The New York Times 2024-07-26 12:10:31


Middle East Crisis: Harris Expresses Support for Israel but Says She ‘Will Not Be Silent’ About Palestinian Suffering

Harris offers support for Israel but calls out Palestinians’ plight after Netanyahu meeting.

Vice President Kamala Harris offered Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu strong support for Israel’s right to defend itself from terrorism on Thursday but declared that “far too many innocent civilians” had died in Gaza and that “I will not be silent” about their suffering.

In what amounted to her debut on the world stage since her rapid ascension as the presumptive Democratic nominee for president, Ms. Harris sought to strike a balance and capture what she called “the complexity” of the strife in the Middle East. But while she did not stray from President Biden on policy, she struck a stronger tone on the plight of Palestinians.

“What has happened in Gaza over the past nine months is devastating,” she told reporters after meeting with Mr. Netanyahu at the White House complex. “The images of dead children and desperate, hungry people fleeing for safety, sometimes displaced for the second, third or fourth time — we cannot look away in the face of these tragedies, we cannot allow ourselves to become numb to the suffering, and I will not be silent.”

She noted that she had also met with the families of Israeli hostages held by Hamas since its Oct. 7 terrorist attack and expressed distress for their anguish, making a point of reciting the names of each of the hostages with U.S. citizenship. “I’ve told them each time they are not alone, and I stand with them,” she said. “And President Biden and I are working every day to bring them home.”

In a sign of the changing order in Washington since Mr. Biden withdrew from the presidential race on Sunday, Ms. Harris offered the only substantive comments after Mr. Netanyahu met separately with each of them. She pressed for the conclusion of a long-delayed cease-fire deal to end the war and bring the hostages home.

Many were watching Ms. Harris, given her new role. Over the nine months since the Hamas attack, she has largely stuck close to the president’s position, although at times she has sounded more empathetic about the suffering in Gaza, leading some to conclude that she might not be as supportive of Mr. Netanyahu’s war as Mr. Biden has been.

Republicans criticized Ms. Harris for not attending the prime minister’s address to Congress on Wednesday while keeping a previously scheduled out-of-town commitment, although they had no criticism for Senator JD Vance of Ohio, their own Republican vice-presidential nominee, for also skipping the speech, citing a scheduling conflict.

Clearly determined not to let herself be painted into a corner, Ms. Harris made a point of denouncing the “despicable acts by unpatriotic protesters” who burned a flag and defaced statues with anti-Israel slogans outside the Capitol on Wednesday.

“I condemn any individuals associating with the brutal terrorist organization Hamas, which has vowed to annihilate the State of Israel and kill Jews,” she said in a written statement issued hours before her meeting with Mr. Netanyahu. “Pro-Hamas graffiti and rhetoric is abhorrent, and we must not tolerate it in our nation.”

The administration’s support of Israel’s war effort, even with the qualms Mr. Biden has expressed about the civilian toll and his suspension of a shipment of munitions, had been a thorny issue for his re-election campaign. He has faced criticism from some Democrats for not exerting more pressure on Mr. Netanyahu to limit the carnage and end the fighting.

The contrast between the prime minister’s meetings with Ms. Harris and Mr. Biden on Thursday was striking. The president greeted Mr. Netanyahu cordially in the Oval Office. “Well, welcome back, Mr. Prime Minister,” Mr. Biden said as the two sat down for what would be a 90-minute meeting. “We’ve got a lot to talk about. I think we should get to it.”

While the two have been at odds over the conduct of the war for months, Mr. Biden offered no thoughts about the situation on the ground while reporters were in the room and instead turned the floor over to Mr. Netanyahu, who used the opportunity to express gratitude now that the president is winding up his long political career.

“Mr. President, we’ve known each other for 40 years, and you’ve known every Israeli prime minister for 50 years, from Golda Meir,” Mr. Netanyahu told him. “So from a proud Jewish Zionist to a proud Irish American Zionist, I want to thank you for 50 years of public service and 50 years of support for the state of Israel. And I look forward to discussing with you today and working with you in the months ahead on the great issues before us.”

Mr. Biden grinned at the reference to him as an “Irish American Zionist” and then said he looked forward to their discussions as well. “By the way, that first meeting with Prime Minister Golda Meir, and she had an assistant sitting next to me, a guy named Rabin,” he said, referring to Yitzhak Rabin, who would later become prime minister. “That’s how far back it goes. I was only 12 then.”

Ms. Harris, by contrast, was polite but businesslike in greeting Mr. Netanyahu in her ceremonial office in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building next to the White House, and the two offered no statements in front of the cameras as they began their 40-minute meeting. When she emerged afterward to make her comments, she did so by herself, and the Israelis were surprised by her tone.

She expressed solidarity with Israel, reiterating her “unwavering commitment” to its existence and its security, and she condemned Hamas as a “brutal terrorist organization” that had started the war when it “massacred 1,200 innocent people, including 44 Americans” and “committed horrific acts of sexual violence.”

“Israel has a right to defend itself,” she said, then added pointedly, “and how it does so matters.”

John F. Kirby, a White House spokesman, played down any differences between the president and vice president on Gaza. “She’s been a full partner in our policies in the Middle East,” he told reporters before either meeting.

Mr. Biden and Mr. Netanyahu met with families of hostages held by Hamas amid renewed confidence about prospects for a cease-fire deal that would release their loved ones. Some of the hostage relatives said as they left the White House that they were convinced the American and Israeli leaders both felt urgency to bring the war to an end so that those captured during the Oct. 7 attack could come home.

“We feel probably more optimistic than we have since the first round of releases in late November, early December,” said Jonathan Dekel-Chen, the father of Sagui Dekel-Chen, who lived on the kibbutz Nir Oz.

“We got an absolute commitment from the Biden administration and from Prime Minister Netanyahu that they understand the urgency of this moment now to waste no time and to complete this deal, as it currently stands with as little change as humanly possible within,” he added.

Rachel Goldberg-Polin, whose son Hersh Goldberg-Polin was grievously injured during the attack but seen in a video released in April, said Mr. Biden’s decision to give up his re-election bid would not diminish his ability to influence events in the region.

“On the contrary, I actually think it allows the president to be laser focused on the things that are true priorities to him,” she said. “And saving human beings, cherished human beings, 115 of them, eight of whom are U.S. citizens, is one paramount issue for him.”

Mr. Kirby said that the negotiators “are closer now, we believe, than we’ve been before” but that there were still gaps. He did not blame Israel in particular for resisting. “The Israelis already have made many compromises to get us to this point,” he said. “Hamas through their interlocutors have made compromises to get us to this point. And yet we’re still not there. So there’s still a need for compromise.”

The White House meeting came a day after Mr. Netanyahu used his address to a joint meeting of Congress to denounce critics of Israel, particularly left-wing protesters he termed “useful idiots.” Police used pepper spray outside the Capitol to push back thousands of protesters, some of whom burned an American flag and marred statues with slogans like “Hamas is coming.” On Thursday, protesters were kept at a distance from the White House by a new wall of fencing beyond the normal gates as they shouted upon Mr. Netanyahu’s arrival.

Mr. Netanyahu planned to hedge his bets by making a trip to Florida to visit former President Donald J. Trump at his Mar-a-Lago estate on Friday. But Mr. Trump, who has soured on Mr. Netanyahu after their initially strong alliance, may not offer the message the prime minister wants to hear.

In an interview on Fox News on Thursday, the former president said that Israel should wrap up the war soon because it has yielded bad public relations for the country. Israel should “finish up and get it done quickly,” Mr. Trump said, “because they are getting decimated with this publicity.”

Zach Montague contributed reporting.

Trump urges Netanyahu to end the war in Gaza ahead of Friday meeting.

