The New York Times 2024-09-25 12:10:47


Thousands Flee Southern Lebanon, as Israel Presses Air Attack on Hezbollah

Pinned

Euan WardAaron Boxerman and Ronen Bergman

Here are the latest developments.

Thousands of people tried to escape southern Lebanon on Tuesday, as Israel’s military pounded the region with more strikes against Hezbollah, including in the densely populated neighborhoods south of Beirut.

Panicked by the intensity of two days of Israeli attacks, civilians continued to stream out of southern Lebanon, clogging the main roads and gas stations leading into the capital. U.N. and Lebanese officials said on Tuesday that 27,000 displaced people had already been settled in temporary shelters. Others slept in cars, parks and along the beach.

“The numbers continue to grow,” Matthew Saltmarsh, a spokesman for the U.N.’s refugee agency, said in Geneva. “The toll on civilians is unacceptable.”

As many residents scrambled to arrange transportation for older family members still trapped in southern town and cities, Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari, the Israeli military’s chief spokesman, told reporters that Israel aspired to have “as short a campaign as possible” against Hezbollah in Lebanon, adding that the military was striking with such “high intensity” there in an effort to achieve that objective.

Yoav Gallant, the Israeli defense minister, told soldiers in a video statement that Hezbollah had been hit hard. “Hezbollah today is different from the organization we knew a week ago,” Mr. Gallant said.

One Israeli strike on Tuesday hit near Beirut, in an area known as the Dahiya where Hezbollah is the dominant power, destroying a six-story building, according to Lebanon’s state-run news agency. Six people had been killed and 15 others injured, Lebanon’s health ministry said.

The Israeli military claimed the strike had killed Ibrahim Mohammed Qobeisi, which it identified as a senior Hezbollah commander who oversaw Hezbollah’s missile apparatus. Hezbollah, in confirming that Mr. Qobeisi had been killed, provided no details on his role, but referred to him by an honorific title reserved only for the group’s senior members.

Hezbollah had fired about 350 rockets into Israel on Tuesday, the Israeli military said in a statement. Most of the rockets were intercepted, as sirens and explosions were heard in several communities.

The strikes have unnerved the Middle East, sparking fears of a war involving ground troops between Israel and Hezbollah, as the fighting in Gaza continues with no clear prospect of a truce.

Lebanon’s health minister raised the death toll from the strikes to 558 people, with another 1,800 injured, making Monday the country’s deadliest day since a civil war that ended in 1990. The ministry’s figures do not distinguish between civilians and combatants, although the health minister, Firass Abiad, said on Tuesday that scores of women and children were among those killed.


Map showing the locations of Israeli strikes in Lebanon on Monday.

Here is what else to know:

  • Biden at the U.N.: President Biden, delivering his final speech to the United Nations on Tuesday, called for a cease-fire in Gaza, returning to one of his central demands about the war even as some White House officials have acknowledged that the goal might be difficult to obtain in the last months of his tenure. “I put forward with Qatar and Egypt a cease-fire and hostage deal,” Mr. Biden said. “It’s been endorsed by the U.N. Security Council. Now is the time for the parties to finalize its terms.”

  • A shift in attention: With all eyes on Israel’s escalating battle with Hezbollah in Lebanon, many families of hostages still held by Hamas in Gaza fear that any hopes to achieve a deal for their release are rapidly vanishing, And they worry that their country’s resources will be directed to the conflict in the north.

  • Travel disruptions: Beirut’s international airport remains open, but flights in and out appear to be heavily disrupted after a number of airlines announced they were suspending services. Most departures for Tuesday — 28 at last count — have been canceled, and the airport’s online arrivals board is also showing cancellations.

  • Automated calls: People in Lebanon received text messages and automated calls warning them to move away from Hezbollah’s weapons caches. That drew criticism from rights groups, which argued that Lebanese civilians would have no means of knowing where military targets were located. Lebanon’s information minister accused Israel of “psychological warfare.”

The British government said in a statement on Tuesday that its citizens should leave Lebanon, noting that about 700 British troops were being sent to nearby Cyprus after the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah escalated in recent days. John Healey, the defense secretary, said that the call to leave Lebanon had come after a meeting with government ministers, intelligence chiefs and diplomats on Tuesday. “Events in the past hours and days have demonstrated how volatile this situation is,” he said.

Hezbollah has confirmed the death of Ibrahim Mohammed Qobeisi, whom the Israeli military targeted in a strike south of Beirut on Tuesday. He had been in charge of the group’s missile apparatus, the Israeli military said. Hezbollah provided no details on his role, but referred to him by an honorific title reserved only for the group’s senior members.


The Security Council will convene an emergency session on Lebanon at 6 p.m. Wednesday. France’s foreign minister requested the meeting after Israeli attacks killed more than 500 Lebanese people in one day.

Israel achieved short-term aims in a week of attacks on Hezbollah, officials say, but the end goal is unclear.

Israel achieved many short-term goals in a series of strikes on Hezbollah during the last week, according to five current and former senior Israeli officials. But they also expressed concern that there was no clear further strategy on bringing calm and returning tens of thousands of displaced people back to Israel’s north.

The escalations against Hezbollah began almost by chance after last-minute Israeli intelligence suggested that an operation to blow up pagers owned by members of the Iranian-backed Lebanese militia was in danger of being exposed, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive matter. If the plan was not activated by the beginning of last week, the officials said, Hezbollah might discover it, possibly along with a second operation targeting walkie-talkies.

That set up a dizzying week of attacks in Lebanon. Israel blew up electronic devices distributed by Hezbollah, killing dozens of people and injuring thousands more. It then assassinated a group of its military leaders in an airstrike near Beirut. On Monday, a wave of Israeli airstrikes targeting parts of the country where Hezbollah holds sway killed hundreds of people.

The intensified attacks against Hezbollah reflects the opinion of some hawkish generals and others who think that the group can be forced to back down, the officials said, while others in the government believe Israel must first come to a deal on a cease-fire and hostage deal with Hamas before turning to another battleground. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has opposed a truce that would allow Hamas to survive the war.

The decision to escalate was met with strong opposition from some senior officials, according to three current and former officials who spoke to The Times. They worried that such actions, the officials said, could lead to all-out war with face-to-face fighting and questioned how they would pave the way for the return of Israelis to the north.

Hezbollah has been targeting northern Israel with rockets and drones since last year in solidarity with Hamas and its war against Israel in Gaza. Hassan Nasrallah, the Hezbollah leader, has said the group will not agree to stop firing at Israel until Israel and Hamas reach an agreement that ends the war in Gaza.

Israel has argued that Hezbollah uses Lebanese civilians as human shields and embeds weapons amid the population and that is why the Israeli military must strike populated areas.

In a video message released Tuesday in Hebrew, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel warned people in Lebanon that “those who have a missile in their living room and a rocket in their garage will not have a home.” He said something similar in an English language video released Monday. In both videos, he told the Lebanese people, “Our war is not with you. Our war is with Hezbollah.”

Israel says it killed another top leader of Hezbollah, the latest blow in a concerted campaign.

The Israeli military said Tuesday that it had killed a senior Hezbollah commander in an airstrike in Beirut, the latest blow in what appears to be a concerted Israeli attempt to take out the group’s leadership.

Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari, the Israeli military spokesman, identified the target as Ibrahim Mohammed Qobeisi, a senior Hezbollah commander who oversaw Hezbollah’s missile apparatus. Hezbollah later confirmed that Mr. Qobeisi had been killed. The group provided no details on his role, but referred to him by an honorific title reserved only for Hezbollah’s senior members.

The Israeli military says that Mr. Qobeisi planned the abduction of three Israeli soldiers in 2000; their bodies were later returned to Israel in a prisoner exchange.

Israel has stepped up efforts to assassinate Hezbollah’s top leaders in recent weeks as part of a campaign to compel the Iranian-backed militant group to stop firing rockets and drones at Israel. For nearly a year, Hezbollah has been attacking Israel in solidarity with Hamas in Gaza, displacing tens of thousands of Israelis from border communities.

The campaign against the top echelon in Hezbollah comes after months of attacks that, Israeli military analysts said, have somewhat degraded Hezbollah’s military capabilities.

Over the past two months, Israel has killed at least two members of Hezbollah’s top military decision-making body, the Jihad Council, and tried to assassinate another.

In July, an Israeli airstrike in Beirut’s southern suburbs killed Fuad Shukr, one of the leaders of Hezbollah’s military operations and a confidante of the group’s leader, Hassan Nasrallah. That attack was a reprisal for a rocket attack from Lebanon that killed 12 children in the Israeli-controlled Golan Heights.

Last Friday, Israeli forces flattened a residential building in an airstrike targeting Ibrahim Aqeel, another top Hezbollah leader, alongside several other leaders of the group’s commando unit. At least 55 people were killed in the strike, including several children and other noncombatants.

And on Monday, Israel tried to assassinate a third member of the Jihad Council, Ali Karaki, with an airstrike in Beirut. Hezbollah has denied that Mr. Karaki was killed and has said he had been taken to a “safe place” in the wake of the strike.

Furious over the continuing war in Gaza, world leaders castigate Israel.

Middle Eastern and other leaders who addressed the opening session of the United Nations General Assembly on Tuesday castigated Israel for what they characterized as its heedless disregard for civilian lives in its war in Gaza.

“Gaza has become the world’s largest cemetery for women and children,” President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey said in a 20-minute broadside against Israel.

While Israel has long been a target of criticism in the United Nations General Assembly, the war with Hamas in Gaza, as well as Israel’s sharply intensified attacks on Hezbollah in Lebanon, have ratcheted up the sweep of denunciations by numerous world leaders. Some also condemned the Hamas-led Oct. 7 attack on Israel that killed more than 1,200 people.

Without naming the United States specifically, Mr. Erdogan lambasted those countries that have called for a cease-fire while continuing to deliver weapons to Israel. He said that the need to confront the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel was as imperative as the World War II effort to confront Hitler. And he hailed university students and other protesters around the world for their stand against the war in Gaza.

Danny Danon, the Israeli ambassador to the United Nations, responded in a statement, saying that while terrorists in both Gaza and Lebanon were attacking Israel, “There is Erdogan who comes every year to the U.N. and spreads pure hatred against the state of Israel.” Mr. Netanyahu is expected to address the General Assembly on Thursday, a trip he delayed earlier this week amid the expanded assault on Hezbollah.

The leaders who spoke critically of Israel all referred to the staggering death toll in Gaza — more than 41,000, according to the local health authorities — as they sought to illustrate the war’s devastation.

“This Israeli government has killed more children, more journalists, more aid workers, and more medical personnel than any other war in recent memory,” said King Abdullah II of Jordan, expressing anger and frustration over the Israeli attacks on Gaza and parallel deadly clashes in the Israeli-occupied West Bank.

In one of the few concrete proposals for addressing at least part of the crisis, Abdullah called for the United Nations to enforce a “Gaza humanitarian gateway” to deliver food, water, medicine and other desperately needed supplies.

He and other speakers suggested that Israel was not interested in achieving peace with the Arab world. “Consecutive Israeli governments, emboldened by years of impunity, have rejected peace and chosen confrontation instead,” he said.

Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, the emir of Qatar, whose mediators were instrumental in negotiating a temporary cease-fire and an exchange of prisoners for hostages late last year, also suggested that Israel was not a sincere partner in later peace talks that are now at a stalemate.

“A whole society is destroyed in the course of the genocide against segments of the Palestinian people,” he said.

Israel has maintained that it is Hamas that is not bargaining in good faith.

Mr. Al Thani also said that the booby-trapped pagers and walkie-talkies that killed hundreds of people and injured thousands more in Lebanon last week were a “major crime.” Current and former defense officials have attributed the blasts to an Israeli operation against Hezbollah. Israel has not claimed responsibility for the attacks.

President Cyril Ramaphosa of South Africa stressed that his country’s case before the International Court of Justice accusing Israel of committing genocide in Gaza was connected to his own country’s experience.

“The violence the Palestinian people are being subjected to is a grim continuation of more than half a century of apartheid that has been perpetrated against Palestinians by Israel,” Mr. Ramaphosa said. “We South Africans know what apartheid looks like. We lived through apartheid. We suffered and died under apartheid. We will not remain silent and watch as apartheid is perpetrated against others.”

Many of the leaders accused the United Nations of failing in its moral obligation to bring about a cease-fire in Gaza.

“It’s no surprise that both inside and outside this hall, trust in the U.N.’s cornerstone principles and ideals is crumbling,” said King Abdullah.

Farnaz Fassihi, Safak Timur and Anushka Patil contributed reporting.

Funerals were taking place on Tuesday in Beirut for those killed in previous days. In Dahiya, the Hezbollah stronghold south of the Lebanese capital, relatives wept and bid farewell to the bodies of two men, five women and two children. They were all victims of a strike on Friday that killed a number of Hezbollah fighters and Lebanese civilians in the same suburb.

As a reminder of how tense the situation remained, less than two hours before the funeral was due to begin, a fresh Israeli airstrike targeted a residential building just a few blocks from the cemetery. That prompted the cancelation of the official ceremony, but a number of relatives still showed up to attend the burial of their loved ones.

Yoav Gallant, the Israeli defense minister, told soldiers on Tuesday in a video statement that Hezbollah had suffered “severe blows,” adding that, “Hezbollah today is different from the organization we knew a week ago.”

Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari, the chief spokesman for the Israeli military, told reporters in a briefing on Tuesday that Israel aspired to have “as short a campaign as possible” against Hezbollah in Lebanon.

He added that the military was striking with such “high intensity” there in the hopes of deterring Hezbollah and achieving that goal. But he also noted that Hezbollah had fired about 300 rockets into Israel on Tuesday.

Danny Danon, Israel’s ambassador to the U.N., indicated Tuesday that Israel was open to ways to de-escalate tensions in Lebanon. While attending the U.N. General Assembly in New York, he posted on social media that “a diplomatic move is always better than a confrontation.”

The Biden administration has been working to reach a cease-fire between Israel and Hamas that would end the war in Gaza, return hostages captured on Oct. 7 and de-escalate fighting in Lebanon. But those talks have stalled.

Hezbollah claimed to have directly targeted at least five civilian communities in northern Israel on Tuesday. It was an unusually high number and followed pledges earlier this year by Hezbollah’s chief, Hassan Nasrallah, to attack new Israeli towns and cities if Lebanese civilians continued to be killed. The wave of Israeli bombardment on Monday left around 100 women and children dead, Lebanon’s health ministry said.

