The New York Times 2024-08-23 12:10:56


Middle East Crisis: Thousands Flee After Israel’s Latest Evacuation Order

top news

Israel ordered people to leave as it said it had ‘intensified’ operations in central Gaza.

Thousands of Palestinian civilians in Gaza were forced to flee their homes and shelters once again this week, after the Israeli military ordered evacuations on Thursday from a swath of neighborhoods in Khan Younis, the largest city in southern Gaza, and from parts of central Gaza the day before.

Mohammed Aborjela was among those who fled an affected city, Deir al Balah, where he had been sheltering with friends. On Wednesday, his phone received a recorded message from the Israeli military, ordering Palestinians to “immediately” leave parts of the city and saying that it would act “forcefully” against Hamas militants in the area.

Mr. Aborjela, 28, packed up what few belongings he had and headed to Al-Mawasi, a coastal area that Israel has declared a humanitarian safe zone, but which has come under attack numerous times.

Hours after he arrived in Al-Mawasi, Mr. Aborjela said, shelling from tanks reached tents people were sheltering in.

“The tanks got close to us,” he said. “And they started shelling the people even though it is supposed to be a safe zone.”

The Israeli military said that it “takes feasible precautions to mitigate civilian harm” when asked whether its ground forces opened tank fire toward Al-Mawasi.

In a statement, the Israeli military said Thursday that its forces had “intensified their operational activities in the area” of Deir al Balah, after its intelligence indicated the presence of Hamas infrastructure and fighters there and in Khan Younis.

Dr. Iyad al-Jabri, a surgeon and administrator at the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital in Deir al Balah, said that seven people who were wounded from the shelling of Al-Mawasi were brought to the medical facility.

They weren’t the only ones hurrying to the hospital. Hundreds of families fleeing the new evacuation orders arrived there to take shelter, even as hospital officials began to make their own contingency plans in case the Israeli military further expands its evacuation zones to include the hospital.

“In this area there is a ground invasion and we have to think, ‘Where can we go, what are we going to do?’” Dr. al-Jabri said. “So we are running around seeing where can we send our patients in case, God forbid, we are ordered to leave this hospital.”

More than 150,000 displaced people have been living in the central Gaza areas subject to Wednesday’s evacuation order, according to the United Nations. Nearly a dozen such orders issued this month by the Israeli military have so far affected an estimated 250,000 people and disrupted the movement of aid, the United Nations said. The multiple orders to flee between Aug. 8 to 17 have caused the loss of essential health services for many, the United Nations said, affecting 17 health facilities in total.

Before the orders issued this month, the United Nations had already estimated that around 90 percent of Gaza’s population of more than two million people had been forced to leave their homes since the war began because of evacuation orders, Israeli bombardments and ground fighting.

In a statement, the Gaza Health Ministry said that Israel’s military offensive was approaching the vicinity of Al-Aqsa hospital, and called on the international community and the United Nations to protect the overcrowded complex.

The Israeli military said on Wednesday that it had been “made clear” to hospitals that they did not need to evacuate, but did not respond to questions about which hospitals this was communicated to and how.

Israel has accused Hamas of taking advantage of Gaza’s urban terrain to provide its fighters and weapons with an extra layer of protection, including running tunnels under neighborhoods and launching rockets near civilian homes. Hamas denies these accusations and says its members are Gazans who live among the population.

International law experts have said that no matter what, Israel bears a responsibility to protect civilians. U.S. officials, while backing Israel’s assertions, have also called for Israel to do more to safeguard Gazans.

Majdi Nassar, 33, a taxi driver before the war who fled to Deir al Balah from the northern Gaza Strip, received a call last Friday on his cellphone instructing him to leave, because the Israeli military said the neighborhood blocks they were in “had become fighting zones.”

“We were 10 people, my wife, son and in-laws,” he said. “We were all sharing one tent and had to dismantle it and flee. We took everything with us: the tent and the canned food we had and our clothes.”

It was the eighth time they have had to flee over 10 months of war.

“I don’t know what they are attacking here now,” he said. “I didn’t hear or see any shooting, or rockets, or anything from the Palestinians in this area.”

He said he was fleeing only for the safety of the children with him.

“I myself no longer care,” he said. “Death is no longer the worst scenario. This life is much worse. The scene of thousands of people running for their lives every day is unbearable.”

KEy developments

A deadly Israeli airstrike hits the West Bank, and other news.

  • An Israeli airstrike hit the West Bank town of Tulkarm, the Israeli military and Palestinian news media reported on Thursday. Three Palestinians were killed in the Thursday morning strike, which hit a home in Tulkarm, according to Wafa, the official news agency of the Palestinian Authority, which exercises limited control in parts of the Israeli-occupied West Bank. A spokesman for the Israeli military, Avichay Adraee, said that an Air Force unit had targeted “armed terrorists.” Nearly 600 Palestinians were killed in the West Bank from the start of the war in Gaza in October through Aug. 12, according to the United Nations.

