STEPHEN MOORE: From Dow 800 to 50,000–Reagan, Trump and the supply-side miracle

When I first arrived in Washington in 1982, the Dow Jones hit a low of 800. You may not believe that, so feel free to look it up.

If anyone had predicted that in a little more than four decades the Dow would surpass 50,000, they might have been admitted into a mental institution. But U.S. stocks have grown 60-fold (not counting inflation). Even accounting for inflation, the Dow is up about 12-fold. We have lived through the greatest period of wealth creation in perhaps the history of the world.

No other nation has come even close in modern times. Consider that American publicly traded companies are now worth more than $70 trillion.

TRUMP PREDICTING 100K ON DOW BY TIME HE LEAVES OFFICE, CLAIMS HE WAS ‘RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING’

Is China catching up? Yes, but they’ve got a lot of work to do despite having four times more people than we do. The market cap of all Chinese companies is estimated at roughly $11 trillion. The market cap of all European Union countries is roughly $16 trillion. Japan’s companies are worth $7 trillion.

We are worth roughly as much as the rest of the world combined, even though we only have 5% of the world’s population. THAT should get you out of your chair shouting, “USA, USA, USA!”

We have lived through the greatest period of wealth creation in perhaps the history of the world.

This wealth spurt didn’t happen by accident. It’s the triumph of good economic policy — including the steep decline in tax rates and tame inflation bookended by two of our greatest pro-business presidents, Ronald Reagan and Donald Trump.

STEPHEN MOORE: ECONOMISTS KEEP MISSING THE TRUMP BOOM — AND THEY WON’T ADMIT IT

Rewind to 1981 when Reagan came into office: Inflation was running at about 12%, the top income tax rate was 70%, the corporate rate was 46%, the estate tax was 70%, and the capital gains rate was 28%. The economy was in a state of collapse.

Today, inflation is roughly 3%, the top income tax rate is 39.6%, the corporate rate is down to 21%, the estate tax is 40%, and capital gains taxes are taxed at 23.4%.

Supply-siders like Steve Forbes, Arthur Laffer and Larry Kudlow should take a bow. They were right about lowering tax rates and inflation, igniting growth and prosperity. The income redistributionists were wrong that the rich would pay much less taxes. They pay more. The top 1% now pay roughly 40% of the income tax.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

That’s the good news. The bad news is that so many Democrats haven’t learned the lesson that lower tax rates create more prosperity. By the way, the evidence also shows that even with these lower tax rates, the richest 1% pay a higher share of the tax burden than ever before.

The city in the U.S. with the highest combined federal/state/local income tax rate is New York City. The new mayor, Zohran Mamdani was elected promising that millionaires and billionaires would pay more taxes to close a $10 billion deficit.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

California is our most populous state. The liberal Democrats want to put a first-in-the-nation wealth tax on the ballot that has already created an exodus of millionaires and billionaires out of the state.

Meanwhile, back in Washington, D.C., Trump is predicting the Dow will reach 100,000 by the time he leaves office. That’s a bit of a moonshot, for sure, but the last four decades prove supply-side miracles can come true.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM STEPHEN MOORE

Nicki Minaj broke free from identity politics — and the left can’t stand it

As I make my way from Alabama into Mississippi on my Walk Across America, I’ve been thinking a lot about the chains that bind us. I’m not thinking of the visible chains of poverty, drugs and violence, but the invisible ones that shackle our minds. Just as great ideas set our minds free, there are destructive notions that keep us imprisoned. It seems far too many of us prefer this imprisoned mindset — and why?

What got me thinking about this was the recent attacks on Nicki Minaj. This Trinidad-born rapper, who rose from the streets of Queens to worldwide fame and wealth, dared to step outside the identity politics script by publicly supporting President Donald Trump. 

Predictably, the left unleashed a torrent of attacks with the explicit aim of “canceling” her. All for what? An individual expressing her opinion? Or, more accurately put, a Black individual expressing her own opinion?

NICKI MINAJ FANS SAY THEY’RE LEAVING DEMOCRAT PARTY AS RAPPER’S POLITICS SPARK BACKLASH AND PRAISE

Is this politics, or something deeper — like White guilt manifesting as control over Black thought? It’s a tired pattern we’ve seen before, from the vilification of thinkers like Thomas Sowell and Shelby Steele. Even I was vilified when I came out in Chicago as a Black conservative. I lost more than half of my church, and my family had to go into hiding due to death threats.

When Minaj appeared at a recent U.S. Treasury event promoting “Trump Accounts” for children’s financial futures, she didn’t mince words. She declared, “I am probably the president’s number one fan, and that’s not going to change.” 

She addressed the backlash head-on: “The hate or what people have to say — it does not affect me at all. It actually motivates me to support him more.” And she didn’t stop there, calling out the “bullying” and “smear campaigns” against Trump, saying, “We’re not going to let them get away with bullying him. … It’s not going to work.”

JOY REID SAYS GOP USING NICKI MINAJ AS A ‘HOUSE PET’ TO PUT ‘BLACKFACE’ ON MAGA

Minaj, an immigrant who came to America as a child, was once a Trump critic. But in her recent posts on X, she has not shied away from questioning the Democratic establishment, asking why key figures like Jay-Z stayed silent when Trump pardoned a Roc Nation executive. 

She’s also called for voter ID, exclaiming, “What sensible, forward-thinking, cutting-edge, leading nation is having a DEBATE on whether or not there should be VOTER ID?!?!!!!”

This isn’t just celebrity gossip. This is a woman in a position of great influence, with millions of fans, who has chosen her own path and opinion. 

TRUMP CALLS NICKI MINAJ ‘A WINNER’ AS RAPPER DEFIES HOLLYWOOD MOLD

The response? A full-scale assault from the left in hip-hop and entertainment circles, where mindless submission to progressive orthodoxy is demanded.

Fans and critics have piled on. One X user lamented, “Nicki Minaj sold her soul for a Trump gold card. … She sold out Black fans, queer fans, immigrant fans.” Another accused her of becoming “anti-immigrant” and “embarrassing” for supporting Trump. 

Even at the Grammys, host Trevor Noah took a swipe: “Nicki Minaj not here — she’s still at the White House with Donald Trump.” 

NICKI MINAJ ACCUSES CALIFORNIA GOV NEWSOM OF ‘TRYING TO BE TRUMP’ IN SCATHING INTERVIEW

Reports claim she’s lost millions of followers due to fan “backlash” and her “MAGA-fication.” One critic even wrote, “She’s such an embarrassment & her fans don’t even care.” The Democratic Party’s official account even quoted a stan page to diss her — a rare and revealing move against a celebrity.

Is this all White guilt at play? Absolutely. White liberals, in their zeal to “protect” Black people from themselves, often end up patronizing and controlling us. They assume we must all think alike, vote alike and speak alike — or else we’re traitors. On the other hand, Black elite liberals shame us into groupthink to keep their hold on power — or else we’re labeled race traitors.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

Steele, in books like “White Guilt,” exposes how liberals use racial guilt to maintain power, treating Blacks as perpetual victims who need their guidance. White guilt is never about actual guilt — no White person today can feel personal guilt for what past Whites did. Instead, White guilt is solely about power, and it has been the tool of progressive elites to keep their tribal agenda alive. As Steele says, White guilt is Black power.

White guilt isn’t benevolence. It’s a cage. It says, “We’ll forgive your history if you let us dictate your future.” But when a Black person like Minaj breaks free — endorsing Trump on issues like economic empowerment or border security — White guilt turns to rage. They can’t handle a queen who crowns herself. Instead of debating her ideas, they bully, mock and erase. This isn’t progress. It’s plantation politics in modern dress.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

I see hope. If I had listened to the progressive left, I would never be in the middle of building my life-changing community center on Chicago’s South Side. That is why I admire Minaj’s defiance. It echoes the spirit of those who’ve always fought for true liberation — thinkers like Sowell and Steele, who remind us that freedom includes the right to disagree. 

Blacks are not a monolith. We can support Trump on policies that build wealth for our kids, like those Trump Accounts, without losing our soul. The left can’t silence us or blind us to the truth. As Minaj said, the hate only motivates more — and let that be our fuel for a far better future for us all.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM PASTOR COREY BROOKS

American seafood is national security — and Washington is failing fishermen

I have spent my life working on the water as a commercial fisherman. Today, I serve as the chairman and chief strategist of the New England Fishermen’s Stewardship Association, (NEFSA) representing fishermen who fish the waters of the North Atlantic and the New York Bight, along with their families, business and industry associations and members of the public who support wild-caught American seafood. I speak for people who work these waters every day and for communities that depend on them.

We see ocean conditions as they exist, not months later in reports. Yet policy too often prioritizes theory over experience and paperwork over outcomes. Commercial fishermen are not line items. We live with the consequences of every decision made in Washington. On the water, those decisions can make fishing less safe, manage fish poorly and drive American commercial fishermen out of business.

AMERICAN SEAFOOD IS AMERICAN FOOD SECURITY

In 2026, it is time to clearly recognize that U.S. wild-caught seafood is U.S. food security. America controls one of the largest and most productive ocean food resources in the world, and commercial fishermen make it possible to feed this country under some of the highest standards anywhere.

COAST GUARD IDENTIFIES 7 VICTIMS ON BOARD GLOUCESTER COMMERCIAL FISHING BOAT THAT SANK OFF MASSACHUSETTS

At the same time, we are forced to compete against cheap imported seafood flooding U.S. markets and undercutting American harvesters. Much of this product comes from overseas operations with weak or nonexistent environmental and labor standards, yet it is marketed as fresh or sustainable. Meanwhile, American fishermen following the rules are slowly being pushed out.

American farmers know this problem well. Domestic food producers who follow strict regulations are routinely undercut by imports that do not. Commercial fishermen, like farmers, are a pillar of national resilience. Any new food policy must rebuild and protect domestic seafood production, so American fishermen can feed American consumers under American standards.

OFFSHORE WIND EQUALS FOREIGN INDUSTRIAL TAKEOVER OF OUR OCEANS

We cannot credibly claim to support domestic seafood or food security while allowing the industrial takeover of our ocean. Offshore wind destroys habitat, displaces fishing from historic grounds and embeds permanent industrial hazards into working waters. It would be like setting our farm fields on fire and calling it progress.

Commercial fishermen warned from the beginning that these projects would compromise offshore safety. Offshore wind degrades marine radar, interferes with search-and-rescue capability and disrupts military and homeland defense systems. When radar and rescue systems fail offshore, lives are put at risk. Infrastructure that causes those failures has no place in working waters or national security zones.

Once built, the damage is permanent. Taxpayer dollars should not be used to eliminate American commercial fishing jobs so foreign energy companies and private equity firms can industrialize the waters that feed this country.

FIXING GROUNDFISH FROM THE GROUND UP

Our New England groundfish fishery is in turmoil. Fishermen face quota swings that shift from feast to famine, often driven by incomplete surveys or outdated data. A stock can be abundant one year and effectively unavailable the next, not because the fish disappeared, but because the survey failed to capture reality.

When that happens, fishermen cannot simply pivot. If the fishery they depend on is suddenly closed and they do not hold permits for others, boats tie up, crews are sent home and coastal businesses suffer despite healthy fish in the water.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

Restoring confidence starts with better assessments. Better science does not mean more models divorced from reality. It means cooperative, industry-based research, with fishermen working alongside scientists over time. On the West Coast, industry-chartered vessels and fishing crews have partnered with scientists for decades to improve surveys, reduce uncertainty and produce more reliable management outcomes.

