The New York Times 2024-08-04 12:10:12


Long Johns, Forensics and a Bound Russian Killer: Inside the Big Prisoner Swap

The private jet that took off from southwest Germany on Thursday afternoon was carrying a group that may have never expected to be confined together: police officers, doctors, intelligence agents, a senior aide to Germany’s chancellor — and a convicted Russian assassin.

In the back of the plane, the assassin, Vadim Krasikov, sat with his hands and feet bound and wearing protective headgear; he was not heard uttering a word on the entire flight.

At the same time, a Russian government jet was also headed for Ankara, Turkey’s capital, carrying officers from the F.S.B. intelligence agency and 16 prisoners being released by Russia and Belarus. At one point, one of the F.S.B. escorts made what seemed like a bad joke to the two best-known Russian dissidents on board: “Don’t have too much fun out there, because Krasikov could come back for you.”

This account of the tense hours surrounding the exchange — the biggest between Moscow and the West since the Cold War — is based on new details revealed by Western government officials involved in the process, and on early testimony from the Russian political prisoners released as part of the deal.

The swap freed Mr. Krasikov, the American journalist Evan Gershkovich and 22 others in a complex seven-country deal that required intricate planning and timing. The successful transfer highlighted the ability of some of the world’s most powerful intelligence agencies to cooperate on a distinct operation of shared interest, even as Russia and the West engage in a tense standoff over the war in Ukraine.

Last month, C.I.A. officers met with F.S.B. counterparts in Turkey to agree on the final terms of the swap, and also to plan the dizzying logistics for how it could actually be carried out on the tarmac in Ankara.

But even in the final hours, the Western officials said, the Americans and Germans worried that something could go wrong — for example, that Russia might not deliver the agreed-upon roster of prisoners or swap in look-alikes.

Near the front of the jet carrying Mr. Krasikov from Germany’s Karlsruhe airport, the foreign policy adviser to Chancellor Olaf Scholz, Jens Plötner, was going over contingencies with the German team. Forensics experts would visually identify the 13 Russian and German prisoners to be handed over to Germany, some of whom hadn’t been seen in public for years.

In coordination, the American plane bound for Turkey took off from Dulles Airport outside Washington, D.C., carrying American officials, medical staff and a psychologist trained to treat the effects of long term captivity. Three Russian prisoners being released by the U.S. were guarded by officers of the Marshals Service.

For those being freed by Russia, the day began at Moscow’s Lefortovo jail, where they had been gathered from prisons as far away as Siberia. Aleksandra Y. Skochilenko, imprisoned for opposing the war in Ukraine, had been driven there from St. Petersburg along with Andrei Pivovarov, another political prisoner; when Mr. Pivovarov saw her, she recalled in an interview on Saturday, he deduced that they would probably be exchanged and told her, “All will be well.”

“Gather your things,” a prison guard told Ms. Skochilenko on Thursday morning.

She said she was taken downstairs to a waiting group of F.S.B. agents with their faces covered, who led her onto a bus. Despite the officers insisting they be quiet, the prisoners talked among themselves about who else was with them and who was not.

Even after an official announced, “This is a political exchange,” Ms. Skochilenko wasn’t ready to believe it. She had been lied to so many times in prison, she said, that the thought crossed her mind: “They’re going to drive us to a forest now and shoot us.”

At Moscow’s Vnukovo airport, some prisoners boarded the plane wearing only their prison robes. One of them, the opposition politician Ilya Yashin, said all he could bring were a toothbrush, toothpaste and his robe. Another, Vladimir Kara-Murza, appearing at a news conference on Friday with Mr. Yashin, said he traveled in long johns, an undershirt and rubber shower slippers.

On the plane, there was no food served, even as the accompanying F.S.B. agents in plainclothes snacked on lunches they appeared to have packed at home, Ms. Skochilenko said. The American and German prisoners all appeared to be seated in the business class section of the plane, she said; she and the other Russian political prisoners flew economy.

At one point, one of the F.S.B. agents made the crack to Mr. Yashin and Mr. Kara-Murza about Mr. Krasikov coming back to kill them, Mr. Yashin recalled.

“It was a joke, of course, an unpleasant kind of joke that does make your skin crawl a little bit,” Mr. Yashin said.

The plane landed in Ankara in coordination with multiple private jets: the one from Germany, the one from Dulles airport, and one each from Poland, Slovenia and Norway, which were also releasing prisoners to Russia.

A complex choreography ensued, the Western officials and Ms. Skochilenko said. Overseeing the operation was Turkey’s MIT spy agency, whose chief, Ibrahim Kalin, was monitoring it remotely. On the ground were Turkish agents in dark suits and sunglasses.

The American delegation on the tarmac comprised officials from the White House, F.B.I., C.I.A. and the State Department. Among the group was David Cotter, an F.B.I. agent who until recently was the National Security Council’s director for hostage and detainee affairs.

The American team stayed in touch with National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan by secure, encrypted telephones.

Footage released by Russia showed German officers walking Mr. Krasikov — still wearing a helmet, in accordance with typical German practice in the transport of dangerous prisoners — to a white bus on the tarmac. The other seven prisoners being released by the West, as well as the two children of the Russian spies freed by Slovenia, were taken to the same bus.

The three released Americans — Mr. Gershkovich, the security contractor Paul Whelan and the journalist Alsu Kurmasheva — were taken onto a second bus. The other 13 prisoners being released by Russia, including Ms. Skochilenko, Mr. Kara-Murza, Mr. Yashin and several German nationals, were brought onto a third.

German forensic experts then boarded the bus carrying those being freed by Russia to verify their identities. Ms. Skochilenko said one of them asked her name and date of birth and examined her face from different angles, checking it against photographs of her that appeared to have been printed out from the internet.

Once the Americans were certain the Russians had delivered on their end of the deal, they gave signed clemency papers to the three Russian prisoners in their custody. The Germans also gave the Turks the green light. Ms. Skochilenko said she watched through the bus window as the Russians being released by the West boarded their plane to Moscow.

The Russian jet took off quickly, headed back to Vnukovo airport, where a red-carpet welcome by Mr. Putin and an honor guard awaited them.

Those released by Russia were whisked to a secure airport building, where they could finally eat and make brief calls. The swap had been so secret that some relatives of the Russian political prisoners were in the dark about whether their loved ones would be freed.

“Do you realize what’s happening?” Oleg Orlov, the co-chairman of the human rights group Memorial, asked his wife Tatyana Kasatkina when he called her, she said.

The three freed American prisoners then boarded the plane, which made its way back to Joint Base Andrews in Maryland. From there, they would fly to San Antonio, Texas, to a facility run by the military that specializes in PISA — post isolation support activities. There, they are expected to spend days under supervision as they try to readjust to normal life.

Mr. Plötner, the German chancellor’s aide, told the 13 German and Russian released prisoners that they would be flying to Cologne. They would be greeted at the airport by Mr. Scholz, provided with German travel documents if necessary, and taken to a military hospital in the nearby city of Koblenz.

In one last precaution, their bags — to the extent they had any — were X-rayed before being loaded onto two planes.

“I wanted to cry,” Ms. Skochilenko said. “But I couldn’t.”

Reporting was contributed by Philip Kaleta from Washington, Ben Hubbard from Istanbul, Valerie Hopkins from Cologne, Germany, Ekaterina Bodyagina and Christopher F. Schuetze from Berlin, and Lauren Leatherby from London.

Enjoy unlimited access to all of The Times.

6-month Welcome Offer
original price:   $3sale price:   $0.50/week

Learn more

In Palermo, a Catholic Saint Joins the Hindu Pantheon

After they spread pink petals on golden statues of Ganesh and Shiva, and recited prayers to blue-skinned and eight-armed gods, the Hindu faithful left their temple and headed to a party for another one of their divinities — the Catholic St. Rosalia.

“To the other goddess!” said Swasthika Sasiyendran, 23, after she changed from her gold-and-white sari into a T-shirt bearing Rosalia’s face.

Every year, in the height of Sicily’s summer heat, Palermo fills with festival lights and honking scooters as people gather to celebrate Rosalia, the city’s patron saint. Among the hundreds of thousands who join the procession, which culminates with a towering statue of the saint being carried through the streets, are members of the city’s Sri Lankan Tamil community, some of Rosalia’s most ardent worshipers.

Palermo is prone to this kind of medley. It is a city that sits between continents, shaped by the overlapping of Greek, Byzantine, Arab, Norman and Spanish civilizations, which hundreds of years ago made it a cosmopolitan, open and refined metropolis.

The blurring of lines between faiths, origins and traditions stands in stark contrast to a growing political discourse in Italy and Europe that insists on firm borders between nations and religions, and immutable identities.

In recent decades, Palermo has welcomed a new generation of immigrants, including thousands of Tamils, both Catholic and Hindu, who fled civil war and came to look for work, forming one of the biggest communities in Italy.