Republicans in Congress applauded often when Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, spoke at the Capitol on Wednesday. But the Republican nominee for president, Donald J. Trump, appeared less impressed with Israel’s messaging the next day.

Israel must end the war in Gaza “and get it done quickly,” Mr. Trump said in an interview on Fox News on Thursday. He argued that Israel was “getting decimated” by negative publicity over its conduct of the war, set off by the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel. Since then, more than 39,000 Palestinians have been killed, according to Gazan health authorities, and the war has wreaked widespread disease, hunger and destruction.

“Israel is not very good at public relations,” Mr. Trump said.

The comments came a day before a scheduled meeting on Friday between the former president and Mr. Netanyahu at Mar-a-Lago, Mr. Trump’s private residence and club in Palm Beach, Fla. But it is not clear that the Israeli prime minister — who praised the former president in his congressional address — would agree with Mr. Trump about wrapping up the conflict.

In his speech to U.S. lawmakers, Mr. Netanyahu vowed that Israel would fight until Hamas was eradicated. He did not say what many Israelis, especially the relatives of hostages in Gaza, wanted to hear: that he would close a cease-fire deal with Hamas to end the war and return about 115 people taken from Israel on Oct. 7 who remain in Gaza, several dozen of whom are believed to be dead.

On Monday, the Israeli military announced that two of the remaining hostages were dead. On Thursday, the Israeli military announced that five hostages’ bodies had been found in tunnels in an operation in Khan Younis and returned to Israel from Gaza.

The steady drumbeat of bad news about the captives underscores the urgency of a deal for the hostages’ relatives, some of whom met with Mr. Netanyahu in Washington this week, including at a gathering with President Biden at the White House on Thursday. They expressed optimism about the possibility of a deal when they emerged from the meeting, and told reporters in a briefing that Mr. Netanyahu understood the urgency of the need for a cease-fire.

It is a point that Mr. Trump may make at Mar-a-Lago, too, telling Mr. Netanyahu what he told Fox News: “Finish up.”

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Israeli forces have retrieved from Gaza the bodies of 5 people killed on Oct. 7.

Israeli forces retrieved the bodies of five Israelis held in Gaza, the Israeli military said on Thursday, amid growing international pressure for a cease-fire deal that would involve the release of the remaining captives.

The bodies were found on Wednesday in a tunnel shaft in a Khan Younis zone that Israel previously designated as a humanitarian area where Gazan civilians could go to avoid the fighting and to receive aid, the Israeli military said. The shaft was nearly 220 yards long and more than 20 yards underground, with several rooms, the military said.

Israel has said that Hamas has exploited the “humanitarian zone” to launch rockets at Israel, as well as use it for other military purposes. Aid groups have lamented that Israel has occasionally struck the area, despite telling Gazans they would be safer there. There was no immediate response from Hamas.

Israel has been carrying out a new operation in Khan Younis this week, using tanks and fighter jets to strike what it has described as Hamas infrastructure in the southern Gaza city. Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari, the Israeli military spokesman, told reporters the renewed offensive aimed in part to “enable the operation” to retrieve the bodies.

Dozens of people have been killed during the Israeli assault on Khan Younis, the Gazan Health Ministry has reported. Many also fled their homes as the Israeli bombardment intensified, while others elected to stay, hoping they would be safer in their houses than in tents. Admiral Hagari said that Israeli forces had killed “many terrorists.”

The five people whose bodies were recovered — Maya Goren, 56; Tomer Ahimas, 20; Kiril Brodski, 19; Oren Goldin, 33; and Ravid Katz, 51 — were killed during the Hamas-led attacks on Oct. 7 and were taken back to Gaza to be held as bargaining chips, Israeli officials said. They are considered hostages by the Israeli government.

Mr. Brodski and Mr. Ahimas were soldiers who fell during the attacks, while the other three were civilians.

Ms. Goren was a teacher from Nir Oz, one of the hardest-hit communities near the Gaza border; her husband was also killed on Oct. 7. Mr. Katz, also from Nir Oz, was a father of three children. The body of Mr. Goldin, a member of a nearby village’s civil response squad, was taken, along with that of his brother-in-law Tal Haimi, whose body is still in Gaza.

The Israeli military said that intelligence — including information from detained Palestinian militants — had guided forces to the tunnel.

More than 250 people were abducted during the Hamas-led attack on Oct. 7, according to Israel, and 105 were released during a brief cease-fire in November. Israeli officials say 115 hostages remain in Gaza, including roughly 40 who are presumed dead.

The return home of the hostages’ remains in body bags added to the domestic political pressure on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to end the war, even as he was visiting Washington and in a speech to Congress gave a full-throated defense of Israel’s military operations in Gaza.

“The war in Gaza could end tomorrow if Hamas surrenders, disarms and returns all the hostages,” Mr. Netanyahu said during his address to Congress on Wednesday. “But if they don’t, Israel will fight until we destroy Hamas’s military capabilities and its rule in Gaza and bring all our hostages home.”

Mr. Netanyahu did not refer to the current proposal backed by the Biden administration and the United Nations Security Council. Under that deal, Israel would ultimately agree to a permanent cease-fire with Hamas and withdraw its forces from Gaza in exchange for the release of all hostages.

Nissim Kalderon, whose brother Ofer was abducted on Oct. 7, accused Mr. Netanyahu of hesitating to reach a deal for political reasons. Mr. Netanyahu’s coalition government depends on hard-line parties who support permanent Israeli control of Gaza, effectively ruling out a cease-fire with Hamas.

“I expected, hoped, wished that you would open your speech with ‘We have a signed deal.’ But again and again, you’re not doing what you should have done 292 days ago,” Mr. Kalderon said at a rally in Tel Aviv on Wednesday night. “Bring your citizens home.”

At least six Israeli relatives of hostages were arrested in the House gallery by Capitol Police during Mr. Netanyahu’s speech as they wore bright yellow T-shirts calling on him to reach an agreement to free their loved ones.

“Benjamin Netanyahu spoke for 54 minutes and he did not mention once the need to seal the deal,” said Gil Dickmann, whose cousin Carmel Gat was abducted from the Israeli border community of Be’eri. “That’s what he needs to do, sign the deal and release all the hostages now.”

Rawan Sheikh Ahmad contributed reporting.

The U.S. has sent thousands of bombs and missiles to Israel, a report found.

In his address to Congress on Wednesday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel asked for the speedy delivery of more American weapons to help his country prevail over Hamas in the war in Gaza. “Give us the tools faster, and we’ll finish the job faster,” he said.

The prime minister’s plea for more weapons, faster, comes despite enormous transfers of American military hardware over the last 10 months.

A tally of publicly known deliveries, as compiled this week by the Jewish Institute for National Security of America, show that more than 20,000 unguided bombs, an estimated 2,600 guided bombs and 3,000 precision missiles — as well as aircraft, ammunition and air defenses — are among the American weapons that already have been shipped since Oct. 7.

Many of the arms shipments that the United States has sent to Israel since the war began in October are classified or have been otherwise kept secret. Nonetheless, what had been delivered by March alone amounts to “an enormous number and variety of weapons, which have played a vital role in helping Israel defend itself,” an analysis by the Foundation for Defense of Democracies found this past spring.

With Americans divided over U.S. support for the war, and the domestic defense industry already stretched thin by the war in Ukraine, some defense officials and weapons experts have predicted that arms shipments to Israel could soon level off, or be phased out over the next decade.

Human rights groups and some U.S. lawmakers have demanded that the United States stop supplying weapons that could be used by Israel in potential war crimes, though security experts and some members of Congress have argued that ending American military aid would make Israel more vulnerable to attacks by Iran and its regional proxies.