A COMMON-SENSE PATH FORWARD

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The choice before the nation is clear. We can continue policies that push American commercial fishermen aside and replace domestic seafood with imports and industrial ocean uses, or we can follow the direction set by the president’s executive order and put America’s food producers first. Through President Trump’s leadership, the federal government has recognized that domestic seafood production is a matter of national interest, economic resilience and food security.

Commercial fishermen stand ready to meet that call. With a clear vision from the White House and policies grounded in real-world experience, we can protect and strengthen fisheries that are already sustainable, restore working waterfronts, and once again make American seafood a backbone of our national food supply. We are a nation of fishermen ready to roll up our sleeves, do the work and get the job done with the president’s help, feeding America first and leading the world by example.

MORNING GLORY: Legacy media didn’t lose readers, it drove them away

Readers will always read, and news junkies will always find and especially read news. Reading is simply faster than broadcast, so news delivered by text is always going to have a market. That reality does not, however, guarantee any platform the loyalty of a subscriber.

“Journalism is a craft, not a profession,” the late Michael Kelly would routinely state in the blessed years when he was a weekly guest on my radio program. Kelly was the equal of any American journalist of his generation, having worked for The New York Times, The Washington Post, The New Yorker, The New Republic and The Atlantic. 

Michael was killed covering the American invasion of Iraq in April 2003. The point he was making was that anyone could be a “journalist,” as there is no licensing involved in American journalism as there is with professions such as medicine and law. Getting paid to “be a journalist” — that was the trick, and as the internet exploded, so did the opportunities to work in the craft.

WASHINGTON POST CEO STEPS DOWN AMID ONSLAUGHT OF BACKLASH FOLLOWING MASS LAYOFFS

The craft survives and thrives in the United States unlike anywhere else in the world because of the First Amendment. The ongoing, never-ending creative destruction of capitalism (thank you for the phrase, Joseph Schumpeter) is the constant companion of every business, including journalism. Freedom of the press, as guaranteed by the Constitution, makes the rise and fall of platforms for journalism particularly robust. There is hardly any “state” media left with the demise of federal funding for National Public Radio and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, but the vast universe of media continues to expand, and the “news media” within it.

In the aftermath of the big layoffs at The Washington Post, there has been an explosion of commentary — again — about the decline and often the death of newspapers. But if you are reading this, it came to your attention via some means other than a subscription to a legacy newspaper. And there, in a sentence, is the dilemma for legacy “news,” and indeed any written product for which a reader has to pay: There is so much “free” content that it is very, very difficult for a high-overhead text product that depends on subscriptions to succeed. By “succeed,” I mean at least break even.

EX-WASHINGTON POST CHIEF BLASTS ‘GUTLESS’ BEZOS AS PAPER ROCKED BY MAJOR LAYOFFS

For as long as I’ve been a broadcast and print journalist — and that dates to 1979, when I first was paid to write by a newspaper, and 1990, when I first broadcast over the airwaves — I’ve been a critic of legacy media in general for its liberal and then left-wing bias. I have tried to do so without dumping on former employers or colleagues. So this column is not specifically about The Washington Post, for which I wrote columns from February 2017 to October 2024.

The late Fred Hiatt, the Post’s editorial page editor who hired me, was a splendid editor and person, as are Ruth Marcus and David Shipley, who supervised the Opinion pages in turn after Fred’s death. All three proved terrific people to work for and with, as did all of my editors at the paper.

After I left the Post, however, I also stopped subscribing to it. That’s not intended as anything other than a statement of fact. Over the past five years, I have also discontinued subscriptions to The Telegraph and the Financial Times in the U.K., as well as The New York Times and most subscription-based products that existed 20 years ago as newspapers, other than The Wall Street Journal and Cleveland.com. (The Journal is owned by Fox News Media’s sister company, News Corp.)

WASHINGTON POST JOINS OTHER NEWS OUTLETS IN LAYING OFF RACE-BASED JOURNALISTS

The Journal has excellent reporting on every major story covered by legacy media, and Cleveland.com super-serves any fan of Cleveland’s Browns, Cavaliers and Guardians, as well as the Ohio State Buckeyes.

That second subscription to a “legacy platform” (the former Cleveland Plain Dealer) makes a key point: The sports editor for Cleveland.com, David Campbell, has done a masterful job cultivating the absolutely essential revenue driver for any formerly “regional paper” that needs a far-flung fan base to be satisfied — and indeed tied even more deeply — to its sports addictions. The podcast and text options available for a couple of bucks more, or for free with a quick ad or two, present a model to be studied by any struggling paper. 

Campbell has kept the dean of Cleveland sports analysis, Terry Pluto, working — and now podcasting — along with a dozen veteran beat reporters, while developing a new generation of journalists serving each team’s “verticals.” I assume, but do not know, that successful platforms in every sports-blessed region have done something similar — and have thereby kept many journalists outside the sports section working.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

I hold up The Journal and the sports section of Cleveland.com as models for what still works for primarily text-based products that depend upon subscription revenue but compete for readers’ eyeballs with quality non-subscription text and audio-video. 

Quality matters most of all, but niche readership super-service, particularly in areas like sports news and opinion, is a close second. In this era of abundant free information, it was inevitable that the winnowing that began with the rise of internet-based blogs — then internet-based newsletters without legacy platforms’ sunk costs — and then Substack and podcasts would take a toll on every legacy platform that owed its origins and legacy audiences to a now-extinct quasi-monopoly status and continued reliance on subscription revenue.

Writers and reporters can still get paid to write and report. Andrew Sullivan — arguably the single most influential journalist of the past 50 years because he helped bring about the institution of same-sex marriage through a sustained effort to persuade, while also pioneering the stand-alone, one-writer subscription model — is no longer alone among writer-reporter-columnists who work for themselves. Such journalists are now, in fact, legion. But they must work for their readers, or the revenue will go away.

The journals and subscription websites that have thrived or arrived in this era are best served by a commitment to both quality and the super-service of niches. Bylines have long been brands, and it is very useful to have some of those as well. The new platforms that have flourished, and the old ones that have survived, must earn subscriber support at least annually. They cannot alienate or drive readers away. It’s just the business. 

The abundance of “free and good” is deadly for the “not free, no matter how good” — and certainly for the “not free and redundant,” or worse, the “not free and just bad.” Free beats not free every time, just as quality beats slop.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Text-only platforms remain abundant, and news delivery platforms are many and varied. The number of working journalists has probably increased since the arrival of the web. Merriam-Webster’s primary definition of a journalist is broad — “a person employed to gather, write, or report news for newspapers, magazines, radio, or television” — but not broad enough. Slash the second half off to make the definition current: Anyone employed to gather, write or report news is a journalist, even if employed directly by readers or viewers. 

In America, at least, the Golden Age of Journalism has begun: There are zero gatekeepers.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM HUGH HEWITT

LIZ PEEK: The trans fever is over — and America is reckoning with the damage done

Trans fever has broken. All it took was a president with the guts to call out the evil being done to children across America and a shocking $2 million settlement awarded to a young girl whose body was mutilated by the grown-ups supposedly looking after her.

Bless President Donald Trump for tackling the trans issue head on in his current term, defying the woke police. In his first few weeks in office, he issued a number of executive orders that reset the issue of gender “fluidity”, declaring that henceforward, agencies would acknowledge two sexes — male and female. No more marking passports with an “X”; no more biological men locked up in women’s prisons. 

Trump demanded that schools stop pushing gender ideology in their curriculums (no more picture books like “When Aiden Became a Brother” targeting 4-year-olds) and using pronouns based on gender identity rather than sex. Trump also challenged the granddaddy of transgender issues by declaring that the “policy of the United States [is] to oppose male competitive participation in women’s sports…as a matter of safety, fairness, dignity, and truth.” 

I WAS 15 AND TRUSTED THE ‘EXPERTS’ ON GENDER CARE. TURNS OUT, THEY WERE WINGING IT

Most importantly, the president declared the government would “not fund, sponsor… or support the so-called ‘transition’ of a child from one sex to another.”

An estimated 4,000 children aged 12 to 18 have endured trans surgeries over the past four years in the U.S., a period during which many countries in Europe moved away from such procedures, declaring them “experimental” and the medical evidence supporting them unreliable. 

As The Economist wrote in 2023, “Some older studies suggest that, left alone, most children will naturally grow out of their dysphoric feelings.” They also reported that the longer-term impact of puberty blockers are unknown but might include problems with “brain development and decreasing bone density.”

Why didn’t America’s doctors investigate the revealing studies and reach the same conclusions as their colleagues in Britain, or Sweden or France? Maybe because concerns about botched diagnoses and harmful surgeries were dismissed by people like Rachel Levine, former President Joe Biden’s assistant secretary for health, who claimed that such reports were just anecdotal. Levine, herself a trans person, claimed, in a radio interview, that, “There is no argument among medical professionals…about the value and the importance of gender-affirming care.” Except, actually, there was.

PLASTIC SURGEON CITES ‘EMOTIONAL BLACKMAIL,’ POOR EVIDENCE IN WARNING AGAINST YOUTH GENDER SURGERIES

As this shameful chapter in American medicine comes to a close, let us hope that a veritable tsunami of lawsuits follows, charging doctors, parents and educators with having ruined the lives of far too many children.

Adults who were either too ignorant or too craven to confront the madness of the moment, and who turned a blind eye to the ghastly “gender-affirming” cruelty that was ruining the lives of (mainly) young girls. They have no excuse. The transgender craze, and gender confusion was, from the beginning, very much a fad.

In 2023, when a staggering 38% of students at Brown University declared themselves “not straight”, compared to only 7% of Americans overall, didn’t anyone at that Ivy school imagine that something was screwy?

PRISHA MOSLEY: DOCTORS TOOK MY BODY APART FOR GENDER ‘CARE.’ NOW THEY ADMIT IT WAS WRONG

And yes, there are people who suffer from genuine gender dysphoria, and who need help. But doctors should know the difference between that rare condition and normal adolescent explorations and confusions.

Like most fads, this concept of gender fluidity is fading. The number of kids claiming to be neither male nor female has plummeted. According to one researcher, “The transgender share among university students peaked in 2023 and has almost halved since, from nearly 7 percent to under 4 percent.” Do we really think the biological makeup of young people changed radically in a matter of a few years? Of course not; young people simply moved on. 

But a number of girls and women in our country cannot move on. One of those is Fox Varian, the 22-year-old from New York state who sued her psychologist and plastic surgeon for performing a double mastectomy on her when she was only 16. She won a $2 million lawsuit against the doctors who recommended the procedure; the jury agreed that the treatment was ill-advised and that Fox, who had a multiyear history of mental health issues, was not given proper care.

DETRANSITIONER PREDICTS MASSIVE WAVE OF LAWSUITS AFTER LANDMARK $2 MILLION VERDICT

There are a number of similar lawsuits in the pipeline, lodged by women whose breasts have been removed or were prescribed puberty blockers at a young age and who later regretted their decision. Chloe Cole is one of the most vocal “detransitioners” who underwent radical surgery and trans treatment beginning at 13 years of age. As she said in an affidavit, “The worst part about my transition would be the long-term health effects that I didn’t knowingly consent to at the time.” 

In a recent interview on Fox News, Chloe said she expected the recent decision would prove a “massive precedent” and that similar lawsuits would flood the country. Let us hope so. 

