slam final.
“It’s not going to be a turning point,” Alcaraz said, fiercely. “I’m sure he’s going to learn from this match, and he’s going to come back stronger the next time we are going to face against each other. I’m pretty sure he’s going to [do] his homework. I repeat: I’m not going to beat him forever.”
It is another element of what makes the Alcaraz-Sinner rivalry so fascinating. The rest of the world’s best players are scared of Sinner and believe they can beat Alcaraz if his focus drops. But Alcaraz always raises his game against Sinner. Like Djokovic chasing Nadal and Federer after they dominated grand slam titles in the unprecedented era of the “Big Three”, Alcaraz and Sinner are going to push each other to new heights every time they play.
“For the sport, it’s something amazing to have these players after Roger and Rafa – and Novak is still playing, of course,” said Alcaraz’s coach and former world No 1 Juan Carlos Ferrero. “They know they have to play unbelievable tennis to beat the other guy and it’s something that is going to help for sure each player to raise the level even more.”
There is a long way to go before two young men can join Djokovic, Nadal and Federer at that table, but they have already absorbed some of the talents and qualities of the Big Three to write themselves into the record books with one of the greatest matches ever played. Alcaraz has Federer’s shot-making and Nadal’s intense belief, Sinner has developed Djokovic’s elasticity to defend the baseline, and both have the explosive power of attacking shots that is crucial in the modern game. They are playing even faster than the generation before them. “I’m sure that we’re going to see them lifting the big trophies quite often,” Djokovic said after his defeat to Sinner in the semi-finals.
Between them, they already account for six grand slam titles in a row. At 22, Alcaraz already has five, becoming a five-time champion at the same age – to the day – as his idol Nadal. Now with two French Opens and two Wimbledons, Alcaraz comes alive on the natural surfaces, but Sinner, with two Australian Opens and the US Open, has a 21-match winning run at the hard-court grand slams. And like a thrilling, extended rally between Alcaraz and Sinner, switching between unreal pace and sublime touch, we will all watch open-mouthed as they go stride for stride in a world that is now their own.
Trump stumbles on steps up to Air Force One
President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio both stumbled as they boarded Air Force One on Sunday on their way to Camp David.
The stumble came after Trump gaggled with reporters in Hagerstown, Maryland, when he was asked if he would be willing to invoke the Insurrection Act in response to the protests against immigration raids in Los Angeles.
“Depends on whether or not there’s an insurrection,” said Trump.
A reporter asked if he believes there is an insurrection taking place.
“No, no, but you have violent people,” he added. “And we’re not going to let them get away with it.”
Asked if he would deploy troops even without invoking the Insurrection Act, Trump said, “We’re going to have troops everywhere. We’re not going to let this happen to our country. We’re not going to let our country be torn apart like it was under Biden.”
Trump frequently mocked former President Joe Biden for the stumbles he took during his time in office. This time, it was Trump facing the mockery of social media users.
“I’m surprised he hasn’t replaced those stairs with a portable escalator of some kind,” RC Huffman said.
“Time to get Old Man Trump fitted for a wheelchair,” said Ron Filipkowski.
Northwestern law lecturer Jason DeSanto added: “More beta energy.”
“When Joe Biden did stuff like this, Fox would play the clips over and over like it was as significant as the moon landing,” journalist Aaron Rupar noted.
“Cannot wait for all the books and wall-to-wall coverage,” political strategist Marco Frieri said.
In the summer of 2023, Trump mocked Biden for falling at the Air Force graduation ceremony in Colorado.
He said it was “not inspiring” for the graduates to have seen the then-president take a tumble over a sandbag.
“I hope he wasn’t hurt. I hope he wasn’t hurt…You don’t want that,” said Trump during a campaign event in Iowa.
He then pointed back to when he tiptoed down a ramp in 2020 at the Army’s West Point graduation ceremony.
“The whole thing is crazy, you have got to be careful about that, you don’t want that even if you have to tiptoe down a ramp,” he said at the time.
He added that the ramp was “like an ice-skating rink.”
Following the 2024 election and Biden’s departure from the campaign in the summer of 2024, leaving then-Vice President Kamala Harris to pick up the mantle, there has been widespread reporting regarding Biden’s physical and mental struggles as he aged in office.