Netanyahu, delayed by Israel’s new assault on Hezbollah, faces broad censure from gathered leaders.

In his address to the United Nations General Assembly a year ago, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel spoke ambitiously of an Israel poised to become a “bridge of peace and prosperity” between Asia and Europe, envisaging a pathway to ending the Arab-Israel conflict that largely bypassed the issue of Palestinians.

Two weeks later, on Oct. 7, a brutal, Hamas-led assault on southern Israel led to a devastating Israeli military campaign in Gaza. That in turn drew attacks from Iranian-allied militias, including the Houthis, who have disrupted global shipping in the Red Sea, and Hezbollah, which has sent rockets into northern Israel from Lebanon. Now, a new Israeli offensive against Hezbollah in Lebanon is bringing the region to the brink of a broader war.

At this year’s General Assembly, Mr. Netanyahu’s moment on the world stage will be clouded by the conflict and the backdrop of global condemnation for his prosecution of the war in Gaza. More than 41,000 people have been killed in Gaza, according to local health authorities, who do not distinguish between civilians and combatants. And more than 600 Palestinians have been killed over the same period in the occupied West Bank, mostly in military actions and a few at the hands of extremist Jewish settlers, according to the United Nations.

Israel is battling a genocide case at the U.N.’s top court over the Gaza war while the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court has requested arrest warrants for Mr. Netanyahu and his defense minister, Yoav Gallant, along with several Hamas leaders, on accusations of crimes against humanity.

And in just days of intense Israeli assaults on southern and eastern Lebanon, hundreds of people have been reported dead and thousands wounded. With that escalation still underway, Mr. Netanyahu has delayed his arrival in New York by days, and his speech appears to have been brought forward from Friday to Thursday, to shorten his time abroad.

For Mr. Netanyahu, the assembly presents an opportunity to make Israel’s case. As Israel’s longest serving prime minister — his first term in office was in the 1990s, though he has been in and out of power since — he ranks as one of the assembly’s most veteran leaders.

“He’s the figure most identified with Israel for the last generation,” said Mazal Mualem, an Israeli political commentator for Al-Monitor, a Middle East news site, and the author of a biography of the Israeli leader, “Cracking the Netanyahu Code.”

Mr. Netanyahu views such occasions as being of historic importance, Ms. Mualem added, though at times in the past, many in the U.N. chamber have left the General Assembly hall when he takes the microphone, leaving him to speak to a largely empty hall.

That might matter less to Mr. Netanyahu, who is known to tailor his speeches abroad toward impressing his audience back home, burnishing his domestic credentials as a world player leagues above his competitors.

“His target audience will clearly be his home audience,” Ms. Mualem said.

His domestic audience is hardly united over his leadership. Many Israelis had demanded his resignation in the immediate aftermath of the Hamas-led assault, which caught Israel off-guard and exposed years of deep intelligence, military and policy failures, mostly on Mr. Netanyahu’s watch. Yet he has so far staved off internal and external pressures, and has chalked up a personal victory for now, at least, by surviving politically, against the odds.

“He’s come after the worst year in Israel’s history and his own history, and he just doesn’t give up,” said Mitchell Barak, an Israeli pollster and analyst who worked as an aide to Mr. Netanyahu in the 1990s.

“Bibi is the Israeli entrepreneur who doesn’t let failure stand in his way,” he said, referring to Mr. Netanyahu by his popular nickname. “He keeps moving forward.”

Israel’s strikes on Lebanon are some of the deadliest in decades.

Israel’s strikes on Lebanon on Monday amounted to one of the most intense air raids in contemporary warfare, outstripping even the bombing of Gaza during the opening days of the Israeli-Hamas war in October, war experts said.

The death count is also one of the highest daily tolls in recent global wars, and could rise because people are still believed to be trapped under the rubble in Lebanon.

War death tolls are estimates, and exact comparisons between conflicts are difficult. But the toll on Monday in Lebanon exceeded most daily tolls in Gaza over the past year and more than doubled the average daily death rate during the deadliest year of the Syrian civil war.

Here’s what else to know.

The number of targets struck by Israel

The Israeli military said it hit more than 1,600 targets in Lebanon on Monday, a number that has few, if any, precedents in 21st-century warfare, according to Emily Tripp, the director of Airwars, a British conflict monitor.


Map showing the locations of Israeli strikes in Lebanon on Monday.

It is roughly 300 more than the number of targets Israel struck during the opening three days of its Gaza offensive after the Hamas-led attack on Oct. 7 — a number that itself was considered unusually high.

During the U.S.-led air campaign against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria between 2014 and 2017, Western fighter jets struck an average of 650 targets a month across a much wider area, according to data published by the Department of Defense.

“Prior to the Gaza war, munitions deployed with this intensity and with this frequency would have been almost unheard-of,” Ms. Tripp said. “There is no comparison in terms of death toll or munitions use with previous 21st-century air campaigns of this nature, as far as we know.”

The Israeli military said Hezbollah fired 250 rockets toward Israel on Monday, most of which were intercepted by Israeli air-defense missiles or missed their targets. At least one man was reported to have been wounded by shrapnel. Since October, Hezbollah has fired more than 8,000 missiles toward Israeli positions, according to the Israeli military.

How the Lebanese death toll compares

The Lebanese health minister, Dr. Firass Abiad, said 558 people were killed on Monday in Israeli strikes — an unusually high number by the standards of contemporary war, experts said.

In Gaza last October, it took 18 days for the reported daily death toll to exceed 500. The Monday toll is about half the entire casualty count during the monthlong Israel-Hezbollah war of 2006. And it is far higher than the average daily toll during the Syrian war in 2014, the deadliest year of that decade-long conflict.


How the Lebanese government collates the death toll

Lebanon’s health ministry runs an emergency operations center that collects casualty numbers from private and state-run hospitals, collating them to create a national toll from the war, according to health officials.

These figures have historically been viewed as reliable and are cited regularly by the United Nations, which helped the ministry develop the operations center.

Hezbollah, the powerful Shiite militia backed by Iran, does not run the ministry. It is overseen by the government of Lebanon, whose members are split along sectarian and political lines.

Dr. Abiad, a former board chairman at Lebanon’s largest hospital, is generally considered apolitical and won praise and prominence for his data-driven assessments during the coronavirus pandemic. He was first proposed for the role of health minister by Saad Hariri, a Sunni former prime minister who is not allied with Hezbollah, and was formally appointed by Mr. Hariri’s successor.

The ratio of slain combatants to civilians

The Lebanese health ministry does not provide detailed breakdowns of the numbers of civilians and combatants killed. But Dr. Abiad said in a brief phone interview on Tuesday that the “overwhelming majority, if not all,” of those killed and injured on Monday were civilians.

For his statement to be true, the number of civilian men killed in Lebanon on Monday would need to overwhelmingly exceed the combined number of slain women and children. The Lebanese health ministry said that 94 women and 50 children were killed on Monday, or just over 25 percent of the total death toll, but it did not specify the number of slain male civilians.

The Israeli military has said it was targeting military operatives, weapons caches and rocket launchers, many of them hidden in civilian neighborhoods and homes.

Ms. Tripp said the number of slain women and children was “consistent with what we’ve seen in conflicts such as Iraq, but lower compared to the recent Gaza war.”

In Gaza, more than 54 percent of the roughly 34,000 people recently named as victims by the Gaza health authorities were said to be either women or boys and girls under 18. Roughly 7,000 other victims are still to be identified by the health authorities, according to the ministry’s chief statistician.

Lauren Leatherby contributed reporting.

In his final speech at the United Nations, Biden calls again for a cease-fire in Gaza.

President Biden, delivering his final speech to the United Nations on Tuesday, called for a cease-fire in Gaza, returning to one of his central demands about the war even as some White House officials have acknowledged that the goal might be difficult to obtain in the last months of his tenure.

“I put forward with Qatar and Egypt a cease-fire and hostage deal,” Mr. Biden said. “It’s been endorsed by the U.N. Security Council. Now is the time for the parties to finalize its terms.”

But months of talks have failed to yield an end to the conflict, which began on Oct. 7, when Hamas led a deadly attack on Israel. In the latest negotiations toward a truce, international mediators have aimed to narrow the gaps between Israel and the Iran-backed militant group. But Hamas has demanded that Israel fully withdraw from Gaza, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel has insisted that he will not give up control of the enclave’s border with Egypt.

The prospects of ending the war in Gaza appear more bleak amid a significant escalation in recent days of a conflict between Israel and the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah, an ally of Hamas. Hezbollah and Israel have been exchanging cross-border missile and drone attacks since October, killing hundreds of Lebanese and forcing the evacuations of tens of thousands of civilians on both sides of the border.

Mr. Biden, who delivered a wide-ranging speech to the U.N. General Assembly that included passages about the war in Ukraine, as well as artificial intelligence, also called for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict involving the creation of a Palestinian state.

It is a long-term goal of U.S. policymakers and an objective of Palestinian leaders, but decades of efforts have yet to achieve it. Mr. Netanyahu has resisted U.S. pressure over the issue, particularly after Oct. 7. He has argued that Israel’s safety requires controlling security in the Israeli-occupied West Bank and has said this it is incompatible with a Palestinian state.

Mr. Biden also called for the return of hostages seized on Oct. 7. Around 1,200 people were killed in the attack, and more than 250 others were taken hostage. Over 100 of those were released during a weeklong cease-fire that began in November, and Israel has freed several others during military operations. But dozens more remain in captivity, and Hamas is holding the bodies of hostages who have died or have been killed since the initial attack.

“The world must not flinch from the horrors of Oct. 7,” Mr. Biden said.

The United States has supplied Israel with military and diplomatic support since the war began, and some of the president’s critics have accused him of paying insufficient attention to civilian suffering in Gaza.

More than 40,000 people have died in the enclave, the bulk of them children, women and older people, according to Gaza’s health ministry. At the same time, the enclave has been devastated by Israeli airstrikes and fighting, and almost all of the population has been forced to flee their homes.

“Innocent civilians in Gaza are also going through hell,” Mr. Biden said. “They didn’t ask for this war that Hamas started.”

Families of hostages and Gazans feel forgotten as fighting heats up in Lebanon.

After six Israeli hostages were found dead recently in Gaza, shocking the country, the families of the remaining captives hoped that the tragedy might pressure Israel to accept a cease-fire agreement to secure their release.

But now, as Israeli fighter jets swoop over Lebanon and Hezbollah fires rockets into northern Israel, the conversation in Israel has shifted toward a potential war in the north. Few believe that an agreement to free their loved ones in Gaza is imminent.

After nearly a year, roughly 100 of the more than 250 hostages held by Hamas since their Oct. 7 attacks remain in the clutches of Palestinian militants in Gaza. They include women and older people kidnapped from their homes, as well as soldiers abducted from military bases.

Israel and Hamas are deadlocked in negotiations over conditions for a truce that would free them. The Israeli authorities have declared that more than 30 hostages are already presumed dead, and their families fear that number will only rise as their loved ones languish in captivity.

With all eyes on Israel’s escalating battle with Hezbollah in Lebanon, many families now fear any hopes to save the hostages are rapidly vanishing, said Itzik Horn, whose sons Eitan, 38, and Iair, 46, are still held.

“We’ve been abandoned again and again” by the Israeli government, said Mr. Horn. “And now, the resources and attention are heading to the north.”

Both Eitan and Iair were abducted from Nir Oz, a border village that was devastated by the Hamas-led attack. Many of its roughly 400 members were either killed or kidnapped by Palestinian militants.

Eitan was visiting his brother, who held various roles in Nir Oz, including running the local pub, when the attack began. Soon afterward, Itzik, their father, lost contact with them. In November, a weeklong truce with Hamas secured the release of 105 hostages, some of whom attested to having seen the two brothers in the tunnels, said Mr. Horn.

Noam Dan, a relative of Ofer Kalderon — who was also abducted from Nir Oz — accused Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, of “cruelly neglecting” the remaining hostages in favor of the escalation. Mr. Kalderon’s children, Sahar and Erez, were released in the weeklong truce with Hamas in November.

Mr. Netanyahu has said that he is committed to securing the release of the remaining hostages. But he has repeatedly said he will not agree to a cease-fire with Hamas that compromises on what he called Israel’s fundamental security needs.

Like many close to the remaining captives, Ms. Dan said she believed Mr. Netanyahu was more worried about the future of his government than securing the release of the hostages. Some of his coalition partners have opposed recent cease-fire proposals.

“What matters to him most is his political survival, and now he’s managed to redirect the conversation close to the anniversary of his resounding failure,” she said. Ms. Dan and others blame Mr. Netanyahu’s government for failing to prevent Hamas’s surprise assault on Israel last year.

Gazans similarly fear that their plight will be shoved aside as the conflict there nears a once-unthinkable milestone: a year of almost constant war. Hundreds of thousands have crowded into an Israeli-designated “humanitarian zone” in central and southern Gaza, often living in rudimentary tent encampments where finding enough food and water can be a daily struggle.

Hundreds of thousands of Israelis have participated in demonstrations calling on the Israeli government to reach an agreement with Hamas to free the captives. The discovery of the six hostages dead in a tunnel a little over three weeks ago — executed by their Hamas guards, according to Israel — shocked the country and prompted mass protests.

But the negotiations stalled, primarily over Mr. Netanyahu’s demand to retain an Israeli military presence along Gaza’s border with Egypt. Hamas immediately rejected the condition.

In Israel, television panels full of former generals and political analysts pick apart the latest reports of strikes and counter-strikes over Israel’s northern border with Lebanon. Correspondents report from northern Israeli communities under rocket fire.

“There’s no momentum, no negotiations, not even a bit of anything. Everyone’s now busy with war in the north,” Mr. Horn said.

Verified videos show the aftermath of a strike in a neighborhood south of Beirut that appeared to hit the top floors of a building. In this one, people can be seen digging through rubble and debris strewn over the road, as well as damaged cars parked nearby.

In another graphic video verified by The New York Times, a badly burned body lies on the roof of a destroyed car, while smoke fills the air. The health ministry in Lebanon said that six people had been killed and 15 others injured in the strike.