While segregation and discrimination remain in many quarters of the city, locals say Palermo has kept some of its tolerance and openness. The shabby and affordable city center has allowed foreigners to settle in, rather than being segregated in only the suburbs. The downtown Ballarò market has quickly absorbed stands selling plantains and cassava alongside those offering traditional fried chickpea patties and boiled octopus. Many groups promoting dialogue between cultures have sprung up.

While some praise Leoluca Orlando, who was the city’s progressive mayor for more than 20 years, for sending out a message of inclusion, many Tamils credit someone else.

“Santa Rosalia,” Ms. Sasiyendran said. “She welcomes everybody.”

Palermo’s Hindu Tamils, most of whom are originally from Sri Lanka, have added the Catholic saint to their colorful pantheon of gods. Many are attracted to her reputation for miracles, especially for saving the city from a plague in the 17th century. They are also drawn to her mystical sanctuary, a cave on a mount north of the city where she is said to have died after escaping an arranged marriage.

Most of the pilgrims who visited the cave on a recent Sunday were Tamils. In the shrines that many Tamils have in their homes, the image of Rosalia in a monk’s habit features alongside images of Hindu gods like Lakshmi, wrapped in golden necklaces, her legs crossed on top of a lotus flower.

“Santa Rosalia is like our mother,” said Tharsan Mahadevar, the secretary of the Hindu temple, as he sat eating lentils and a spicy vegetable curry while wearing a shiny sarong, the image of Ganesha tattooed on his arms and chest.

Like many other Tamils, Ms. Sasiyendran’s father, Sasi, came to Palermo in the 1990s from Sri Lanka, which was then ravaged by civil war. He did not have a Hindu temple in Palermo, or a place of worship to attend, except for the peaceful Santa Rosalia sanctuary atop Mount Pellegrino. Surrounded by umbrella pines, the site reminded him of the temples back home, hidden in the green mountains of northern Sri Lanka.

He and other lonely, scared men, including many Catholic Tamils, began calling Rosalia “Madonna,” a mother who welcomed them to Palermo. Three days after Ms. Sasiyendran’s mother traveled from South Asia to Palermo to marry her father, he took her to the sanctuary, which he had begun calling Mazhai Kovil Madha, or “Mountain Church Mary.”

Over the years, their Hindu temple was built, wedged between short buildings and bleached awnings near Palermo’s shipyards, but Mr. Sasiyendran continued turning to Rosalia for help and comfort.

When he died of a lung disease in 2022, he was holding a statue of the Madonna, his daughter said.

“I think he is with her now,” said his wife, Eswari Sasiyendran, as she stood in their apartment in Palermo, where a key holder decorated with Rosalia hung alongside a shrine with golden statues of Ganesh. Ms. Sasiyendran said she had resisted pleas from her family to leave Palermo and return home since she had been widowed.

“I have got someone here to pamper me,” she said, referring to the saint.

She added: “Mother doesn’t see fair son or Black daughter. For her, everyone is equal.”

The Sasiyendran family credits the saint with an array of favors, including catching flights, finding forgotten bags and protecting their father when he was still sleeping on benches in Palermo’s parks. Many of the Tamils who climbed up the mountain on a recent morning — who were afforded a stunning view of Palermo in the rosy dawn light — also came with gratitude.

Kuganathan Kanagasingam, 54, said that when his wife had depression in 2022, he began walking up the mountain every Sunday at 5 a.m. — even in the pouring rain or scorching heat.

“Now she is well,” he said. “The medicines do a part, God does the other,” he said, before kissing the steps leading to Rosalia’s cave.

Alongside the cave hung baby shoes, ultrasound photographs and silver figurines of organs the saint had healed, among other votive paraphernalia.

Kiru Ponnampalam, 48, a Tamil cleaner, lit a red candle and placed it in front of Rosalia’s statue. He said he had been married for 10 years with no children until he began going to the sanctuary, when he finally managed to have a child, Abi, who is now 6.

“It was a miracle by Santa Rosalia,” he said.

Academics who have studied the community say that the Tamils’ devotion to Rosalia has provided a way to legitimize themselves and to be accepted by Sicilians.

“It was a way for them to become visible,” said Eugenio Giorgianni, an anthropologist at the University of Messina. “To enter the public space.”

Agostino Palazzotto, 62, an Italian volunteer at the sanctuary, watched on as a long line of Tamils climbed up the church’s stairs.

“I believe in the Santuzza,” he said, using a local nickname for the saint. “They believe in her A LOT.”

Polytheistic religions like Hinduism have the benefit of allowing for the continual incorporation of new gods. Pagan Romans venerated a mix of Greek, Egyptian and Persian gods, in addition to their own emperors.

“Santa Rosalia was a person,” said Mohan Thampiaijah, 56, another Tamil pilgrim. “Vishnu is blue and Ganesh is an elephant.” He paused. “I haven’t heard of any other differences.”

A family of Tamil pilgrims, after wetting their hands with holy water from a spring in the sanctuary, went to change from their cotton dresses into elaborate red-and-gold saris before heading to the Hindu temple. Others soon joined them, some still wearing plastic Christian crosses.

That evening, they headed to Rosalia’s annual party, where they mixed with Sicilians, tourists, street vendors and loudspeakers blasting Italian summer hits. They watched the fireworks and admired Rosalia’s statue: Like the Hindu goddess Lakhsmi, she was wrapped in flower petals, a lily this time.

“I really don’t see that big of a difference,” said Dhanja Kirupakaran, 20 — who, according to her mother, was born because of a miracle by the saint.

Violent Protests Grip English Cities in Wake of Knife Attack at Dance Class

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please try reloading the page or log in.

Enjoy unlimited access to all of The Times.

6-month Welcome Offer
original price:   $3sale price:   $0.50/week

Learn more

Kamala Harris’s Life in Canada Was Marked by a Yearning for Home

Sign up for the Canada Letter Newsletter  Back stories and analysis from our Canadian correspondents, plus a handpicked selection of our recent Canada-related coverage.

Follow live updates on the 2024 election here.

While campaigning this past week, Senator JD Vance of Ohio called Vice President Kamala Harris a “phony” who “grew up in Canada,” as former President Donald J. Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, continued raising false and incendiary questions about the presumed Democratic nominee’s racial identity.

“Kamala Harris grew up in Canada,” Mr. Vance said during a campaign stop in Arizona on Wednesday. “They don’t talk like that in Vancouver or Quebec or wherever she came from.”

Ms. Harris did, indeed, move to Montreal as a 12-year-old with her sister in 1976, when their mother, Shyamala Gopalan, was recruited to conduct breast-cancer research at Jewish General Hospital and to teach at McGill University’s medical school.

Over the next five years, Kamala Harris continued to shuttle between Quebec’s largest city and California to stay with her father, Donald J. Harris, an economist at Stanford, and a family friend during holidays and vacations.

In her memoir, Ms. Harris characterizes that period of her life as a time of longing for California. (Her campaign declined to comment on Ms. Harris’s time in Canada.)

“I’d gotten used to most of it,” she wrote of her move to a predominantly French-speaking city with harsh winters that was far away from most of her family. “What I hadn’t got used to was the feeling of being homesick for my country. I felt this constant sense of yearning to be back home.”

She left Canada after completing Westmount High School in Montreal and enrolling at Howard University in Washington.

Wanda Kagan, whom Ms. Harris has described as her closest friend at Westmount, said the vice president and the other American students at the school maintained their bonds to the United States.

“They were American and they kept their American identity,” said Ms. Kagan, who lives in Montreal and works in health care. “It’s not like you come here and then you become French Canadian or Canadian.’’

“They were still proud Americans,” she added.

It was a time of enormous social, political and economic change in Quebec. The year Ms. Harris arrived with her mother and sister, the first Parti Québécois government came to power with a mandate to separate from Canada and expand provincial laws intended to make French the predominant language.

In response, several corporations moved many or all of their operations to neighboring Ontario. Between 1971 and 1986, nearly 200,000 English-speaking Quebecers left the province.

But Ms. Kagan said little of that filtered into the hallways and cafeteria of Westmount High. Like much of the western part of the island of Montreal, she said, life there was disconnected from the largely French-speaking areas to the east.

Within the high school, the only visible effects of the sweeping political changes were new laws requiring high school students to reach a minimum proficiency in French in order to graduate, Ms. Kagan recalled.

Ms. Kagan said she and Ms. Harris stood out because both of them had attended classes at a French-language school for a year before transferring to Westmount, which was part of the English-language public school system.

Ms. Harris wrote in her memoir that her mother had sent her to a French school to acquire a second language. But it did not go well.

“I used to joke that I felt like a duck because all day long at our new school I’d be saying, ‘Quoi? Quoi? Quoi?’ (‘What? What? What?),” Ms. Harris wrote.