In May, the State Department concluded that Israel had most likely violated humanitarian standards by failing to protect civilians in Gaza, but it did not find specific instances that would justify withholding American military aid.

Earlier this year, the Biden administration halted the shipment of 1,800 2,000-pound bombs to Israel after concerns swelled that such explosives had killed thousands of Palestinian civilians in southern Gaza. President Biden said in May that he would block the delivery of weapons that could be fired into densely populated areas of Rafah, in southern Gaza, where more than a million Palestinians were sheltering.

But this month, Mr. Biden loosened some of the restrictions to allow the delivery of 1,700 500-pound bombs that were part of the paused shipment of 2,000-pound bombs.

The seeming inconsistency has prompted some weapons experts to explore how — or whether — Israel can become less reliant on the United States, in part by building up its own weapons industry. Such development would cost Israel tens of billions of dollars, the defense foundation’s analysis said, for a country that already spends around 4.5 percent of its gross domestic product on defense — more than any NATO country.

“It seems unlikely that Israel could attain across-the-board weapons and munitions self-sufficiency anytime soon (and some say ever),” the analysis said.

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Israelis contrast Netanyahu’s speech in Congress with the grim reality at home.

For many Israelis, it wasn’t what Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, it was what he didn’t say.

In his speech to Congress on Wednesday, Mr. Netanyahu cast the war in Gaza as a battle for the survival of the Jewish state, a view widely shared across Israel.

But many Israelis want the their leader to agree to a cease-fire that would allow for the release of the 115 remaining hostages in Gaza, at any cost. While Mr. Netanyahu spoke of “intensive efforts” to secure the release of the captives, he did not publicly embrace a proposed truce deal being negotiated.

In Israel, the dissonance between the repeated applause from U.S. lawmakers during his address and a grimmer domestic reality was apparent on the front pages of Thursday’s Hebrew-language newspapers, which were dominated by news that the military had recovered the bodies of several hostages from the Palestinian enclave.

Yedioth Ahronoth, a popular mainstream daily, split its front page horizontally, devoting the top half to portraits of four captives whose bodies were recovered, and the bottom half to the speech. A fifth body was subsequently identified by the Israeli authorities, who said all five had been killed on Oct. 7, during the Hamas-led assault on southern Israel that prompted the war.

The visit to Washington by Mr. Netanyahu, who arrived at the White House on Thursday afternoon for meetings with President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, was intended to shore up support for the war both at home and abroad.

But there is a widespread sense of government failure in Israel as the war has dragged on, with the fighting having expanded to multiple fronts and the leadership offering little vision for what comes next.

“It was a speech devoid of disappointments or good tidings,” wrote Ben-Dror Yemini in Thursday’s Yedioth Ahronoth. “Never, ever was there such a large chasm between high words and contradictory actions.”

In Israel, critics of Mr. Netanyahu have accused him of putting his political survival above the fate of the hostages. Two far-right parties that he relies on for his governing coalition have threatened to quit should he agree to a deal on terms that they would deem a surrender to Hamas.

Seeking better terms, Mr. Netanyahu has delayed the departure of an Israeli negotiating team that was meant to set out from Israel on Thursday for talks with mediators in Qatar. An Israeli official with knowledge of the talks said only that the team would depart for Qatar sometime after Mr. Netanyahu’s meeting with Mr. Biden, without specifying a new date.

The Hostages Families Forum, a grass-roots organization advocating for the captives’ release, declared a “crisis of trust” in a statement on Thursday, accusing Mr. Netanyahu of obstructing a deal.

“This foot-dragging is a deliberate sabotage of the chance to bring our loved ones back,” the forum said in its statement, adding, “It effectively undermines the negotiations and indicates a serious moral failure.”

Gaza’s death toll was largely accurate in the early days of the war, a study finds.

A new study analyzing the first 17 days of Israel’s bombardment in the Gaza Strip found that the Gaza Ministry of Health’s death toll, a subject of debate at the time, was reliable.

The study, conducted by Airwars, a British organization that assesses claims of civilian harm in conflicts, added to previous research suggesting that the Health Ministry’s figures in the early days of the war were credible.

In late October, the Health Ministry published the names of about 7,000 people who had been killed in the first 17 days of the war. Of the thousands of Israeli airstrikes and other explosions during that time period, only a fraction — 350 events — were analyzed by Airwars for the study released Wednesday. Airwars said it was able to independently identify 3,000 names, most of which matched the ministry’s list.

As a result, Airwars said, it felt confident the ministry’s casualty reporting system at the beginning of the war was reliable and that it was working to analyze additional strikes and explosions.

Airwars reported that more recent ministry figures had become less accurate after the destruction of the territory’s health system.

The war has, however, clearly devastated the civilian population in Gaza. On Wednesday, the ministry, whose death toll does not distinguish between civilians and combatants, said that more than 39,000 people had been killed.

The ministry is ultimately overseen by Hamas, and Israeli officials have expressed skepticism about its accuracy. Early in the war, before the Health Ministry released its list, President Biden said he had “no confidence in the number that the Palestinians are using,” though he and other American officials have since expressed more confidence in them, urging Israel to do more to protect civilians.

Israel says that it tries to avoid civilian casualties, but notes that Hamas often bases its forces in densely populated urban areas.

Airwars focused its research only on the early days of the conflict. It said that there were many other strikes and explosions apart from the nearly 350 it documented during the period.

About 75 percent of the names documented by Airwars appeared on the Health Ministry’s October list, a rate that showed that “both capture a large fraction of the underlying reality,” said Mike Spagat, a professor at Royal Holloway College at the University of London who reviewed the findings and advised on the research process.

Many international officials and experts familiar with the way the Health Ministry verifies deaths in Gaza — drawing on information from morgues and hospitals across the territory — say its numbers are generally reliable. But there is evidence that the quality of the data has declined, as infrastructure has collapsed in many parts of the territory. In December, after many hospitals had closed, the Health Ministry announced it was supplementing its hospital and morgue-based tally with “reliable media sources.”

In its analysis, Airwars verified that at least some militants were included on the list of those killed in the first three weeks of the war. Israel’s military said in July that it had killed or captured around 14,000 combatants in Gaza since the war began, a number that cannot be independently confirmed.

In one instance, an Israeli airstrike on Oct. 19 targeted and killed Maj. Gen. Jihad Muheisan, commander of the Hamas-run National Security Forces, along with 18 members of his family, including nine children and six women, Airwars found. General Muheisan and all but one of the 18 were included on the Health Ministry’s list.

Because Airwars only analyzed incidents in which civilians were reportedly harmed, researchers said they could not estimate how many militants were included on the Health Ministry’s list.

Other studies have also backed the reliability of the ministry’s early death toll.

Johns Hopkins researchers found that there was no evidence that it was inflated through early November. And researchers from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine who analyzed ID numbers from the October list found there was “no obvious reason” to doubt the data.

Airwars used the same methodology in its Gaza analysis as it has for conflicts in Iraq, Syria, Ukraine, Libya and others, said Emily Tripp, the group’s director.

The pace of those killed in Gaza in October stands out, she said. Airwars tracked more allegations of harm to civilians in October than in any month in its decade of monitoring, according to the report, including the U.S.-led fight against Islamic State and Russia’s bombardment of Syria. About a quarter of those included at least 10 civilians reportedly killed, which is much higher than other conflicts it has monitored.

“We have, per incident, more people dying than we’ve seen in any other campaign,” Ms. Tripp said. “The intensity is greater than anything else we’ve documented.”

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

This was the message that Netanyahu took to Congress.

Israel’s leader traveled some 5,000 miles and did not give an inch.