The U.N.’s refugee agency said on Tuesday that it was “outraged” after two employees were killed by Israeli strikes in Lebanon a day earlier. Dina Darwiche, a 12-year veteran of UNHCR’s office in eastern Lebanon, was killed alongside her youngest son after an Israeli missile hit their home, the agency said. Ali Basma, who worked as a UNHCR contractor in southern Lebanon, was also killed.

Here is how the death toll from the first day of Israeli strikes in Lebanon compares to the toll from the 2006 war.


Far more people were killed in a single day on Monday in Lebanon than on any day during the devastating 2006 war between Israel and Hezbollah, according to the latest information released Tuesday by Lebanon’s health minister and historical data from human rights groups.

More than 1,000 Lebanese people were killed in just over a month of fighting during the 34-day war in 2006. Lebanon’s health minister, Firass Abiad, said 558 people were killed on Monday.

Monday was also the deadliest day in Lebanon since a 15-year civil war that ended in 1990.

The figures released by Lebanon’s health ministry do not distinguish between civilians and combatants. Mr. Abiad said the “overwhelming majority” killed yesterday were unarmed, and that dozens of women and children were among the dead.

The escalation of fighting in the Middle East looms over the General Assembly’s annual summit.

The United Nations General Assembly convened in New York on Tuesday against the backdrop of a world embroiled in several wars, including Israel’s expanding and increasingly deadly wars with Hamas and Hezbollah.

Despite a mounting death toll and a catastrophic humanitarian disaster, progress in peace talks remains elusive nearly one year after the Hamas-led Oct. 7 attack on Israel that set off the war in Gaza.

Violence between Israel and Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed Lebanese militia, has escalated over the last week as the two groups ramp up tit-for-tat strikes across the Lebanese border.

Hezbollah’s leaders have vowed to retaliate against Israeli strikes, saying the group will continue its attacks on Israel until a cease-fire deal is reached between Israel and Hamas, Hezbollah’s ally.

More than 40,000 people have been killed in Gaza during the first 11 months of the war, according to the Gazan Health Ministry, which does not distinguish between civilians and combatants. Many more have been displaced. Lebanon had remained relatively unscathed until recently, when Israel turned its attention to Hezbollah.

Israel pummeled Lebanon with airstrikes on Monday, the deadliest day in the country since at least 2006. The attack left more than 550 dead and more than 1,500 injured. The Israeli military said in a statement on Tuesday that its air force hit about 1,600 Hezbollah targets in Lebanon on Monday and was continuing to strike the country.

Israel’s escalation comes after hundreds of pagers and walkie-talkies owned by Hezbollah members exploded across Lebanon last week, killing more than 30 people, including two children, and injuring thousands. Israel did not explicitly claim responsibility, but Yoav Gallant, the Israeli defense minister, said that the “center of gravity” of Israel’s military effort, which had concentrated on eliminating Hamas in Gaza, was “moving north.”

Israel bombarded Lebanon throughout the weekend. On Friday, Israel hit Beirut, the Lebanese capital, killing several top Hezbollah commanders, including one of the group’s most senior leaders, according to Israeli officials. The attack also flattened a residential building, killing and wounding dozens of civilians.

On Sunday, Hezbollah launched more than 100 missiles, rockets and drones into Israel, striking around 30 miles inside the country’s borders in its deepest attack since last October.

António Guterres, the U.N. secretary-general, called on Monday for an immediate end to hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah, with his spokesman, Stéphane Dujarric, saying in a statement that, “there is no military solution that will make either side safer.”

On Tuesday, Danny Danon, Israel’s ambassador to the U.N., said Israel was not eager to start a ground invasion in Lebanon. “We don’t want to send our boys to fight in a foreign country. But we are determined to protect the civilians of Israel. We prefer a diplomatic solution — if it’s not working, we are using other methods to show to the other side that we mean business.”

The Israeli military just claimed that an Israeli airstrike in Beirut’s southern suburbs killed Ibrahim Mohammad Qobeisi, identified as a senior Hezbollah military commander. The Israeli military said Qobeisi oversaw Hezbollah’s missile apparatus and was alongside other Hezbollah officers when Israel attacked. It wasn’t clear how Israel had confirmed his death, and Hezbollah did not immediately comment.

Lebanon’s health ministry said that six people had been killed and 15 others injured in an Israeli strike on Tuesday in Dahiya, a densely populated area south of Beirut where Hezbollah holds sway.

News Analysis

Analysts wonder about Hezbollah’s next move.

Swaths of southern Lebanon are smoldering ruins. Highways are clogged with thousands fleeing the possibility of an even bigger war between Israel and Hezbollah. As towns and villages held funerals on Tuesday, Lebanon was just beginning to grapple with the fallout from its deadliest day in decades.

A vast wave of Israeli airstrikes on Monday targeting parts of the country where Hezbollah holds sway killed hundreds of people and plunged Lebanon into a deep state of uncertainty over what Israel would do next, how deeply the militia had been damaged and what sort of response its remaining forces could muster.

Israel said it had hit more than 1,000 sites, mostly in southern and eastern Lebanon, aimed at the fighters and military infrastructure of Hezbollah, the Lebanese political party and militia it has been fighting along the Israel-Lebanon border for 11 months. At least 558 people were killed in the strikes, including 94 women and 50 children, Lebanon’s health minister told reporters on Tuesday.

That toll marked a terrible milestone for Lebanon: Monday was the country’s deadliest day since its 15-year civil war, which ended in 1990.

“The victims of a strike by the Israeli enemy on the village of Arnoun. Targeted in their homes!” read text over a photo shared on social media of three women killed in one of the strikes.

The death toll given by the health ministry did not differentiate between fighters and civilians, and the strikes overwhelmingly hit parts of the country where Hezbollah dominates, suggesting that Israel had struck another fierce blow to the group. That capped a week in which Israel also blew up electronic devices distributed by Hezbollah, killing dozens of people and injuring thousands more, and assassinated a group of its military leaders in an airstrike near Beirut.

Some experts on Hezbollah suggested that Israel’s recent attacks had largely debilitated the group, leaving its membership in disarray.

“They have no options,” said Hilal Khashan, a professor of political science at the American University of Beirut and the author of a book on Hezbollah. “Israel disabled Hezbollah.”

The attacks since last Tuesday have hit both Hezbollah’s leadership and its fighters hard while severely disrupting their ability to communicate and coordinate large-scale retaliation against Israel, he said.

“Now Hezbollah is headless,” Mr. Khashan said. “Israel eliminated Hezbollah’s leadership, so the rank and file are astray.”

Other experts acknowledged the severity of the blows but were more cautious about writing the group off so quickly, citing its large weapons stockpiles and history of adapting to confront Israel’s much more high-tech military.

Hezbollah was formed with Iranian help in the 1980s to fight the Israeli occupation of southern Lebanon, which ended in 2000. In the years since, it has grown into a significant political player in Lebanon and the country’s most powerful military force while sending fighters to help other Iranian-backed forces in Syria, Iraq and Yemen. Israel, the United States and other countries consider it a terrorist organization.

Hezbollah launched cross-border attacks on Israel after the start of the war in Gaza last October in solidarity with the Palestinian group Hamas, which is also backed by Iran. Israel responded by striking Hezbollah sites in Lebanon, but for many months, both sides made efforts to keep their battle focused on the border area. Hezbollah’s leader, Hassan Nasrallah, has said that the group would continue striking Israel as long as the war in Gaza continued.

Last week, Israeli leaders sharply escalated the attacks on the group, saying that removing it from the border zone was the only way that the tens of thousands of Israelis who have fled their homes in the area could return home. (About 90,000 Lebanese have fled their homes near the border, too.)

A diplomat with knowledge of the talks aimed at containing the violence, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to brief the news media, said Israel was demanding that Hezbollah agree to a cease-fire along the Lebanon-Israel border regardless of what happens in the war in Gaza and that it must move its forces and arms away from the frontier.

Joseph Daher, who teaches at Lausanne University in Switzerland and wrote a book about Hezbollah, said Israel had greatly increased the pressure but that Hezbollah was unlikely to agree to its demands.

“It puts pressure politically and socially on Hezbollah, but will it make Hezbollah separate the Gaza front from the Lebanese front? I don’t think so,” he said. “Nor will it get Hezbollah to withdraw its military capacities from the border area.”

So far, at least, Hezbollah does not appear to have changed its strategy of trying to avoid a total war that could cause deep damage to the movement and to Lebanon, Mr. Daher said.

“We are already in a form of war, but they don’t want a total war with Israel,” he said. “This is why they are maintaining a calculated and to some extent moderated reaction, although intensifying their attacks against Israel, as seen this weekend.”

Hezbollah has continued to strike Israel in recent days, including with long-range missiles that it says it has aimed at military bases and other sensitive sites. Many have been intercepted by Israel’s defenses and little serious damage has been reported.

Before the Gaza war, Hezbollah was widely considered one of the most heavily armed nongovernmental forces in the world.

Its military wing was believed to have between 20,000 and 30,000 members, including low-level guerrillas, experienced commanders and teams of technicians focused on rockets, missiles and drones, according to Philip Smyth, an analyst with the Atlantic Council’s counterterrorism project.

Its arsenal included more than 100,000 rockets and missiles, likely including intermediate-range ballistic missiles, cruise missiles and portable antiaircraft weapons. Its fighters have deployed anti-tank missiles to blow up Israeli vehicles, and Israeli officials have said it has developed precision-guided missiles that could hit military bases or critical infrastructure.

Some of Hezbollah’s senior leaders have been with the group for decades, and many of its fighters got battlefield experience during the Syrian civil war and in the fight against the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq.

How much of Hezbollah’s force and fighting ability remains after 11 months of war — and after the last week’s attacks — is an open question. The group had announced the deaths of more than 400 fighters between October and the most recent attacks.

Israel’s recent escalation injured many midlevel figures and killed military planners and a still unknown number of fighters and other operatives. Still, it has not yet prompted a large retaliation from Hezbollah, either because the group has chosen not to mount one or because it simply cannot.

In either case, Israel has robbed Hezbollah of its aura of power and competence, especially by turning its own covert communications network into a weapon against it, Mr. Smyth said.

“I don’t think anyone is under any illusions that this was a very deep attack that penetrated an opaque organization that prides itself on being opaque,” he said.

U.N. General Assembly: U.N. Live Updates: World Leaders Confront Global Turmoil at U.N.

Pinned

Farnaz FassihiSheryl Gay Stolberg and Zolan Kanno-Youngs

Here is the latest on the U.N. meeting.

In his fourth and final address to the United Nations General Assembly, President Biden reflected on the conflicts he witnessed during his career in public service, and warned on Tuesday that the world once again faced an “inflection point.”

World leaders were gathered in New York to hear Mr. Biden and other speakers address the 79th meeting of the U.N. assembly, in the shadow of war and turmoil in Europe, Africa and the Middle East.

The newly elected president of Iran, Masoud Pezeshkian, also spoke Tuesday afternoon, telling world leaders that he campaigned on reform and engagement with the world and that he aimed to usher Iran into “a new era.” Mr. Pezeshkian also slammed Israel for what he called “crimes against humanity” and presented Iran’s support of a network of proxy militia groups as support for freedom fighters.

Many other speakers on Tuesday also castigated Israel over its war with Hamas in the Gaza Strip, where the death toll has surpassed 41,000, according to local health authorities, and there is no cease-fire in sight after more than 11 months of fighting. And now, escalating cross-border volleys of missiles fired by Israel and by Hezbollah in Lebanon have raised the threat of a multi-front war in the Middle East.

Calls to end the Middle East conflict and wars in Ukraine and Sudan were expected to dominate the weeklong General Assembly session, but resolutions appear to be out of reach now for any of the three conflicts. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is grinding into its third year with no end in sight. And the ruthless civil war in Sudan has “unleashed one of the world’s worst humanitarian crises,” Mr. Biden said.

“Our task, our test, is to make sure that the forces holding us together are stronger than those that are pulling us apart,” Mr. Biden said. “I truly believe we’re in another inflection point of world history. For the choices we make today will determine our future for decades to come.”

Here’s what else to know:

  • A final address: Mr. Biden’s speech also covered the climate crisis, the urgent need for aid to strife-torn areas and the challenge of artificial intelligence. And it was a farewell of sorts. He has long spoken about the power of personal relationships as an instrument of diplomacy, and aides say he is likely to have a number of one-on-one meetings with fellow world leaders on the sidelines of the summit. The speech also came at a time of uncertainty, with the presidential election six weeks away, and Mr. Biden cast his decision to step down from the presidential ticket as a larger lesson for the world’s leaders, saying, “Some things are more important than staying in power.”

  • A proposal for Ukraine: The U.N. Security Council convened a session Tuesday on Ukraine, a last-minute addition after Ukrainian diplomats raised concerns that their war might be falling off the agenda with so much attention fixed on the Middle East. President Volodymyr Zelensky appealed to the 15 members to continue supporting his country’s defense against Russia. “Russia is committing an international crime. This war can’t simply fade away, this war can’t be calmed by talks. Actions are needed,” Mr. Zelensky told the Council. “Russia can only be forced into peace.”

  • Secretary general’s address: António Guterres, the secretary general of the United Nations, warned in opening remarks on Tuesday that “a powder keg risks engulfing the world.” He urged modernization of U.N. institutions like the Security Council and the World Bank. “It is in all our interests to manage the epic transformations underway, to choose the future we want and guide our world toward it,” he said.

  • Who won’t be there: The recent escalation of attacks between Israel and Hezbollah, the armed Iranian-backed Lebanese group, prompted Prime Minister Najib Mikati of Lebanon to cancel his appearance. Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, delayed his trip until Wednesday. He is scheduled to speak on Thursday.

In his first U.N. speech, Iran’s president aimed to defuse tensions with the West while criticizing Israel.

In his first address to the U.N. General Assembly on Tuesday, the new president of Iran, Masoud Pezeshkian, said he was elected to steer Iran into a new era of domestic reform and constructive global engagement with the world and he did not seek war or tension with any country.

“The Islamic Republic of Iran seeks to safeguard its own security, not to create insecurity for others. We want peace for all and seek no war or quarrel with anyone. We seek lasting peace and security for the people of Ukraine and Russia,” Mr. Pezeshkian said.

Mr. Pezeshkian’s speech was unusually reconciliatory in tone and words. In the past, Iranian presidents have used the global platform of the Assembly to project defiance, and have threatened to take revenge on American presidents and denied the Holocaust in their speeches.