It has been reported that aides discussed the use of a wheelchair if Biden had won a second term in the White House.
Gaza-bound aid ship with Greta Thunberg onboard seized by Israel
The Madleen boat has reached the Ashdod port in Israel after Israeli forces intercepted the Gaza-bound vessel off the coast of Egypt.
Israel has vowed to deport all 12 activists on board the Madleen, including climate activist Greta Thunberg.
The UK-flagged boat, which was carrying a symbolic amount of aid and intended to break Israel’s naval blockade around Gaza, in place since 2007, was intercepted in the early hours of Monday morning.
The Freedom Flotilla Coalition, which had organised the voyage, said the activists were “kidnapped by Israeli forces” while trying to deliver desperately needed aid to the territory.
The Israeli foreign minstry said the passengers of the boat are currently undergoing medical examinations after arriving at Ashdod port.
Defence minister Israel Katz has dismissed the activists as engaged in a publicity stunt and said the vessel would be transported to the port of Ashdod.
Mr Katz said he had told the military to force the passengers to watch videos of the Hamas atrocities of 7 October upon arrival “to see exactly who the terrorist organisation they came to support and for whom they work is”.
Cambridge professor accused of faking poor IQ test to boost £1m brain injury compensation claim
A Cambridge University professor has been accused of deliberately flunking IQ and memory tests in a bid to boost a £1m brain damage compensation claim over botched treatment for a stroke.
Orthopaedic surgeon and Cambridge school of medicine lecturer Dr Mohamed Atef Hakmi, 64, was left with permanent disabilities and had to give up surgery after suffering a stroke at home in November 2016.
Claiming a failure to promptly diagnose his stroke meant he missed the chance of vital treatment, resulting in brain damage and physical disabilities, he is now suing the NHS in London’s High Court for more than £1million damages.
But after scoring only a “very bad” 84 on a pre-trial IQ test as part of the case – putting him well below the UK average, despite continuing to teach at one of the world’s most prestigious universities – Dr Hakmi has been forced to deny deliberately throwing the tests to boost his claim.
Dr Hakmi is a Hertfordshire-based orthopaedic surgeon and medical educator, who specialises in foot and ankle surgery, as well as lecturing in the UK and abroad.
He is a fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons and an affiliated assistant professor at Cambridge University, where he performs a teaching role, the court heard.
He first suffered a stroke in September 2016, but was given clot-busting thrombolysis treatment and made a very good recovery, returning to the operating theatre within weeks.
But his barrister, Robert Kellar KC, told Judge David Pittaway KC that the surgeon had suffered a second stroke in November 2016, first spotting the symptoms while he worked late at night on paperwork.
When the symptoms returned again in the early hours, he went to Lister Hospital, in Stevenage, calling ahead and telling staff that he was having a stroke, said the barrister.
However, he was not given the same treatment as before after being examined by an A&E doctor and then having spoken to a stroke specialist on the phone in line with the NHS’ remote stroke treatment system.
He says he was told he would not be offered thrombolysis because he was “not having a stroke,” with the remote doctor suggesting it could be simply a migraine or epilepsy.
It was not until 9am that day that his stroke was diagnosed at the hospital, at which point it was too late to be treated with the same drugs as before.
Dr Hakmi accuses the NHS of “cumulative and inter-related” failings, including a “cursory and sub-standard examination” in A&E and the fact that he was only able to speak to the remote stroke specialist on the phone due to the NHS’ Telemedicine system malfunctioning.
Mr Kellar said Dr Hakmi had been left permanently disabled by the stroke, but that the worst of the injuries could have been avoided if not for the negligence of staff at Lister and on the remote stroke line.
As well as a limp and reduced sensation in his fingers and toes, he suffers from fatigue in his right arm, hand and grip, preventing him performing complex tasks for long periods.
He was also left with a brain injury, which has resulted in short-term memory impairment, impaired concentration, reduced processing speed and “executive deficits.”
“His confidence is low, and he is experiencing significant depressive symptoms due to physical, cognitive, speech, and language issues resulting from his second stroke, which are negatively affecting important aspects of his life,” he said.