Addressing a joint meeting of Congress on Wednesday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pushed back on condemnations of Israel’s prosecution of the war in Gaza and lavished praise and thanks on the United States for its support.

He offered a retort to harsh international criticism that Israel had done far too little to protect civilian lives in Gaza and was starving the population there. And he remained defiant in the face of the global pressure over a conflict that has killed tens of thousands of Palestinians, giving little hint that Israel would back down from the fight anytime soon.

Here are some of the highlights.

He name-checked both Biden and Trump.

Mr. Netanyahu was careful to walk a middle path, thanking both Democrats and Republicans, including President Biden and the Republican presidential nominee, Donald J. Trump, for their support.

“I know that America has our back,” he said. “And I thank you for it. All sides of the aisle. Thank you, my friends.”

He expressed particular appreciation for Mr. Biden’s “heartfelt support for Israel after the savage attack” led by Hamas on Oct. 7. But he also made a point of praising Mr. Trump, who as president was more receptive to some of his expansionist policies.

He denied that Israel was starving Gazans.

The prosecutor of the International Criminal Court has requested arrest warrants for war crimes and crimes against humanity for Mr. Netanyahu and the leaders of Hamas. But Mr. Netanyahu rejected accusations by the court’s prosecutor that Israel was deliberately cutting off food to Gazans.

“Utter, complete nonsense, a complete fabrication,” he declared.

Israel, he said, has enabled more than 40,000 aid trucks to enter Gaza during the war.

However, U.N. aid officials say Israel is responsible for most obstacles to getting aid to desperate Palestinians. Mr. Netanyahu said members of Hamas were stealing the goods.

He rejected blame for the heavy civilian loss.

More than 39,000 people have been killed in Gaza during the war, according to the Gaza health authorities, who do not distinguish between combatants and civilians. But Mr. Netanyahu again rejected Israeli responsibility. He denied deliberately targeting noncombatants and said the Israel Defense Forces had worked hard to protect them.

“The I.D.F. has dropped millions of fliers, sent millions of text messages and hundreds of thousands of phone calls to get Palestinian civilians out of harm’s way,” he said.

But those directives often confuse Gaza civilians who struggle to find any safe place to shelter amid the incessant airstrikes and bombardments that have lasted for more than nine months.

Mr. Netanyahu again blamed Hamas, saying it “does everything in its power to put Palestinian civilians in harm’s way” by using schools, hospitals and mosques for military operations.

International law requires combatants to avoid using such “civilian objects” for military objectives. But Israel’s critics say that Hamas’s use of civilian sites does not absolve Israel of its obligations under international law to protect civilians, nor does it explain the scale of death and destruction.

He played up diversity in Israeli society.

During the speech, Mr. Netanyahu called on a few Israeli soldiers in the audience to stand up, including one of Ethiopian descent and another who is Bedouin, citing their heroism and their important role in the Israeli military. It appeared to be an effort to convey that Israel and its military are not homogenous.

“The Muslim soldiers of the I.D.F. fought alongside their Jewish, Christian and other comrades in arms with tremendous bravery,” Mr. Netanyahu said.

Ethiopian Jews and Bedouins in Israel are often marginalized, but the prime minister offered a different portrayal.

He sketched out a vague vision of peace.

The Israeli prime minister has been accused by critics in Israel and some diplomats of dragging his feet in reaching a cease-fire deal with Hamas to end the bloodshed, possibly to preserve his own political longevity.

But Mr. Netanyahu said “a new Gaza could emerge” if Hamas was defeated and Gaza “demilitarized and de-radicalized,” adding that Israel “does not seek to resettle Gaza.”

He turned to past world conflicts to make his case, noting that the approach of demilitarization and de-radicalization was used in Germany and Japan after World War II.

There is broad concern, however, that in Gaza the trauma of the war will yield a new generation of radicalization.

The common enemy? Iran, he said.

“If you remember one thing, one thing from this speech, remember this: Our enemies are your enemies,” Mr. Netanyahu said. “Our fight is your fight. And our victory will be your victory.”

Iran, he said, wants to impose “radical Islam” on the world and sees the United States as its greatest enemy because it is “the guardian of Western civilization and the world’s greatest power.”

He argued that Iran-backed militias like Hamas, Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen, whatever their aggression against Israel, are actually fighting a different war.

“Israel is merely a tool,” Mr. Netanyahu said. “The main war, the real war, is with America.”

Israeli forces press forward in Khan Younis. At least 30 people are reported killed in 24 hours.

At least 30 people were killed and dozens more injured over a 24-hour period on Wednesday and Thursday in the Gaza Strip, local health officials said, as the Israeli military pushed deeper into parts of Khan Younis that it had previously designated as humanitarian zones for civilians fleeing the fighting.

The Israeli military, which began a renewed offensive in the southern Gaza city of Khan Younis earlier this week, said it was targeting Hamas forces whom it accused of embedding fighters among civilians.

Many of the victims were taken to the Nasser Medical Complex in Khan Younis, where photos taken by a photographer for Agence France-Presse showed bloodied children being rushed in for care.

Mohammad Saqer, the director of nursing at Nasser Hospital, said he had treated three children for severe blast wounds, which he said were most likely from bombardment. Dr. Saqer, who has worked at the medical center for 18 years, said few shipments of medicine and fuel were arriving at the hospital, making treatment difficult.

“So many dead, so many wounded, not enough beds,” Dr. Saqer said. “The situation’s disastrous. We’re rationing electricity, turning off air conditioning, trying to save what we can.”

Patients at the facility have been forced to share beds, and the hospital was “under enormous strain as the killing, wounding and maiming of people continues relentlessly in southern Gaza,” the aid group Doctors Without Borders wrote on social media earlier in the week.

The United Nations said that 150,000 people fled Khan Younis on Monday alone, the day the renewed Israeli offensive began, and that “large-scale displacement” from the area was ongoing.

In Al-Mawasi, the coastal town where the Israeli military ordered Khan Younis residents to go, there is “no space for even a single tent due to the overwhelming number of people desperate for safety,” the Palestinian Red Crescent said. The group said that one of its ambulances came under fire on Thursday as medics were trying assisting injured civilians.

Fighting in recent days has centered around three towns near the city of Khan Younis — Bani Suaila, Al Zanna and Al Qarara. On Wednesday, the Israeli military discovered the bodies of five Israelis in Al Qarara who had been killed in Hamas’s Oct. 7 attack on Israel. The bodies were found in a tunnel used by militants.

“Hamas exploited the humanitarian area and used it to hold our hostages captive,” the military said in a statement on social media. Hamas did not issue a response on its social media channels.

Israeli officials say 115 hostages remain in Gaza, including roughly 40 who are presumed dead.

The military said on Thursday that Hamas had launched several rockets toward Israel from the humanitarian area in Khan Younis earlier in the day. But the strike did not reach Israel and at least one rocket hit a U.N.-run school in Al Qarara, killing two people and injuring several others, the military said.

Schools have not been operating during the war and most of them have become shelters for displaced people. UNRWA, the United Nations’ main relief group for Palestinians that runs schools, did not confirm the attack.

The Israeli military said its forces operating in Khan Younis had killed dozens of Hamas militants over the past day and struck more than 60 terror targets.

Gaza’s health ministry said Israeli military strikes on areas in eastern Khan Younis killed at least 14 people early Thursday, with airstrikes reported in southern Gaza and tanks advancing in central Rafah.

Mahmoud Basal, a spokesman for the Palestinian Civil Defense, said Israeli forces had killed at least 17 people on Thursday in Deir al-Balah, in central Gaza, and in Khan Younis, Israeli snipers shot and killed at least one person while he was moving down Salah al-Din Street, Gaza’s main north-south route, he said. The Israeli military did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the incident.