Instead, Mr. Pezeshkian extended an olive branch to Iran’s Western adversaries, with the exception of Israel. To what extent his rhetoric will match Iran’s actions remains to be seen.

The Iranian president praised Iran’s nuclear deal with the West as a diplomatic achievement and said Tehran was ready to engage in negotiations with all sides to return to the deal and lift U.S. sanctions.

He said once that hurdle is overcome, “fully and in good faith, dialogue on other issues can follow.”

Still, analysts said that Mr. Pezeshkian’s peace message did not match the country’s actions on the ground, where the powerful Revolutionary Guards Corps supports and arms militant groups like Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen and militias in Iraq and Syria. These groups have been launching attacks on Israel, U.S. military bases and, in the case of the Houthis, ships on the Red Sea.

On Oct. 7, Hamas invaded Israel from Gaza, killing roughly 1,200 people, including women and children, according to Israeli authorities, and taking more than 200 hostages.

Iran has denied that it supports Russia in its war against Ukraine. But Western officials say that the country has been supplying Russia with drones, which the Kremlin has used against targets in Ukraine for more than a year, and that Iran recently delivered short-range ballistic missiles to Russia.

When it came to Israel, Mr. Pezeshkian took a harsher stand but stopped short of directly threatening the country.

Like many world leaders who spoke at the Assembly today, Mr. Pezeshkian slammed Israel for what he called “atrocities in Gaza,” the wave of recent attacks in Lebanon that have killed hundreds of people and a covert war with Iran assassinating its nuclear scientists, diplomats and “guests on our soil” — a reference to the killing of Hamas’s leader, Ismail Haniyeh, in Tehran.

Mr. Pezeshkian defended Iran’s support of the militant networks known as the “axis of resistance” in the Middle East which have taken up arms against Israel, including Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon. He called the networks “popular liberation movements of people that have been victims of four generations of the crimes and colonialism of the Israeli regime.”

Mr. Pezeshkian, a heart surgeon, is a reformist who won the election in July against a conservative candidate. Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has the last word on all state matters, has endorsed Mr. Pezeshkian and called on all government branches and political factions to cooperate with him.

“He has a really difficult balancing act to put on display in New York, because a lot of the priorities he is pursuing are mutually exclusive,” Ali Vaez, the Iran director for the International Crisis Group, said of Mr. Pezeshkian. “He wants to improve relations with the West when Iran is on the opposite side of the West in the wars in Gaza and Ukraine.”

Mr. Pezeshkian called on the international community to immediately bring a cease-fire in Gaza and “bring an end to the desperate barbarism of Israel in Lebanon, before it engulfs the region and the world,” saying that aggression with thousands of victims “cannot go unanswered.”

In April, after Israel struck Iran’s Embassy in Damascus, Syria, Iran retaliated by launching hundreds of drones and missiles against Israel. And Tehran vowed revenge after Israel assassinated Hamas’s political leader, Mr. Haniyeh, but after intense diplomatic efforts military commanders said Iran would retaliate at a time and place of its choosing.

Mr. Pezeshkian said he had a message for the American people: “We have the opportunity to transcend these limitations and enter a new era. This era will commence with the acknowledgment of Iran’s security concerns and cooperation on mutual challenges.”

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Zelensky addresses the Security Council, calling for attention to stay on Ukraine.

President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine told the United Nations Security Council on Tuesday that “Russia can only be forced into peace” and urged that the Russia-Ukraine war not be overlooked as the world turned its attention to wars in Gaza, Sudan and Myanmar.

“Russia is committing an international crime,” Mr. Zelensky said in a short but impassioned speech. “This war can’t simply fade away, this war can’t be calmed by talks. Actions are needed. Russia can only be forced into peace.”

Mr. Zelensky also told the council’s 15 members that Ukraine had obtained information that Russia was planning to attack its three nuclear plants. “We have proof of this, if Russia is ready to go that far, it means nothing you value matters to Moscow,” he said.

Mr. Zelensky said he had put together a new victory plan in the almost three-year-old war based on the principles and values of the U.N. charter, but did not elaborate on its details other than to say that he was organizing a peace conference. He added that he would invite all countries to the conference, including China, Russia’s most powerful partner, and India, which has said it is a neutral player in the war but is helping to sustain Russia’s economy with large oil purchases.

Mr. Zelensky was speaking ahead of meetings this week, during which he plans to present his “victory plan” to President Biden and other U.S. officials. So far, he has withheld details of the plan from the public. Mr. Zelensky has also called for the United States and other allies to permit Ukraine to use long-range missiles provided by the West to strike deep into Russia.

Secretary General António Guterres briefed the Council, telling diplomats that it was past time to end the war in Ukraine, which has led to catastrophic civilian suffering and spillover consequences, such as a rise in grain and energy prices and the displacement of millions. He also laid out the U.N.’s role in providing lifesaving humanitarian aid to some 6.2 million people in Ukraine this year, and he appealed to donors for more funding.

With the bitter winter approaching, only half of the U.N.’s response plan was funded, Mr. Guterres pointed out.

“The longer this tragic war continues, the greater the risk of escalation and spillover,” he said.

Antony J. Blinken, the U.S. secretary of state, said the Security Council must act to address North Korea and Iran sending weapons to Russia for its war. He repeated an assertion that he first made during a trip to Britain this month — that in exchange for Iran equipping the Russian military with armed drones and short-range ballistic missiles, Russia was “sharing technology with Iran on nuclear issues, as well as space information.”

Mr. Blinken did not give more details. Russia was one of several powerful nations that joined an agreement led by President Barack Obama to place limits on Iran’s nuclear program.

Mr. Blinken said the Security Council must also help Ukraine reach “a just and lasting peace.” That means any diplomatic settlement must allow Ukraine to retain its full sovereignty and territorial integrity, despite the intent of President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia to occupy and annex large parts of eastern Ukraine, in addition to Crimea.

The Security Council has been deadlocked over the war in Ukraine since the start of the Russian invasion. Russia, a permanent member of the Council with veto power, has blocked resolutions calling for an immediate withdrawal of its troops.

The U.N. Security Council will convene an emergency session on Lebanon on Wednesday evening. France’s foreign minister requested the meeting after Israeli strikes killed more than 500 people on Monday.

During Pezeshkian’s speech, Iran’s mission at the United Nations announced that his scheduled news conference on Wednesday had been canceled. The abrupt cancelation was unusual, and came after he set off a media storm in Iran by telling American reporters on Monday that Iran was ready to defuse tensions with Israel and lay down arms if Israel did the same. Conservative media pundits have said he spoke out of turn.

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Iran’s new president, Masoud Pezeshkian, is making his international debut at the General Assembly. Elected just a few months ago, he is telling world leaders that he campaigned on reform and engagement with the world and that he aims to usher Iran into “a new era.” He quickly moved into sharp criticism of Israel for what he called “crimes against humanity” and presented Iran’s support of a network of proxy militia groups as support for freedom fighters.

Russia’s war in Ukraine has cost it standing in the world, billions of dollars, a chunk of its naval force and tens of thousands of soldiers’ lives. But Russia’s ambassador to the U.N., Vasily Nebenzya, told me ahead of the Security Council meeting on Ukraine today that the session was “another show” and that “the most pressing crisis today is Gaza and Lebanon and the Middle East in general, and they are spending our time on Ukraine just to make another show.”

The U.S. secretary of state, Antony J. Blinken, told the Security Council that Ukraine continued to seek “a just and lasting peace,” and that it was prepared to reach a diplomatic settlement to the war. But he said President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia still showed no signs of wanting to engage in sincere talks.

Zelensky told the Security Council that Russia was responsible for invading Ukraine in violation of the U.N. charter and must be forced into peace. He also asserted that Ukraine had obtained information that Russia planned attacks on three Ukrainian nuclear facilities.

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Furious over the continuing war in Gaza, world leaders castigate Israel.

Middle Eastern and other leaders who addressed the opening session of the United Nations General Assembly on Tuesday castigated Israel for what they characterized as its heedless disregard for civilian lives in its war in Gaza.

“Gaza has become the world’s largest cemetery for women and children,” President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey said in a 20-minute broadside against Israel.

While Israel has long been a target of criticism in the United Nations General Assembly, the war with Hamas in Gaza, as well as Israel’s sharply intensified attacks on Hezbollah in Lebanon, have ratcheted up the sweep of denunciations by numerous world leaders. Some also condemned the Hamas-led Oct. 7 attack on Israel that killed more than 1,200 people.

Without naming the United States specifically, Mr. Erdogan lambasted those countries that have called for a cease-fire while continuing to deliver weapons to Israel. He said that the need to confront the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel was as imperative as the World War II effort to confront Hitler. And he hailed university students and other protesters around the world for their stand against the war in Gaza.

Danny Danon, the Israeli ambassador to the United Nations, responded in a statement, saying that while terrorists in both Gaza and Lebanon were attacking Israel, “There is Erdogan who comes every year to the U.N. and spreads pure hatred against the state of Israel.” Mr. Netanyahu is expected to address the General Assembly on Thursday, a trip he delayed earlier this week amid the expanded assault on Hezbollah.

The leaders who spoke critically of Israel all referred to the staggering death toll in Gaza — more than 41,000, according to the local health authorities — as they sought to illustrate the war’s devastation.

“This Israeli government has killed more children, more journalists, more aid workers, and more medical personnel than any other war in recent memory,” said King Abdullah II of Jordan, expressing anger and frustration over the Israeli attacks on Gaza and parallel deadly clashes in the Israeli-occupied West Bank.

In one of the few concrete proposals for addressing at least part of the crisis, Abdullah called for the United Nations to enforce a “Gaza humanitarian gateway” to deliver food, water, medicine and other desperately needed supplies.

He and other speakers suggested that Israel was not interested in achieving peace with the Arab world. “Consecutive Israeli governments, emboldened by years of impunity, have rejected peace and chosen confrontation instead,” he said.

Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, the emir of Qatar, whose mediators were instrumental in negotiating a temporary cease-fire and an exchange of prisoners for hostages late last year, also suggested that Israel was not a sincere partner in later peace talks that are now at a stalemate.

“A whole society is destroyed in the course of the genocide against segments of the Palestinian people,” he said.

Israel has maintained that it is Hamas that is not bargaining in good faith.

Mr. Al Thani also said that the booby-trapped pagers and walkie-talkies that killed hundreds of people and injured thousands more in Lebanon last week were a “major crime.” Current and former defense officials have attributed the blasts to an Israeli operation against Hezbollah. Israel has not claimed responsibility for the attacks.

President Cyril Ramaphosa of South Africa stressed that his country’s case before the International Court of Justice accusing Israel of committing genocide in Gaza was connected to his own country’s experience.

“The violence the Palestinian people are being subjected to is a grim continuation of more than half a century of apartheid that has been perpetrated against Palestinians by Israel,” Mr. Ramaphosa said. “We South Africans know what apartheid looks like. We lived through apartheid. We suffered and died under apartheid. We will not remain silent and watch as apartheid is perpetrated against others.”

Many of the leaders accused the United Nations of failing in its moral obligation to bring about a cease-fire in Gaza.

“It’s no surprise that both inside and outside this hall, trust in the U.N.’s cornerstone principles and ideals is crumbling,” said King Abdullah.

Farnaz Fassihi, Safak Timur and Anushka Patil contributed reporting.

A Security Council meeting on the war in Ukraine has begun and Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, just entered the chamber. The meeting was added to the schedule at the last minute, after Ukrainians complained that the war was falling out of focus as attention moves to the war in the Middle East.

After President Biden’s farewell speech to the United Nations General Assembly, the White House is confirming he will travel to Germany and Angola from October 10th to 15th. Biden will focus on shoring up support for NATO allies, Ukraine and combatting antisemitism in Germany before traveling to Angola, where he will try to strengthen economic partnerships in the continent.

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

The U.S. nixes the security detail for Haiti’s president, then restores it.

There seemed to be some confusion this weekend as world leaders prepared to meet in New York: Just who is Haiti’s president, and who would represent the country at the U.N. General Assembly?

The president of Haiti’s transitional presidential council, Edgard Leblanc Fils, announced on Saturday that the U.S. State Department notified him that he would not be receiving a head of state security detail during his trip to New York.

So he decided not to go.

“I made this decision, because there is confusion that has arisen between the United Nations, the State Department and the representation of Haiti to the United Nations,” Mr. Leblanc told reporters at a news conference Saturday.

Haiti’s last elected president, Jovenel Moïse, was assassinated three years ago. For now, the country is governed by the presidential council, whose members will rotate the presidency until elections are held in 2026 to choose an actual president. Because he has not been elected, Mr. Leblanc is essentially the acting president.

Haiti has no shortage of representatives at the United Nations.

The prime minister, Garry Conille, is already in New York receiving diplomatic security. Another transitional council member, Leslie Voltaire, also flew to New York and met with U.N. Secretary General António Guterres on Sunday. He is also getting protection while in New York, according to the Secret Service.

The decision to cut Mr. Leblanc out was widely viewed as an embarrassing blow to him and the council — and another chapter in Haiti’s long history of political upheaval.

But a day after Mr. Leblanc’s announcement, the Biden administration backtracked.

“President Leblanc will receive a full protective detail, as provided to every Head of State,” the embassy said on X. “The U.S. government takes the security of foreign dignitaries in the United States very seriously and regrets delays in approving his security detail due to the complexity of our internal processes.”

A U.S. government official who was not authorized to speak openly on the matter because of the diplomatic sensitivities said the dust-up had been the result of a translation mistake.

The title of transitional council president had been translated as coordinator, which bumped Mr. Leblanc down to a cabinet-level official — someone who would not be entitled to a full security detail provided to heads of state, the person said.

His security restored, Mr. Leblanc said he would go to New York after all, and deliver Haiti’s address to the assembly on Thursday.

In a rally outside the U.N. headquarters, several hundred people protested against President Masoud Pezeshkian of Iran, who will address the Assembly later today. The rally was organized by Organization of Iranian American Communities, a group allied with the Mujahedeen Khalq, an organization classified as a terrorist group by the U.S. until 2012. Speakers at the rally included Alan Dershowitz, who represented former President Donald J. Trump in his first impeachment trial, and Sam Brownback, a former U.S senator from Kansas. Both called for regime change in Iran.

Senator Ted Cruz of Texas addressed the protesters in a pre-recorded audio message, saying he stood with the group “and with Iranian Americans all across the country and with the people of Iran in your unceasing quest for freedom.”