It is not an easy path to challenge woke gender orthodoxy. Chloe Cole has been doxed and shamed by the trans community; they despise anyone who believes this transition should be left only to adults capable of making such a profound decision.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

The American Society of Plastic Surgeons issued a statement after the Varian verdict admitting that, “there is considerable uncertainty as to the long-term efficacy for the use of chest and genital surgical interventions for the treatment of adolescents with gender dysphoria, and the existing evidence base is viewed as low quality/low certainty.” In other words, the medical basis for such life-changing interventions is garbage.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The American Medical Association, the country’s largest physician group, has also pivoted, declaring that children should not receive surgical gender-realigning treatments. Surely the American Academy of Pediatrics, which reaffirmed their backing of trans mutilations as recently as 2023, will follow suit.

Too little, too late for some women who will forever live with the consequences of a nation and a medical community afraid to tell the truth.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM LIZ PEEK

Ronald Reagan’s granddaughter, Kevin McCarthy honor late president’s legacy on his 115th birthday

Hundreds gathered Friday at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library to honor the late president on what would have been his 115th birthday — a tribute especially poignant with the death of his son Michael Reagan earlier this year.

Among those in attendance was Reagan’s granddaughter, Ashley Reagan, who said the annual commemoration helps maintain the legacy her father Michael spent much of his life preserving.

“Even with his passing recently, it was very important to my whole family to make sure we were here to honor my grandpa and his legacy and everything it represents,” she said.

“What he lived for was making sure that my grandpa’s legacy lived on,” she said. “So now, it’s carrying on my grandpa’s legacy and my dad’s legacy.”

MICHAEL REAGAN, ELDER SON OF FORMER PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN, DIES AT 80

The annual commemoration in Simi Valley, California drew family members, political leaders and longtime admirers of the former president.

Fox News Digital spoke exclusively with Ashley Reagan and former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy to reflect on Reagan’s legacy and the relevance of his leadership in today’s deeply divided political climate.

Ashley spoke candidly about her father following his death on Jan. 4 after a battle with cancer. He was 80.

“He was definitely a big personality. He spoke his mind. You always knew where he stood with politics as well,” Ashley said. “He was somebody that always spoke the truth.”

Ashley said her father, a nationally syndicated radio talk show host, shared the ability to connect with people from all walks of life, “no matter who they were.”

“I think it came from a lot of years of watching and observing and kind of watching how my grandpa interacted with people, how he communicated with people and his communication wasn’t based on who somebody wasshe explained “It’s why he was able to accomplish what he was able to accomplish when he was in office.”

Ashley also emphasized that the version of Ronald Reagan Americans saw on the national stage as president was no different than the “grandpa” she knew at home, characterizing him as the “heart of the earth.”

“The person that you saw was the person he was with us,” Ashley told Fox News Digital. “We rode horses with him; we went to his house and had lunch with him all the time, and he was just, he was Grandpa.”

A SPEEDING TICKET LED ME TO RONALD REAGAN’S HOMETOWN AND A DEEPER UNDERSTANDING OF AMERICA’S PRESIDENT 

When speaking about how Reagan would perceive today’s political climate, both Ashley and McCarthy said it bears similarities to the turbulent period Reagan faced when he took office in the 1980s, theorizing that history is repeating itself.

“I think it mirrors when he took over in the ’80s,” Ashley said. “I think if you go back in history and you kind of look at where the country was at before he came into office, it mirrors that time frame.”

“High inflation, America embarrassed what happened with our hostages, the challenge that you had a sitting president believe the best days were behind us… A lot of similaritiesMcCarthy added.

Ashley said her grandfather would have emphasized unity, particularly at a time when political divisions run so deep.

“I think he would encourage us to reach across the aisle a little more, but unfortunately, I think we’re watching history repeat itself in a lot of ways,” she said.

“He was all about unity, and he always said the only way you can get things accomplished is by reaching across the aisle and working with the other side. And he was able to accomplish so much because he didn’t just focus on people that agreed with him, but he worked with everybody,” she added.

McCarthy, a keynote speaker at Reagan’s 115th birthday commemoration, told Fox News Digital that the former president played a big influence in determining his political philosophy.

“I grew up in a family of all Democrats,” the speaker said. “He and Abraham Lincoln are the reason why I’m a Republican. I rejected what I heard at home.”

“I remember in elementary school watching Jimmy Carter tell me the best days were behind me and he [Reagan] walks up to a podium, say no pastels, fly the bold colors, and go to that shiny city on the hill. That’s who I wanted to follow. And that’s what brought me to the Republican Party,” McCarthy added.

The speaker also described Reagan as a “happy conservative” who believed strong principles brought more freedom — the kind of leader, he said, America needs today.

“He actually welcomed more people to the party,” McCarthy said. “We had what we called were the Reagan Democrats. These people just got educated through him and said, ‘I wanna be with him. I want America to be better.’ Those are the type of candidates we should look for.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Ashley said part of how she continues the Reagan legacy is through her work with Young America’s Foundation (YAF), which operates the Reagan Ranch in Santa Barbara, California – a site she explained as deeply personal to the family.

“With my dad’s passing, it only makes us more involved in that sort of thing because we don’t want to miss that connection with Ronald Reagan,” she said.

In a statement to Fox News Digital, YAF’s President, former Wisconsin governor Scott Walker said, “Young people still draw inspiration from President Reagan’s words on freedom. Drawing attention to his birthday draws attention to his remarkable influence even today.”

From kneeling to Spanish anthems: How the NFL lost Middle America at halftime

After the chaotic early 2020s, when the NFL led the way by leaning into woke nonsense like kneeling for the national anthem or introducing “Lift Every Voice” as a separate anthem for Black Americans, there’s been a lack of trust between the average football fan and the Super Bowl halftime production. The sense is, “What are they going to try this time?”

The NFL responded with an all-Spanish halftime show and effectively challenged Americans to have a problem with it. What are viewers going to do — not watch?

But many didn’t.

BAD BUNNY’S SUPER BOWL HALFTIME SHOW IGNITES TRUMP’S FURY, DIVIDES VIEWERS

Turning Point’s “All-American Halftime Show” was announced a few months ago to contrast with what many expected would be a politicized halftime show by Bad Bunny, an artist whose songs are exclusively in Spanish and who has made political statements in the past, including “Ice Out” at the Grammy Awards and “F— Trump” during the Black Lives Matter protests.

The New York Times puts the number of concurrent viewers of the alternative show at 6.1 million, while Turning Point says its total viewership was around 9 million. The show aired on streaming platforms like YouTube and Rumble. That number may be a fraction of the “official” halftime show, but the Super Bowl halftime show is one of the most expensive productions in entertainment, often running more than $10 million, and the artists, who are not paid, perform for the exposure.

TURNING POINT USA’S PATRIOTIC SUPER BOWL ALTERNATIVE EARNS PRAISE AS MILLIONS TUNE IN OVER BAD BUNNY

To lose anywhere from 6 million to 9 million viewers is not a win for the official show. That Turning Point was able to compete at all, with stars like Gabby Barrett and Kid Rock, is a testament to how much Americans are craving a normal show — one with performers who don’t hate them, don’t attack law enforcement and don’t despise the president they just re-elected.

There was some irony in the show, such as when Ricky Martin joined Bad Bunny on stage for the song “Lo Que Pasó en Hawái,” which translates to “What happened to Hawaii.” What happened to Hawaii is that an influx of people moved in unchecked, and the local population was displaced, with some forced to leave their homes. 

NFL’S ROGER GOODELL BELIEVES BAD BUNNY ‘UNDERSTANDS’ SUPER BOWL LX PLATFORM IS MEANT TO UNITE AMID ICE OUTCRY

The lyrics could easily be applied to concerns many Americans have about unchecked, massive, illegal immigration during the Joe Biden presidency:

“Quieren al barrio mío y que tus hijos se vayan (They want my neighborhood and want your children to leave) / No, no suelte’ la bandera ni olvide’ el lelolai (No, don’t let go of the flag or forget the lelolai) / Que no quiero que hagan contigo lo que le pasó a Hawái (I don’t want them to do to you what happened to Hawaii).”

Before the show, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell called Bad Bunny “one of the great artists in the world,” saying the performer “understood the platform he was on” and that the platform is used “to unite people and bring them together through creativity and talent.”

He didn’t.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

His only spoken phrase in English — still the primary language of most Americans — was “God bless America,” followed by a list of countries in Central and South America. The point, of course, was that America — the United States of America — is not special and not something worth celebrating.

That’s the problem with choosing someone like Bad Bunny for the Super Bowl halftime show. His music is fine on a beach, a few beers in, playing in the background. But the halftime show is supposed to be something else. As Goodell said, it’s supposed to unite.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

We’re in a new moment as Americans — a “vibe shift” following the re-election of Donald Trump — where we know we have something worth preserving and celebrating. 

Bad Bunny doesn’t get that, and it showed.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM KAROL MARKOWICZ

I’ve done thousands of fracking jobs — here’s the truth the activists won’t tell

In 1643, Evangelista Torricelli used a tube of mercury to first measure pressure. In 1897, German mechanical engineer Rudolf Diesel invented the diesel engine with financial help from the Krupp family, financiers of the Third Reich. Four thousand years ago, the Egyptians invented the pump. Collectively, the above are the bedrock of fracking.

In 1949, Haliburton performed the first frack job ever. In 1865, E.A. Roberts received a patent for loading a torpedo with nitroglycerin and dropping it into shallow Pennsylvania wells. 

Fracking is science, but not a dark one. To date, there have been about 2,000,000 frack jobs in the U.S. My company alone has done thousands of them without incident. Yet, the public has been slow to catch on, or is suspicious, or distrusting. That is mostly a byproduct of the culture wars and the rich deceiving the poor, but more on that below.

TRUMP ADMIN RELAUNCHES KEY COUNCIL AFTER BIDEN ADMIN SHUTTERED IT: ‘IGNORANCE AND ARROGANCE’

By process, rock mechanics determine the pressure needed to fracture an oil and gas formation. Completions engineers use that data to calculate fracture pressure and propagation, the amount of frac slurry required, and at what rate it should be pumped. A frack company then mobilizes on-site alongside a wireline company. Wireliners isolate the wellbore a few hundred feet at a time into “stages,” shooting 20 or 30 holes through the casing and then pull off. The frac fleet starts in with a mix of water, sand and chemicals that they pump down the vertical section of the wellbore, a mile or two deep, and then out into the horizontal section for another two, three, or four miles. Most shales are pumped at 3,800 gallons per minute against surface pressures of 10,000+/- psi.

Pumping continues for a few hours, creating a web of permeability that will allow oil and gas to flow back to the wellbore. The process is repeated, often more than 50 times for a single well. Why it works so well is that even though the oil and gas formation may be only 50 feet thick vertically, turning the bit horizontally exposes the same formation for two, three or four miles. That’s a multiple of 210 to 420, an astonishing difference. Furthermore, it was a revolutionary one that is credited to a Houston wildcatter named George Mitchel, the son of Greek immigrants, who spent his own millions proving you could couple horizontal well drilling with high-rate fracking to unlock hydrocarbons in the source rock — shales (where oil and gas are formed) — instead of from the sandstones and carbonate trap rocks where oil and gas accumulate.

By the job’s end, millions of pounds of silica sand are pumped, which no one much cares about, but the millions of gallons of water pumped are a flashpoint. It might sound like an unquantifiable number, that is, until you compare it to golf. The watering of U.S. golf courses uses more water than all of North America’s fracking, and little of it is recycled. Consider too, that golf produces no energy. Nor does it save the planet, though that’s debatable.