But Ms. Kagan said that their one year in the French system meant that both she and Ms. Harris avoided the struggle many classmates had passing the recently introduced French test.

Ms. Kagan said that life at school for her and Ms. Harris was more about school activities, like “doing the variety show.”

“We did the fashion show,” she said, “and we did the pep rally.”

They developed an unusually close friendship. When Ms. Kagan told Ms. Harris that she was being sexually abused by her stepfather, Ms. Harris had her move into her family’s apartment in a middle-class neighborhood.

“It’s not just that she took me in,” Ms. Kagan said. “It’s that human side of her, that empathetic side of her that could be so compassionate to realize that there was something going on.”

Ms. Harris said in 2020 that her friend’s plight helped influence her desire to become a prosecutor.

Like Ms. Harris, whose father is Black and from Jamaica and whose mother is South Asian, Ms. Kagan is biracial, with a white mother and a Black father.

The pair found themselves in a high school that was about 60 percent white and 40 percent Black and drew from a variety of neighborhoods that cut across economic lines.

Ms. Kagan said that she and Ms. Harris straddled the school’s racial divide.

Until Ms. Harris was picked as Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s running mate in 2020, her political career had passed largely unnoticed in Canada. Her years in the country had also received relatively little attention since she announced she was running for president.

Ms. Harris has not gotten too deeply involved in U.S.-Canada affairs, though as a senator, she voted against the renegotiated version of the North American Free Trade Agreement because, she said, she believed it lacked sufficient environmental protections.

The government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau viewed the pact as vital to Canada’s economy and made its approval by all three countries its top political priority.

Before moving to Canada as a young girl, Ms. Harris had expressed some misgivings, though in the end, she seemed to have found her niche.

“My mother tried to make it sound like an adventure,” she wrote, recalling the time she was told about the move. “We were going to be explorers of the great northern winter. But it was hard for me to see it that way.”

Vjosa Isai contributed reporting from Toronto.

Enjoy unlimited access to all of The Times.

6-month Welcome Offer
original price:   $3sale price:   $0.50/week

Learn more

Middle East Crisis: Israel Braces for Iranian Retaliation After Assassinations

An anxious calm hangs over Israel.

An uneasy calm hung over Israel on Saturday as the country braced for a threatened Iranian retaliation for the assassinations of senior Hamas and Hezbollah figures, with fears escalating that Israel’s long-running hostilities between Iran and its allies could intensify into a wider regional war.

The Israeli public is already worn down by 10 months of fighting in Gaza following the Oct. 7 attack led by Hamas on the country, and by attacks on other fronts. Hezbollah and the Israeli military have for months traded fire across Israel’s northern border with Lebanon, and Iran in April launched a wave of missiles and drones at Israel in response to a strike on its embassy complex in Syria.

Iran and Hezbollah’s latest threats have added another level of uncertainty to the persistent anxiety of the war. Israeli officials have urged residents to prepare food and water in fortified safe rooms. Paramedics conducted an emergency drill to practice in case of full-scale war. Medical centers in northern Israel prepared for the possibility that they might need to move patients into protected underground wards.

“The volume has been turned up to 11 from every side,” said Ofer Wasserman, 51, a resident of Tel Aviv.

His partner, Anat, wondered whether anxiety over a potential escalation was justified.

“Hezbollah hasn’t shot at us with the aim of total war up until now — why should they do it now?” she said as they watched their daughter from a Jerusalem street bench. “We have safe rooms, as well, and the Iron Dome,” she added, referring to Israel’s aerial defense system.

“But they might feel the need to respond now, and then there would need to be a response to that, as well,” Mr. Wasserman said.

Regional tensions soared this week after the two high-profile killings. On Tuesday, Israel assassinated Fuad Shukr, a senior Hezbollah commander, in Beirut, describing it as retaliation for a rocket attack that killed 12 children in the Israeli-controlled Golan Heights days earlier. Several hours after the Beirut strike, an explosion in Tehran killed Ismail Haniyeh, leader of Hamas’s political office. Iran and Hamas blamed Israel, which has not publicly taken responsibility for killing Mr. Haniyeh.

Iran, Hezbollah and Hamas have all vowed to avenge the killings, putting Israel on a state of alert for the possibility of an imminent attack that could come from multiple countries at once.

Mr. Wasserman said the assassinations would ultimately accomplish very little. Both leaders would be replaced, he said, just as Hezbollah and Hamas had quickly filled the shoes of other leaders assassinated by Israel. “As long as there are people without rights, there’s going to be resistance,” he said. “It won’t end even if you take out the current leaders.”

Over the months since Oct. 7, Israel had slowly adjusted to the wartime routine. Nearly 300,000 Israelis have served weeks or months of military reserve duty and tens of thousands of others have been forced to flee their homes on Israel’s northern and southern borders because of the fighting.

But even longtime observers were shocked by the dizzying pace of developments over the past week.

Before the latest assassinations, some Israelis were hoping for a cease-fire soon that would bring home the remaining 115 hostages still held in Gaza. U.S. officials have said a truce between Israel and Hamas could also pave the way for a diplomatic settlement to end the fighting with Hezbollah.

Although Hezbollah has fired thousands of drones and missiles at Israel since Oct. 8, and Israel has retaliated in turn, the conflict has persisted in a measured, if destructive, game of tit-for-tat. Neither side has shown an appetite, so far, to escalate to a full-on war that would likely be disastrous for Israel and Lebanon.

In contrast with Hamas, Hezbollah possesses a sophisticated arsenal of drones and precision-guided missiles that analysts say could overwhelm Israel’s aerial defenses. The Israeli military response to such an attack would likely be devastating to Lebanon.

For now, Israel is bracing to see how Iran and Hezbollah will retaliate. Hassan Nasrallah said this week that “the response will come, whether spread out or simultaneously,” but also that Israel’s reaction would determine whether the war escalated.

The supreme leader of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has promised “harsh punishment” for the killing of the Hamas leader in Tehran. But Iran’s April response to a provocative strike — which killed senior Iranian generals in Syria — was telegraphed well in advance. In that response, Iran fired 300 missiles and drones at Israel, causing a display of fireworks in the skies as Israeli rockets intercepted the barrage.

That attack mostly targeted an Israeli air base in the country’s south, and Israel and the United States had ample time to prepare a joint aerial defense. Some Israelis and their allies fear any coming attack could hit civilian areas and critical infrastructure, and the Pentagon dispatched additional combat aircraft and missile-shooting warships to the Middle East on Friday to bolster defenses.

Israel’s northern border towns and villages lie directly in the line of fire, particularly from Hezbollah’s rockets. Roughly 60,000 people in Israel and 100,000 in Lebanon have been displaced by the fighting with Hezbollah since October, with no clear timeline for returning to their homes.

Eli Rachevski, who works in the administration of Kfar Blum, a kibbutz in northern Israel, said residents were worried about possible escalation. The attack in the Golan Heights, which hit a soccer field in the village of Majdal Shams, was an event that could have easily taken place in their community, he said.

“But at the same time, we’ve been living in this situation for 10 months now, being shot at all the time,” said Mr. Rachevski, 51.

Many of Kfar Blum’s homes and public buildings lacked fortified shelters despite their proximity to the Lebanese border, Mr. Rachevski said. Kibbutz leaders were discussing whether to evacuate the children and older people farther south in the event of a major escalation, he said.

Some frustrated residents now hope that the escalation might at least break the monthslong deadlock.

Nisan Zeevi, who lives in Kfar Giladi near the Lebanese border, said the last few days had been quieter than usual, despite the occasional rocket barrage. Only a few dozen residents remained in the village — most were evacuated early in the war — and those who remained were “on alert,” he added.

“We’re hoping to see the government step up its fight against Hezbollah,” said Mr. Zeevi, a member of the town’s emergency patrol. “We have been stuck in this situation for too long.”

The prospect of a truce — either in Gaza or in Lebanon — remains remote for the time being. Negotiations that would free the remaining hostages have largely stalled in the wake of Mr. Haniyeh’s assassination, although the Israeli government sent a delegation to Cairo to resume talks on a potential cease-fire deal.

But all sides are still waiting to see how Hezbollah and Iran respond to the assassinations, which will likely shape their calculations during future talks. Diplomats and analysts say Hamas also needs time to regroup after the death of Mr. Haniyeh, who played a key role in the negotiations.

The killing of a Hamas leader has fueled more tension between Biden and Netanyahu.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel is pushing back against President Biden over American concerns about the assassination of the political leader of Hamas and Israel’s approach to cease-fire talks in the latest rift between the two allies since the war in Gaza began 10 months ago.