As he often has, President Cyril Ramaphosa of South Africa used his address to call for more just and equitable treatment of African nations, and the developing world in general. He blasted the West for failing to uphold commitments to fund climate adaptation in Africa. He said Africa needed a seat on the Security Council. But he dedicated much of his speech to South Africa’s boldest position over the past year: calling for an end to Israel’s war in Gaza.

Ramaphosa said that South Africa brought a genocide case against Israel to the International Court of Justice under its obligations as a state party to the U.N. genocide convention. He also spoke of a deep sense of moral obligation, saying that Israel’s attacks on the Palestinian people were “a grim continuation of more than half a century of apartheid.”

“We South Africans know what apartheid looks like,” Ramaphosa said. “We lived through apartheid. We suffered and died under apartheid. We will not remain silent and watch as apartheid is perpetrated against others.”

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Netanyahu, delayed by Israel’s new assault on Hezbollah, faces broad censure from gathered leaders.

In his address to the United Nations General Assembly a year ago, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel spoke ambitiously of an Israel poised to become a “bridge of peace and prosperity” between Asia and Europe, envisaging a pathway to ending the Arab-Israel conflict that largely bypassed the issue of Palestinians.

Two weeks later, on Oct. 7, a brutal, Hamas-led assault on southern Israel led to a devastating Israeli military campaign in Gaza. That in turn drew attacks from Iranian-allied militias, including the Houthis, who have disrupted global shipping in the Red Sea, and Hezbollah, which has sent rockets into northern Israel from Lebanon. Now, a new Israeli offensive against Hezbollah in Lebanon is bringing the region to the brink of a broader war.

At this year’s General Assembly, Mr. Netanyahu’s moment on the world stage will be clouded by the conflict and the backdrop of global condemnation for his prosecution of the war in Gaza. More than 41,000 people have been killed in Gaza, according to local health authorities, who do not distinguish between civilians and combatants. And more than 600 Palestinians have been killed over the same period in the occupied West Bank, mostly in military actions and a few at the hands of extremist Jewish settlers, according to the United Nations.

Israel is battling a genocide case at the U.N.’s top court over the Gaza war while the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court has requested arrest warrants for Mr. Netanyahu and his defense minister, Yoav Gallant, along with several Hamas leaders, on accusations of crimes against humanity.

And in just days of intense Israeli assaults on southern and eastern Lebanon, hundreds of people have been reported dead and thousands wounded. With that escalation still underway, Mr. Netanyahu has delayed his arrival in New York by days, and his speech appears to have been brought forward from Friday to Thursday, to shorten his time abroad.

For Mr. Netanyahu, the assembly presents an opportunity to make Israel’s case. As Israel’s longest serving prime minister — his first term in office was in the 1990s, though he has been in and out of power since — he ranks as one of the assembly’s most veteran leaders.

“He’s the figure most identified with Israel for the last generation,” said Mazal Mualem, an Israeli political commentator for Al-Monitor, a Middle East news site, and the author of a biography of the Israeli leader, “Cracking the Netanyahu Code.”

Mr. Netanyahu views such occasions as being of historic importance, Ms. Mualem added, though at times in the past, many in the U.N. chamber have left the General Assembly hall when he takes the microphone, leaving him to speak to a largely empty hall.

That might matter less to Mr. Netanyahu, who is known to tailor his speeches abroad toward impressing his audience back home, burnishing his domestic credentials as a world player leagues above his competitors.

“His target audience will clearly be his home audience,” Ms. Mualem said.

His domestic audience is hardly united over his leadership. Many Israelis had demanded his resignation in the immediate aftermath of the Hamas-led assault, which caught Israel off-guard and exposed years of deep intelligence, military and policy failures, mostly on Mr. Netanyahu’s watch. Yet he has so far staved off internal and external pressures, and has chalked up a personal victory for now, at least, by surviving politically, against the odds.

“He’s come after the worst year in Israel’s history and his own history, and he just doesn’t give up,” said Mitchell Barak, an Israeli pollster and analyst who worked as an aide to Mr. Netanyahu in the 1990s.

“Bibi is the Israeli entrepreneur who doesn’t let failure stand in his way,” he said, referring to Mr. Netanyahu by his popular nickname. “He keeps moving forward.”

Iran will aim to both defuse tensions with the West and criticize Israel at the assembly, officials say.

In his first address to the U.N. General Assembly on Tuesday, the newly elected president of Iran, Masoud Pezeshkian, will try to defuse tensions with the West by setting a conciliatory tone while harshly criticizing Israel as a destabilizing force in the Middle Eastern region, according to two Iranian officials who were not authorized to speak publicly.

Mr. Pezeshkian hinted at a change in the severe rhetoric Tehran’s leaders usually deploy toward the West in a speech on Monday at a side event in New York City, where world leaders spoke about global challenges.

He said Iran was not seeking war. “Iran is seeking a strong, stable and unified region,” Mr. Pezeshkian said.

He also denied that Iran was supporting Russia in its war against Ukraine. But Western officials say that Iran has been supplying Russia with drones, which Russia has used against targets in Ukraine, for more than a year, and that it recently delivered short-range ballistic missiles to Russia.

When it came to Israel, Mr. Pezeshkian said on Monday that no global pact could guarantee stability and peace as long as Israel had impunity for its military conduct in the war against Hamas in Gaza, which he called “genocide” and “blind state-sponsored terrorism.” Gazan health officials say the war has killed more than 40,000 Palestinians, many of them women and children. The Hamas-led attack on Israel on Oct. 7 killed about 1,200 and led to the abduction of 250 others to Gaza.

Analysts said that Mr. Pezeshkian’s peace message did not match Iran’s actions on the ground, where the country’s powerful Revolutionary Guards Corps supports and arms militant groups like Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen and militias in Iraq and Syria. These groups have been launching attacks on Israel, United States military bases and, in the case of Houthis, ships in the Red Sea.

Mr. Pezeshkian, a heart surgeon, is a reformist who won the election in July against a conservative candidate. Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has the last word on all state matters, has endorsed Mr. Pezeshkian and called on all government branches and political factions to cooperate with him.

“He has a really difficult balancing act to put on display in New York, because a lot of the priorities he is pursuing are mutually exclusive,” Ali Vaez, the Iran director for the International Crisis Group, said of Mr. Pezeshkian. “He wants to improve relations with the West when Iran is on the opposite side of the West in the wars in Gaza and Ukraine.”

In recent days, Israel and Hezbollah, the Lebanese militant group allied with Iran, have intensified cross-border attacks against each other, raising fears of an all-out war. Tensions have also flared between Iran and Israel, with the two coming to the brink of war twice this year.

In April, after Israel struck Iran’s Embassy in Damascus, Syria, Iran retaliated by launching hundreds of drones and missiles against Israel. And Tehran vowed revenge after Israel assassinated Hamas’s political leader, Ismail Haniyeh, in Tehran in July.

The Iranian president arrived in New York with a team of seasoned diplomats who were part of Iran’s nuclear negotiating team. His delegation included Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi; and the former Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, who now serves as vice president of strategy.

Mr. Pezeshkian has expressed openness to reopening nuclear negotiations with the West, with the aim of lifting American economic sanctions imposed by President Donald J. Trump after he unilaterally exited the nuclear deal between Iran and world powers in 2018. Mr. Araghchi said on Instagram that he planned to stay in New York for an extra few days to meet other foreign ministers with the aim of restarting talks.

Amid the diplomatic moves, the imprisoned human rights activist Narges Mohammadi, Iran’s Nobel Peace Prize laureate, appealed to world leaders to keep the country’s human rights violations and the quest for democracy and peace in the Middle East at the forefront.

“I implore you to include human rights in your discussions as a precondition to negotiations at any level in action and not just words,” Ms. Mohammadi said in a statement shared by her family.

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Zelensky says U.S., Britain and France must let Ukraine make deep strikes into Russia.

President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine said Tuesday that he would urge the leaders of the United States, Britain and France to allow Ukrainian forces to use weapons supplied by those nations for strikes deep into Russian territory.

Mr. Zelensky said he had yet to get permission from any of those countries, despite other NATO leaders arguing that Ukraine should be given leeway for broad use of missiles and other arms supplied by its partners.

Mr. Zelensky said he would make his case this week in meetings with President Biden and in a separate meeting with Keir Starmer, the prime minister of Britain, and Emmanuel Macron, the president of France.

“Our decision depends on their will,” he said in an interview with The New York Times on Tuesday morning at the United Nations with Mette Frederiksen, the prime minister of Denmark. “For today, they have to give, or say that they will not give.”

“Do they really want us to prevail, or is it about something long, some terrible and long tragedy?” Mr. Zelensky said.

Recent diplomatic discussions among the three allied nations have focused on the question of allowing Ukraine to use imported weapons for long-range fire into Russia. Mr. Starmer and Mr. Macron are leaning toward giving permission but want to coordinate with Mr. Biden, who could soon decide to support Britain and France in loosening their restrictions before the United States does anything similar, U.S. officials say.

Since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Mr. Biden has feared an escalation into a Russia-versus-NATO war and has only gradually given Ukraine certain weapons systems and slowly loosened some restrictions on their use.

Mr. Zelensky also said the allies should help Ukraine fully equip all its brigades. The country’s reserve units are underequipped and not properly trained on weapons systems provided by the United States and other allies, but that shortcoming can be addressed by the nations giving Ukraine enough arms quickly, he said.

Ms. Frederiksen said in the joint interview that the United States and Europe must prepare to support Ukraine in a war that could last for years longer, and that means loosening arms restrictions.

“I don’t think Ukraine can win with one arm on their back,” she told The Times. “So I think we need to end that discussion, to give what is needed, and actually to put it the other way around — ask Ukraine what is needed to win this war. And then we have to ensure that they will have what they need.”

Denmark, Sweden and Finland, all NATO members, have said Ukraine can do as it wishes with military aid from those countries. Mr. Zelensky and Ukrainian commanders say they want to use Storm Shadow missiles from Britain, as well as a similar missile supplied by France, to strike deep into Russia. In May, Mr. Biden agreed to let Ukraine use American weapons for short cross-border strikes against Russia but still banned long-range attacks.

Mr. Zelensky said on Tuesday that allies had given a lot in recent years, but never the full amount he has requested.

Both Mr. Zelensky and Ms. Frederiksen also said the United States and European nations needed to increase their capacity to produce weapons, and that allied investment in the production of arms inside Ukraine would help alleviate the shortage.

“We need to shift our mind-set,” Ms. Frederiksen said. “We still have a peacetime mind-set in the rest of Europe.”

“Of course we could have more production faster in the rest of Europe, if we took the right decisions, but at the same time helping inside Ukraine, I mean, co-production and so on,” she added, saying governments needed to encourage more direct investment in factories in Ukraine.

Mr. Zelensky noted that the European nations currently still produce more arms than Russia, and said, “What do we have to do to get it, just to get it to Ukraine?”

When asked about the “victory plan” that he has said he will present to Mr. Biden and other American politicians this week, Mr. Zelensky said a central component was bolstering Ukraine’s military — “real strengthening, not slow packages.”

Both Mr. Zelensky and Ms. Frederiksen also said NATO member nations must expedite Ukraine’s entry into the security organization.

Mr. Zelensky denounced the direct weapons aid that North Korea and Iran have given Russia, while Ms. Frederiksen said she believed China’s commercial partnerships with Russia had been pivotal in allowing Moscow to sustain its war effort. The Biden administration has said China helped Russia rebuild its defense industry despite U.S.- and Europe-led sanctions.

“I don’t think it would be possible for Russia to have a full-scale invasion and war in a European country and at the same time mobilize in their own country without help from China,” Ms. Frederiksen said. “We need to push China more, because you cannot help Russia in invading a European country.”

Mr. Zelensky flew to the United States on Sunday and visited a factory in Scranton, Pa., that makes 155-millimeter howitzer artillery shells. He thanked the workers for their efforts in supporting Ukraine.

Mr. Zelensky said in the interview that he planned to have meetings in Washington after his United Nations visit.

In an address of a little more than 20 minutes to the General Assembly, Biden ticked through the high points of his nearly four years in office. He also acknowledged that his time was short — he has only a few months left in office and there is a significant risk that his vision of global alliances will be abandoned if his predecessor, Donald J. Trump, reassumes office in four months.

The escalation of fighting in the Middle East looms over the General Assembly’s annual summit.

The United Nations General Assembly convened in New York on Tuesday against the backdrop of a world embroiled in several wars, including Israel’s expanding and increasingly deadly wars with Hamas and Hezbollah.

Despite a mounting death toll and a catastrophic humanitarian disaster, progress in peace talks remains elusive nearly one year after the Hamas-led Oct. 7 attack on Israel that set off the war in Gaza.

Violence between Israel and Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed Lebanese militia, has escalated over the last week as the two groups ramp up tit-for-tat strikes across the Lebanese border.

Hezbollah’s leaders have vowed to retaliate against Israeli strikes, saying the group will continue its attacks on Israel until a cease-fire deal is reached between Israel and Hamas, Hezbollah’s ally.

More than 40,000 people have been killed in Gaza during the first 11 months of the war, according to the Gazan Health Ministry, which does not distinguish between civilians and combatants. Many more have been displaced. Lebanon had remained relatively unscathed until recently, when Israel turned its attention to Hezbollah.

Israel pummeled Lebanon with airstrikes on Monday, the deadliest day in the country since at least 2006. The attack left more than 550 dead and more than 1,500 injured. The Israeli military said in a statement on Tuesday that its air force hit about 1,600 Hezbollah targets in Lebanon on Monday and was continuing to strike the country.

Israel’s escalation comes after hundreds of pagers and walkie-talkies owned by Hezbollah members exploded across Lebanon last week, killing more than 30 people, including two children, and injuring thousands. Israel did not explicitly claim responsibility, but Yoav Gallant, the Israeli defense minister, said that the “center of gravity” of Israel’s military effort, which had concentrated on eliminating Hamas in Gaza, was “moving north.”

Israel bombarded Lebanon throughout the weekend. On Friday, Israel hit Beirut, the Lebanese capital, killing several top Hezbollah commanders, including one of the group’s most senior leaders, according to Israeli officials. The attack also flattened a residential building, killing and wounding dozens of civilians.

On Sunday, Hezbollah launched more than 100 missiles, rockets and drones into Israel, striking around 30 miles inside the country’s borders in its deepest attack since last October.