Anushka Patil and Aaron Boxerman contributed reporting.

A Military Leader to His People: ‘Fight or You Disappear’

Teenagers toyed with guns at a museum exhibit. Young men posed in front of posters of the country’s military leader. Over dinner in restaurants, families watched television monitors showing footage of drone strikes.

The event was billed as a national cultural festival in the West African nation of Burkina Faso. But it often resembled a mobilization campaign in the all-out war against the Islamist terrorists who have gradually occupied the country in recent years.

“The motherland or death,” Alaila Ilboudo, a spoken word artist, shouted onstage to the cheers of crowds at the festival, held in May in Bobo-Dioulasso, the country’s second largest city.


Map locates Bobo-Dioulasso, Djibo, Mansila, Soudougui in Burkina Faso, and Ouagadougou, the capital city.

Burkina Faso has long been known for its international film festival and arts scene. But as extremists affiliated with the Islamic State and Al Qaeda have turned a swath of West Africa into the world’s epicenter of terrorism, Burkina Faso has been the hardest hit.

More than 8,000 people were killed last year in a conflict between extremists and the military, according to analysts. That is twice as many as in 2022. In a country of 23 million, nearly three million people have fled their homes, according to humanitarian groups, and 1.4 million children are expected to face hunger this summer, with aid corridors choked off by the extremists.

A recent trip across the country and interviews with civilians and analysts revealed a nation torn apart by escalating violence, perpetrated by both the Islamist fighters and the military in its brutal effort to defeat them.

The country is now led by the world’s youngest state leader, Capt. Ibrahim Traoré, a 36-year-old autocrat who seized power in a coup in 2022. He has enlisted Russian military advisers and drafted about 50,000 civilians to fight with his army, leading to a surge of human rights abuses against local populations. Nevertheless, the United States has provided more than half of the country’s humanitarian aid this year — $150 million.

Captain Traoré has silenced activists, lawyers and journalists through forced conscription, imprisonment and disappearances. “Either you fight or you disappear,” he said in a speech in May to draftees.

The military government has denied accusations of targeting civilians or specific ethnic groups in its campaign against the extremists. It did not respond to several requests for comment.

So far, Captain Traoré is losing the battle against the extremists, who freely roam the countryside and lay siege to dozens of towns and cities. In June, more than 100 soldiers were killed in an attack on a military base in Mansila, in eastern Burkina Faso. The Islamists claimed responsibility.

Only the capital, Ouagadougou, and a handful of other areas remain relatively secure.

Just to reach the cultural festival, which also showcased athletes, many participants had to put their lives at risk.

Germaine Poubéré, a lean 20-year-old wrestler from Soudougui, a village about 300 miles east, said she had to dodge ambushes by the fighters and talk her way through army checkpoints. Once at the festival, she defeated one adversary after another, only to lose in the final round against the national champion.

Between two contests, Ms. Poubéré recalled how she and her family had fled their village, which was under attack by militants, and how she spent the last year out of school. She has since moved back home, but she sometimes sleeps at school because the extremists still attack roads in her area.

“It requires so much courage,” she said.

At the festival, hundreds of soldiers were deployed to provide protection.

Captain Traoré himself was in town, exhorting people to support their military. He regularly urges citizens to turn in neighbors or others accused of collaborating with extremists.

At night, vigilantes gather outside to patrol the streets.

“There are enemies from within. We are on the front line,” said Rasmané Porgo as he kept watch at a roundabout near the festival.

Mr. Porgo, a father of five, believes Captain Traoré will succeed in stamping out the extremists. “Burkina Faso will be stable” in a few years, he said.

For now, much of the country remains unsafe.

Captain Traoré traveled back from the festival to the capital in an armored, nondescript vehicle squeezed in the middle of a speeding convoy of more than a hundred armored pickups and motorcycles. Heavily armed soldiers stationed along the road scanned the bush and ordered all other traffic off the road before he passed.

In 2014, a movement led by artists, intellectuals and activists pushed out the president of Burkina Faso, who had clung to power for nearly three decades.

Islamist fighters were raging to the north in Mali, but Burkina Faso had been spared from the violence.

Western countries like France and the United States saw a relative haven of stability, sending weapons, special forces and advisers to Burkina Faso to help contain the extremists.

It was a short-lived era.

Militants crept from Mali into Burkina Faso’s north and began staging attacks in 2015, destabilizing the once-peaceful country.

Since he seized power in 2022, Captain Traoré vowed to eradicate what he calls “the terrorist Hydra,” referring to the extremists who have multiplied across Burkina Faso and neighboring countries.

He initially promised to be only an interim leader for a few months until an election could be held. But in May, religious, military and political leaders named him “Supreme leader of the armed forces” and empowered him to lead the country for five more years.

Captain Traoré has ignored calls by Western and West African partners to respect human rights and to abide by the rule of law in his effort to quell the fighters. He has accused the United States and European countries of threatening Burkina Faso’s sovereignty, and last year ordered French special forces based in the country to leave.

On a trip to St. Petersburg last summer Captain Traoré said that President Vladimir V. Putin felt “like family.”

As Amadou, a schoolteacher in eastern Burkina Faso, reached his classroom one morning earlier this year, he said that he saw pro-government, civilian militia fighters searching for people of his ethnic group, the Fulani. His legs shaking, he escaped on his motorbike, he said.

Many ethnic Fulanis are caught between the Islamist fighters, who often invade their villages and recruit them, and the military and civilian militias, which accuse them of being extremists.

Amadou, like many people approached by The New York Times in Burkina Faso, asked that only his first name be used for fear of his safety. He said that he had fled his village years ago because he and his family had refused to follow orders from Islamist fighters that women fully cover themselves and follow their prayer rules.

But now, pro-government militia fighters routinely round up Fulanis with no explanation, he said. “It feels as if nowhere is safe,” Amadou said. “That at any time I can be detained, or worse, because I’m Fulani.”

Soldiers and civilian militia fighters have committed massacres of civilians accused of cooperating with extremists — killings that have gone unpunished, rights groups say.

Women and children have been killed by soldiers, too, according to Fulani representatives and researchers, who have warned the country is approaching a campaign of ethnic cleansing.

“The targeting of civilians has reached mass killing levels,” said Héni Nsaibia, a senior analyst with the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project.

As the Islamists move closer to some villages and cities, they are tearing families apart.

Under armed guard, a 44-year-old farmer named Zeinabou fled the besieged city of Djibo in April with six of her children. Djibo had been a refuge for Zeinabou and her family after they ran away from extremists attacking their village in 2018.

But Djibo is no longer safe. Zeinabou said she risked abduction or death just by growing peas or millet in nearby fields. She and her husband eventually decided that she would leave for the capital while he stayed behind in Djibo with his second wife and other children.

Now in a Ouagadougou neighborhood sheltering with more than 1,300 people, Zeinabou said she hopes to find work braiding hair to feed her family. For now, though, they rely on people’s generosity.

She said that she has barely been able to talk to her husband and children back in Djibo. But, she added, “We couldn’t think of another option” but to leave.

What a Professor’s Firing Shows About Sexual Harassment in China

In the video, the Chinese graduate student stared straight into the camera as she spoke. She wore a mask, but in a bold move, made clear who she was by holding up her identification card. Then she issued an explosive accusation: A prominent professor at a top Chinese university had been sexually harassing her for two years.

Shortly after the woman posted the video on her Chinese social media pages on Sunday, it drew millions of views and set off an online outcry against the professor she named, Wang Guiyuan, then the vice-dean and Communist Party head of Renmin University’s School of Liberal Arts in Beijing.

The next day, Renmin University fired Mr. Wang, saying that officials had investigated the student’s allegations and found that they were true.