“Thus, Dr Hakmi presents with cognitive deterioration, including intellectual functioning, memory, the speed at which he is processing information and executive functioning.
“At the time of the index incident, he was undertaking full-time NHS employment and had a busy private practice.
“He no longer has any private practice. He has returned to his NHS employment but is undertaking restricted duties because of the issues arising from his second stroke.
“He no longer does any surgery. But for the breach of duty, the claimant is likely to have made a good recovery. He would have been able to return to all types of surgery that did not require a high degree of manual dexterity.”
But NHS barrister John de Bono KC denied that Dr Hakmi is due any damages payout at all and accused him of hamming up his symptoms while being assessed by experts before the trial.
As well as the “very bad” IQ score, he had scored at the very bottom of the range in memory tests, the barrister told the court.
He said that Dr Hakmi had scored only 84 on an IQ test, putting him below 86% of the general population, adding: “That’s very bad – it suggests it would be hard to function as a surgeon or as an educator at that level.”
He had also been assessed by two neuropsychologists, who had performed memory tests, with “very surprising” and sometimes “astonishing” results which he said raised a “serious concern about whether he was putting forward his best effort” in the tests.
Dr Hakmi was unable to recall more than four single digit numbers in a row during one examination and scored so low in the tests that in some respects he was below 99% of the population, despite continuing to work as an “educator” at undergraduate level.
“You scored astonishingly badly for someone operating at the level you are describing this morning,” he said, referencing the fact Dr Hakmi had spoken with pride in the witness box of his work with Cambridge University.
“I understand you feel very strongly that you have suffered greatly as a result of this second stroke,” he continued.
“I understand that you feel the reason you have suffered as badly as you have is because of mistakes or negligence. I understand it must make you angry.”
He went on to suggest that Dr Hakmi’s “sense of injustice” may have led to a desire to make sure that “people fully understand the impact this has had on you.”
“Is it possible when you went to be tested that you performed worse than you should have done because you were trying to demonstrate to them just how big the impact had been?
“One possibility which I put to you is that you were deliberately underperforming.”
But Dr Hakmi denied playing up for the medics who assessed him pre-trial, telling the court he had found the tests “exhausting.”
He denied being dishonest with the doctors, telling the judge, “it was an exhausting environment when the tests were done in a lengthy and not organised manner.
“Anybody can fail a test but they must be given the best chance,” he continued.
“I definitely have a memory problem, slow effort. I have done everything to mitigate my losses. I know definitely I’m not as before I had the stroke.”
Mr de Bono pressed on, referring to a “memory and malingering” test which had resulted in a score “very nearly at chance level,” telling Mr Hakmi: “Someone giving random answers would nearly have scored as badly as you.”
Accusing him of “not being straightforward” with those who assessed him pre-trial, he said: “There is a pattern emerging. In any given situation, you will try and say whatever you think is going to help you most to achieve whatever your aim is.”
But Dr Hakmi hit back: “I have been straightforward in everything in my life. I have aimed to be a surgeon again, but I have failed.”
The damages claim is against the East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, which runs the Lister Hospital, and the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, where the remote stroke doctor who spoke to Dr Hakmi was based.
The trusts both deny blame, saying he was “at all times treated with reasonable care and skill by highly competent clinicians.”
He was assessed as being unsuitable for thrombolysis treatment because his symptoms were not serious enough and it was too late after the onset of his symptoms.
Such treatment can also be risky, carrying a significant risk of brain haemorrhage and death, said the NHS barrister, and even if he had been given it the outcome would probably have been the same.
The trial continues.
The 7 best outdoor adventures in Sydney and New South Wales
Whether you’re lacing up your hiking boots, throwing on a wetsuit to catch some waves, or hitting the wide-open roads of New South Wales (NSW) by campervan, this Australian state is home to some of the country’s most exciting outdoor adventures – all easily accessible thanks to Qantas’ extensive domestic network.
Flying into Sydney with Qantas is the ideal way to experience a slice of Australia before you’ve even landed. And with onboard wellbeing perks, plus the option to book more discounted domestic legs using Qantas Explorer, it really is the savvy traveller’s best way to explore Australia.
Here are seven next-level outdoor adventures in NSW, and the best way to get there.