António Guterres, the U.N. secretary-general, called on Monday for an immediate end to hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah, with his spokesman, Stéphane Dujarric, saying in a statement that, “there is no military solution that will make either side safer.”

On Tuesday, Danny Danon, Israel’s ambassador to the U.N., said Israel was not eager to start a ground invasion in Lebanon. “We don’t want to send our boys to fight in a foreign country. But we are determined to protect the civilians of Israel. We prefer a diplomatic solution — if it’s not working, we are using other methods to show to the other side that we mean business.”

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Biden left out any mention of Iran’s involvement in the wider war in the Middle East, its supply of drones and missiles to Russia and its record of human rights violations. The current Nobel Peace Prize laurete, Narges Mohammadi, is jailed in Iran and rights groups have been pressing for world leaders to call for her release at the General Assembly.

Biden’s last speech at the General Assembly defending his foreign policy is hardly a victory lap. The majority of U.N.’s member states have been highly critical and angry at his policies supporting Israel and blocking efforts at the U.N. for a cease-fire for the first eight months of the war. Many also want to see the United States take steps to end the war in Ukraine.

As the leaders applauded, Biden touched his hand to his heart before walking away from the lectern — his final United Nations General Assembly speech behind him.

A year from now, this speech will be looked back at as the coda of an era of American leadership that is over or a bridge to a new generation.

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Farnaz, I agree that the relative absence of Iran from this speech has been notable — also in the context of the war in Ukraine. Iran came under heavy criticism from U.S. officials earlier this month, after all, who accused Iran of shipping short-range ballistic missiles to Russia. But there was no mention of Iran’s support for Russia’s war in Biden’s speech.

Iran got a brief mention in Biden’s speech: He said he would never allow Iran to obtain nuclear weapons. It’s a notable change from years past when Iran occupied more space in American president speeches at the General Assembly and a sign that Washington prefers to defuse tensions with Iran to prevent a wider war in the region. It could also be a signal to Iran’s new president that the United States is open to his proposal to start negotiations on the nuclear deal to lift sanctions.

These are rare, candid remarks Biden is making now about stepping down from the presidential ticket. In recent speeches, he’s kept most of his comments about the topic to jokes about his age. “It’s your people that matter the most. Never forget we are here to serve the people. Not the other way around.”

Peter, I thought it was also a dig at Trump: “Some things are more important than staying in power.”

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Pretty interesting for Biden to use this platform to talk about his decision not to seek another term, but he casts it in terms of a larger lesson for the world’s leaders, many of whom have been in office for years and decades with no intention of ever surrendering the grip on power.

Biden is wrapping up, explaining his decision not to seek a second term. “There is so much more I want to get done. But as much as I love the job I love my country more.” And he adds: “Some things are more important than staying in power.” The line got sustained applause.

The portion of Biden’s speech on artificial intelligence was a chance for the president to call out the credentials of his vice president, Kamala Harris. She has led a delegation to London last year to deliver a major speech on the risks and benefits of the technology. Biden neglected to do so.

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

In Lebanon’s Capital, Israel’s Strikes Stoke Fears of a Full-On War

Want to stay updated on what’s happening in Israel and Lebanon? , and we’ll send our latest coverage to your inbox.

It began with messages sent by Israel to radio stations and some cellphones in Beirut on Monday morning, warning of imminent military action.

“The I.D.F. will be moving against military bases,” an automated voice said, using the acronym for the Israel Defense Forces. “The I.D.F. don’t want to hurt you. If you are present in a building used by Hezbollah, you should leave.”

The alerts stoked alarm across the capital, the southern suburbs of which are dominated by Hezbollah, the Lebanese militant group. Parents rushed to schools to pick up their children. By early afternoon, lines of cars and motorbikes snaked out from fuel stations and down streets in the city as many residents fled, hoping to find refuge in Lebanon’s northern mountains. Others wandered the mostly empty aisles of grocery stores, their carts stacked with water bottles, bags of rice and jugs of oil, uncertainty hanging in the air.

All the while, news updates flashed across people’s phone screens detailing the more than 1,000 Israeli airstrikes pounding southern Lebanon. Worn by decades of conflicts, many believed they knew what was coming.

“It’s a war,” said Daher Amdi, 34, as he sat outside a mostly empty cafe, taking slow drags from a cigarette.

Residents in Beirut, Lebanon’s capital, have grown increasingly on edge as Israel has stepped up its airstrikes against Hezbollah. With Monday’s strikes across southern Lebanon, the prospect of the escalating conflict enveloping Beirut suddenly became real.

The attacks were the deadliest in a single day in Lebanon since 2006, with hundreds of people killed and thousands injured, according to Lebanon’s Health Ministry, mostly in the south of the country. And with both sides vowing to step up the conflict’s intensity, many residents, like Mr. Amdi, fear the city will soon be caught up in a full-on war.

Late Monday morning, Lebanon’s education ministry ordered the closure of some public and private schools, citing “security and military situations” that could endanger students. Outside of one school in east Beirut, dozens of secondary school students in light-blue polo shirts stood waiting to be picked up. Other, younger students hurried out of the building, many clutching their parents’ hands.

Joaelle Naser, 44, had come to pick up her three daughters, ages 6, 8 and 16. “I am scared, I’m scared,” Ms. Naser said, standing next to her two youngest, their neat ponytails held in place with fuzzy, rainbow-colored scrunchies. “I’m not prepared for if something happens.”

As the day dragged on, the extent of Israel’s deadly barrage became clearer. News outlets showed massive plumes of smoke hovering over villages across the south. People stared at their phones, watching the death toll tick up to 50, then 100, watching it double, triple — and then rise higher.

In Tariq El-Jdideh, a predominantly Sunni neighborhood in Western Beirut, Habib Bazzi, 75, sat on a metal bench, his eyes closed, his face turned up toward the sun. Originally from Bint Jbeil, along Lebanon’s southern border with Israel, Mr. Bazzi had been watching news channels on television since early Monday morning. He stepped outside, he said, to take a break from the seemingly endless destruction.

“I’m heartbroken,” Mr. Bazzi said. “What else can I say?”

In the City Center Mall just outside of Dahiya, a southern suburb of Beirut dominated by the Iran-backed Hezbollah, Mirna, 38, and her 14-year-old son roamed the aisles of the Carrefour grocery store. They pushed two large, deep blue shopping carts brimming with bags of sugar, lentils and rice.

A resident of Dahiya, Mirna, who asked to be identified only by her first name for fear of retaliation, said that most of her neighbors had fled the neighborhood for relatives’ homes in other parts of the city or in northern Lebanon. Only three days before, Dahiya was rocked by an explosion that killed several senior Hezbollah commanders — a sign, she worried, of what was to come.

“I told my husband we should leave, we should definitely leave soon,” she said.

Nearby, Lama Abdul Sater stood behind the glass counter of a watch stand in the mall, neat lines of gold and silver bands in the case reflecting the fluorescent lights above. Her 10-year-old daughter, Manesa Tarshishi, stood next to her in a bright pink-and-blue sundress, fiddling with the zipper of her pencil case.

Tucked behind the counter was Ms. Sater’s large, navy handbag, holding her wallet and two passports. Before she left for work with Manesa, her husband advised her to take them just in case they had to suddenly evacuate the city. If there was bombardment so intense that they could not leave, he told her, they should stay at the mall — it was safer, he said.

“Death is very close, I’m worried it’s very near,” Ms. Sater said in a near whisper, so Manesa would not hear. But as certain as she was that war was coming, she did not know whether it was safer to leave or stay, or where she would go if they fled the city. “Any decision I make might not be the right decision, I’m not sure about anything,” she said.

Such impossible choices are familiar to many residents here. Even before the recent hostilities, Lebanon was deep in turmoil from a yearslong political and economic crisis that began in 2019 when the economy collapsed, taking the government along with it. The country’s current caretaker government has been unable to provide the most basic services since it came to power in 2020.

Against that backdrop, most Lebanese do not have an appetite for another big war.

“It’s not the time for this war,” said Bilal Borjawi, 37. He used to run a tourism agency, he said, but over the last year his business had sputtered to a halt, with many clients worried about the security situation. Now, he said, he works as a security guard making about $300 a month — nothing compared with the $20,000 a month he used to rake in when he had his agency.

“We cannot afford more pressure than we already feel right now,” Mr. Borjawi said.

Still, as they have throughout the decades of civil strife, war, economic downturns and political crises, Lebanese in the city have endured.

At a Total Energies gas station in the Mazra neighborhood of West Beirut, drivers honked their horns, impatient to fill their tanks with fuel. Farid, a driver in his 30s who said he lives nearby, was filling up his car as his family prepared to leave for eastern Lebanon.

“My family is really panicked, they’re crying and scared,” he said, pulling crisp $20 bills from his worn, leather wallet to hand to the station attendant. “I keep trying to calm them down, saying they aren’t going to attack, they won’t bomb us here, but honestly I don’t know.”

Later Monday night, the city’s fears were realized. About 6:30 p.m., news of another strike flashed across television screens. This time, the target was in Beirut.

Discover The Times with our best offer: 

$0.50/week for your first year.

Sale ends soon
$0.50/week for your first 6 months year.
Billed as $2 every 4 weeks, then $12 thereafter.

Learn more

Ukrainian Poet and Rock Star Fights Near Front and Performs Behind It

When the Ukrainian army hit a crisis of recruitment earlier this year amid rising losses on the battlefield, one of the most popular cultural personalities in the country stepped up and enlisted.

“At some point it became uncomfortable not to join up,” said Serhiy Zhadan, in an interview at a military base in July.

A beloved poet, novelist, lyricist and rock star in Ukraine, Mr. Zhadan, 50, joined a local National Guard brigade in his home city of Kharkiv in May and started a two-month stint in boot camp. By summer he was serving in an engineering unit on the second line of defense.

Many of his friends were already fighting, he said of his decision to enlist. “This feeling that someone is fighting for you, instead of you, while you are also able to join, was also important.”

Although he said he did not intend to set an example, Mr. Zhadan’s decision to join the army resonated with many, across generations and with lovers of both his words and music.

He can fill a sports hall or a Kyiv theater for poetry readings, as he did on occasions this summer, and his rock band was acclaimed for delivering the best set at the Atlas music festival, Ukraine’s largest, in July. Proceeds of his performances go toward buying medical supplies and other equipment for the soldiers.

His commanders and friends in the Khartia National Guard Brigade were happy for the morale boost and publicity his presence has brought. He has long been a supporter and fund-raiser for the brigade, and even gave it its name, which means Charter, when volunteers from Kharkiv formed it in 2022.

But his commanders are also conscious of the responsibility to keep such a national icon safe. A Russian war blogger has announced a $5,000 price on his head. Mr. Zhadan said that he was not getting special treatment, but that in breaks in his training, soldiers and instructors would ask him for selfies.

Poets have held a special place in Soviet society and its aftermath, trusted as dissidents under a brutal totalitarian system, and as moral and cultural guides in the chaotic transition after the breakup of the Soviet Union.

In his work, Mr. Zhadan has searched for meaning for what he calls the last Soviet generation, people like himself who grew up in the Soviet Union and came of age as Ukraine gained its independence, participated in years of rallies and democracy protests, and are now fighting a war.

His fans, whether of his poetry, music or both, turn to him for cultural sustenance.

“We all need food for our souls,” said Bohdan Beniuk, director of the Theater on Podil in Kyiv, as he introduced Mr. Zhadan at a poetry reading in July.

His rock concerts with his band Zhadan i Sobaky (Zhadan and the Dogs) have brought him additional popularity, especially with younger people. His songs, a mixture of punk and jazz, which he writes the lyrics for and the band sets to music, are anarchic, full of profanities and odes to drugs, alcohol and rock ‘n’ roll. But they’re also about love and freedom.

His body of written work — poetry and prose spanning more than three decades, chronicling his own evolution and that of his generation — has made him one of the most important contemporary literary figures in the country. Significantly, he is a poet from eastern Ukraine, and he has given voice to the people from the borderland provinces of the Donbas, which are now largely occupied by Russian forces and claimed by President Vladimir V. Putin as part of Russia.

“He’s a great poet,” said Tamara Hundorova, a professor at the Institute of Literature at the Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and a visiting professor at Princeton and Harvard Universities, who last year proposed Mr. Zhadan for the Nobel Prize in Literature. “He’s a true poet but he’s also a citizen, he’s very engaged in this very difficult time.”

Professor Hundorova, among other academics, credits Mr. Zhadan with helping revitalize the Ukrainian language, not least with his use of slang and swear words, and contributing to a cultural renaissance, picking up the mantle of Ukrainian futurist poets of the 1920s, who flourished in Kharkiv but were cut short by the purges under Stalin.

Born in August 1974, the son of a Soviet army officer, Mr. Zhadan grew up in a village southeast of Kharkiv, near the Russian border, and went to high school in the nearby town of Starobilsk. The town, where his father is buried, has been under Russian occupation since 2022.

He studied philology at the H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University in Kharkiv, Ukraine’s second largest city and its former capital, and has since made his home there. After graduating, he worked as a researcher at the Kharkiv Literary Museum and joined a collective of young writers.

His mother’s younger sister, Oleksandra Kovalova, a poet and translator, who was prominent in the Ukrainian national liberation movement in Kharkiv, was a formative influence. She took him to political rallies, introduced him to literary and artistic circles in Kharkiv, and helped him publish his first volume of poetry.

He burst on the literary scene at age 17, “baring his soul boldly,” in 1991, the year that Ukraine gained independence, Ms. Hundorova, the professor, said in an interview.

Ahead of the times, he was the first to explore the symbolism of losing the country, the Soviet Union, that he had grown up in, and seeing his parents’ world, and all the certainties of the communist system, collapse — and along with it, the authority of the older generation. His generation, he depicted as homeless and nihilistic, in constant migration.

Later in adulthood, he experienced a homecoming, explored in his 2010 novel “Voroshilovgrad,” rediscovering a deep connection to the “high sky” and “black earth” of the land and a feeling of loyalty and belonging to the neglected, postindustrial regions of the east.

The novel, whose title references a Soviet-era name for the eastern Ukrainian city of Luhansk, was prescient, revealing the deep ties Ukrainians felt for their homeland. His poetry was too. He published poems about war coming to the region a full two years before Russia began its military interference to annex the Crimean Peninsula and its staging of a separatist rebellion in eastern Ukraine.