Another flashpoint is the chemicals used in a frac job. Polyacrylamides reduce friction and are toxic in large concentrations, but are also used in cosmetics, moisturizers, shampoo and sunscreens, where they are also toxic in large concentrations. Guar, another commonly used friction reducer and viscosifier, is made from edible bean extract. Clay stabilizers like choline chlorides are cheap and not toxic in the quantities run. The biocides run are similar to household bleach and the chlorine used in pool water. Acid is used in small quantities that become benign with activation. The truth is that there just isn’t much toxicity left to frac chemicals anymore. If you think otherwise, watch Chris Wright drink a glass of frac fluid. Chris is the current U.S. Energy secretary and remains alive to this day.

AMERICAN ENERGY DOMINANCE GIVES US THE POWER TO FEND OFF ENEMIES AND RESCUE VENEZUELA

Fracking does not “destabilize” the earth, as I recently heard, nor will it contaminate the earth’s fresh water supply. I’ve never seen an intrusion into an aquifer. Ever. The wastewater scare is also fading away as other companies, like my own, recycle their wastewater into frac water. Electric frack fleets are displacing diesel fleets in an effort to combat emissions. Frackers and their customers were self-starters on all of this. No legislation mandated it.

Irrationally, though, fracking remains a maligned and misunderstood business. Ridiculously politicized, yet fracking is the apex building block of U.S. energy. Three-quarters of all U.S. production is from fracked wells. That’s nine plus million barrels out of 13. If you canceled the nine, as is the wish of the Park Foundation (which funded misleading anti-frack documentaries), the Heinz Endowments, and the Schmidt Family Foundation, we’d be living in a dog-eat-dog world of energy competition. Their goals would be an absolutely suicidal concept, killing one thing that works — always — is cheap, and is not changing the planet in any meaningful way, in favor of something that works intermittently, cannot be scaled to meet the need, is expensive and has its own climate issues.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Per climate scientist Bjorn Lomborg, to go entirely electric, three months of battery backup would be needed. Currently, the U.S. has the equivalent of 10 minutes! The cost to get to three months would be roughly one-third of the U.S. GDP ($10 trillion yearly). The environmental result would be a hellscape of smelting, acid rain and deforestation. But surely these wealthy foundations and their enthroned trustees and beneficiaries thought through this, didn’t they?

Then suddenly we have AI with its power-hungry data centers, and Silicon Valley’s turn to natural gas. Therein lies a little break for fracking. The realization that it is essential to life on earth. 

JASON CHAFFETZ: 2028 election will be a referendum on our AI-dominated future

Neither party has put a stake in the ground on the issue that will drive the next presidential election cycle. Artificial intelligence is expected to transform the global economy at a dizzying pace, radically reordering nearly every industry and bringing with it unprecedented disruptions in the labor market.

Nobody is prepared to address what could be the biggest issue of 2028. In a recent earnings call, xAI founder Elon Musk described an exciting era of abundance in which AI and robotics take over labor and Americans enjoy what he calls “universal high income.” But that vision raises more questions than it answers.

Where do people go when entire industries shrink? How do we fulfill our need for meaningful work? Who decides how to distribute this “universal high income?” What is the role of higher education? How much government would we need?

PALANTIR’S SHYAM SANKAR: US MUST USE AI AS ‘SLINGSHOT’ AGAINST CHINA OR FACE ECONOMIC DEFEAT

As America approaches its 250th anniversary this summer, we celebrate principles of individual liberty, free markets and limited government that have propelled our prosperity for more than two centuries. Are those principles compatible with Musk’s vision of a post-labor economy featuring universal income distribution? 

We have to come to terms with where this AI revolution could take us. In the world of politics, which tends to follow where the winds are blowing, what are the principles that remain timeless? Who do we trust to steer us in these uncertain waters?

Economic incentives are about to shift dramatically. Will free-market Republicans be tempted to become protectionists? Will big government progressives have to embrace deregulation and nuclear energy to protect threatened industries?

I expect every other issue to take a backseat to the looming questions that affect young and old, rich and poor. Traditional political alignments may be turned on their heads. This is too important for us to get it wrong. We can’t just respond reflexively. 

FOX NEWS POLL: TOO FAST, TOO UNCHECKED? VOTERS SOUND OFF ON RAPID AI USE & GOVERNMENT REGULATION

AI may offer Americans a generational opportunity to double down on the foundational principles that historically drove our prosperity. But we can expect strong headwinds pushing us toward revisiting the collectivist experiments that have consistently failed in the past.

The rules are changing. You used to be able to protect your likeness, your works. We had patents, trademarks, boundaries. But now with deepfakes, generative AI and apps that will undress anyone at the touch of a button, we need to come together to establish a better framework of boundaries.

Both parties need to come up with a vision to steer AI toward empowerment, foster independence and amplify human potential rather than erode it. Historical precedents suggest technological advances, though disruptive, ultimately create more opportunities than they destroy.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

I’m hopeful that AI will create new roles we cannot yet fully imagine, perhaps allowing workers to focus on strategic and creative roles that machines can’t replicate. AI doesn’t have to be the end of work. It can be the beginning of better work.

AMAZON TO CUT 16,000 ROLES AS IT LOOKS TO INVEST IN AI, REMOVE ‘BUREAUCRACY’

Economic incentives are about to shift dramatically. Will free-market Republicans be tempted to become protectionists? Will big government progressives have to embrace deregulation and nuclear energy to protect threatened industries?

But in the process of getting from here to there, we face challenges that will test our resolve and the foundational principles that sustain our past success. AI threatens to create the perfect opportunity for globalists to build the central-planned economy they’ve always wanted.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

America is very good at harnessing innovation to foster independence. If we approach this the right way, AI may empower us to innovate — to build a future where every American contributes on their own terms. We know that government doesn’t create jobs. Entrepreneurs do.

The key is not to resist, but to embrace AI as a tool that enhances independence — freeing us for meaningful pursuits like family, community and invention. We can build a future where every American contributes on their terms. For 250 years, these principles have stood the test of time. Instead of resisting progress we need to be directing it to more productive use.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM JASON CHAFFETZ

How Jeff Bezos ruined The Washington Post and why he should sell it

The first time I spoke to Jeff Bezos, he had founded Amazon as an online bookstore and made himself available to all kinds of journalists — a “political genius,” said The New York Times Magazine, a “brilliant, charming, hyper, and misleadingly goofy mastermind.” In 1999, having blown past the naysayers who scoffed at the strange notion of online retailing, the 35-year-old businessman was named Time’s Person of the Year.

Nearly a decade-and-a-half later, as one of the world’s richest men, Bezos spent $250 million of his personal fortune to buy the Washington Post from Katharine Graham’s family.

And now he should fold his cards and sell it.

It’s a different era for the industry and a very different Bezos, one who is comfortable slashing a third of the paper’s staff.

EX-WASHINGTON POST FACT CHECKER HITS ‘ABSENTEE OWNER’ BEZOS, TELLS HIM TO COMMIT TO SAVING PAPER OR SELL IT

Having initially declared that “the duty of the paper is to the readers, not the owners,” Bezos, whose Blue Origin company has federal contracts, is actively trying to repair his once-strained relationship with President Donald Trump. Amazon donated $1 million to Trump’s inauguration.

While management has made more than its share of mistakes, I don’t think it’s an exaggeration to say that Bezos has destroyed what was once one of America’s great newspapers.

I bring my personal history to the table. I spent 29 years at the Post, working for Bob Woodward’s investigative SWAT team, as Justice Department reporter, as New York bureau chief, and eventually as media reporter and columnist.

In the 1980s and ’90s, when newspapers really mattered, the Post, while lacking the resources of The New York Times, delivered scoops with an all-star team, from politics (David Broder and Dan Balz) to sports (Tony Kornheiser, Michael Wilbon and Tom Boswell) to the metro desk (Woodward and Bernstein). And there was the freewheeling Style section of Sally Quinn and many other narrative writers.

This was the paper of Watergate, helping to drive Richard Nixon from office, after defying his administration in running the Pentagon Papers, documenting the lies of the Vietnam War. It was the newspaper of the legendary Ben Bradlee, whose retirement I covered after being secretly briefed. Despite occasional blunders (such as Janet Cooke’s fraud), it was glamorized in two movies (Robert Redford and Dustin Hoffman in “All the President’s Men,” Meryl Streep and Tom Hanks in “The Post”), inspiring legions of young graduates to go into journalism.

When Bezos fired 300 journalists the other day, he completed the wave of destruction that had already left the Post a shell of its former self. Those dismissed included such remaining stars as Lizzie Johnson, who said she was “devastated” as she reported from the Ukraine war zone without heat or running water. And Marty Weil, a sardonic night-shift guy who has been at the paper for 60 years. And Sarah Ellison, an elegant writer who came from Vanity Fair. And this wrecking ball followed several earlier rounds of layoffs. 

Bezos doesn’t care. I just think he’s bored with the property he once believed would bring him instant credibility. He’s more interested in his rocket company. The Post is a blip on his global radar.

PROMINENT PITTSBURGH NEWSPAPER THAT PREVIOUSLY ENDORSED TRUMP TO SHUTTER THIS YEAR

I’m not in the camp that says Bezos should subsidize the paper forever just because he’s uber-rich. With the paper losing $100 million last year, he’s entitled to look for a path to profitability. But Bezos is getting absolutely hammered by the media. 

“We’re witnessing a murder,” wrote Ashley Parker, now with the Atlantic.

Liberal commentator Charlie Sykes offered this headline: “Gutless Billionaire Guts the Post.”

Former executive editor Marty Baron, who previously ran the prize-winning Boston Globe, declared: “Bezos’ sickening efforts to curry favor with President Trump have left an especially ugly stain of their own. This is a case study in near-instant, self-inflicted brand destruction.”

Onetime Metro editor David Maraniss, a mentor to so many at the paper, said: “He bought the Post thinking that it would give him some gravitas and grace that he couldn’t get from just billions of dollars, and then the world changed. Now I don’t think he gives a flying f—.”

In fairness, many newspapers have struggled with the collapse of their business model, as classifieds and advertising migrated online, and people could get breaking news from their phones or watches. Some converted to websites; the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette is closing in May. 

More than a quarter of American newspapers have folded in the past two decades. Back in 1981, the Washington Star, where I worked, was shuttered as afternoon papers became obsolete.

But the Post is a classic case study of failure to adapt to the digital age. Katharine Graham was skeptical when she summoned me to explain this emerging universe.

EX-WASHINGTON POST CHIEF BLASTS ‘GUTLESS’ BEZOS AS PAPER ROCKED BY MAJOR LAYOFFS

In the Bezos era, the crashing waves of cutbacks meant asking readers to keep paying for a product that grew increasingly diminished over time, with its star players defecting to other major outlets. 

At first, Bezos took a hands-off approach, seemingly in sync with the newsroom culture. During Trump’s first term, he coined the slogan “Democracy Dies in Darkness.” But there was a drastic shift in 2024.

When the editorial board drafted an endorsement of Kamala Harris, Bezos killed it, which, as the owner, he has every right to do. Had he decided on a non-endorsement earlier, few would have cared. But Bezos wielded the ax a week before the election, and the furor was deafening. As the Post itself reported, more than 250,000 people canceled their subscriptions.