Sydney might be a modern metropolis, but it’s also home to an extraordinary natural playground, the star attraction of which is Sydney Harbour National Park. This protected area weaves through the city’s coastline, offering walking trails, secluded beaches, and panoramic views that blend wild bushland with iconic urban landmarks. Away from the National Park, you can paddle a kayak at dawn beneath the Sydney Harbour Bridge, go on a cycle tour and sunset cruise around Manly and North Heads coastal cliffs, or follow the Bondi to Coogee coastal walk for sweeping ocean views and refreshing swim spots.
Just a 90-minute trip from Sydney by road, the UNESCO World Heritage-listed Blue Mountains is an endless landscape of towering eucalyptus forests and striking sandstone cliffs as far as the eye can see. There are few places quite as grand as this so close to a city. Don your hiking boots and traverse spectacular scenery to Wentworth Falls or take on the Grand Canyon Track – a 6km loop of dramatic cliffs, fern-fringed valleys and thundering waterfalls with lookouts to match. If you’re an early riser, watch the sunrise at Echo Point, where the Three Sisters rock formation is lit up by the glow of first light.
Wildlife lovers need to head north to Port Macquarie for some of the best marine encounters on the east coast. Humpback whales are almost guaranteed from May to November, and dolphins can be spotted all year round. For front-row views, jump on a whale-watching cruise, or pitch up with a picnic on a headland and watch the breaching giants from afar.
Swap the sandy beaches for subtropical rainforest in Coffs Harbour’s hinterland in Dorrigo National Park, where winding roads serpentine through flourishing banana plantations, dense palm-filled forest and endless rolling hills. The region’s cycling trails range from casual loops to more challenging rides with jaw-to-the-floor sea views.
Aussies love their surfing, and Byron Bay is the epitome of surf culture Down Under, with beaches to suit all skill levels; from the gentle swell at The Pass to barrel-laden breaks at Tallows. If you’ve got any stamina left, soak up the view from Cape Byron Lighthouse post-surf – the easternmost point of mainland Australia.
With over 8,000 islands to its name, Australia offers the ultimate in island adventures. Lord Howe is one of them, a UNESCO World Heritage-listed pristine island, where only 400 visitors are allowed at any one time. You’ll find rare birds, kaleidoscopic coral reefs, and Mount Gower, offering one of the best day hikes in the country, with epic coastline views and dizzying drops.
For those who need more than a beach stroll to get the heart pumping, grab a kayak and explore the Sapphire Coast from the water in Merimbula. Glide over crystal-clear waters, past secluded coves, pristine beaches, and the untouched beauty of surrounding national parks. Keep an eye out for dolphins and other marine life as you paddle. Once back on shore, refuel with the region’s famous fresh oysters and enjoy a refreshing dip at Bar Beach.
Book your flight to Sydney today at qantas.com and start your Australian adventure.
Full list of 19 countries hit by Trump travel ban as it comes into force
President Donald Trump’s order banning the citizens of 12 countries from entering the United States has come into force on Monday.
The directive, signed on Wednesday last week, is part of an immigration crackdown Trump launched this year at the start of his second term, which has also included the deportation to El Salvador of hundreds of Venezuelans suspected of being gang members, as well as efforts to deny enrollments of some foreign students and deport others.
“We will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm,” Trump said in a video posted on X arguing the ban was designed to protect the country from “foreign terrorists”. He said the list could be revised and new countries could be added.
Follow The Independent’s live blog on Donald Trump’s feud with Elon Musk here.
The proclamation came into effect at 12:01 am EDT (04:01 GMT) on Monday. Visas issued before that date will not be revoked, the order said.
Trump said in a social media address that a recent Molotov cocktail attack on Jewish activists in Colorado, allegedly carried out by an Egyptian man, highlighted the need for such restrictions.
Mohamed Sabry Soliman, the alleged attacker, remained in the U.S. after his travel visa and subsequent work authorization expired, according to the government.
“The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, has underscored the extreme danger posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas,” Trump said from the Oval Office. “We don’t want them.”
During his first term in office, Trump announced a ban on travelers from seven Muslim-majority nations, a policy that went through several iterations before it was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018.