The swift response by the university reflected the growing pressure that Chinese academic institutions have come under to curb sexual harassment on campus. In recent years, several schools have been accused of not doing enough to protect their students from tutors and professors who preyed on them.

At the same time, in denouncing the professor, the university and commentaries in state media that followed studiously avoided describing his conduct as sexual harassment. Instead, they depicted it as a moral failing, using language that feminist activists and scholars say points to a strategy of deflection that turns the attention away from victims.

“If they have to avoid saying ‘sexual harassment,’ it’s very hard to imagine that they take sexual violence seriously,” said Feng Yuan, an academic and the founder of an anti-domestic violence help line in Beijing.

In her video, the graduate student, who identified herself as Wang Di, said that Mr. Wang, her doctoral supervisor, had demanded in 2022 to have sex with her, then abused her physically and verbally after she refused.

“Because I rejected him, he retaliated over the past two years, threatening that I would not graduate,” she said in the hourlong video. She included audio clips of what she described as recordings of his attempts to force himself on her. She also said she had text messages that backed up her claims.

Renmin University responded by saying it had verified the student’s allegations and dismissed the professor, whom it identified only by his last name, Wang. In a statement, the school said the professor had “seriously breached the party discipline, school rules and the professional ethics of teachers.”

Mr. Wang, the professor, did not reply to an email seeking comment. Ms. Wang, the student, also did not respond to a request for comment.

The university also said he had been expelled by the Communist Party, and the local police department said it was investigating the situation. An online commentary about the case in the People’s Daily, a Communist Party mouthpiece, hailed the quick action, saying: “Black sheep cannot remain in the herd and the reputation of top schools cannot be destroyed.”

Feminist activists said that school administrators were often more concerned about protecting the reputation of the school than the rights of the victim. Schools in China have long encouraged students to keep quiet about such allegations. In this case, the activists said, administrators may have had little choice but to take action, given the evidence that the student had collected and the widespread scrutiny on the school.

The Chinese authorities have tried to avoid addressing the harm that had been done to the victim, said Lu Pin, a prominent Chinese feminist activist. “It is not a question of rights, it is not a question of safety, but a problem of violating morality and the politics of the party-state,” she said. This was to avoid being seen as encouraging students to seek legal redress, she said.

The avoidance of the term “sexual harassment” has been a feature in past cases as well. In 2023, Southwest University in Chongqing fired a professor after a doctoral student said he had pressured her into having sex with him. In the university’s announcement, it described the teacher as having had an “improper sexual relationship” with a student, a term that scholars like Ms. Feng say is problematic because it implicates the victim as well.

Even though sexual harassment by university teachers of students is officially described as a breach of professional ethics, the tendency within academia was to downplay the issue, said Lao Dongyan, a law professor from Tsinghua University, in a post on Weibo.

Yet “the environment around me seems to collectively assume it a trivial matter, or even an inevitable love affair for the men,” she wrote in the post, which has been liked nine million times.

That Ms. Wang had to resort to going public with her complaint at the cost of her privacy reflected how weak reporting mechanisms on campus can be, Ms. Lu said.

After the university’s response, Ms. Wang posted a statement online saying she was satisfied by the school’s response and appreciative of its concern for her well-being. Her original video was no longer available, though it was not immediately clear who took it down.

Kremlin Uses Olympic Ban as Another Arrow to Shoot at the West

More than 10,500 athletes from some 200 countries will participate in the Olympic Games in Paris, but only 15 of them will be from Russia. They will compete without the accompaniment of the Russian flag or its national anthem.

Back in Russia, the competition will not be shown on television for the first time since 1984. And state TV is paying little attention to the Games, other than to point out flaws in the Games in commentary that smacks of sour grapes.

News segments, for instance, have reported on the cleanup of the Seine, which they concluded would inevitably fill up with sewage again. And media commentators expressed disgust that a drag queen carried the Olympic torch — which is antithetical to Russia’s increasing emphasis on what it calls “traditional values” and its crackdown on L.G.B.T.Q. expression.

It’s quite a comedown for Russia, a traditional Olympic powerhouse that for years used the competition as a way to project power and foster national pride, and often finished first in the final medal count. And it represents the price the country is paying for its invasion of Ukraine two years ago and the daily mayhem it inflicts there.

Banned from participating because of the war, Moscow has chosen to spurn the Games in return. It is framing them as part of the same narrative that President Vladimir V. Putin has used to stoke nationalism at home: that Russia is engaged in an existential standoff with a Western alliance bent on the country’s humiliation.

No one wants to recognize the real reason for the increased barriers to Russia’s participation,” said Dmitri Navosha, a Belarusian who co-founded a prominent sports website in Russia but has left the country and opposes the invasion of Ukraine. “The reason is the war.” And in Russia, he said, “this fact is simply hidden and interpreted as ‘the West doesn’t like Russia, so they don’t let us go anywhere.’”

Still, the Kremlin and its supporters insist the decision to bar Russia is borne of American hypocrisy.

“So now we mix sports and politics?” Dmitri V. Gubernyev, a well-known Russian sports announcer, said in an interview. “Americans, who went to Iraq and later acknowledged the mistake,” he added, implying that the United States was never sanctioned in the sports world for waging wars. “And who invaded Vietnam, acknowledged later — not by you and me, but by Biden — as a mistake?”

In 2017, the International Olympic Committee suspended Russia’s team from participating until the end of 2022 because of a doping scandal. Even so, it sent some of the largest contingents to the Games — 335 in Tokyo three years ago — where Russian athletes participated and won medals under a “neutral” designation.

In 2022, the I.O.C. banned Russian athletes again in the wake of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The suspension also extends to athletes from Belarus, Russia’s neighboring vassal state, whose leader, Aleksandr G. Lukashenko, has supported Mr. Putin’s invasion of Ukraine.

Last year, the I.O.C. decided to allow individual Russian athletes to participate if they met strict requirements for participation.

Russian and Belarusian athletes and personnel “who actively support the war” or are contracted to their country’s military or national security agencies are ineligible to participate.

The I.O.C. also ruled that no Russian or Belarusian state official could be accredited for the Games. Many media representatives from both countries were also prohibited from attending, further irritating the Kremlin.

Russian sports organizations, commentators and general society are divided over participation in these circumstances.

The head of Russia’s Olympic Committee, Stanislav Pozdnyakov, has maligned the athletes who chose to participate, in part because about half of them are based outside of Russia. He called them “foreign agents,” a derogatory designation for people the authorities consider to be working against the national interest.

The Russian Olympic Committee has also made payouts of more than 200 million rubles, or $2.3 million, to at least 245 athletes who could not or chose not to compete, the body’s director general told RIA Novosti.

There was a public pressure campaign inside Russia to persuade athletes to withdraw. At least 20 Russian athletes who qualified and met the criteria for competing rejected the invitations — either because their federation decided not to participate or out of solidarity with other team members who were not greenlit by the Olympic committee.

In a statement, the Russian Wrestling Federation said that it “would not allow the spirit of the Russian team to be broken.” The group said it would rather none of its athletes participate than only a few who qualified.

The judo team also complained that “of the 17 judokas who received the Olympic rating, the I.O.C. allowed only four to participate in the Olympics.” It refused to let those who qualified to compete under what it called “humiliating conditions.”

The Kremlin has left the thorny decisions on who should participate to the federations and their athletes.

“Each athlete makes such decisions independently,” said the Kremlin spokesman Dmitri S. Peskov. “As for those who had the opportunity and did not go, each federation has its own circumstances, agreements, collective opinions and decisions. This needs to be respected.”