Four months later, Bezos decreed that the editorial pages would focus every day on promoting “personal liberties” and “free markets,” banning any attempt to offer opposing views. Opinion Editor David Shipley, whose section had won two Pulitzers, resigned, and other editors and columnists cut ties with the Post.  

Meanwhile, the mogul socialized with the Trumps at Mar-a-Lago, and sat behind the president at his second inauguration.

Bezos himself, as everyone knows, is now quite the jet-setter. He found himself in the middle of a tabloid scandal when the National Enquirer published lewd texts between Bezos and his girlfriend, Lauren Sanchez, as news of his divorce was breaking. The Enquirer also published pictures of his genitals, which he slammed as an attempt at blackmail. Bezos proposed to Sanchez on his 417-foot yacht, and they were married last spring in Venice, an extravaganza attended by the likes of Oprah Winfrey, Leonardo DiCaprio, Gayle King, Tom Brady and Kim Kardashian. The price tag for the multiday celebrations was somewhere between $20 million and $50 million.

For Bezos, this was basically spare change. Peter Baker, a Post alumnus who is now chief White House correspondent at the Times and an MS NOW analyst, reports that Bezos’ net worth is up $224 billion since buying the Washington paper.

So why does Bezos need the headache? He should unload this distressed asset to someone who would have a fresh shot at resuscitating The Washington Post from its near-death experience–though in all candor, it’s probably too late.

A day after abolishing the Post’s sports section, CEO Will Lewis – who blew off the staff call explaining the layoffs – was walking the red carpet at the NFL Honors in San Francisco, an event leading up to the Super Bowl. Those who had lost their jobs, and their colleagues, were furious.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Even worse, he wouldn’t allow the Post to write about the sweeping layoffs. Seriously. His terse farewell note thanked only Bezos.

Back in the day, there would have been a half-dozen stories in the Post about the journalistic earthquake in its midst. But that was a long time ago.

No, Rep Crockett, driving an 80,000-pound truck is not the same as driving a rental car

As someone who has spent decades training professional truck drivers, I take highway safety very seriously. America’s economy depends on a national freight network that moves goods through every state, across every major highway corridor, and into every community. When safety standards for commercial drivers are weakened anywhere, the consequences ripple across the entire country, putting motorists, supply chains and professional drivers at risk.

That’s why I was deeply troubled by recent remarks from Democratic Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett during a House Judiciary Committee hearing, suggesting that English language proficiency is not necessary to safely operate a commercial motor vehicle. She equated it to the same practice as someone driving a rental car in a foreign country where they might not speak the language. Her assertion is misguided, dangerous and dismissive of the professionalism of America’s truck drivers.

Operating an 80,000-pound commercial vehicle is not remotely comparable to driving a passenger vehicle. A commercial driver is not simply following turn-by-turn directions from point A to point B. They are navigating complex highway systems, responding to emergency situations, complying with law enforcement instructions, interpreting roadside signage, understanding weather alerts, and coordinating with dispatchers, first responders and inspectors — often under intense pressure. English language proficiency is fundamental to every one of those responsibilities.

Across the United States, commercial trucks move agricultural products from rural communities, consumer goods through major interstate corridors and critical supplies to ports, factories, hospitals and distribution centers. From coast to coast, our economy relies on professional drivers to keep freight moving safely and efficiently. That makes strong, consistent safety standards not a regional concern, but a national imperative.

MIGRANT TRUCKERS SUE CALIFORNIA DMV OVER CANCELED COMMERCIAL DRIVERS’ LICENSES

Federal law has long required commercial drivers to demonstrate English language proficiency for good reason. A commercial driver’s license is not a checkmark on a piece of paper — it is a promise to the public. It tells every motorist sharing the road that the person behind the wheel of that truck has been properly trained, evaluated and held to consistent safety standards. Weakening or downplaying those requirements undermines trust in the Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) itself.

This debate cannot be divorced from a broader reality confronting the trucking industry. Across the country, regulators are uncovering bad actors who cut corners on training, falsify records, or exploit loopholes to push unqualified drivers onto public roads. These so-called “CDL mills” don’t just endanger safety — they devalue the hard work of legitimate drivers and reputable training schools that do things the right way.

As a training professional and chairman of the Commercial Vehicle Training Association (CVTA), I see the difference every day between real, rigorous instruction and sham operations that promise “fast” or “guaranteed” licenses. True commercial driver training takes time. It involves classroom instruction, hands-on skills development, supervised behind-the-wheel training, and clear communication between instructors and students. None of that works without a shared language.

To be clear, this is not about exclusion. Trucking has always been a pathway to opportunity for people from diverse backgrounds. CVTA supports expanding the workforce — but growth must never come at the expense of safety. Lowering standards does not solve labor shortages; it creates more crashes, more fatalities, more scrutiny and, ultimately, fewer good jobs.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

Our drivers — professional men and women who earn their living the right way — deserve better than to have their work trivialized. Suggesting that language proficiency doesn’t matter insults the professionalism of drivers who take pride in mastering a demanding craft and meeting high expectations every single day.

The solution is not new laws or political talking points. The solution is consistent, nationwide enforcement of existing safety requirements. Regulators must fully enforce entry-level driver training rules, conduct meaningful audits and shut down fraudulent operators wherever they exist. Every state should continue partnering with federal agencies to ensure every CDL on the road represents real training, real accountability and real competence.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

When you see a truck in the next lane, you should be confident that the driver can read the signs, understand emergency instructions, and respond correctly in a crisis. That confidence begins with maintaining — and enforcing — standards that put safety first.

We owe that to our drivers and the traveling public.

What Usha Vance’s pregnancy news tells us about men and women in America

Second lady Usha Vance’s announcement of baby number four was delightful and refreshing news. Having four children in the U.S. is not the norm these days. Across the U.S., women are having fewer children, or none at all. As a parent myself, I hope Vance’s news will encourage more women to do the same.

A woman’s decision to have children is often seen as a personal lifestyle choice. However, this decision also affects the nation: without enough births to maintain its population, a country struggles to sustain its economy, communities and culture.

We do not have to look far to see where this leads. The Free Press recently reported that Britain is facing a full-blown demographic crisis. Deaths are now poised to outnumber births. Many educated, prosperous and financially stable women say their decision not to have children is deliberate. One woman in The Free Press story noted, “It’s not that I don’t have reasons. It’s that I have too many. If you knocked one down, I’d just give you 10 more.”

The United States is experiencing a sustained decline in birth rate, which has lasted for over a decade and now puts the rate well below replacement level. This trend mirrors challenges seen elsewhere.

CANDACE CAMERON BURE SAYS ‘MEN ARE SCARED TO TALK TO WOMEN’ IN TODAY’S MODERN DATING WORLD

The reasons women give for avoiding motherhood are real: children and childcare are expensive; many careers demand total availability during a woman’s prime fertility years. Often, the culture treats motherhood as a professional liability rather than a benefit to society.

But there is another factor few are willing to say out loud — one that affects women long before they ever consider having children. Increasingly, women are not delaying motherhood because they do not want families: they are having trouble finding men who are ready to build one.

Modern dating is broken, and pornography has played a devastating role. Millions of men now habitually consume pornography. Barna Group data from 2024 found that 78% of U.S. men (ages 13–65) consume pornography “to some extent.” But this is not harmless entertainment. Many studies have shown that heavy pornography consumption distorts expectations, damages emotional intimacy, reduces motivation and undermines real-world relationships.

HOW FEMINISM HIJACKED THE CONVERSATION ON MASCULINITY

Pornography can lead men to have distorted views of sex and women. A culture that normalizes constant sexual consumption trains men to expect gratification without sacrifice. Pornography promises connection but delivers isolation.

A lonely society, cut off from marriage, family, and genuine intimacy, does not reproduce itself. A culture that floods men with pornography should not be surprised when fewer of them step up as husbands and fathers. When men are trained to consume rather than commit, women ultimately pay the price, but so does the larger society.

Marriage does not collapse because women suddenly lose interest in family. It collapses when men stop pursuing commitment. Growing numbers of men are living disconnected lives, often alone, often online. Indeed, men are also being sold a lie that they have to have an enormous amount of money saved before they can commit to marriage and children.

FROM ‘HAPPILY EVER AFTER’ TO ‘NOT SO FAST’: WHY YOUNG WOMEN ARE TURNING FROM MARRIAGE

Women are not often rejecting motherhood out of selfishness or ambition. They are responding rationally to a dating culture where emotional maturity, fidelity and long-term responsibility are increasingly rare.

America needs strong men who are willing to reject pornography and focus on leaving a legacy by building families. At the same time, women should resist the message that motherhood must be delayed until everything is “perfect.” That day will never arrive. And the reality is that fertility does not wait.

Often, the culture treats motherhood as a professional liability rather than a benefit to society.

Yes, economics matter. But economics alone cannot explain what is happening. Even countries with generous family benefits, paid leave, and subsidized childcare remain well below replacement fertility rates. When marriage weakens and meaning erodes, no amount of government spending can persuade people to build families.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

Career success matters — education matters. But neither was ever meant to replace family, meaning, or legacy. A culture that treats children as optional accessories eventually runs out of people. That decline shows up in labor shortages, strained entitlement systems, and a shrinking pool of future caregivers, workers and citizens.

What is missing is a shared belief that marriage, motherhood and fatherhood are still good and worth protecting.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Each generation before us faced uncertainty, whether in the form of war, depression, or upheaval, and yet still chose to build families. They believed the future was worth the investment. A society that stops believing stops having children.

America now stands at a crossroads: we can rebuild a culture that honors marriage, supports motherhood, and calls men to responsibility, or we can manage decline and pretend it is progress. Children are not the problem: they are the point. Second Lady Vance models that well.

America can’t duck and cover from Washington’s nuclear waste disposal failure

Nuclear energy is hot and everyone wants a piece of the action. President Donald Trump has announced his vision to quadruple America’s nuclear capacity by 2050, and 33 countries signed a declaration to triple nuclear capacity over the same period.

Not only are governments clamoring for new nuclear power, but private companies are moving full steam ahead. Tech companies are working to restart shuttered plants and to extend the lives and power levels of existing ones. America’s largest, oldest and most successful companies are moving towards new nuclear energy.

But a 90,000-ton pot of nuclear waste lies at the end of this rainbow and poses problems not for safety but for a significant nuclear energy expansion. First, the federal government collected fees for nuclear waste disposal but did not dispose of the waste. Second, because Uncle Sam was assigned responsibility, companies had no incentive to develop disposal solutions.

TRUMP ADMIN POURS $1B INTO MASSIVE EFFORT TO RESTART NUCLEAR REACTOR AT HISTORIC MELTDOWN SITE

It is not a safety issue. Nuclear waste, or more accurately, spent nuclear fuel is safely stored on site at nuclear power plants in secure pools and in dry casks and takes little space. All U.S. spent fuel ever produced would fit on a single football field stacked 10 yards high, and a few more reactors would add little to the mound.

However, the Nuclear Waste Policy Act gave the federal government responsibility for disposing of nuclear waste, and it gave Washington until 1998 to start doing its job. To pay, the Energy Department collected fees predominantly from electricity ratepayers totaling over $65 billion, including accrued interest. The Department spent $11.5 billion, and the remaining funds held in the Nuclear Waste Fund total over $50 billion.