Former President Joe Biden repealed that ban on nationals from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen in 2021, calling it “a stain on our national conscience.”
Trump said the countries subject to the most severe restrictions were determined to harbor a “large-scale presence of terrorists,” fail to cooperate on visa security and have an inability to verify travelers’ identities, inadequate record-keeping of criminal histories and high rates of visa overstays in the United States.
“We cannot have open migration from any country where we cannot safely and reliably vet and screen those who seek to enter the United States,” Trump said.
President Donald Trump cited a range of reasons for placing 19 countries under new travel bans or restrictions in the U.S.
They include allegations of lax screening of travelers, “a significant terrorist presence” in its territory, a government that wasn’t cooperative enough in accepting deported citizens or residents who were prone to overstaying their visas in the United States.
Here are the 12 countries placed under the ban, and the seven placed under travel restrictions:
Trump’s proclamation declares that there is not a reliable central authority for vetting nationals who leave the country, or for issuing passports, therefore raising the risk of national security.
A spokesperson for the Taliban-led Afghan foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Citizens from Chad were accused of having high visa overstay rates in the U.S., the proclamation said.
The high rate of visa overstays by immigrants from Chad, which has a population just under 20 million, showed a “blatant disregard for United States immigration laws”, the proclamation read.
The entry of immigrants to the US from Equatorial Guinea, a small central African country of under two million people, has been fully suspended by the U.S..
This is on account of the high rate of visa overstays, The White House said.
The central African country of more than six million people sits west of the Congo River.
It was suspended for alleged high visa overstay rates, the proclamation stated.
The US says criminal records for Eritrean nationals are not available in the U.S., and accuses the country of refusing to accept back its “removable nationals”
Questioning the “competence of the central authority” and pointing to a high rate of visa overstay of Eritrean immigrants, the US has imposed a full ban on the northeast African country of around 3.5 million.
The White House said in the proclamation that “hundreds of thousands of illegal Haitian aliens flooded into the United States during the Biden Administration”.
The increase in migration from Haiti has increased national security rates and the establishment of criminal networks, it said, adding that Haitian authorities do not sufficiently ensure its nationals do not undermine U.S. security.
Iran, one of the most powerful countries in the MIddle East with a population of 90 million, has a long history of tense relations with the U.S.
“Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism,” the proclamation reads. “Iran regularly fails to cooperate with the United States Government in identifying security risks, is the source of significant terrorism around the world, and has historically failed to accept back its removable nationals.”
The US alleges that Libya does not have a competent authority for issuing passports, adding that the “historical terrorist presence” in the country poses a risk to U.S. nationals.
A full ban has been imposed on the north African country.
Myanmar has failed to cooperate with the U.S. to “accept back their removable nationals”, the White House says, while immigrants from the war-torn nation have a high visa overstay rate in the US.
A full ban has been imposed on immigration from the southeast Asian nation.
Somalia “stands apart from other countries in the degree to which its government lacks command and control of its territory”, the White House said.
The Trump administration has described the east African country as a “terrorist safe haven” which has refused to accept the return of its “removable nationals” and poses a threat to the U.S.
Migration from Sudan, which the U.S. says has a high visa overstay rate and does not have appropriate vetting measures for its emigrants, has been fully suspended.
Millions of people have been displaced in Sudan and fled the country altogether, as it remains in the grip of a brutal civil war with devastating humanitarian consequences.
The Yemeni government does not have physical control over its own territory, the U.S. says, and does not sufficiently vet those leaving the country, the proclamation states.
The U.S. has also engaged in military operations on Yemeni territory with the Houthi rebel group, it notes.
Burundi, the east African country of 13 million people, has seen a partial ban on immigration of its citizens to the U.S.
The validity of nonimmigrant visas will be reduced as far as the law allows, the proclamation states.
The Trump administration describes Cuba as a “state sponsor of terrorism”, adding that it fails to share “sufficient law enforcement information with the United States”.
Barack Obama had sought an easing of relations with Cuba on the back-end of his presidency, something which has since been reversed by presidents Trump and Biden.
Immigrants from Laos are accused by the U.S. of having high overstay rates. The country’s government does not accept back nationals who have been removed from the U.S., the proclamation adds.