  • Israeli warplanes attacked more than 10 Hezbollah targets in southern Lebanon overnight, the Israeli military said in a statement on Thursday. Israeli forces have conducted at least two similar rounds of strikes against the powerful Iranian-backed militia this week. The two sides have traded cross-border strikes for months.

A group representing hostage families says the autopsies of six recovered bodies revealed bullets.

A group representing relatives of hostages taken in the Oct. 7 attack on Israel said on Thursday that autopsies showed “bullets were found in the bodies” of six captives Israeli troops recovered from an underground tunnel in southern Gaza, raising questions about how they died.

The group, the Hostages Family Forum, said that the autopsy results indicated that the six hostages “were taken alive and executed in the tunnels of Hamas.”

But an Israeli military spokesperson, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter to families, said on Thursday that the autopsies showed “marks suggestive of gunshots” on the bodies and stressed it was too soon to determine whether gunshot wounds were the cause of death.

The autopsy reports have not been made public. The New York Times has not reviewed them and cannot confirm the results.

Four other bodies found in the tunnels near the hostages, believed to belong to Hamas militants, did not display the same marks, the military spokesperson said.

How and when the hostages died has been a matter of contention. Hamas has blamed the deaths on Israeli airstrikes, and the Israeli military has acknowledged some of them likely died while Israel was carrying out military operations in the area where they were found. Some Israel news outlets reported the hostages may have suffocated when the tunnel filled with toxins after an airstrike.

The revelations raise new questions about the circumstances of the hostages’ deaths after months of conflicting statements about some of the recovered captives from Hamas and the Israeli military.

On Tuesday, the Israeli military announced that it had recovered the six bodies in a hidden tunnel network, alongside four of their presumed captors.

Five of the six captives were already believed to be dead, according to the Israeli military. Three of them — Haim Peri, 80; Yoram Metzger, 80; and Alexander Dancyg, 75 — had been abducted from the Nir Oz kibbutz near the Gaza border. Two others — Nadav Popplewell, 51, and Yagev Buchshtab, 35 — were taken from another border community, Nirim.

The sixth body belonged to another resident of Nir Oz, Avraham Munder, 79. Mr. Munder’s death had not been established previously.

Abu Ubaida, a spokesman for Hamas’s military wing, said in March that Mr. Metzger and Mr. Peri were among seven hostages who had been killed in Israeli airstrikes in Gaza. Hamas then said in May that Mr. Popplewell had died from injuries sustained in an Israeli airstrike more than a month earlier.

Weeks later, in early June, the Israeli military’s chief spokesman, Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari, said that it was examining the possibility that some of the hostages had been killed together months earlier while Israeli forces were operating in the Khan Younis area.

On Tuesday, Adm. Hagari was asked again about how the hostages died at a news conference. He repeated what he had said in June — that the “hostages were killed while our troops were operating in Khan Younis” — and added that a forensic examination would reveal more.

Israeli news media reported on Tuesday that initial assessments suggested that five of the six hostages had died from suffocation when an Israeli airstrike hit another tunnel, causing the one they were in to fill with carbon dioxide. The Times could not confirm those reports.

The recovery of six dead hostages this week emphasized the urgent need for a cease-fire deal, families of the captives said in their statement on Thursday. The forum said the evidence the hostages may have been shot “serves as further proof of the cruelty of the terrorists,” and it condemned the government’s failure to reach a cease-fire agreement that would lead to the return of all hostages and an end to the fighting in Gaza.

“In every minute that the deal is not completed, another hostage could lose their life,” the forum said. “After 10 and a half months of war in which the hostages have been suffering, tortured, and dying, it is clear to all that the return of the hostages is only possible through a deal.”

Officials are trying to salvage negotiations for a cease-fire in Gaza.

Last-ditch efforts to salvage talks on a cease-fire in Gaza went forward on Thursday, as senior Israeli and American officials headed to negotiations in Cairo, less than a day after President Biden emphasized the “urgency” of closing the deal in a phone call with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel.

In the call on Wednesday, Mr. Biden and Mr. Netanyahu discussed a new round of talks in Cairo “to remove any remaining obstacles” to the proposed cease-fire and hostage release deal, the White House said, adding that Vice President Kamala Harris had joined the call. Mr. Netanyahu’s office confirmed that the call had taken place.

The Biden administration has been leading the latest push for a cease-fire deal between Israel and Hamas, with Egypt and Qatar acting as mediators, and has presented a “bridging proposal” meant to close, or at least narrow, the gaps between the sides.