But the Energy Department has provided no service for these funds, collecting virtually no spent fuel, pouring over $10 billion down a hole in Yucca Mountain, a proposed disposal site, without finalizing the system. Nuclear companies left holding waste and paying for storage, sued Washington for not meeting its contractual obligation — and won. Now taxpayers are liable for $44.5 billion, the cost of the Energy Department’s failure, according to an audit conducted for DOE’s Office of Inspector General.

This liability is paid not from the Energy Department’s budget, but from the government’s Judgment Fund, set up to pay for court judgments against the federal government. Under current policy, waste is produced, nothing happens to it and taxpayers pay to make everyone financially whole. This decimates any incentive for a real solution.

TRUMP’S ENERGY PRICE PROMISE IS COMING DUE. HE HAS THE POWER TO SOLVE THE CRISIS

Washington should never have been made responsible for waste management. Even if the system worked perfectly, bureaucrats would have chosen a compulsory waste solution. This rigidity would have undermined incentives for the private sector to innovate by finding more economical ways to manage waste; reactors that produce more efficient waste streams; or value from spent fuel. Today’s firms have pioneered such technologies, but if there is no demand for waste management services, the value of these technologies cannot be captured or even measured.

President Trump’s executive order Reinvigorating The Nuclear Industrial Base may break this stalemate. In compliance with the order, the Energy Department has issued a request for information from states “interested in hosting potential Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses.” These campuses would house nuclear energy hubs that would include all aspects of the nuclear fuel cycle, including spent fuel management.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

Three reasons for optimism and innovation exist. First, the request asks states to self-identify as interested hosts — in contrast to the current broken system, which used political processes to identify the host state. Second, the request requires private sector leadership, imperative for any successful plan. Finally, although the request provides substantial detail on desired commercial activities, these are only guidelines and the Department is open to other proposals. This leaves a lot of room for innovative thinking on how to solve the problem.

RAPID RISE OF AI PUTS NEW URGENCY ON CONGRESS TO UNLEASH AMERICAN ENERGY

It is not only government seeking solutions. Former Nuclear Regulatory Chair Allison MacFarlane and former acting director of the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Lake Barrett recently issued a new nonpartisan report, “The Path Forward for Nuclear Waste in the U.S.,” laying out a strategy for moving nuclear waste policy forward. Full disclosure: I was a contributor.

The report suggests plans to realign responsibilities for nuclear waste management, ensuring that the money collected for nuclear waste disposal gets spent on its intended purpose. The report provides flexibility to meet today’s and tomorrow’s growing disposal needs by holding the federal government responsible for its current obligations and allowing for new systems. Lastly, the report recognizes the need for permanent geologic storage but also allows for other technologies and approaches.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

For the first time in decades, Washington is signaling that it may untangle the policy failures that have paralyzed nuclear waste management. The Path Forward report outlines a workable strategy, but success now depends on states and private firms stepping up where the federal government has fallen short. 

If we want abundant clean energy and a thriving nuclear industry, we must replace bureaucratic stagnation with competition, innovation, and genuine accountability.

Why Bad Bunny’s polarizing Super Bowl halftime show felt like a slap at America

Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl halftime show is officially behind us. Mercifully. What began with hype and outrage, and then more outrage, ended with a show most charitably described as polarizing and confusing for those who were not already Bad Bunny fans. NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell promised that Bad Bunny would use the show to unite the world “in a really creative and fun way.” It turns out that he was right. Most of the country, with the exception of some Democrats like California Gov. Gavin Newsom, was united in its revulsion over a show that was narrowly tailored to a niche audience despite being billed as inclusive and respectful of America.

The pre-show hype around Bad Bunny’s invitation to perform at this year’s Super Bowl began with his “SNL” demand that viewers “learn Spanish.” He walked the dig back at the pre-Super Bowl press conference, but the sentiment ended up being true.

Then there was the online rumor that Bad Bunny would wear a dress during his halftime performance and honor Hispanic LGBTQ+ figures. That turned out to be a hoax.

BAD BUNNY’S SUPER BOWL HALFTIME SHOW IGNITES TRUMP’S FURY, DIVIDES VIEWERS

You’ve got to hand it to Bad Bunny and his marketing team. In the weeks leading up to the Super Bowl, they made sure to captivate people’s attention, whether positive or not.

The Super Bowl halftime show was a condensed version of the show he put on during his Puerto Rico residency. As America watched, Bad Bunny began with a walk through a sugar cane field. He passed by several scenes typical of Puerto Rico as he opened with “Tití Me Preguntó (“Auntie Asked Me”),” such as a coconut water stand and a domino table. As he arrived at a house, viewers were treated to a mashup of several of his other hits before transitioning to a homage to ’90s and ’00s reggaeton and the blink-and-you’ll-miss-it depiction of two dudes grinding.

GREEN DAY FRONTMAN TELLS ICE AGENTS TO ‘QUIT THAT S—-Y JOB’ AT SUPER BOWL PARTY PERFORMANCE

Had any of the show been in English, we would’ve heard a mostly positive message from Bad Bunny: “My name is Benito Martinez Ocasio. And if I’m here today at Super Bowl LX, it’s because I never, never stopped believing in myself. You should also believe in yourself. You’re worth more than you think. Believe me.”

We then proceeded to the highlight of the show: Lady Gaga joining the salsa band in a version of “Die With a Smile” on a stage built to resemble the El Morro fortress in Old San Juan — the one moment where perhaps a majority of those present at Levi Stadium could sing along.

NFL LEGEND BLASTS LEAGUE FOR CHOOSING BAD BUNNY AS HALFTIME PERFORMER: ‘ANYTHING FOR MONEY’

But wait, there’s more. This segues into Bad Bunny’s “Baile Inolvidable (Unforgettable Dance),” “Nueva Yol (New York),” and a symbolic handover of his Grammy.

Up until this point, there wasn’t anything in the show that could be perceived as overtly anti-American. That changed when Ricky Martin began singing the chorus of “Lo Que Le Pasó a Hawaii (What Happened to Hawaii),” which translates to:

“They want to take the rivers and the beaches away from me They want to take my neighborhood and for Grandma to go away No, don’t let go of the flag and don’t forget the le lo lai (song) I don’t want them to do with you what happened to Hawaii.”

KID ROCK SAYS TPUSA’S ALTERNATE HALFTIME SHOW IS FOR PEOPLE WHO LOVE JESUS AND AMERICA

“What happened to Hawaii” is that it was admitted into the Union as its 50th state. Bad Bunny, who sings under the auspices of a record label founded by a former Venezuelan intelligence officer, would prefer that Puerto Rico separate from the United States in order to become an independent country — an option that only 12% of the island’s voters chose in 2024. The record shows that Bad Bunny also endorsed the pro-independence, Chávez- and Castro-sympathizing candidate for governor of Puerto Rico.

The Grammy-winning artist’s halftime show ended with a depiction of power outages, the titular “Debí Tirar Más Fotos, and his Grammy quote, “The only thing more powerful than hate is love,” flashing on the big screen.

Bad Bunny walked off the field with a flag-bearing entourage in tow. His shout of “God Bless America!” really meant “América,” as in the Americas, not the United States. A grand finale that was stilted, confusing, and subtly but passively aggressively anti-American.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

This begs the question: Why even invite Bad Bunny to do the show in the first place? Could the NFL make a business argument to bring him in as the halftime performer? Yes. As the league expands into Latin America and other markets, Bad Bunny makes sense. They both share Mexico as their biggest overseas market, for example. It was a no-brainer.

On the other hand, this was a clear vetting failure. The halftime show was carefully constructed to mainstream two similarly toxic ideas to viewers in the United States: first, the idea of Puerto Rico as a separate nation from the United States. Second, the idea of Latino identity as a nation within a nation, a permanent immigrant status separate from the American mainstream.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Far from uniting the world “in a really creative and fun way,” Bad Bunny delivered a highly divisive show that put identity politics front and center. The final product fell far short of Goodell’s hype, leaving a sour taste in the mouths of millions of viewers.

One shudders to think what the league might have in mind for next year if they insist on forsaking their core audience in pursuit of global expansion.

DAVID MARCUS: In rural Virginia, mixed signals for Trump and the GOP

LEXINGTON, Va. – President Donald Trump’s poll numbers are a bit all over the place these days. The averages have him about seven points underwater, while some surveys show him down as much as 19. And then, one poll, the most accurate of 2024, has him up one point at 50%.

Likewise, large majorities of Americans say in polls that they want all illegal immigrants deported, but large majorities also say that the Trump administration is going too far in executing this policy. 

So, what do the American people actually want?

I traveled to Lexington, Virginia, to get a feel for what the reality is on the ground, below these shaky and inconsistent poll numbers, and what I found was good news and bad news for both parties and a midterm that is still wide open.

HEALTHCARE, ECONOMY AND THE ‘ONE BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL’: WELCOME TO THE MIDTERMS

Brian, from nearby Lynchburg, was visiting town with his wife Erin. A chef in his early 50s and a former Republican, he finds Trump’s coarseness, and what he would call his racism, such as the recent social media post featuring the Obamas as monkeys, to be a dealbreaker.

Brian was very interesting because, while he knew he could not tolerate Trump, he was also quite forthright about the negative tradeoffs in voting for Democrats. When I asked him, as a business owner, about Virginia’s new governor, Abigail Spanberger, his response was telling.

“I voted for her,” Brian told me. “Part of me wishes I hadn’t had to, but I did, given the alternative.”

LEE CARTER: 45% OF AMERICANS CALLING THEMSELVES ‘INDEPENDENT’ AREN’T INDEPENDENT AT ALL – THEY’RE JUST ANGRY

The alternative here seemed to be Trump, not former Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, Spanberger’s actual opponent, and something that any Republican thinking of running by distancing themselves from Trump should consider. It probably won’t work anyway.

I pressed a bit on Spanberger, asking Brian if the wave of new taxes she supports worries him.

“Absolutely it worries me,” he said. “I’m a fiscal conservative. I have to balance my budget, and the government should too. But if the alternative is racism, then I have to reject that.”

LEE CARTER: TRUMP’S APPROVAL RATINGS REVEAL WHAT LEGACY MEDIA REFUSES TO SEE

Never mind that Earle-Sears is African American. Brian was the perfect example of why Democrats focus so much on race and racial issues. For some voters, alleged racism on the president’s part will trump even their own policy beliefs and preferences and taint the party he rules.

This phenomenon can also look like fool’s gold to pollsters who see a voter with some conservative leanings who should be obtainable. But some, like Brian, just flat-out will never support Trump or the GOP so long as Trump leads it.

As Brian bluntly put it, “If it’s men in women’s sports or racism, I have to go with men in women’s sports.”

FOX NEWS POLL: AN EARLY LOOK AT THE 2026 MIDTERMS

But it wasn’t all bad news for Trump in rural Virginia. Alice, who is in her 40s and works in real estate, thinks the Trump economic measures are starting to pay off.

“I can just feel it,” she told me. “Gas prices are low, more stuff is on sale at the grocery. That’s what we voted for.”

When I asked about Trump’s gruff manner, the one that bothered Brian so much, she just said, “If you aren’t used to it by now, you’re not getting used to it.”

REPUBLICAN ‘WAKE-UP CALL’: SPECIAL ELECTION SHOCKER HIGHLIGHTS GOP TURNOUT AND MIDTERM RISKS

Others, like Peter, in his 70s and retired, are feeling a real political fatigue. Apathy is the wrong word, but perhaps frustration fits.

“Today, it’s like who you vote for is your whole identity,” he said. “But I can’t fall out of a tree every time Donald Trump opens his mouth.”