Ukraine has actively lobbied against some athletes who are participating. For instance, it called for the I.O.C. to exclude the Russian gymnast Angela Bladtseva, 18, from trampoline jumping. Kommersant, a Russian business daily, reported that Ukrainian officials had complained because Ms. Bladtseva competed in the Russian city of Krasnodar last year against a background with the pro-war symbol “Z” and the slogan “We do not abandon our own.” She will participate in the Paris Games.

The war has caused other divisions over Russia’s Olympic participation. Military bloggers, who are generally full-throated supporters of Russia’s army, have criticized St. Petersburg for offering cash awards to athletes who earn medals, calling it a form of betrayal.

“We are literally collecting pennies to help the front throughout the country, while they are paying traitors,” wrote one blogger with 257,000 followers on Telegram, using a slur for L.G.B.T.Q. people to refer to those who proposed the payments.

The scant Russian presence this year feels like a repetition of the 1980s, said Mr. Navosha, the founder of the sports website. The United States led a boycott of the 1980 Moscow Olympics in protest of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, leading to a Russian boycott of the 1984 Los Angeles Games.

“We have a very clear historical parallel that directly indicates where Russia is now — exactly where the Soviet Union was in 1980,” he said. “A direct, undisguised confrontation with the Western world, in which sport became an instrument of the confrontation.”

There is one notable difference, he added. In 1984, the Soviet Union organized its own Olympic-style competition, Druzhba-84, or the Friendship Games. The event was portrayed as evidence that the socialist way of life “provides more favorable facilities for the human beings’ all-round physical and spiritual development.” Athletes from about 50 countries participated.

This time around, a version known as Druzhba-24, was scheduled to take place in September by Mr. Putin’s decree. Organizers allocated money and planned competition in more than 30 summer sports, but it was postponed until at least next year, Mr. Navosha said, a sign that not enough countries were on board to compete.

“We understand that Russia’s circle of allies is much smaller now than it was back then, and it is too small to hold their ersatz Olympics,” said Mr. Navosha.

Mr. Gubernyev, the announcer, said he was in favor of all athletes who qualified competing, even if he believed the conditions were unfair. He added that he, like other Russians who love sports, would find a way to watch the games.

But he warned that the exclusion from Paris would foster resentment in a generation of athletes, and Russians in general against the West: “A person does sports to win an Olympic medal.”

“Against the background of these decisions, another round of confrontation will be born,” he added. “Because there are people who really want to broaden their horizons, see Europe and show the world what they can do. That wasn’t given to them, so their response will wind up being, ‘Go to hell.’”

Alina Lobzina and Ivan Nechepurenko contributed reporting.

Enjoy unlimited access to all of The Times.

6-month Welcome Offer
original price:   $3sale price:   $0.50/week

Learn more

Ukraine Detains Suspect in Killing of Nationalist Politician

The Ukrainian authorities detained a suspect on Thursday in the killing of Iryna Farion, a divisive far-right Ukrainian politician who was shot dead by a gunman last week in the western city of Lviv, a crime that shocked the nation.

Ihor Klymenko, Ukraine’s interior minister, said in a statement that there was “sufficient evidence” that the suspect, whom he identified only as an 18-year-old man, had killed Ms. Farion. He said the suspect had been arrested in his hometown, Dnipro, a large city more than 500 miles east of Lviv in eastern Ukraine.

Mr. Klymenko added that a preliminary investigation suggested that the suspect had worked with others to plan the killing. He added that the suspect, while preparing for the killing for at least two months, had “rented at least three apartments in Lviv.” Mr. Klymenko did not rule out the possibility of Russian involvement.

Ms. Farion died on Friday after an unknown assailant shot her in broad daylight near her home in Lviv. Witnesses told Ukrainian news outlets that the killer fired a single shot and quickly fled.

For nearly a week, the Ukrainian police had been searching for a suspect who had appeared on surveillance cameras and was described as a man in his 20s. Mr. Klymenko and President Volodymyr Zelensky said hundreds of security agents and investigators had been deployed to find him.

“They checked every corner along the gunman’s escape route” and searched about 250 acres of forest, Mr. Klymenko said of the police. “Eventually, the suspect was tracked down.”

The killing last Friday of Ms. Farion, a former lawmaker and award-winning linguist, sent chills through the country, where there had been no high-profile killings since Russia began its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Given Mr. Farion’s controversial profile, some Ukrainians feared that her death would polarize Ukrainian society.

Ms. Farion was a highly divisive figure in Ukraine. She belonged to Svoboda, a hard-line nationalist party, and some Ukrainians despised her for her denunciation of Russian-speaking fighters in the Ukrainian army. Ukraine is a bilingual country, and many Ukrainians speak Russian, especially in eastern regions closer to Russia.

In November, the Ukrainian security services opened a criminal investigation into Ms. Farion’s statements. She was also fired from Lviv Polytechnic National University, where she taught.

Ms. Farion remained a respected linguist, and several thousand mourners attended her funeral on Monday in Lviv. Supporters described her as a true patriot and a pioneer of current efforts to promote the use of Ukrainian, once banned by the Soviet authorities.

Political analysts and officials said it was crucial to conduct a swift and transparent investigation to keep rumors from spreading.

Yaroslav Yurchyshyn, the head of the Ukrainian Parliament’s committee on freedom of speech and a liberal politician, wrote on Facebook last week that the killing could increase distrust of the Ukrainian police and pit rival political parties against each other. Like other Ukrainian officials, he suggested that Moscow might have been behind the killing in an attempt to sow divisions.

On Thursday, the Ukrainian police said they were examining unverified claims linking the killing to a Russian neo-Nazi group.

On Eve of Olympics, a Curious Mix of Security and Silence

Helicopters whirling overhead. Police demanding a QR code and proof of identity to pass. Metal fences barricading the streets. And an army brigade, marching by in formation, machine guns hoisted to their chests.

This is what it has been like getting to the front door of my apartment building for the past few evenings.

It’s a weird moment in Paris, on the eve of the Olympic Games and its unusual opening ceremony. The heart of the city has been transformed into a fortress, with metal barricades and checkpoints, subway stations shuttered, 45,000 police officers — about 10 times more than normal — on top of 10,000 soldiers, search dogs, bomb squads and tactical teams, including in helicopters.

The Seine’s banks and bridges, normally teeming with humanity, are suddenly empty. A strange, exquisite calm has descended.

The reason: After all its hand-wringing over a Plan B, Paris is proceeding with its risky and wonderful plan to float the opening ceremony — with the world’s best athletes — down the Seine, through the center of the ancient city and before more than 400,000 spectators packed into stands and leaning out of windows.

Even if Paris weren’t scarred by terrorist attacks, protecting all those people forms an obvious — and heavy — security challenge.

Officials warned us for months of their plans: On July 18, eight days before the opening ceremony, they set up a security zone on both sides of the river, putting up some 44,000 metal fences and manning each corner with police. Anyone who wanted to get inside the so-called gray zone needed to apply to the police for a QR code and then produce it on request — whether it was to go home, get to work or make a restaurant date. Some 200,000 people applied and were screened.

At the same time, the police entered some 500 buildings inside the secured area, examining stairwells and basement caves, interior ministry officials said. They’ve searched the sewers, sealed thousands of manhole covers and scoured through the city’s underground network of catacombs.

And police imposed what amounts to house arrest on 155 people who were considered to be potential threats.

As the start of the ceremony on Friday evening approaches, the security will get even more intense. The restricted zone will expand. More subway stations will close. Police officers will up take positions on rooftops, and the airspace over and around Paris for 93 miles will be closed, with all four nearby airports shuttered, including Charles de Gaulle, Europe’s third-largest.

This unusually heavy blanket has irritated some locals, particularly business owners, and bewildered many tourists trying to understand the directions proffered in broken English by police officers.