In what a U.S. official described as a heated conversation on Thursday, Mr. Netanyahu denied that Israel was an obstacle to a cease-fire agreement and rejected Mr. Biden’s contention that the killing of the Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh on Iranian soil could sabotage efforts to reach a deal halting hostilities and freeing hostages.

A senior Israeli government official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive relations between the two countries, said in an interview that Mr. Netanyahu insisted he was not trying to block a cease-fire. While he acknowledged that the death of Mr. Haniyeh, the main negotiator in the cease-fire talks, would interrupt progress for a few days, Mr. Netanyahu argued that it would ultimately hasten the finalization of an agreement by putting more pressure on Hamas, according to the Israeli official.

Mr. Biden contended that the assassination of Mr. Haniyeh was poorly timed, coming right at what the Americans hoped would be the endgame of the process, according to the U.S. official, who likewise did not want to be identified describing private talks. Moreover, Mr. Biden expressed concern that carrying out the operation in Tehran could trigger the wider regional war that he has been trying to avert.

According to both governments, the Israelis did not inform the Americans of the plan to kill Haniyeh even though Mr. Biden had hosted Mr. Netanyahu at the White House just days before. Mr. Netanyahu did not want to compromise the Americans by giving them a heads-up, the Israeli official said. For their part, American officials have made no objections to being left in the dark.

Mr. Biden alluded to his worries about the combustible situation in the Middle East during a brief late-night conversation with reporters at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland on Thursday after welcoming home three Americans released by Russia in a prisoner swap.

“I’m very concerned about it,” the president said. “I had a very direct meeting with the prime minister today — very direct. We have the basis for a cease-fire. He should move on it and they should move on it now.”

Asked if the Haniyeh killing made it harder to reach a deal, Mr. Biden said, “It’s not helped. That’s all I’m going to say right now.”

Even as Mr. Biden and Mr. Netanyahu quarreled, the two allies were working closely to thwart a threatened Iranian attack in retaliation for the Haniyeh killing. Mr. Biden ordered more warships and aircraft to the region, and U.S. military officers were collaborating with their Israeli counterparts to counter such a strike, much as they did in April when they knocked down nearly all of 300 missiles and drones that Iran had launched at Israel.

The president’s frustration over the fitful cease-fire talks came as Israel’s Channel 12 reported on Friday that Mr. Netanyahu had clashed with his own security chiefs, who accused him of changing the terms of the proposal to make it harder to reach a deal. The prime minister’s office denied the report.

Mr. Netanyahu ordered his negotiators to return to Cairo on Saturday to resume the talks, and American officials said they were determined to keep pressing. The U.S. official said disagreements between American and Israeli officials over the latest draft proposal had been resolved over the last week and that it was not fair for critics to accuse Mr. Netanyahu of changing the conditions. But reports from Cairo indicated that no breakthrough had been reached.

The senior Israeli government official described in detail how Israel sees the state of play at the moment. The official flatly denied that Israel had added new conditions, asserting that Hamas had made 29 changes to the document.

But either way, it was clear that significant points of dispute between the two sides remained unresolved. The first phase of the three-stage cease-fire plan calls for Hamas to turn over 33 hostages and for Israel to release a number of Palestinians in Israeli prisons during a 42-day break in military operations.

Mr. Netanyahu, however, is insisting that the remains of hostages who have died not be counted toward the total to be returned. Under the deal as currently written, Israel retains a veto of about 100 Palestinians serving life sentences who will not be eligible for release and can stipulate that about 50 others go into exile rather than return to Gaza.

The Israelis insist on preserving control of what is called the Philadelphi corridor, a narrow strip of land along Gaza’s border with Egypt, to prevent weapons and militants from entering Gaza. The Israeli official strongly denied reports that the Israelis had agreed to leave that corridor. The Israelis also are demanding a mechanism to prevent Hamas fighters from traveling from south to north in Gaza, although it is not clear whether that would have to mean checkpoints.

While Israeli forces would pull back to the along the borders of Gaza under the cease-fire plan, the Israeli official said that Israel considers Rafah, the major city in the south of Gaza, to be part of that perimeter, meaning its forces would remain there.

Israel also wants to make it clear that as the two sides negotiate during a final phase of the cease-fire, it can choose to withdraw from the talks if it does not think progress is being made toward a permanent resolution and resume the war. Otherwise, Hamas could simply stretch out the talks with no intention of actually coming to a final agreement while hostilities remain paused, the official said, calling that a huge dealbreaker.

The Israeli official complained that the pressure from the Americans might encourage Hamas to assume that the United States does not fully support Israel and that the group therefore does not need to make a deal. Biden administration officials have rejected that logic, and some have questioned whether Mr. Netanyahu really wants a deal or simply wants to look like he does to deflect pressure from the families of hostages anxious for the return of their loved ones.

The issue came up during the Oval Office meeting between Mr. Biden and Mr. Netanyahu on July 25. Mr. Biden pressed Mr. Netanyahu strongly during that conversation to make a cease-fire agreement, raising his voice and insisting that a deal be done in a week or two, according to the U.S. official, in details previously reported by Axios.

Mr. Biden had a document in his hand to discuss the Israeli position on the cease-fire. The U.S. official said the Israelis had amended their views of some parts of the proposal and brought those views to the meeting, but Mr. Biden and his advisers argued that some of those views were problematic and could prevent a deal. Mr. Netanyahu told Mr. Biden he had not added any conditions, the Israeli official said.

Mr. Biden and the Americans asked to have teams from the two sides get together to work out those points of dispute, which they did in the succeeding days, according to the U.S. official. The final result is now in good shape, added the official.

But an Israeli strike that killed a Hezbollah commander in Lebanon on Tuesday, just five days after the Oval Office meeting, and the assassination of Mr. Haniyeh in Tehran on Wednesday caught the Americans off guard. While they said they did not mourn either of the men, the timing and venues of the operations stunned the Americans and raised questions in their minds about whether Mr. Netanyahu was as serious about the cease-fire as he had just told the president he was.

The subsequent phone conversation between Mr. Biden and Mr. Netanyahu on Thursday was a tough one. The president was extremely direct and forthright, according to the U.S. official, telling the prime minister that it was time to get the deal over the finish line.

In the interview, the senior Israeli official said it seemed like the American side wanted a deal immediately, regardless of what is in it, and complained about the pressure being put on Mr. Netanyahu.

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Israel conducts airstrikes on West Bank, killing 3 members of Hamas military wing.

Israel hit a town in the occupied West Bank with two airstrikes on Saturday in the latest use of a once-rare tactic in the densely populated area. Hamas said that three members of its military wing and six other fighters were killed in the strikes around the town of Tulkarm.

In one of the attacks, a drone strike killed five people in a vehicle, according to Palestinian media, including a local leader of the Qassam Brigades, the Hamas military wing. The Hamas statement said three of the dead belonged to Qassam, but did not claim the other six fighters as members.

The Israeli military said only that it had targeted “terrorists” in the strikes on Saturday as part of an ongoing operation in Tulkarm, without identifying specific targets. It said that those in the vehicle were on their way to carry out an attack.

The military also closed roads into Tulkarm, leaving residents with no route out. Palestinian media published videos showing Israeli bulldozers tearing up stretches of road.

The Israeli military has stepped up near-daily raids on Palestinian cities and towns in the West Bank since the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel. Israeli forces have also increasingly carried out deadly airstrikes in the territory, a rise in aerial attacks not seen since the second Palestinian uprising against Israeli occupation in the early 2000s.

Before Oct. 7, airstrikes and drone attacks on the West Bank were rare and far more limited than in Gaza. But since the war in Gaza began, Israel has stepped up its aerial attacks on Palestinian areas.

The two Palestinian territories have long been under separate governments. Hamas ruled Gaza for 17 years before war broke out there in October, while the Palestinian Authority, dominated by a rival faction to Hamas, Fatah, administers parts of the West Bank.

The Israeli military has carried out at least 39 airstrikes on Tulkarm over the past 10 months, according to the United Nations. The figure does not include Saturday’s strikes. In one of the most recent attacks on July 22, an Israeli drone strike killed five Palestinians, including two women, in Tulkarm, according to the United Nations.

At least 589 Palestinians have been killed in the West Bank by Israeli forces or Jewish settlers since Oct. 7. Some were members of Palestinian armed groups fighting the Israeli occupation, but others were civilians, according to Palestinian media and health officials. Among them were 142 children and youths under the age of 18, the Palestinian Health Ministry reported last month.

Rawan Sheikh Ahmad contributed reporting.

The U.S. is sending more combat aircraft to the Middle East, officials say.

Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III on Friday ordered additional combat aircraft and missile-shooting warships to the Middle East in response to threats from Iran and its proxies in Gaza, Lebanon and Yemen to attack Israel in the coming days to avenge the death of Ismail Haniyeh, the Pentagon said.