On Friday afternoon, a small protest of mostly older White people was gathered on a street corner in pretty-as-a-picture Lexington. Annette, the leader and spokesperson, was handing out cookies. Unlike their peers in Minneapolis, they were happy to talk with the press.

LIBERAL COLUMNIST DECLARES TRUMP ‘VIBE SHIFT IS DEAD,’ SAYS DEMOCRATS CAN WIN ‘ATTENTION WARS’

“This is what we feared all along,” one man holding the Virginia state flag with its motto, Sic Semper Tyrannis, told me of the Trump administration’s handling of Minneapolis. “It’s why we have been out here protesting for a year.”

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

Generally speaking, the huge shifts that pollsters are so ardently looking for appear to exist more in the world of numbers than that of flesh and blood, where it continues to be very rare to meet anyone who has changed their mind politically in the age of Trump.

No, the fear for Republicans today is not that Trump or the party are bleeding support. It’s that the Democrats on the ground seem far more motivated to stop Trump than the Republican voters are to reward slow and steady progress.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Importantly, there does not appear to be anything that Trump could do, any position he could soften, be it on immigration enforcement, tariffs or his own rhetoric, that will sway the third of voters who just detest the man. But both Trump and the party have proven they can win without them.

From now until the midterm, we will be in the field with our ear on the ground, listening to the things that voters never tell the pollsters. And if Lexington is any indication, this is still anybody’s ballgame.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM DAVID MARCUS

Whispering death: Army’s new M1E3 Abrams tank is a hybrid-drive silent killer

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth has his “Arsenal of Freedom Tour” in full swing, visiting the nuclear submarine production floor at Newport News, Virginia, and Blue Origin’s space launch at Cape Canaveral, Florida. His goal: restore American industrial prowess and secure freedom for generations to come.

You’ll never guess which program is moving fastest of all: it’s the Army’s new M1E3 Abrams tank.

Get this: the M1E3 Abrams is five years ahead of schedule. Yes, five years. And it’s a hybrid.

While Golden Dome missile defense, the battleship design and other programs are on the drawing board, the Army has accelerated the M1E3 Abrams to wartime pace.

HEGSETH SAYS DEPARTMENT OF WAR ‘WILL BE PREPARED TO DELIVER’ WHATEVER TRUMP WANTS FOLLOWING IRAN WARNING

Credit Army Chief of Staff Gen. Randy George and Secretary of the Army Dan Driscoll. It’s part of their push to accelerate top programs like the MV-75 air assault tilt-rotor plane. In the case of the tank, the Army had been studying upgrades and watching the Ukraine war. George and his science advisor Dr. Alex Miller were told they would not see the tank until 2032. “We said no,” Miller recalled.

The result: the M1E3 prototype rolled out at the Detroit Auto Show in January. The first platoon of the M1E3 will be ready for testing by soldiers in 2028.

As seen in Detroit, the new M1E3 is a sleek change from earlier Abrams models. Gone is the top turret position. Now the three-man crew side by side in the hull where armor is strongest. External cameras, sensors, heat-detecting thermal sights and laser-range finders feed into gaming-inspired cockpit displays. Their remote? It’s not for changing channels. An M1E3 tank crew can remotely fire a Javelin anti-tank missile with a 2.5-mile range and a range of other weapons, including loitering munitions.

US MILITARY DETAILS TIMELINE OF OPERATION TO CAPTURE MADURO, REVEALING MORE THAN 150 AIRCRAFT INVOLVED

Here are five killer attributes of the M1E3 Abrams.

• Formula One Cockpit. The M1E3 tank has a driver interface that “looks like an Xbox controller,” said George. Just as important, the tank uses a modular, “plug-and-play” open systems software backbone. Soldiers can plug in new apps and upgrade it at a point in the vehicle software where all the things that make the vehicle run are protected.
• Quiet mode. It’s a hybrid. No, the Army isn’t going eco-friendly. The M1E3 will have a Caterpillar diesel engine and a SAPA transmission that allows it to switch into electric mode. The hybrid electric drive is all about silent stalking. Iraqis facing the Abrams in 1991 called it Whispering Death, but the new Abrams takes the silent mode into a new realm when the tank is running on electric. Add in heat signature reduction and electronic jammers. The new Abrams takes silent lethality to a new level.

HEGSETH TO HIGHLIGHT REBUILDING THE ‘ARSENAL OF FREEDOM’ IN SPEECH AT REAGAN NATIONAL DEFENSE FORUM

• Active Protection. Shoot at an Abrams and “active protection” will detect, target and obliterate you. This is the Army’s term for a system that can sort out a whole range of incoming threats, from recoilless rifles to anti-tank guided missiles, rockets, tank rounds and rocket-propelled grenades. And of course, drones. The best part is the detection system nails the location of the enemy shooter so the Abrams crew can destroy it.
• Reactive Armor. Already an Abrams standard, tiles fitted on the tank hull prevent penetration by RPGs and deflect blast downward or outwards, depending on the tactical situation. The Army really doesn’t like to talk about this secretive system, but guarantee you, the M1E3 will improve on it.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

• Great Guns.  With lessons drawn from the Ukraine battlefield, a .30-mm chain gun replaces both the .50-caliber and the loader’s gun. The .30-mm can hit light-armor vehicles like the Russian BMP. It can also chew up drones. Remember, remote control permits the crew to fire without popping the hatch.

By the way, this is a tank on a diet. Older Abrams models weigh close to 80 tons. Expect the M1E3 to weigh in at about 60 tons, after shedding top turret armor. Lighter weight yields about 40% greater fuel efficiency. It also allows the M1E3 tank to access 30% more bridge crossings in Poland and other NATO Eastern front-line countries facing Russia.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Why a new tank? To deter Russia. The Ukraine war could stop tomorrow, and Putin’s Russia would still be a long-term threat. Russia has lost over 3,000 tanks in Ukraine but can still produce 1,500 tanks per year, according to Gen. Christopher Cavoli, former NATO supreme allied commander.

In the end, it is the tank that deters the taking of territory. Just ask the soldiers of the 3rd Battalion, 66th Armored Regiment, 1st Armored Brigade Combat Team, who wrapped up an armored live-fire exercise in Poland during Operation Winter Falcon last month. Polish and U.S. forces fired their M1A2 Abrams tanks side by side. “We train to be ready for anything that might happen in the future… you’ve [got to] do that in the place you may have to defend,” said U.S. Army Col. Matthew Kelley, commander, 1st Armored Brigade Combat Team.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM REBECCA GRANT

From 4 wins to Super Bowl contender — the secret behind the Patriots’ epic turnaround

The New England Patriots are going to the Super Bowl for a record 12th time. But this time is unlike any previous trip.

Last season the Patriots won only four games. This season they won 17 games and are the AFC Champions. It is one of the greatest turnarounds in NFL history.

I’ve written and spoken about comebacks and turnarounds. I wrote a book “Turn Your Setbacks Into Comebacks” sharing the components of a comeback and the steps to a turnaround.

SUPER BOWL LX: WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT THE GAME

But before you can drop setback mentality, exit survival mode, have forward focus or regain your momentum, something must happen first.

A turnaround or comeback will only happen if you change. You must be willing to do things differently from what you’ve done up to that point. A turnaround pivots on decisive change.

This is exactly what the Patriots did. They made massive changes to their team, and the result is a wildly successful season with an opportunity to become NFL champions. And be the first NFL team to win seven Super Bowls.

Anyone who wants a turnaround in their life must be willing to change too.

EX-NFL STAR SHARES SUPER BOWL ADVICE HE WOULD GIVE TO SAM DARNOLD, DRAKE MAYE

The first thing that must change is your mind. And you change your mind through knowledge. A change of mind happens when you receive new information and gain new knowledge. Part of that knowledge comes through defeat and failure.

The Patriots knew they had to make wholesale changes after losing 13 games last season. Their change started at the top by hiring a new head coach Mike Vrabel. He had played for the Patriots and won three Super Bowls. He previously was the coach of the Tennessee Titans. He hired Josh McDaniels as offensive coordinator. McDaniels had coached for the Patriots twice before and won Super Bowls with them.

McDaniels developed quarterback Drake Maye from a rookie to an MVP candidate in just his second season. Maye’s progress meant the Patriots had an All-Pro at the most important position in football.

The Patriots made changes in their roster too. They signed wide receiver Stefon Diggs, who leads the team in receptions and yardage. They signed linebacker Robert Spillane, who leads the team in tackles. They signed edge rusher Harold Landry, who leads the team in sacks. And they signed defensive tackle Milton Williams, who impacts the whole defense.

TOM BRADY SHARES JOSH MCDANIELS STORY THAT MIGHT GIVE PATRIOTS EDGE IN SUPER BOWL LX

They drafted key players as well. The Pats picked Will Campbell to be their new left tackle and Jared Wilson their new left guard. They drafted running back TreVeyon Henderson, who scored 10 touchdowns this season. The Patriots’ opening day roster included 30 new players, most in the NFL. All these changes helped turn around the Patriots’ season.

A turnaround or comeback will only happen if you change. You must be willing to do things differently from what you’ve done up to that point. A turnaround pivots on decisive change.

You can have an incredible comeback if you change your mind. It happens because you know more, you are wiser and you have insights that will lead to a turnaround.

After a change of mind, there must be a change of heart. A change of heart is the result of a new attitude; you decide that your attitude is going to change. You determine that you are going to view life from a positive perspective.

Some people never have the comeback they should because they refuse to change their attitude. A negative attitude will never lead to a positive comeback.

Resistance to change is mostly fear of the unknown. The way you overcome fear is with belief. You believe that the change can happen, that it can be done. This is what coach Vrabel stressed to his team, “You have to believe things sometimes before you can see them.”

You must open yourself up to new possibilities, new opportunities and new experiences. But if your attitude doesn’t change, and you don’t have a change of heart, it won’t happen.

Vrabel helped his team to believe more by introducing the Four H’s, where players shared personal insights into their history, heroes, heartbreaks and hopes. He went first, and the entire team bonded over a newfound attitude of belief.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

There is a final change that must happen. You must change your future. And you change your future through commitment. You choose to be committed to your turnaround. Everybody wants a turnaround; every NFL team wants to be a conference champion. The Patriots won because they committed to coach Vrabel’s two non-negotiables — effort and finish.

You have a comeback when you commit to change.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Not when you want to change, not when you think you should change, not when you talk about changing, but when you commit to change.

Commitments drive success more than goals. Successful people are simply ordinary people who make commitments others are unwilling to make. I’ve seen it repeatedly in my life and leadership. And the NFL has witnessed it with the Patriots’ remarkable turnaround.

If you gain new knowledge, believe you will have a comeback and stay committed to the process — you can experience a powerful turnaround too.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM PASTOR RICK MCDANIEL

DAVID MARCUS: Only Hegseth can save storied Virginia Military Institute from woke state lawmakers

The last time that Virginia Military Institute was nearly destroyed was when Union troops set it ablaze during the Civil War. Today, a new threat to this storied college is coming from within the Old Dominion itself in the form of woke Democrat politicians.

Measures before the Virginia Legislature, in response to allegations of systemic racism at the institution, could not only strip the oldest state-run military college in the nation of its independence, but also cut off funding it needs to exist.

Last week, the Department of War, under Secretary Pete Hegseth, took to social media to back up VMI, writing that “the stability of this proven leadership pipeline is a matter of direct national security interest” and that the department “reserves the right to take extraordinary measures to protect the integrity of VMI.”