An Israeli delegation led by David Barnea, the head of Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency, and Ronen Bar, who leads the Shin Bet domestic security service, was heading to Cairo on Thursday to continue talks, said Omer Dostri, the Israeli prime minister’s spokesman.

Brett McGurk, the White House coordinator for the Middle East and North Africa, was already in Cairo on Thursday and William J. Burns, the C.I.A. director, was also expected to attend the talks, according to a Western official who spoke on condition of anonymity.

The deliberations in Cairo were expected to focus on security arrangements along Gaza’s border with Egypt and on reopening the Rafah border crossing between Gaza and Egypt, said an Israeli official and another official familiar with the matter. Both spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.

One main focus of disagreement between Israel and Hamas has been Mr. Netanyahu’s insistence on maintaining an Israeli military presence along the Philadelphi Corridor, a narrow strip of land along Gaza’s southern border with Egypt. The Israeli leader has argued that the area has served as a major conduit for weapons smuggling into Gaza and that abandoning it would allow Hamas to quickly rearm.

Egypt and Hamas strongly object to continued Israeli control of the corridor and have called for a full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza. Israeli security officials have suggested that other solutions can be found.

A visit to the region this week by Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken ended without any apparent resolution to major sticking points — and in acrimony, with Mr. Netanyahu and Hamas officials trading blame for obstructing progress.

Israeli negotiators were taken aback and, in some cases, angered by Mr. Blinken’s statements this week apparently affirming that Mr. Netanyahu had accepted the American bridging proposal and that it was now up to Hamas to follow suit, according to people familiar with the talks.

Those statements — which came after a nearly three-hour meeting on Monday between Mr. Blinken and Mr. Netanyahu — made it appear that the Israeli prime minister and the Biden administration saw eye-to-eye on aspects of the proposal that Hamas clearly would not accede to, one of the people said, dimming the prospects of an agreement. Instead, they said, Mr. Blinken could have called more vaguely for flexibility on both sides.

But the Western official disputed that interpretation, saying that Mr. Blinken was clear that there were a lot of details left to be ironed out.

“These are still complex issues, and they’re going to require hard decisions by the leaders,” Mr. Blinken said after the meeting.

The details of the bridging proposal have not been made public. Another Israeli official with knowledge of the talks, who was not authorized to speak about them publicly, cautioned that few people really know what is being said behind closed doors, and said that talks were continuing at various levels as part of a difficult negotiation.

Rawan Sheikh Ahmad and Aaron Boxerman contributed reporting from Jerusalem.

The crew of an oil tanker attacked in the Red Sea was rescued, but the tanker is an ‘environmental hazard.’

The crew of a Greek-flagged oil tanker that came under gun and missile attack in the Red Sea has been rescued after being forced to evacuate the vessel into a lifeboat, a European Union naval mission said on Thursday. The attack appears to have been the most serious in weeks against commercial shipping off the coast of Yemen.

The stricken vessel, which was carrying 150,000 metric tons of crude oil, was still floating and had become a “navigational and environmental hazard,” according to the E.U. statement. A statement from Delta Tankers, the ship’s operator, said it would be moved to a safer place for repairs. It was not clear whether any oil was leaking.

The Yemen-based Houthi militia, which has staged a series of attacks against commercial ships in the Red Sea in what it says is solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza, has not claimed responsibility.

The tanker, the Sounion, was sailing about 90 miles west of the Yemeni port of Hudaydah early on Wednesday when two small boats approached it, said a statement on social media from Britain’s maritime trade agency, which is based in Dubai.

“The first craft had three to five persons onboard while the second had approximately 10,” the statement said. “The two small craft hailed the merchant vessel, leading to a brief exchange of small-arms fire.”

The small craft retreated and the ship was then hit by three “unidentified projectiles,” starting a fire and causing the ship to lose engine power, it said. It was not clear on Thursday whether the fire had been extinguished.

The crew was rescued by a ship from an E.U. military mission, Operation Aspides, that has been mounted in response to attacks by the Houthi militia, according to a statement the mission posted on social media Thursday.

The statement included a photograph showing an enclosed lifeboat, typical in the oil industry, bobbing in the water and a second photo of crew members aboard a rescue speedboat.

After coming under attack, the ship’s captain called for help. The E.U. military destroyed what it described as an “unmanned surface vessel” that had posed an imminent danger to the Sounion. The crew was being transported to Djibouti, the statement said.

The Houthi militia, which is backed by Iran, began firing late last year on ships entering the Red Sea en route to the Suez Canal, which is a vital artery for vessels moving between Asia, Europe and the eastern United States.