The military will send one additional squadron of Air Force F-22 fighter jets, an unspecified number of additional Navy cruisers and destroyers capable of intercepting ballistic missiles, and, if needed, more land-based ballistic-missile defense systems.

To maintain the presence of an aircraft carrier and its accompanying warships in the region, Mr. Austin also directed the aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln, now in the eastern Pacific, to relieve the aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt in the next couple of weeks when it is scheduled to return home.

Some ships already in the western Mediterranean Sea will move east, closer to the coast of Israel to provide more security, a senior Pentagon official said.

“Secretary Austin has ordered adjustments to U.S. military posture designed to improve U.S. force protection, to increase support for the defense of Israel and to ensure the United States is prepared to respond to various contingencies,” Sabrina Singh, the deputy Pentagon press secretary, said in a statement.

The statement did not specify when the additional warplanes and combatant vessels would arrive, but officials said on Friday it would be a matter of days for the additional aircraft and somewhat longer for the naval reinforcements.

Earlier on Friday, officials were still deciding how many additional planes and warships to send. Officials said they were seeking to calibrate the American response to send enough of the right types of aircraft and ships as quickly as possible to help defend Israel without appearing to escalate the conflict.

Ms. Singh, in a news conference earlier on Friday, had raised the possibility that the United States could also send additional troops to operate whatever additional capabilities the Pentagon sends to the region. The support, she said, would be defensive in nature.

She said that during a telephone call Mr. Austin held with his Israeli counterpart, Yoav Gallant, on Friday morning, Mr. Austin “committed” that the United States would help Israel in its defense. “We will be bolstering our force protection in the region,” she said.

The Pentagon is also bracing for the possibility that Iran-backed groups, including the Houthis in Yemen and Kataib Hezbollah in Iraq, might target American troops in the region as part of the expected Iranian retaliation for the killing of Mr. Haniyeh this week.

Mr. Austin, during the conversation with Mr. Gallant, expressed concerns about the dangers of escalation. He said that “all countries” in the region would benefit from defusing tensions, Ms. Singh said.

In addition to some 80 land-based combat aircraft, the Pentagon has already deployed more than a dozen warships in the region. The aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt, equipped with about 40 F/A-18 Super Hornet and F-35 attack planes, is now steaming near the Arabian Gulf, while the U.S.S. Wasp amphibious ready group, with 30 airplanes and helicopters as well as 4,500 Marines and sailors, is operating in the eastern Mediterranean Sea.

Any additional air power could be crucial. Iran fired more than 300 drones and missiles against Israel in a major attack in April, but only a handful got through, causing slight damage. U.S. Air Force jets based in Jordan and in Saudi Arabia coordinated with French, Jordanian and British Air Force fighters to shoot down more than 80 drones.

Iran telegraphed that strike in advance, giving the Pentagon sufficient time to move additional combat aircraft and Navy ships into place while U.S. commanders negotiated access to airspace for fighter jets and coordinated air defense batteries on the ground to help defend Israel.

It is unclear whether Israel and its allies will have that much time to prepare for any new round of major Iranian attacks, officials said.

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Palestinians say funeral prayers for a slain Hamas leader, but anger is subdued.

Palestinians in the parts of the Israeli-occupied West Bank and Gaza joined in performing funeral prayers for the slain Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh on Friday as he was buried in the capital of Qatar, Doha.

But few appeared to heed a Hamas call for a “day of anger” to condemn the assassination of Mr. Haniyeh and Israel’s invasion and ongoing bombardment of Gaza. Israel is widely believed to have carried out Mr. Haniyeh’s killing but has not acknowledged a role in the attack.

There was rage on the streets of Gaza, but it wasn’t necessarily over Mr. Haniyeh’s killing.

Much of it was triggered by the grisly familiar sight of rescuers and civilians pulling the dead and wounded from buildings destroyed by new Israeli airstrikes in Gaza City and Khan Younis.

And while Mr. Haniyeh’s funeral prayer in Doha was held in the grandeur of Qatar’s largest mosque and attended by thousands, those in Gaza note that funeral prayers for their dead — if they happen at all — are generally rushed and performed either in hospital hallways or in the street amid ruined buildings.

Mr. Haniyeh’s coffin was draped ceremoniously in the Palestinian flag, but Gazans killed in the war are routinely buried in body bags, quickly and mostly in mass, unmarked graves.

“Somebody feel for us,” one man pleaded in the Tal al-Hawa neighborhood of Gaza City as other men around him carried the dead in body bags after airstrikes there. “We are dying. We are dying. Oh, Arabs. We are dying, oh world,” he said in a video posted by Palestinian media.

At least seven new Palestinian deaths were added to a toll that Gaza health officials say is nearing 40,000 people, many of them women and children, over almost 10 months of war started by the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel. Israel vowed to eradicate Hamas after that and says it has since targeted its leaders in a series of attacks.

At Al Aqsa Mosque in the Old City of Jerusalem, Sheikh Ekrima Sabri mentioned “the martyr Ismail Haniyeh” during his weekly Friday prayer sermon and asked for mercy on his soul.

After the sermon, a funeral prayer in absentia was performed for Mr. Haniyeh. Not all worshipers took part though, and some left after the weekly prayer had ended. Nearby, outside the Dome of the Rock prayer hall, Israeli paramilitary police patrolled the courtyard near worshipers trying to stay cool in the shade. There is a history of tension and clashes between the Israeli police and Palestinian worshipers around the mosque compound — a contested religious site holy to both Muslims and Jews.

The afternoon at the mosque mostly passed without incident, but later, the Israeli police said they had initiated an investigation to determine whether there was any “suspicion of incitement” in Mr. Sabri’s prayer sermon and summoned him for questioning.

Police also said they had arrested another person who “chanted inciting remarks during the prayer.”

In the Shati refugee camp in northern Gaza, where Mr. Haniyeh was born in 1962, dozens of men and boys gathered to perform the funeral prayer on the ground floor of a damaged building. Part of one wall was completely missing.

Despite its designation as a refugee camp, Shati was a developed neighborhood before the war, housing permanently displaced Palestinian refugees and their descendants who fled or were expelled from their homes in 1948 during the conflict that surrounded the creation of Israel.

Mr. Haniyeh was born there to parents who themselves fled their homes in what has become the Israeli city of Ashkelon and were never allowed to return by Israel.

Rawan Sheikh Ahmad contributed reporting.

Israel strikes a school compound in Gaza, where rescuers report multiple people killed.

The Israeli military struck a school compound in Gaza City on Saturday, asserting that it was being used by Hamas as a military command center, a statement Hamas denied. The Palestinian emergency agency reported that multiple people had been killed.

The agency, the Palestinian Civil Defense, did not say how many people had died. The news outlet Al Jazeera and Wafa, the Palestinian Authority’s official news agency, both reported that at least 15 people had been killed in the attack.

At least 26 people were brought to Al-Ahli Hospital, according to Dr. Fadel Naim, head of orthopedic surgery at the hospital.

Videos posted on social media on Saturday showed a building engulfed in flames after a strike, with smoke rising. People could be seen running for cover.

The Israeli military, in a statement, called the compound, known as the Hamama School, “a hiding place for Hamas terrorists” and said that attacks were “planned and carried out from there.” It also said weapons were manufactured and stored in the compound.

Condemning the attack, Hamas said in a statement that Israel “deliberately targeted civilians including children, women and elderly.” It said Israel had told “blatant lies” in asserting that the school compound was used for military purposes.

Most of Gaza’s schools have been converted into shelters for thousands of displaced people since the war began on Oct. 7, when Hamas led an attack into Israel. The Israeli military has repeatedly bombed school buildings in Gaza or struck in their immediate vicinity, often saying the buildings were being used by Hamas fighters, claims that the group has denied. The Israeli authorities say they take steps to limit the risk to civilians.

According to a recent U.N. assessment, nearly 85 percent of Gaza’s schools have been destroyed or damaged during the war, and more than half of the school buildings used as shelters have been directly hit.

In the occupied West Bank, where tensions and violence have increased since the war began on Oct. 7, the Israeli military hit a town with two airstrikes in what it called a counterterrorism operation. Hamas said that three members of its military wing and six other fighters were killed in the strikes around the town of Tulkarm.

Terrorist Attack on Crowded Beachfront in Somalia Kills at Least 32

A suicide bomber detonated explosives outside a hotel in a popular beachfront area in Somalia’s capital, Mogadishu, before gunmen stormed the building, setting off a four-hour siege that left at least 32 people dead and more than 60 others wounded, the police said on Saturday.

The Islamist militant group Al Shabab claimed responsibility for the deadly assault, which started late Friday. Al Shabab have been waging an insurgency against the internationally backed government in Somalia for more than 17 years and have previously targeted the beach area, Lido, which is popular with businesspeople and officials as well as with other residents.