The full-scale invasion in 2022, when Russian troops came close to capturing the city of Kharkiv, robbed him of words at first, he said.

“The stress was so enormous, it took your breath away,” he said. But the need to write returned after a few months. He remains prolific, dwelling on pain, death and separation, and the importance of recording it all.

In recent poems translated from the Ukrainian by Virlana Tkacz and Wanda Phipps, he wrote:

They didn’t tell you the most important thing.

They didn’t warn you that death is limited

By the silence that comes with it.

He returned to the theme in another poem:

The only rule — grow roots,

Break through.

The only chance — reach out for a branch, grab hold of a voice.

There is nothing else.

No one will remember you for your silence.

No one but you can name the rivers nearby.

On a morning in July driving with an engineering team near the front line, he expressed great rage against the Russian occupation of the eastern provinces of Ukraine.

He said he had friends living under Russian occupation, who became trapped and unable to leave. Some have been detained, some have been killed and their property seized, and a classmate even ended up fighting and dying on the Russian side, he said.

“In the east, the war cuts through every family,” he said.

Yet he remains confident Ukraine will prevail.

“It will be a long process, but I think at the end of this process we will see a return to our borders,” he said.

For the Russians, he predicted great turmoil. “With this war, they started a very serious and irreversible, internal destruction,” he said. “I think we are witnessing this colossus crumbling.”

Vladyslav Golovin contributed reporting from Kyiv, Ukraine.

Discover The Times with our best offer: 

$0.50/week for your first year.

Sale ends soon
$0.50/week for your first 6 months year.
Billed as $2 every 4 weeks, then $12 thereafter.

Learn more

How a Leftist Delivered Sri Lanka’s Biggest Political Jolt in Decades

Two of the front-runners in Sri Lanka’s presidential election were the sons of former presidents. A third contender, the incumbent, was the nephew and political heir of yet another president.

But when Anura Kumara Dissanayake arrived at the election commission office late Sunday to accept his victory in the vote, he cut a different figure, his sleeves rolled up and his beige shirt tucked into simple blue jeans.

His sweep to power is the biggest jolt to Sri Lanka’s political landscape in decades — an emphatic rejection of the political elite that had long ruled the island nation. He rode a wave of discontent that crested in 2022 with a popular uprising over an economic collapse and continued until the first presidential election since then.

Mr. Dissanayake, 55, offered his broad leftist coalition as the best hope for a different political culture. He cast it as an alternative for a country with an aspiring middle class that is hungry for competent economic leadership that the old political system, rife with nepotism and corruption, did not provide.

His personal story resonated: The son of a farmer and a homemaker, he worked as a tutor, sold cigarettes on trains and hawked vegetables in his village market before committing to politics. He vowed to clean up the patronage networks that had enriched a small elite while the fortunes of the majority stagnated and then plummeted as the country’s economy disintegrated.

“They think that the family power they have obtained from ruling the country for a long time will bring them victory,” Mr. Dissanayake said at one of his final rallies. “It is the people’s power that will definitely win.”

His government faces a hard road ahead. The country’s economy, while stabilized after the long fuel and food lines of two years ago, continues to suffer from deep structural flaws: too much spending, and too little taxation and revenue. And there are no easy fixes.

Austerity measures have added to the suffering of the poor, with a quarter of the country’s population of 23 million below the poverty line. Corruption and patronage won’t be easily rooted out. The ethnic prejudices that led to a 26-year civil war remain largely unaddressed.

For decades, temporary covers — from majoritarian ethnic nationalism to the economic boost from heavy spending at the end of the civil war — papered over anger at “the decadence of this political elite,” said Nirmal Dewasiri, a professor of history at the University of Colombo, in Sri Lanka’s capital.

The economic collapse two years ago, Dr. Dewasiri added, awakened the country to how deep and structural the political rot was.

Now, with Mr. Dissanayake’s victory, “it’s a very unique situation,” Dr. Dewasiri said. The two traditional political camps “have sort of broken down.”

Power in Sri Lanka long alternated between two dominant parties until one of them, the center-right United National Party, entrenched itself in the 1970s and ruled for 17 years.

The party’s consolidation of power and crackdown on dissenting voices helped lead to violent insurrections — the three-decade Tamil insurgency in the north, and repeated violent Communist insurrections in the south. New coalitions and networks formed in an effort to topple the U.N.P.

Another reality was also emerging. While established politics long relied on rural patronage, the country was developing a new urban and semi-urban middle class that was looking beyond party structures for a path to prosperity.

The Rajapaksa family stepped into this moment of churn, tapping into the nationalism of the majority Buddhist Sinhalese population to rule for 10 years under its patriarch, Mahinda Rajapaksa. When his tenure ran its course, a second Rajapaksa brother, Gotabaya, ascended to power in 2019 with a campaign intended to appeal to the urban middle class.

He pitched himself as a technocratic “nonpolitician” who was at once an insider and an outsider, a former army officer who was returning from living in the United States. As a candidate he held a series of symposiums around the country where professionals would offer solutions to problems.

But Sri Lanka’s economic crisis and the resulting protests that forced out Mr. Rajapaksa provided an opening for other political forces that had spent years organizing.

“Many of the things that we would have been speaking about in the past I think began to make sense to people — that, primarily, the problem in the country stems from the political culture, corruption, nepotism, the patronage system,” Harini Amarasuriya, an academic and activist who is a senior leader of Mr. Dissanayake’s alliance, said in an interview before the vote.

On Tuesday, Dr. Amarasuriya was appointed as Sri Lanka’s new prime minister. While she is the third woman to hold the post, women’s representation in Parliament still remains just 5 percent. The two previous female prime ministers both came from a political dynasty.

Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna, the Marxist party that Mr. Dissanayake helped lead to power as part of a broader coalition, is drastically different today than when he joined it as a student leader in the 1980s.

Thousands were killed in violence between J.V.P. insurgents and Sri Lankan government forces. Mr. Dissanayake’s own family home was burned, and the family was forced to live in a relative’s kitchen. A cousin his parents had raised almost as a sibling to Mr. Dissanayake was shot dead not far from him. He kept this news from his family for a decade, he said; they kept a vigil and visited temples to pray for his return.

In Sinhalese Buddhist culture, families keep a horoscope that, based on planetary alignments, predicts their child’s future. Past leaders, particularly the Rajapaksas, emphasized astrology in political life. When Mr. Dissanayake was asked in a recent interview whether his horoscope had predicted his rise, he was blunt.

“In 1989, our house was burned. My horoscope got burned with it, and I haven’t made a new horoscope since then. I don’t believe in horoscopes,” he said. “My parents didn’t have big dreams — their world wasn’t that big. The biggest hope my mother had for me was the teaching profession. That was their world.”

The J.V.P. spent decades trying to distance itself from the violence and radical communism of its past. With the stigma not yet fully gone, Mr. Dissanayake ran under the name of his coalition, the National People’s Power. Though the coalition retained the J.V.P. at its core, it brought in academics and activists like Dr. Amarasuriya who had none of the old political baggage and could better articulate an alternative vision.

The alliance vowed to change the political culture within existing frameworks. It reached out to young people and women who had long been on the political margins. It ensured “a feminist sensitivity” by putting female voices in its leadership and mobilizing female voters, Dr. Amarasuriya said.

Two years before, it had been young people and women who spilled into the streets as the economy cratered.

“Although the husband might bring the money, the women felt the brunt more because they run the kitchen,” said Hiranthi Boralessa, 59, a teacher in the southern district of Galle.

She had been married to a J.V.P. leader for over three decades but had only now gotten directly involved in political organizing.

Her husband, Dharmawardhana Munasinghe, 69, a retired teacher, was part of the earliest leadership of the J.V.P. His detention at an army camp, and his cat-and-mouse game with the authorities for nearly a decade after, complicated their young romance. Their wedding had to wait for a decade, and it eventually happened at a small, hushed ceremony in Colombo.

Mr. Munasinghe said that in all the decades after the party distanced itself from the violence, it had remained a marginal player in Galle. But he said the landscape changed entirely after the 2022 protest movement, with the local cells of the two main parties discredited over the economic collapse and hated for years of impunity for local abuses.

He said that Mr. Dissanayake’s pragmatism and discipline had achieved what older generations of leftist leaders could not.

“I’m not a wizard or a magician — I am a normal citizen of this country,” Mr. Dissanayake said on Monday after taking the oath of office in a low-key ceremony in Colombo. “My main task now is to absorb my skills and collect my knowledge to lead this country. It is my responsibility to be a part of that collective intervention.”

As Lebanon Reels From Israeli Attacks, the Future Is Murky for a Wounded Hezbollah

News Analysis

As Lebanon Reels From Israeli Attacks, the Future Is Murky for a Wounded Hezbollah

Some experts said that Israel’s onslaught had left Hezbollah in disarray. Others noted its large weapons stockpiles and history of adapting to battle Israel’s much more high-tech military.

Ben Hubbard

Reporting from Istanbul

Swaths of southern Lebanon are smoldering ruins. Highways are clogged with thousands fleeing the possibility of an even bigger war between Israel and Hezbollah. As towns and villages held funerals on Tuesday, Lebanon was just beginning to grapple with the fallout from its deadliest day in decades.

A vast wave of Israeli airstrikes on Monday targeting parts of the country where Hezbollah holds sway killed hundreds of people and plunged Lebanon into a deep state of uncertainty over what Israel would do next, how deeply the militia had been damaged and what sort of response its remaining forces could muster.

Israel said it had hit more than 1,000 sites, mostly in southern and eastern Lebanon, aimed at the fighters and military infrastructure of Hezbollah, the Lebanese political party and militia it has been fighting along the Israel-Lebanon border for 11 months. At least 558 people were killed in the strikes, including 94 women and 50 children, Lebanon’s health minister told reporters on Tuesday.

That toll marked a terrible milestone for Lebanon: Monday was the country’s deadliest day since its 15-year civil war, which ended in 1990.

“The victims of a strike by the Israeli enemy on the village of Arnoun. Targeted in their homes!” read text over a photo shared on social media of three women killed in one of the strikes.

The death toll given by the health ministry did not differentiate between fighters and civilians, and the strikes overwhelmingly hit parts of the country where Hezbollah dominates, suggesting that Israel had struck another fierce blow to the group. That capped a week in which Israel also blew up electronic devices distributed by Hezbollah, killing dozens of people and injuring thousands more, and assassinated a group of its military leaders in an airstrike near Beirut.

Some experts on Hezbollah suggested that Israel’s recent attacks had largely debilitated the group, leaving its membership in disarray.

“They have no options,” said Hilal Khashan, a professor of political science at the American University of Beirut and the author of a book on Hezbollah. “Israel disabled Hezbollah.”

The attacks since last Tuesday have hit both Hezbollah’s leadership and its fighters hard while severely disrupting their ability to communicate and coordinate large-scale retaliation against Israel, he said.

“Now Hezbollah is headless,” Mr. Khashan said. “Israel eliminated Hezbollah’s leadership, so the rank and file are astray.”

Other experts acknowledged the severity of the blows but were more cautious about writing the group off so quickly, citing its large weapons stockpiles and history of adapting to confront Israel’s much more high-tech military.

Hezbollah was formed with Iranian help in the 1980s to fight the Israeli occupation of southern Lebanon, which ended in 2000. In the years since, it has grown into a significant political player in Lebanon and the country’s most powerful military force while sending fighters to help other Iranian-backed forces in Syria, Iraq and Yemen. Israel, the United States and other countries consider it a terrorist organization.

Hezbollah launched cross-border attacks on Israel after the start of the war in Gaza last October in solidarity with the Palestinian group Hamas, which is also backed by Iran. Israel responded by striking Hezbollah sites in Lebanon, but for many months, both sides made efforts to keep their battle focused on the border area. Hezbollah’s leader, Hassan Nasrallah, has said that the group would continue striking Israel as long as the war in Gaza continued.

Last week, Israeli leaders sharply escalated the attacks on the group, saying that removing it from the border zone was the only way that the tens of thousands of Israelis who have fled their homes in the area could return home. (About 90,000 Lebanese have fled their homes near the border, too.)

A diplomat with knowledge of the talks aimed at containing the violence, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to brief the news media, said Israel was demanding that Hezbollah agree to a cease-fire along the Lebanon-Israel border regardless of what happens in the war in Gaza and that it must move its forces and arms away from the frontier.

Joseph Daher, who teaches at Lausanne University in Switzerland and wrote a book about Hezbollah, said Israel had greatly increased the pressure but that Hezbollah was unlikely to agree to its demands.

“It puts pressure politically and socially on Hezbollah, but will it make Hezbollah separate the Gaza front from the Lebanese front? I don’t think so,” he said. “Nor will it get Hezbollah to withdraw its military capacities from the border area.”

So far, at least, Hezbollah does not appear to have changed its strategy of trying to avoid a total war that could cause deep damage to the movement and to Lebanon, Mr. Daher said.

“We are already in a form of war, but they don’t want a total war with Israel,” he said. “This is why they are maintaining a calculated and to some extent moderated reaction, although intensifying their attacks against Israel, as seen this weekend.”

Hezbollah has continued to strike Israel in recent days, including with long-range missiles that it says it has aimed at military bases and other sensitive sites. Many have been intercepted by Israel’s defenses and little serious damage has been reported.

Before the Gaza war, Hezbollah was widely considered one of the most heavily armed nongovernmental forces in the world.

Its military wing was believed to have between 20,000 and 30,000 members, including low-level guerrillas, experienced commanders and teams of technicians focused on rockets, missiles and drones, according to Philip Smyth, an analyst with the Atlantic Council’s counterterrorism project.

Its arsenal included more than 100,000 rockets and missiles, likely including intermediate-range ballistic missiles, cruise missiles and portable antiaircraft weapons. Its fighters have deployed anti-tank missiles to blow up Israeli vehicles, and Israeli officials have said it has developed precision-guided missiles that could hit military bases or critical infrastructure.

Some of Hezbollah’s senior leaders have been with the group for decades, and many of its fighters got battlefield experience during the Syrian civil war and in the fight against the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq.

How much of Hezbollah’s force and fighting ability remains after 11 months of war — and after the last week’s attacks — is an open question. The group had announced the deaths of more than 400 fighters between October and the most recent attacks.

Israel’s recent escalation injured many midlevel figures and killed military planners and a still unknown number of fighters and other operatives. Still, it has not yet prompted a large retaliation from Hezbollah, either because the group has chosen not to mount one or because it simply cannot.