The United States and Britain have launched strikes against the Houthis in response, but analysts have said they have done little to damage the militia’s military infrastructure. The attacks have continued, forcing ships to find alternative routes and disrupting global trade. Oil prices on Thursday were little changed, trading near their lowest levels of the year.

Over the course of dozens of attacks, at least two vessels have sunk and at least three crew members have been killed.

Jason Karaian contributed reporting.

The War in Gaza Is Making Thousands of Orphans

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please try reloading the page or log in.

Canadian Government Orders Arbitration and End to Rail Freight Shutdown

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please try reloading the page or log in.

Venezuela’s Supreme Court, Loyal to Maduro, Rules Him Election Winner

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please try reloading the page or log in.

Enjoy unlimited access to all of The Times.

6-month Welcome Offer
original price:   $3sale price:   $0.50/week

Learn more

Mike Lynch’s Body Is Found After Sicily Yacht Sinking, Official Says

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please try reloading the page or log in.

Enjoy unlimited access to all of The Times.

6-month Welcome Offer
original price:   $3sale price:   $0.50/week

Learn more

German Support for Ukraine Comes Under New Strains

BERLIN — The German government has come under increasing pressure at home to roll back its support for Ukraine and push harder for negotiations to try to end its war with Russia.

Amid severe clashes over the budget and increasing evidence that Ukraine was behind the blowing up of natural gas pipelines between Russia and Germany, Chancellor Olaf Scholz has been trying to allay fears that Berlin will diminish its aid. Speaking on Wednesday in Moldova, he insisted that “Germany will not let up in its support for Ukraine” for “as long as necessary,” and would remain, he said, “Ukraine’s biggest national supporter in Europe.”

But his three-party coalition government is increasingly unpopular and facing critical state elections in September, where parties on both the far left and far right, which have called for an end to military assistance to Kyiv, are expected to do well.

The primary burden on the government, which can seem paralyzed in making major financial decisions, is the constitutional requirement to keep new budget debt to no more than 0.35 percent of GDP.

But the government also faces a potential embarrassment if the prosecutor general charges any Ukrainian officials with responsibility for blowing up three of the four Nord Stream gas pipelines between Russia and Germany in 2022.

The government has unsuccessfully sought the arrest of a Ukrainian diver who had been living in Poland, prompting suggestions that the Polish government, which strongly opposed Germany’s decision to build the pipelines, might also have aided the effort to destroy them. The suspicions have already increased tensions with Poland, with whom Germany has a difficult relationship, and raised questions about Germany’s unconditional support for Ukraine.

German criticism of “insufficient investigative assistance” from Polish authorities was met with blunt words from Prime Minister Donald Tusk of Poland, who took to X to suggest in English that the “initiators and patrons of Nord Stream 1 and 2 should apologise and keep quiet.”

But Germany’s tensions with Ukraine are more concretely about the 2025 budget. Finance Minister Christian Lindner wants to avoid raising taxes and to cut the budget, which must be close to balanced by law.

That constraint has put pressure not only on the government’s aid to Ukraine, but also on Mr. Scholz’s pledge made just after the start of the war two and a half years ago for Germany to make a dramatic strategic pivot and step up its military spending.

Since then, Germany’s increased military spending has been met largely by a special 100 billion euro special fund, outside the regular budget, expected to dry up by 2027. Mr. Lindner has insisted that the government no longer take loans outside the budget for special projects, like increased military spending.

Only last Friday the coalition agreed to narrow its 2025 budget deficit target from 17 billion euros ($18.9 billion) down to €12 billion, after original proposals fell apart.

As part of that deal, the German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung reported, Mr. Lindner suggested in a letter that the government would freeze new military aid to Ukraine until full budget resources were funded.

Already last month, the government decided to cut 2025 funding to Ukraine from €7.5 billion to €4 billion, arguing that the shortfall would come from anticipated income from frozen Russian assets held in Europe under a plan agreed upon by the Group of 7 nations at their June summit meeting in Italy.

There, the G7 agreed to provide a $50 billion loan to Ukraine, using the frozen Russian assets as collateral. Together with funds provided by individual nations, Mr. Scholz said, “this will be more than what has been available to Ukraine in terms of support to date.”

Germany is Europe’s largest supporter of Ukraine’s war against Russia’s invasion, providing over €14 billion in support — mostly military — between the invasion in February 2022 and the end of June 2024, according to the Kiel Institute for the World Economy.

Asked about Ukraine’s decision to invade Russia in the Kursk region, Mr. Scholz said that he did not know about it in advance and suggested that “this is a very limited operation in terms of space and probably also in terms of time.”

Enjoy unlimited access to all of The Times.

6-month Welcome Offer
original price:   $3sale price:   $0.50/week

Learn more