A witness, Mohamed Jibril, said that, at the time of the attack, he had been out with friends in the area, which had been thronged with hundreds of people.

“We heard a loud explosion followed by gunfire,” Mr. Jibril said in an interview.

“I have never seen anything like that in my entire life,” he added. “I saw many people lying on the beach asking for help, and no one dared to help them because there was ongoing shooting.”

A spokesman for the Somali police, Abdifatah Adan Hassan, said that officers had killed three attackers who had stormed the beachfront hotel, ending the siege.

“Our security forces have eliminated all three Shabab attackers who entered the hotel and took hostage the customers and beachgoers who took shelter inside the building,” he said.

The attack underscores Al Shabab’s enduring threat despite yearslong efforts by the Somali government and its allies, including the United States and the African Union, to suppress the militant group.

President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud of Somalia vowed to defeat Al Shabab when he came to power in 2022, and his efforts initially proved successful as the government limited the group’s ability to carry out attacks in the capital and kicked the militants out of large swaths of the country.

But in the past year, Al Shabab, which is linked to Al Qaeda, have succeeded in retaking villages and towns across central and south-central Somalia. In January, Al Shabab also captured a United Nations helicopter with at least nine people onboard after the craft made an emergency landing in an area controlled by the group.

In a post on social media, Mr. Mohamud sent his condolences to the families of those killed in the latest outbreak of violence.

“The terrorist attack on Lido beach shows the brutality” of the attackers “and their aim to kill the Somali people everywhere,” he said in a statement, adding, “The government is committed to eradicating this group from the whole country.”

The Lido area has been the target of several previous attacks, including a six-hour siege by Al Shabab on a beachside hotel in 2023, which left six civilians dead and 10 wounded. Five people were killed in a car bomb blast at a cafe in the capital last month. And in March, the militants killed three people and wounded 27 in an hourslong siege of another Mogadishu hotel, breaking a relative lull in the fighting.

Abdi Latif Dahir contributed reporting from Nairobi, Kenya.

Enjoy unlimited access to all of The Times.

6-month Welcome Offer
original price:   $3sale price:   $0.50/week

Learn more

In Gaza, Even Poetry and Toilets Aren’t Safe From Thieves

Follow our latest updates on the Middle East crisis here.

As he perused a market selling everything from stolen children’s shoes to battered plumbing pipes, Mahmoud al-Jabri was surprised to find something familiar: his own book collection.

Among the collection was his first published work of poems, with his handwriting scrawled along the margins. Even more shocking than seeing the book he had toiled for years to create was that the vendor wanted a paltry 5 shekels, or about $1, for it.

The salesman suggested using the pages for kindling.

“I was torn between two feelings,” he said, “laughter and bitterness.”

In Gaza, even poetry books can become a source of profit for enterprising thieves. A pervasive lawlessness has emerged from the rubble of cities obliterated since Israel launched its all-out offensive on the enclave in retaliation for the Hamas-led attacks of Oct. 7.

“Thieves’ markets,” as they are called by locals, have proliferated across Gaza, selling loot plundered from homes, businesses and even hospitals. With Israel blocking the flow of most goods into Gaza, the markets have become important places for finding household necessities. And visits to the markets have become a weary ritual for Gazans seeking to reclaim stolen pieces of their lives.

Some, like Mr. Al-Jabri, even stumble upon belongings they had not yet realized were missing.

In his hometown in southern Gaza, Khan Younis, where the central market was reduced to rubble by Israeli strikes, vendors sell stolen hospital supplies and clothes on plastic tarps or wooden carts alongside produce sellers on the main road out of the battered city.

In Deir al-Balah, in central Gaza, the bustling trade in stolen goods happens next to the traditional street market. Once a tangled network of streets awash in the smell of spices and the chants of vendors hawking fruit, that market has been reduced to a single thoroughfare as most commerce has dried up under the Israeli blockade.

Now, it is the thieves’ markets that thrive, teeming with nervous energy as crowds mill about piles of loot.

Shoppers and vendors look around suspiciously as they go about their business. Sometimes, families forced to buy their own possessions back at exorbitant prices are overcome with rage at sellers who claim to have no idea where the goods came from. The arguments can come to blows, residents say, and, occasionally, even gunfire.

The lawlessness is felt everywhere in Gaza. Many increasingly destitute people have been driven to petty thievery.

Prisons abandoned by Hamas jailers are now empty, and felons roam free, residents say. Criminal gangs band together to strip bare hospital and university buildings, or ambush the few trucks that enter with food and supplies.

Before the current war, Hamas-affiliated police patrolled the streets and kept a lid on crime. But they have now all but disappeared, targets of Israel’s military as it undertakes its aim to “dismantle Hamas military and administrative capabilities.”

Israel’s 10-month war in Gaza — and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s refusal to articulate a postwar plan — has essentially created a power vacuum in the enclave, though without any alternative leadership in place, Hamas has been able to regroup in some areas and re-emerge as a military force.

In some southern regions of Gaza, Hamas officials have also tried to re-exert influence by sending members to patrol markets for price gouging. Yet Hamas itself stands accused by locals of profiting off the chaos, with suspicions high that its militants are somehow affiliated with armed gangs that sell their services to protect warehouses or goods.

Communal trust has also been depleted. Locals trade stories of business partners who robbed them, or of thieves who sneak in among rescue workers after an airstrike, stealing anything from jewelry to kitchen utensils as families are being dug out from the rubble.

When civilians flee their homes in response to Israeli evacuation orders, thieves descend upon empty neighborhoods, sneaking into apartments and ripping out everything they can, residents say.

Anas Al-Tawashy, 32, went to the thieves’ market in Deir al-Balah after his house was robbed for the third time. He said he was trying to find his niece’s pajamas and his wife’s pots and pans — everyday items that have become ever more rare amid waves of bombardment, displacement and the Israeli blockade.

Yet what he most longed to find was the PlayStation and games that he and his twin brother, now far away in Canada, spent hours playing together as young boys.

“Those were my childhood memories,” he said, after days of fruitless searching. “I feel so much pain over this.”

Not even toilets are spared the thieving frenzy. So many have been stolen that when families return home or relocate to towns where fighting has ebbed, they are forced to buy used toilets for their lodgings. Thieves effectively created soaring demand for toilets, selling them at around $100 — triple their price before the war.

After evacuation orders came to his neighborhood in Khan Younis, Salah Al-Qedra tried to pre-empt the thieves by emptying out his home of everything he could, including the toilets. His family moved in with nearby relatives, but like so many homeowners in Gaza, he risks his own life every day by remaining in an area Israel has warned it may strike to stand guard over the remnants of his home.

Last month, Mr. Al-Qedra said he and his neighbors watched helplessly as armed gangs looted the nearby European Hospital. The crime was especially outrageous, he said, because it incapacitated one of the few hospitals still able to treat the constant flow of wounded.

“What if a thief got injured? Where will he be taken? How would he get treatment?” he asked. “This hospital served the community and displaced people for more than eight months, and that good deed was repaid by simply robbing them.”

The thieves, undeterred by onlookers filming them with their phones, dragged out loot like beds, stretchers and IV equipment, Mr. Al-Qedra said.

Hospitals are a lucrative target, just like the schools that have mostly been converted into refugee shelters, as most have large solar panels on the rooftops to power their facilities.

In today’s wartime conditions, a solar panel is not only a power supply, but a business opportunity. Savvy entrepreneurs can use solar panels to set up charging stations amid the rows of tents in displacement camps, allowing locals to charge their phones or batteries to power lighting or other electronics at night.

Even as more crimes are orchestrated, others are spontaneous attacks symptomatic of a desperate population.

Last month in Khan Younis, a man ran toward a crowd of people on a busy street, shouting: “Everyone! A truck loaded with tents is coming this way!”

With so many Gazans displaced more than once in this war, tents are invaluable.

Passers-by and street vendors sprang into action, looking for rocks and sticks to strike the truck, and blocking the road. The truck, its carriage caged in steel for protection, barreled toward the crowd at top speed, as gunmen inside opened fire, leaving behind a cloud of dust and a disappointed crowd.

But clever thieves can repurpose nearly anything for profit, like the stolen books that Mr. Al-Jabri, the poet, initially assumed were sold for people to read and pass time during the war.

Once he understood the books were being sold for kindling, Mr. Al-Jabri walked away in disgust. The vendor chased after him crying, he recalled, offering to drop the price.

“At that moment, I lost my passion for the written word,” Mr. Al-Jabri said. “The priority now is survival — to eat, not to read.”

Who Are the Far-Right Groups Behind the U.K. Riots?

Violent unrest has erupted in several towns and cities in Britain in recent days, and further disorder broke out on Saturday as far-right agitators gathered in demonstrations around the country.

The violence has been driven by online disinformation and extremist right-wing groups intent on creating disorder after a deadly knife attack on a children’s event in northwestern England, experts said.