Entry of nationals from Laos, the southeast Asian country of 7.6 million, has therefore been suspended.
Sierra Leone, the west African country where the U.S. attempted to bring peace during a civil war in the 1990s, has been added to the partial suspension.
The proclamation cites high visa overstay rates, and accuses the government of failing to accept returned immigrants.
Togo, in West Africa, has been added to the list on account of the high overstay rates of its immigrants to the U.S., the White House proclamation read.
“These restrictions distinguish between, but apply to both, the entry of immigrants and nonimmigrants,” Trump said.
Turkmenistan has also seen migration of its citizens to the U.S. restricted due to alleged high visa overstay rates.
The central Asian country has a population of 7.3 million.
As of January 2025, there were approximately 607,000 Venezuelans living in the U.S., according to the Migration Policy Institute.
The proclamation states that a high number of these immigrants overstayed their visa, and accused the country of failing to have strong vetting processes for its nationals who emigrate.
Chad president Mahamat Idriss Deby Itno said he had instructed his government to stop granting visas to U.S. citizens in response to Trump’s action.
“Chad has neither planes to offer nor billions of dollars to give, but Chad has its dignity and its pride,” he said in a Facebook post, referring to countries such as Qatar, which gifted the U.S. a luxury airplane for Trump’s use and promised to invest billions of dollars in the U.S.
Somalia immediately pledged to work with the U.S. to address security issues.
“Somalia values its longstanding relationship with the United States and stands ready to engage in dialogue to address the concerns raised,” Dahir Hassan Abdi, the Somali ambassador to the United States, said in a statement.
Venezuelan Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello, a close ally of President Nicolas Maduro, responded on Wednesday evening by describing the U.S. government as fascist and warning Venezuelans of being in the U.S.
“The truth is being in the United States is a big risk for anybody, not just for Venezuelans … They persecute our countrymen, our people for no reason.”
Trump’s presidential campaign focused on a tough border strategy and he previewed his plan in an October 2023 speech, pledging to restrict people from the Gaza Strip, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Yemen and “anywhere else that threatens our security.”
Trump issued an executive order on January 20 requiring intensified security vetting of any foreigners seeking admission to the U.S. to detect national security threats.
Vegetarians are more power-hungry than meat eaters, research suggests
Vegetarians are more likely to seek power and prize achievements over their meat-eating counterparts, new research has suggested.
A study which assessed the values of more than 3,500 adults in Poland and the United States found that the 800 participants who were vegetarian were most likely to align themselves with values that improved their social status.
Those included higher levels of personal ambition and a keener appetite for “novelty and challenge in life”.
Meanwhile, meat-eaters were found to align themselves closer to values of tradition, such as respecting established norms, and conformity, meaning a desire not to upset others and to comply with socially accepted conventions.
They also placed more emphasis on benevolence, such as kindness towards friends and family, and security.
Professor John Nezlek of SWPS University in Warsaw, who led the research, told The Times said: “There’s this long association between meat and masculinity. It’s far more common for women to adopt vegetarianism than men, and there are three main reasons that people become vegetarians: health, the environment and animal welfare ethics.
“When you pile all of that together, you might start to think that vegetarians would be more benevolent, a little less assertive, generally more ‘huggy’ people — but I found the complete opposite.”
Participants in both Poland and the US were handed brief sketches of fictional individuals accompanied by descriptions, such as: “Being very successful is important to him. He likes to impress other people.”
They were then asked to rank how much they related to the character from a scale of one to six.
The report found that those who follow a vegetarian diet were likely to be independent thinkers who are not afraid to “march to the beat of a different drum”, given that they are a minority in many countries.
“In the face of such beliefs and in the face of the experiences of rejection and criticism that may accompany the expression of such beliefs vegetarians need to be committed and hold their beliefs strongly,” the report found.
It concluded: “The present results suggest that although vegetarians may be more sensitive to the pain and suffering of animals and may be more aware of threats to the environment than non-vegetarians, this sensitivity and awareness do not reflect the basic human value of benevolence.
“Moreover, the present results suggest that vegetarians hold values consistent with being members of a social minority who are willing to stand by their principles. Although the present studies leave important questions unanswered, they suggests a path forward.”