“We just wanted to go to Notre-Dame and now … what is this?” said Darius Emadi, 38, an American professional clown who just moved to Paris and was clueless about the closures and codes as he stewed, stuck behind a checkpoint near City Hall.

“I’m never going to make it to my doctor’s appointment!” complained a woman stopped near the silver Bir-Hakeim Bridge.

The heightened security has also infringed on human rights, according to some lawyers contesting the house arrest orders.

“These administrative orders destroy lives; they amount to social deaths for people who are not even identified as a threat by the police,” said one lawyer, Samy Djemaoun. “It’s not a case-by-case approach. It’s an across-the-board one.”

Terrorism was the reason the Paris mayor agreed to lobby for the Olympics in the first place, and why organizers pushed for such an atypical, exposed opening ceremony. It would be a sign of hope and freedom for a wounded city, after two attacks by Islamist extremists killed nearly 150 and wounded more than 400 people in 2015. Since then, the country has endured dozens more attacks — the latest in December, when a man with a knife and hammer killed a tourist and injured three others near the Eiffel Tower.

“I totally agree with all the security measures they put in place because you never know,” said Clarissa Jimenez, 25, stepping out of the hair salon in the Passy neighborhood where she works.

“In the beginning, I found it all kind of scary,” she said, “but now I feel safe.”

The police and French security services dragnet has yielded some results. In central France, a man of Chechen origin was charged in the planning of an attack outside an Olympic soccer match. Another man, a neo-Nazi sympathizer living in the Alsace region, was sentenced to two years in prison for publishing an explosives recipe online and for making threats. This week, a 40-year-old Russian man was charged with working at the behest of a foreign power to “provoke hostilities” in France intending to destabilize the Olympic Games.

Police checks have vetted about a million people involved in the Games, including security guards, stadium workers and volunteers. Of those, about 5,000 were rejected because of their criminal records, the authorities said, or because they had been flagged for “radicalization.”

But 5,000 out of one million was a low number, the interior minister, Gérald Darmanin, said during his media tour of reassurance this week.

“We are very confident, but obviously very, very focused,” Mr. Darmanin said. “We have perceived no clear threat targeting the Olympic Games — neither the French intelligence services, nor the services of foreign services helping us.”

Security experts say that given the police density and preparation, the risk of a major terrorist attack on the ceremony is very low. A greater concern is an isolated person with a knife outside the security zone, said Guillaume Farde, a security expert who teaches at Sciences Po in Paris.

“Even if the reaction time with that density of police in Paris is in the order of dozens of seconds, in dozens of seconds you can make a victim,” he said. “That’s very, very hard to control or anticipate.”

To guard against that possibility, police have poured into the city from across the country. They received handwritten instructions from Mr. Darmanin this week to be thorough and professional, but also friendly: “the most beautiful face of France.” He echoed General Dwight D. Eisenhower’s famous message to American soldiers on the eve of the D-Day landings, 80 years ago: “The eyes of the world will be fixed on you. Your job will not be easy.”

Many Parisians have noticed the change in tone.

“The police officers are charming,” Florence Bellamy said as she walked through the desolate protected zone one morning with her QR code. Last Monday was her 71st birthday and she said she felt as if the Olympics had emptied out the city center, and was offering it up to her as a present.

She wandered across the Seine and visited old haunts, stopping at Café de Flore, where Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir once hung out, for a café crème.

“I had the feeling that all of Paris belonged to me,” said Ms. Bellamy, a writer and French teacher, “and I would never see it like this again.”

The day after the ceremony, if everything goes smoothly, most of the fences and checkpoints are scheduled to come down. No more QR codes. One third of the police officers will leave. The ones who remain will spread out across the city and suburbs. And the Olympic Games will begin in earnest.

“All this will be quickly forgotten,” Mayor Anne Hidalgo said during a welcome cocktail at City Hall this week. “After the ceremony, when they pull down all the fences and people can see all the beautiful spaces, there will be joy.”

Ségolène Le Stradic contributed reporting.

Enjoy unlimited access to all of The Times.

6-month Welcome Offer
original price:   $3sale price:   $0.50/week

Learn more

Pop the Cork? A Shipwreck Brims With Unopened Sparkling Wine

The Baltic Sea floor is full of secrets.

Untold thousands of sailors have died beneath its cold waves, some lost to battle, some to weather and rocks. With them sank their ships — and their treasure.

This month, a Polish diving team slipped below the sea’s surface to check out a small wreck, just a few miles off Sweden. A first pass revealed a small, seemingly unremarkable merchant ship about 58 meters (190 feet) beneath the surface. But Tomasz Stachura, who leads the Baltictech diving group, had a hunch.

The next morning, he returned. This time, he found crates and crates of what appeared to be Champagne, along with wine and porcelain, almost as if the ship’s cargo had been headed to a party.

“We realized that this was a kind of treasure,” he said. He took photos and cleaned the labels, but they were illegible. However, the shape of the bottles suggested that they contained Champagne, he said. Looking closer, he saw bubbles. “It came to me that, perhaps, they are drinkable.”

The wreck itself is hardly novel: Some 100,000 sunken ships dot the Baltic seabed, said Jim Hansson, a maritime archaeologist at the Vrak Museum of Wrecks in Sweden.

But finding Champagne would be a marvel. “It’s not so common,” he said, between dives with the Swedish Coast Guard.

Sparkling wine may have been even more of a luxury than it is today in the mid-1800s, which is when Mr. Stachura thinks the ship may have sunk. (An archaeologist analyzed bottles of mineral water, a relic of an earlier health food craze, from the wreck, and said the labels were from 1850 to 1876.)

It is not the first time that alcohol has been found aboard a shipwreck in the Baltic Sea.

In 2019, cases of cognac were found on a Swedish steamship that had sank in 1917 after being attacked by a German submarine in World War I. And in 2010, divers found bottles of Champagne, some of which appeared to have been bottled before 1830.

“I wouldn’t call them pleasurable drinks,” said Essi Avellan, a Champagne expert in Finland who tasted some of the bottles from that wreck found in 2010. “But, of course, it’s like drinking history.”

The drinkability all depends on how well it was sealed, said David T. Smith, a British drinks writer and consultant who once tasted a shipwrecked gin — with unexpected seawater notes. (“Disgusting.”)

“I don’t know, necessarily, how good it would taste,” he cautioned, of the recent discovery of sparkling wine.

On the other hand, the sea could act like a preservative, Ms. Avellan said: No oxygen can come through the cork. “It would probably taste more youthful than a wine that had been aging at the winery,” she said.

The water itself is also cool and dark, just like a wine cellar. (It’s pressurized, too, which is good for sparkling wines like Champagne.) And the salinity is lower in a sea than in an ocean, so wrecks are better preserved.

“It’s a frozen time capsule,” said Johan Rönnby, a professor of maritime archaeology at Södertörn University in Sweden, who may research the wreck with Mr. Stachura.

For now, the wreck — and the divers — are in a holding pattern. Mr. Stachura reported the find to Swedish authorities. Now, he is waiting for permission to work with maritime archaeologists like Dr. Ronnby to conduct underwater research and, possibly, targeted excavations of the cargo. Approvals may take some time.

For now, the ongoing research is happening on land. Mr. Stachura thinks he just might have identified the ship as one that Czar Nicholas I of Russia lost in 1852. Right time, right route, right client profile.

Eventually, perhaps, he may taste the sparkling wine himself.

“If some expert says it’s drinkable?” he said. “Yes, yes, why not? It would be nice to try what people would drink 170 years ago.”

Enjoy unlimited access to all of The Times.

6-month Welcome Offer
original price:   $3sale price:   $0.50/week

Learn more