A range of far-right factions and individuals, including neo-Nazis, violent soccer fans and anti-Muslim campaigners, have promoted and taken part in the unrest, which has also been stoked by online influencers.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer has vowed to deploy additional police officers to crack down on the disorder. “This is not a protest that has got out of hand,” he said on Thursday. “It is a group of individuals who are absolutely bent on violence.”

Here is what we know about the unrest and some of those involved.

The first riot took place on Tuesday evening in Southport, a town in northwestern England, after a deadly stabbing attack the previous day at a children’s dance and yoga class. Three girls died of their injuries, and eight other children and two adults were wounded.

The suspect, Axel Rudakubana, was born in Britain, but in the hours after the attack, disinformation about his identity — including the false claim that he was an undocumented migrant — spread rapidly online. Far-right activists used messaging apps including Telegram and X to urge people to take to the streets.

Over 200 people descended on Southport on Tuesday night, many traveling by train from elsewhere in Britain, the police said. Rioters attacked a mosque, wounded more than 50 police officers and set vehicles alight.

On Wednesday night, another far-right demonstration brought clashes with the police in central London, leading to over 100 arrests. Smaller pockets of disorder broke out in Hartlepool, in northeastern England; in the city of Manchester; and in Aldershot, a town southeast of London.

On Friday night, Northumbria Police said its officers had been “subjected to serious violence” as far-right demonstrators set fires and attacked officers in Sunderland, a city in the northeast. On Saturday, activists clashed with police in the northern cities of Liverpool, Hull and Nottingham, among other places.

The chair of the National Police Chiefs’ Council, Gavin Stephens, told BBC Radio on Friday that extra officers would be on Britain’s streets and that the police would use lessons learned from the 2011 London riots.

“We will have surge capacity in our intelligence, in our briefing and in the resources that are out in local communities,” he said.

Several far-right groups have been at the riots or promoted them on social media. David Miles, a prominent member of Patriotic Alternative, a fascist group, shared photographs of himself in Southport, according to Hope Not Hate, a Britain-based advocacy group that researches extremist organizations.

Other far-right agitators spread information about the protest on social media, including British Movement, a neo-Nazi group. Images of the protests examined by Hope not Hate showed some people with Nazi tattoos.

After the disorder in Southport, the police said that supporters of the English Defence League had been involved. The riots have also attracted people linked to soccer violence, or hooliganism, which has long overlapped with nationalist movements in Britain.

Officials noted that not everyone at the demonstrations had far-right views. David Hanson, a cabinet minister, told LBC Radio on Friday: “Some might be caught up in the summer madness. Some might be people who’ve got genuine concerns.”

But, he warned, “If you are organizing this now, we will be watching you.”

Created in 2009, the English Defence League was a far-right street movement notorious for violent protests and an anti-Islam, anti-immigration stance.

The group emerged in Luton, England, where community tensions had risen after a handful of Islamic extremists chanted abuse at British soldiers returning home from Iraq. Luton was already associated with Islamist extremism, because it was home to a small number of adherents to Al Muhajiroun, an extremist group implicated in the 2005 London bombings.

Among the English Defence League founders was Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, who goes by the name Tommy Robinson. Born in Luton, he was at one time a member of the far-right British National Party. He also had connections to soccer violence and was convicted of leading soccer fans in a brawl in Luton in 2010.

In the group’s early years, regional divisions carried out local demonstrations, including protests over planned mosques, and engaged in actions like placing pig heads around Muslim sites.

According to Matthew Feldman, a specialist on right-wing extremism, the group represented a new stage in far-right British politics, because unlike the National Front or the British National Party, it did not contest elections.

“This is direct-action politics, disseminated and coordinated via the new media — ranging from Facebook to mobile phones, and digital film to YouTube,” Professor Feldman wrote in a 2011 academic study of the English Defence League.

In 2013, Mr. Yaxley-Lennon said he had broken ties with the league. And after leadership disputes and internal divisions, the group no longer formally exists. But experts say that many of its supporters remain active through other nationalist groups with similar aims and tactics.

In the later 2010s, Mr. Yaxley-Lennon rose to prominence in international circles that shared his anti-Muslim stance, including in Europe and the United States. In the past week, he has used social media, including a previously banned X profile that was reinstated under Elon Musk, to promote falsehoods about the identity of the Southport attacker.

Nowadays, experts say the English Defence League has evolved into a diffuse idea spread mainly online. Its Islamophobic and xenophobic stance has become an “ideal that people self-radicalize themselves into,” said Sunder Katwala, the director of British Future, a nonprofit that researches public attitudes on immigration and identity.

Many far-right groups in Britain have deliberately moved away from formal hierarchies and leadership structures, experts say.

Joe Mulhall, Hope Not Hate’s director of research, called the movement “post organizational” in a 2018 analysis. Social media and other technologies, he wrote, offer “new ways for it to engage in activism outside the confines of traditional, organizational structures.”

Violent street rallies, a core part of the English Defence League’s rise, often serve as a recruiting tool for extremist groups, according to Paul Jackson, a University of Northampton professor who specializes in the history of radicalism and extremism.

“Social movements thrive on such demonstrations,” he wrote in a 2011 paper. “They are ‘performances’ that can reinforce the perceived senses of injustice and being ignored by mainstream voices to followers.”

The police may also struggle to respond to mobs that can be conjured within hours through private messaging apps. According to Professor Feldman, “police are still oftentimes thinking in 20th-century terms — that something like this might take a few days to set up; that they might ask for a permit for a march.”

The Southport riot, he said, “was very nearly a flash demo.”

Amid Heavy Industry, Canada’s Newest (and Tiniest) National Park

Ian Austen

Reporting from Windsor and Point Pelee National Park in Ontario

The beach is more about broken glass from generations of illicit parties than sand. The roar and squeal of a nearby railway locomotive compete with the birdsong. The wind carries a sweet chemical scent from a cooking oil processing plant to the west.

And just across the Detroit River, the skyline offered up by the United States is dominated by a sooty factory puffing out clouds of steam and intermittently shooting orange flame from a chimney as it turns coal into coke for steel mills.

But amid all this blight peeks out a most surprising sight: familiar yellow signs sporting the beaver logo of Parks Canada.

In a country with national parks set amid majestic mountains and vast expanses of wilderness, this unprepossessing stretch of land in Windsor, Ontario, is set to become part of Canada’s newest national park.

“People were really excited to see the first signs,” said Mike Fisher, a member of a volunteer group that has long promoted the idea of a national park here. “It’s essentially the beginnings of the tiniest national park in Canada.”

Despite more than a century of industrial and urban encroachment, the area that will form the core of the national park is covered by some of the last remaining tallgrass prairie that once dominated the southern landscape of Ontario, Canada’s most populous province. Living within the area, currently called the Ojibway Prairie Complex, are more than 3,000 species of plants and animals, including 200 or so that biologists have categorized as being at risk.

But the planned park is in a city that like its American neighbor, Detroit, is best known for automaking, and it is about more than protecting a natural area.

It is one of six urban national parks currently under various stages of development that are also an attempt by Parks Canada at reconciliation with the country’s Indigenous people.

For much of its early history, the parks agency forcibly removed Indigenous people from their lands and excluded them from management of the resulting parks.

For example, Point Pelee National Park, about an hour’s drive from Windsor, was established in 1918 on land that was once the home of the Caldwell First Nation. It was not compensated for the loss of the land until 2011.


Back in Windsor, that the future park’s patchwork of grasslands and woods survived into 2024 is largely thanks to an event that happened almost 100 years ago: the Great Depression.

Before the Depression, United States Steel had announced it would build a major factory here, with jobs for 16,000 workers and an adjacent model city to be called Ojibway.

But then the economic collapse came, and the complex was only partly built before the land was sold for underground salt mining, though remnants of the project lingered. Sidewalks leftover from the company town that never was remain, in a distressed state, although the rusting fire hydrants that once accompanied them are gone.

The land has been preserved, informally and formally, since then. The area along the Detroit River shoreline was owned by the federal government, which passed it last year to Parks Canada from the port authority. A large municipal park and a tract of mostly open grassland belonging to the Province of Ontario will also be incorporated into the national park.

What the proposed park lacks in epic grandeur, it more than compensates for with biodiversity, said Catherine Febria, a biologist who studies the restoration of freshwater areas at the University of Windsor. “Ultimately, it’s not science that’s going to restore this,” Dr. Febria said. “It is people coming together over time.”

Particularly important, Dr. Febria said, will be the area’s Indigenous people.

Some of what the Indigenous involvement may look like in the national park was previewed in an area of the future park known as Spring Garden, where three young people from the Walpole Island First Nation, which is about 55 miles upstream from Windsor, had recently done traditional, low-intensity controlled burns to keep invasive grasses from taking over.