In either case, Israel has robbed Hezbollah of its aura of power and competence, especially by turning its own covert communications network into a weapon against it, Mr. Smyth said.

“I don’t think anyone is under any illusions that this was a very deep attack that penetrated an opaque organization that prides itself on being opaque,” he said.

In Rare Graft Case in Singapore, Former Minister Pleads Guilty

He was the first minister to be charged with corruption in Singapore in nearly 50 years. For months, he had vowed to clear his name.

On Tuesday, in a surprise twist, the prosecution dropped the charges of corruption, and S. Iswaran, the former transport minister, pleaded guilty to lesser offenses: four charges of obtaining valuable items as a public servant and one charge of obstructing justice. It was not clear whether a plea deal had been reached.

In January, Mr. Iswaran was slapped with 35 counts of wrongdoing, including accepting bribes — such as tickets to the play “Hamilton,” soccer games in England and the Formula 1 race in Singapore — that were valued at 403,000 Singapore dollars ($312,000). Most of those dealings involved the property tycoon Ong Beng Seng, who has not been charged in the case.

The case stunned many Singaporeans, who had long believed that their politicians were incorruptible in part because of their high salaries. Singapore has consistently been lauded for its lack of graft. It was the fifth-least-corrupt country in Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index in 2023, the only Asian country in the top 10.

It was also seen as a black mark on the governing People’s Action Party, which has been in power for more than six decades and projected a scrupulous image. Mr. Iswaran was a senior figure in the party and was best known for his role in bringing the glitzy Formula 1 race to Singapore.

Mr. Iswaran is set to be sentenced on Oct. 3.

At the start of the trial on Tuesday, prosecutors sought a prison term of six to seven months. In court on Tuesday, Deputy Attorney General Tai Wei Shyong said Mr. Iswaran was “more than a passive acceptor” of the gifts. Not punishing such acts, Mr. Tai said, would send a signal that these acts can be tolerated, according to The Straits Times, the main newspaper in Singapore.

Mr. Tai asked for a custodial sentence — meaning a prison term — because of Mr. Iswaran’s former position as a minister and the potential damage to the public interest.

Mr. Iswaran’s case was the latest in a slew of bad press for the Singapore government. It came months after Singapore’s speaker of Parliament resigned after an extramarital affair with a fellow lawmaker, and the real estate dealings of two ministers stirred controversy.

Singapore does not allow civil servants or politicians to ask for gifts or favors. Any person who accepts a gift that is valued at $38 or more would have to pay its value to the government. The affluent city-state pays its ministers some of the highest salaries in the world, calling it a measure to prevent corruption.

Mr. Iswaran’s lawyer, Davinder Singh, argued that Mr. Iswaran should not spend more than eight weeks in prison. He said his client’s acts did not have an impact on the reputation of the government. By charging its own minister, the government was sending the strongest signal that it was upholding its longstanding commitment to integrity, Mr. Singh said, according to The Straits Times.

Mr. Singh said that there was no abuse of power in office and that Mr. Iswaran’s actions were never “about the money.” He pointed out that Mr. Iswaran had returned some of the gifts he received and voluntarily returned the salary he received as a minister and his allowance as a member of Parliament.

Mr. Singh argued that Mr. Iswaran’s culpability was low because he received the gifts in the context of his friendship with Mr. Ong and David Lum, managing director of a Singapore-based construction company, without any “premeditation or sophistication involved.”

U.K.’s Starmer Attempts to Sprinkle Some Harris-Style ‘Joy’ Into Speech

Sign up for the Tilt newsletter, for Times subscribers only.  Nate Cohn, The Times’s chief political analyst, makes sense of the latest political data.

Taking a page from the Democratic presidential ticket in the United States, Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Tuesday promised to bring joy back to everyday life in Britain, which he said was sorely lacking after a cost-of-living crisis and the strain of coping with the country’s run-down public services.

Mr. Starmer, who has been criticized for an unrelenting message of doom-and-gloom since his Labour Party swept into power in July, tried to channel his inner Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, sprinkling dollops of hope into his keynote speech to the party’s annual conference in Liverpool.

“I know that the cost-of-living crisis drew a veil over the joy and wonder in our lives, and that people want respite and relief,” Mr. Starmer declared to a warm crowd. “Because we do need joy, we do need that in our lives.”

It was a critical moment for Mr. Starmer, whose new government quickly ran into turbulence over unflattering disclosures about freebies given to Mr. Starmer and his wife, Victoria, as well as rumors of feuding inside 10 Downing Street.

The prime minister’s popularity has slumped and party members are restive, though political analysts say it made sense for him to emphasize the problems he inherited from the previous Conservative government.

Mr. Starmer did not signal any major shifts in policy. The government is still expected to roll out an eat-your-broccoli budget next month that will likely mix some tax increases with budget cuts to fill a hole in Britain’s public finances. But the prime minister said the belt tightening would result in a brighter future.

“If we take tough long-term decisions now, if we stick to the driving purpose behind everything we do,” he said, “then that light at the end of the tunnel, that Britain that belongs to you — we get there much more quickly.”

Mr. Starmer, 62, is not known for his personal touch. But he struck an unusually intimate tone, reminiscing about playing the flute in a youth orchestra and visiting the Lake District, where his family had vacationed when he was child. These memories, he said, were sources of “joy and wonder” to him.

A public prosecutor-turned-politician, Mr. Starmer still seemed most comfortable when he was arguing a case against his opponents. He blamed the Conservatives for leaving the country with overcrowded prisons, insecure borders, crumbling school roofs, broken public finances and rampant child poverty.

“Do not let them attempt to shift the blame, because the state of the country is on them,” he said to thunderous applause.

At the same time, Mr. Starmer acknowledged the political attacks and criticism of his bumpy start, insisting it was “water off a duck’s back.”

Conceding there was unhappiness over his government’s decision to restrict a subsidy for winter heating to only the poorest retirees, he insisted it was necessary to show that Britain could “fund its policies properly” and argued that “every pensioner will be better off” because of other Labour policies. On Wednesday, the conference is expected to hold a nonbinding vote on the topic, which could produce an embarrassing defeat for the government.

Reflecting on the first major test of his government — anti-immigrant riots that exploded across the country in August — Mr. Starmer said he would “never let a minority of violent, racist thugs terrorize our communities.” The authorities arrested and charged hundreds of people who took part in the unrest, which began after a deadly stabbing in a children’s dance studio by a young British assailant whose parents had immigrated from Rwanda.

However, the prime minister also said concerns about Britain’s high rate of immigration were valid and promised to do better than the Conservatives did in controlling the borders. “I have never thought we should be relaxed about some sectors importing labor when there are millions of young people, ambitious and highly talented, who are desperate to work,” he said.

In an awkward moment, Mr. Starmer repeated his call for a cease-fire in Gaza and the return of Israeli hostages — initially mispronouncing the word as “sausages,” before swiftly correcting himself.

The mood at the conference — the first in 15 years in which the party was in power — was decidedly mixed. Some senior Labour figures expressed optimism that the recent run of bad publicity would soon be forgotten.

Others voiced resentment at recent media coverage, which has been dominated by reports that Mr. Starmer’s chief of staff, Sue Gray, earns more than the prime minister, (although less than dozens of other civil servants), and that Mr. Starmer had accepted gifts worth more than 100,000 pounds, or $133,000, over the past five years.

In a speech at one of many conference parties, the health secretary, Wes Streeting, joked that newspapers would soon report that Ms. Gray had “shot J.F.K.,” among other transgressions.

“I want to welcome the BBC’s conviction that no one should be paid more than the prime minister, that no one should give or receive hospitality, and that we should judge performance on social media mentions,” said Mr. Streeting in a jibe at some of the broadcaster’s highly paid staff, who earn comfortably more than Mr. Starmer. “Be careful what you wish for.”

Among Labour activists, there was a mood of celebration at finally being back in power, mixed with some frustration over how the government’s teething problems were dominating the headlines.

Speaking after a speech Monday by the chancellor of the Exchequer, Rachel Reeves, in which she promised no return to austerity, Bobby Johnstone, 25, a party member from Cheltenham said his reaction was that “hope is back, my belief that the country I grew up in 10 years ago is back.”

Jane Giddens, 64, from northeast Somerset, said she was frustrated about the media focus on the gifts, including clothes, donated to Mr. Starmer and his wife, which she blamed on “mischief making by the right-wing press.”

Still, referring to the cutbacks in fuel subsidies, Ms. Giddens said, “They were too busy trying to look tough rather than explain the socialist values of the whole thing.”

Forced From Home by War, They Found Solace in Soccer

It was just a regular practice, but the players were excited to get on the soccer field. They divided into teams and chose from an array of bibs that all bore the same message: “Women Win.”

Just being on the field was a revolutionary act for some of these girls and women — migrants from Myanmar, or Burma, in Thailand — because they were defying cultural norms by playing a sport. On that recent Monday evening, it was a place to forget for a little while the civil war that has ravaged their native land and the worries about life in their adopted home as refugees or undocumented migrants.

The coach blew a whistle, and the match began. Some of the women moved the ball deftly past others. Cheering their friends on from the sidelines, others screamed in Burmese, “The ball is here!”

There has long been a sizable Burmese community here in the city of Mae Sot, a trade hub in western Thailand. But since the Myanmar military seized power in a coup in February 2021, that population has swelled and transformed Mae Sot, as people fled the military dictatorship’s campaign of bombings and torture.

Nyein Pyae Sone Naing, 37, is one of them. She was an assistant manager for the soccer federation in Yangon, Myanmar’s biggest city, but never played because her parents forbade her to do sports. After the junta took control, she was one of many peaceful protesters charged with incitement. She fled to the jungles, where for a while she was a medic for an armed rebel group. She moved to Mae Sot in 2022 and signed up for soccer this July.

Her first time was a disaster. Each time the ball flew in her direction, she dodged it. Asked to run for the ball, she shouted back, “No!” The outing left her so sore that she had to take painkillers.

Ms. Nyein Pyae Sone Naing said she was inspired by her 16-year-old son, who played with her that first time in a mixed game. “Now, he sees me as his hero and says I can do anything,” she said. She returned the following week.

The Monday practices are run by a decade-old nonprofit called PlayOnside. One of its goals is to foster communication between migrant children from Myanmar and the local Thai population of Mae Sot.

At least 350,000 Burmese now live in Mae Sot, a third of whom arrived after the coup, according to the Joint Action Committee for Burmese Affairs. The Mae Sot government puts its total population at roughly 175,000, suggesting that many Burmese are here illegally.

A community that was largely migrant workers from Myanmar is now an assortment of activists, teachers, filmmakers and celebrities. In restaurants and cafes, one often hears more Burmese than Thai in this dusty border town that is quickly filling up with safe houses.

For the migrants, life here is a constant state of waiting. Waiting to hear back on asylum offers. Waiting to see if they can ever go back to a democratic Myanmar. There is anxiety and paranoia about being spied on by the junta.

PlayOnside tries to help with this too, and offers group therapy of sorts. After practice that Monday, 50 girls and women, ranging in age from 13 to 45, sat in a circle. It was time for “women’s talks,” and the theme that day was, “Bad day, not bad life.”

“Today, I had a job interview. Since I’m an ethnic minority, I was worried because I’m not very good at speaking Burmese. I don’t speak English well either,” a petite woman said in Burmese.

“Everyone living here is constantly dealing with stress and struggling to get by,” a woman in a red jersey said. “That’s why I came here with the determination to survive and make this place a place of solace for myself.”

For those fleeing the war in Myanmar, living in Mae Sot can be both a haven and a hazard. Thailand has sheltered about 90,000 refugees from Myanmar across nine refugee camps since the mid-1980s, but has also pushed back thousands of the recent arrivals, according to Human Rights Watch.

Ei Ei Aung said when she first moved to Mae Sot in 2022, she was lonely, jobless and lived in fear of the Thai police.

“When I play football, I forget about the stress,” said Ms. Ei Ei Aung, 41, who represented Mandalay, Myanmar’s second-biggest city, in the Under-14 division. “I also realized that I’m not the only one with trauma and stress when I see my friends here.”

Initially, it was hard for PlayOnside to recruit women to play. Schools with migrant populations would send only male students.

“What about the girls?” Javier Almagro, the Spanish co-founder of PlayOnside, said he asked the principals.

Finally, in 2017, PlayOnside started with seven or eight female players.

They turned up in pants, worried about exposing their legs. Now, all of them wear shorts. The women’s biggest obstacles were often their parents.

“When I was younger, they restricted me, and I even got beaten for playing,” said Thone Darin Han, 23. “I used to be jealous of my brother. My parents never stopped him from playing because he’s a boy.”

Fah Sai, 24, was raised in a refugee camp where men’s soccer tournaments were organized.

“When I was in high school, I was told I couldn’t join because I’m a girl,” she said. “They believed soccer was a sport for men, saying it was too tough for girls.”

Ms. Fah Sai, an ethnic Karen whose parents are from Myanmar’s Kayin State, plays for Girls On Fire, a team made up of women from refugee camps in Thailand. Unlike more recent arrivals from Myanmar, she has lived in Thailand since she was born in 2000 in a refugee camp in Tak Province, where her family fled a long-running conflict between Karen rebel groups and Myanmar’s military.

Many of her teammates are not allowed to leave their camps unless they get permission from the Thai authorities.

Often, they also need clearance from male figures in their families.

“We can’t just change women’s minds — we need to focus on men’s perspectives as well,” said Pyae Sone, the PlayOnside coach.

His group started offering free transportation for the women and set up soccer sessions for their children, who play at the same time as their mothers.

In November 2022, Daen Kajeechiwa, a founder of PlayOnside who now has his own training program, raised money to start a women’s tournament. This summer five teams played in a league for the first time.

During the second week of the Borderland Women’s League, a crowd of supporters banged on tin cans and cheered on the teams.

On that Saturday evening, Ms. Fah Sai’s Girls on Fire was pitted against Amicizia, Mr. Daen’s team.

As the matches ended after dark, a birthday cake appeared: It was Mr. Daen’s birthday. There was dancing and cheering.

Then it was time to leave. The men were waiting to play.

Discover The Times with our best offer: 

$0.50/week for your first year.

Sale ends soon
$0.50/week for your first 6 months year.
Billed as $2 every 4 weeks, then $12 thereafter.

Learn more