This area also illustrates the competition between the urban and the natural that the park must resolve.

A large pond, ringed by a rusting chain-link fence, has been cleared of invasive plants by Parks Canada and is now filled with waterfowl and lined with local species of water plants. Nearby, residents were walking dogs through the area, and horses and their riders from the nearby Rowdy Girls’ Ranch often came down the path, as did cyclists.

All of those uses will continue in the national park. But Karen Cedar, a coordinator at the City of Windsor’s nature center, said that the national park status would help prevent less-welcome activities. She pointed high up a tree where the ears of some recently hatched great horned owls poked above a crumbling, plastic laundry basket.

The basket, Ms. Cedar said, was placed in the tree a few years earlier by “well-meaning, but misguided” residents after a wind storm blew down the owls’ nest. “The great horned owl is notorious for being not much into nest building,” she said.

The name of the new park has yet to be finalized. But it has the jump on the other five urban national park candidates with its official designation.

Brian Masse, who represents the area in Parliament, introduced a bill to establish it. With backing from Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government, the bill has passed the House of Commons and is in the unelected Senate. Mr. Trudeau’s current budget bill includes money to set up and operate the park.

In addition to the park’s name, many other questions remain, including exactly what land will be included.

One parcel of city-owned land is of particular interest to the Caldwell First Nation.

Surrounded by an expressway exit ramp, as well as by the main thoroughfare leading to the bridge to Detroit and by a residential subdivision, the parcel, known as Aboriginal Park, is not much to look at. It is mostly a lawn with a single basketball net, two benches and some playground equipment, including a swing set. Overgrown bush, where someone has placed crudely built shelters for feral cats, rings two sides of it.

In a chilly drizzle, Zack Hamm, an archaeologist who works for the Caldwell First Nation, pointed to where streams once led up to the site, which had been long used for burials by Indigenous people.

From the 1930s to the late 1980s, he said, archaeologists found about 30 buried remains in the area. The last of those archaeological surveys, in 1989, exhumed some of the bodies and then reburied them without recording their location, Mr. Hamm said. His guess is that they are within an unkempt area next to the expressway ramp, but he added that it was quite possible that they were beneath the playground.

Not only does Chief Mary Duckworth of the Caldwell First Nation want Aboriginal Park incorporated into the new national park, she also wants it transformed.

“I want a memorial to the bodies that are buried in here that we know nothing about,” Chief Duckworth said. “It’s like us going to a cemetery and taking down the headstones and us putting a playground on top of your grandfather.”

She acknowledged that the neighbors were unlikely to be happy about losing their only playground, but said that she was confident they would come around.

“Most people, if they knew the truth, would understand why we’re doing what we do,” she said. “Windsor is a real industrial town. It’s a dirty town. So can we leave something nice for everybody? Do we have to fight about it?”

Enjoy unlimited access to all of The Times.

6-month Welcome Offer
original price:   $3sale price:   $0.50/week

Learn more

Roaring Back After Crackdown, Bangladesh Protesters Demand Leader’s Ouster

Fresh protests roiled Bangladesh on Saturday, just weeks after a deadly government crackdown, as demonstrators returned to the streets in what appeared to be the biggest numbers yet and escalated their demands to include the prime minister’s resignation.

In its efforts to break last month’s student-led protests, which started peacefully but turned violent after demonstrators were attacked, the government detained student organizers, rounded up about 10,000 people and accused tens of thousands more of crimes such as arson and vandalism.

A curfew and communications blackout quieted things down, and the students won a significant concession from the courts on their initial demand to end a preferential quota system for public-sector jobs.

But the crackdown by the security forces of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina — which led to the deaths of more than 200 people — seems to have made many Bangladeshis even angrier and broadened the movement’s scope.

The protesters’ re-emergence on the streets, days after the curfew and communications blackout were eased, ratcheted up what was already the biggest challenge that the iron-fisted Ms. Hasina has faced in her 15 years as leader of this country of 170 million people.

As they gathered in huge numbers on Saturday, the demonstrators whittled their demands to a single — and highly provocative — request. Previously, they had called for an apology by Ms. Hasina and the firing of some officials. Now, they are demanding the resignation of both her and her government as accountability for the hundreds of protester deaths.

The demonstrators called for further protests and a “complete noncooperation movement” until Ms. Hasina steps down.

“It is time for her to go,” Nahid Islam, one of the student leaders who was tortured in custody in recent weeks, said at Shaheed Minar, a national monument in Dhaka where teeming crowds gathered on Saturday. “It is not enough to just oust Sheikh Hasina; the murders, looting and corruption that have taken place in this country must see justice.”

In an indication of the risk of violence in the days ahead, Ms. Hasina’s ruling Awami League called for gatherings of its own across the country on Sunday and Monday.

By late Saturday evening, the homes of several officials in Ms. Hasina’s party had been attacked in Chattogram, Bangladesh’s second-largest city, according local police officials and party leaders. Hours later, the homes of several opposition leaders were also attacked in the city, in what appeared to be retaliation.

The protests began largely peacefully in early July, after a Dhaka court reinstated quotas for more than half of all civil service jobs, which are highly sought after. Under pressure from protests in 2018, Ms. Hasina had paused the decades-old system that gave preference to, among others, descendants of people who fought for Bangladesh’s independence from Pakistan.

Students called the quotas discriminatory. But anger over the issue was also expressive of broader unhappiness with an economy that has stagnated in recent years, and an increasingly authoritarian governing party in which cronyism was entrenched, analysts said.

Ms. Hasina’s initial response to the protests was dismissive, fueling a perception that she favored reinstating the quotas as an offering to her supporters after winning a fourth consecutive term in January.

When the protests grew angry and violence flared, she struck a more conciliatory note, and then a Supreme Court ruling reduced the quota-reserved jobs to 7 percent of the total, down from 56 percent. But by then the crackdown had already resulted in the deaths of students.

On Saturday, Ms. Hasina again spoke of conciliation, a tone that for many clashed with the violence of the earlier crackdown. “The door of Ganabhaban is open,” Ms. Hasina said, referring to her official residence. “I want to sit with the agitating students of the movement and listen to them. I want no conflict.”

Ms. Hasina’s government blamed last month’s violence on her sworn political enemies, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party and the Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami, an Islamic party, and rounded up their leaders. She also issued a decree banning the political activities of Jamaat-e-Islami and its student wing. Ms. Hasina’s lieutenants put some arrested student leaders on camera, where they read a statement declaring the end of their movement.

But the moment the government eased up on the restrictions, the protesters began demanding justice for their peers who had been killed, wounded or detained. Once the student leaders were freed, they said they had been forced to make that statement, and they repeated their call for mass gatherings.

Mr. Islam, the student leader who called for Ms. Hasina’s resignation on Saturday, was picked up by the security forces shortly after the crackdown began around July 16. When he was released days later, his sister Fatema Tasnim said he had been tortured. He had bruises on his arms, and his thighs had turned black from beatings. He was picked up again days later while receiving treatment at the hospital.

Ms. Tasnim said people were looking to student leaders like her brother to break the entrenched authoritarianism in Bangladesh, in which Ms. Hasina’s government enforces policies without much care for the population. Ms. Tasnim quoted a Bengali poet: “If we don’t wake up, mother, how will the morning come?”

The political culture in Bangladesh has long been violent. But many saw the targeting of students and other young people by Ms. Hasina’s government as crossing a line.

The Bangladeshi newspaper Prothom Alo examined 175 of the more 200 deaths. The paper found that 137 of the bodies had bullet wounds, and that more than 100 of the dead were people under 30. UNICEF said that at least 32 children were killed in the crackdown.

The protesters had returned to the streets after congregational noon prayers on Friday, the start of the weekend in Bangladesh, with thousands braving rain across the country to participate. Late in the afternoon, clashes between the protesters and security forces were reported across the country. At least two people were killed, including one police officer.

The numbers appeared to have grown on Saturday. Local news reports estimated the number of protesters at Shaheed Minar in Dhaka, where the largest of the gatherings took place, at tens of thousands. Large rallies were also reported across several other districts of the country. While the security forces in Dhaka appeared more restrained on Saturday, there were reports of dozens of injuries in other districts.

“There’s a storm inside my chest,” a group of protesters gathered near Dhaka College chanted on Saturday. “I’ve bared my chest, go ahead and shoot.”

Salimullah Khan, a university professor who joined the protests once they resumed, said there was anger over the killings, and no trust that the same authorities who administered the crackdown would deliver justice.

“How can you ask a killer to bring justice to a murder?” he said. “These killings were state sponsored, carried out by state forces and their collaborators.”

Anupreeta Das contributed reporting from New Delhi.

Enjoy unlimited access to all of The Times.

6-month Welcome Offer
original price:   $3sale price:   $0.50/week

Learn more