Having spent some time this week in Lexington, Virginia, the mountainous home of VMI, it is clear that not only is the college a national treasure, it is very much a local one as well.

HEGSETH ENDING MILITARY EDUCATION TIES WITH HARVARD AMID TRUMP FEUD: ‘WE TRAIN WARRIORS, NOT WOKESTERS’

“VMI is the beating heart of Lexington,” Melinda, an educator who has lived in the town for decades, told me. “I can’t imagine the place without it.”

I met John, who graduated from VMI in the early 2000s and who said of the supposed racism and sexism, “The people who hate VMI just hate VMI because they think it represents the Confederacy.” He insisted that allegations are overblown because every cadet lives by the same code of conduct.

Even a group of anti-President Donald Trump protesters I ran into on a chilly Friday afternoon had little but glowing things to say about VMI.

PENTAGON VOWS TO REFORM MILITARY NEWSPAPER STARS AND STRIPES, REMOVE ‘WOKE DISTRACTIONS’

“We were disappointed by the firing of the superintendent,” Annette told me, referring to Maj. Gen. Cedric Wins, the first black head of the school, who was fired last year. “But we all love VMI.”

So, if basically everyone in Lexington thinks VMI is great, and if it has provided America with great military leadership, from Gen. George S. Patton to Gen. George C. Marshall, why is it on the chopping block?

Because of the insatiable appetite for destruction of wokism.

CAMPUS RADICALS: DEMS TARGET MILITARY SCHOOL, CHICAGO TEACHERS WREAK HAVOC, COLLEGE NURSE’S VIRAL SCANDAL

VMI is integrally connected to the history of the Confederacy. Its most famous instructor was Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson, whose preserved horse one can visit at the college museum. But over the course of the 20th century, the school came to terms with this, often bending over backwards to do so.

Take for example the historical marker for Benjamin West Clinedinst’s epic painting “Charge of the New Market Cadets.”

“Although ‘Charge of the New Market Cadets’ was completed during a time in American history when ‘lost cause’ ideology was pervasive in Virginia, today the painting serves the VMI community not as a commemoration of a Confederate victory or veneration of the Confederacy,” it says.

That is what political correctness looked like, sheepishly apologizing for your own culture when nobody asked you to. But wokeness is different. Wokeness cannot tolerate the existence of ties to the evil past.

Even my hotel, which for nearly a century stood as the Robert E. Lee, has a new name. The only reference to Lee left is a plaque indicating the elevator is an original Otis car installed in 1926.

The erasure of history lurks around every corner and is now coming for VMI.

WHY ELITE COLLEGES FEAR TRUMP AND MCMAHON’S NEW ACADEMIC COMPACT TYING FUNDING TO FREE SPEECH

The Union army chief of artillery who shelled and destroyed much of VMI in 1864, over his personal objection, was a Delaware man named Henry A. Du Pont, who, in 1914, as a U.S. senator, passed legislation to reimburse the school for the damage he had wrought.

These are the kinds of stories that echo around the halls of the Institute, tales of imperfect men of an imperfect nation, working toward greater perfection. If you quiet yourself on the campus on a cold, crisp winter day, you can hear them.

Last week, the VMI Class of 2001 penned an open letter to Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger, published in Lexington’s News Gazette. Two things are notable about this class: It was the first class to include women, and it graduated into war.

FIRST COLLEGE OFFERS TO JOIN TRUMP’S ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE COMPACT AFTER OTHERS NATIONWIDE DODGE AGREEMENT

“We integrated women into the Corps when the nation doubted it could be done,” the letter said. “We produced citizen soldiers of every race and background who trained, served, and bled together. We did not prove this through symbolism. We proved it in Fallujah, Kandahar, the Korengal, and in military funerals across the Commonwealth.”

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

With Democrats in clear control of the political power in Virginia, the threat to VMI’s funding and future is very real, which is why it is so vital that Hegseth and the Department of War make clear that they are a backstop to keep this special place running.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

A nation and a people are its history, and few institutions hold so much of it as VMI. A town and a community are its institutions, the places that are old and storied, and in Lexington, that is VMI.

Long may Virginia Military Institute and its traditions endure.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM DAVID MARCUS

JONATHAN TURLEY: Grandstanding Newsom will stop at nothing to ride the rails to glory in 2028

In the dystopian novel “1984,”  George Orwell wrote, “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” 

The true meaning of that line was never more clear than watching the truly bizarre photo op of Democrat California Gov. Gavin Newsom heralding the success of the greatest boondoggle in history: his high-speed train to nowhere. 

Without laying a single yard of track after burning $12 billion, Newsom showed a diesel freight train on a conventional track to create the appearance of a working railroad.

I have been writing about this boondoggle for years. Newsom promised years ago that the project would be transformative. It was, but not as he promised.

CALIFORNIA IS BROKE, BUT IT’S NOT TOO LATE FOR THE REST OF US

Voters approved a $9.95 billion bond issue in 2008 after absurdly low estimates of the projected cost. Influential figures and companies stood to make a fortune, and the key was to secure a “buy-in” worth billions, so that it would become increasingly difficult to abandon the project as overruns and delays sent costs soaring.

Now the official estimate of future ridership has dropped by 25%, and it demands billions more to complete a project delayed by decades. Remember that this entire project was meant to create a rail line of only 171 miles. It is projected to exceed $128 billion and could ultimately cost a billion dollars per mile. There are still uncompleted environmental assessments and challenging rail lines through the mountains.

There is still no train and not a yard of track almost 20 years later.

The state’s inspector general, Benjamin Belnap, issued a scathing report on the first phase of the still uncompleted project.  That is only the stretch from Merced to Bakersfield which was supposed to be completed by 2033. 

Belnap wrote, “With a smaller remaining schedule envelope and the potential for significant uncertainty and risk during subsequent phases of the project, staying within the 2033 schedule envelope is unlikely. In fact, uncertainty about some parts of the project has increased as the authority has recently made decisions that deviated from the procurement and funding strategies that were part of its plans for staying on schedule.”

JAMES WOODS WARNS NEWSOM’S PRESIDENTIAL APPEAL WON’T LAST LONG AMID ‘ATROCIOUS’ CALIFORNIA FAILURES

Rather than deliver on the promise of high-speed rail from Los Angeles to San Francisco, the Merced-Bakersfield line would now cost $35.3 billion, exceeding the 2008 projection for a complete system.

Merced and Bakersfield have a combined population of just 500,000 for the most expensive rail project in the state’s history.

However, Newsom still wants to be president, even as citizens are fleeing his state in record numbers. The “train to nowhere” is a problem. Even The New York Times is writing editorials on whether Newsom will be the next mistake of the Democratic Party.

NEWSOM PUSHES CLIMATE RECORD ABROAD AS CALIFORNIANS SHOULDER AMERICA’S HIGHEST GAS COSTS

Newsom’s response is to arrange for gushing columns like Maya Singer’s embarrassing piece in Vogue: “Let’s get this out of the way: He is embarrassingly handsome, his hair seasoned with silver, at ease with his own eminence as he delivers his final State of the State address.

“Newsom’s lanky frame was folded onto a sofa a bit too low-slung for him. This made him lean back — away from me. Or it could be that his body language had nothing to do with ergonomics and is a function of Newsom’s quality of being at once gregarious and aloof.”

BIDEN’S GREEN ENERGY FIASCO, NOT TRUMP’S REFORMS, IS JACKING UP YOUR ELECTRIC BILL

It is the type of teenybopper heartthrob coverage that Newsom is counting on from the media. It is not the billions burned on a non-existent railway but his glorious hair and “eminence.”

However, others beyond Vogue readers may be interested in his actual record. Hence, the need to release this absurd photo op that would make a propagandist blush.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

“All of the hard work behind us. Now we’re going to see the fruits of that. We’re going to start seeing precisely what you see here. Real tracks, real progress.”

Merced and Bakersfield have a combined population of just 500,000 for the most expensive rail project in the state’s history.

It is like paying for a meal at a restaurant and the chef charging you ten times what was on the menu, not producing the meal for hours and then showing you a picture of a different dish as a sign of his progress.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The difference is that Newsom has taken almost two decades to deliver and cut the original dish to a fraction of its original size while increasing the price exponentially.

Californians are now captives on a train to nowhere. The state must continue to burn billions because too much is invested economically and politically. They must ride the train with Gavin Newsom to the very end.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM JONATHAN TURLEY

PRISHA MOSLEY: Doctors took my body apart for gender ‘care.’ Now they admit it was wrong

This week, two of the most influential medical associations in the country quietly admitted what detransitioners have been saying for years: The American Medical Association and the American Society of Plastic Surgeons both acknowledged that gender surgeries on minors should not be considered standard medical practice. The ASPS said surgery is not recommended “until a patient is at least 19 years old.” To me, these policy reversals amount to a confession — one that arrived years too late, after childhoods like mine were permanently altered in the name of “care.”

Childhood is precious. It is precious because children are innocent, and because they don’t yet understand the dangers and deception of the world. We choose our words carefully in front of children and avoid certain subjects that may be confusing or too graphic for them to comprehend. We make sure they’re in bed by a decent hour and that they eat their vegetables so they can grow up big and strong. We send them off to play with toys like Mr. Potato Head, to use their imagination and experience the kind of innocent fun that childhood is meant to hold.

Unfortunately, over the past 15 years, we have turned children into Mr. Potato Heads instead. I would know, because I was one of those children.

MAJOR MEDICAL ORGANIZATION URGES DELAYING YOUTH GENDER SURGERIES

When I was a teenager, I was introduced to transgender ideology, which led me into a series of irreversible decisions that I still live with today. Doctors and activists told me my body was made up of interchangeable parts, easily removed or added on. That lie cost me healthy parts of my body I can never get back. And the worst part is that I believed it — because that’s what my doctors told me.

Predatory activists and doctors enable delusional beliefs that children develop from video games, online communities on social media, and movies, and then trick young patients into signing up for losses they cannot possibly comprehend.

Let that sink in.

THE MEDICAL SYSTEM PUSHED TRANSGENDER SURGERY ON KIDS — NOW IT’S FACING LEGAL JUSTICE

For years, I was told that what I was experiencing wasn’t distress or trauma, but an identity issue. The solution, I was assured, wasn’t patience, counseling or time to grow into a young woman. It was hormones, surgery and the promise that if I altered my body enough, my mind would finally fall into place.

Doctors and activists told me my body was made up of interchangeable parts, easily removed or added on. That lie cost me healthy parts of my body I can never get back. And the worst part is that I believed it — because that’s what my doctors told me.

This is how thousands of young people today are taught to see their bodies: as customizable avatars — something separate from who they are, something malleable, something disposable.

What no one dared to explain to me was that a body is a vessel. My mind and body are not separate entities negotiating with each other. Instead, they are one integrated system, designed to support one another through every stage of the human experience. You cannot cut, suppress or chemically alter a healthy body without consequences, no matter how alluring the promise of a fix may sound.

CHILDREN’S NATIONAL HOSPITAL IN DC TO END GENDER TRANSITION MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS

My doctors, rather than healing me, removed perfectly healthy bodily functions in pursuit of fraudulent mental health goals. Cosmetic alterations cannot cure psychological suffering. Yet I was told — explicitly and implicitly — that removing healthy body parts would bring peace. I believed my doctors. I had no idea I would later regret these changes because detransition and regret were never discussed.

Regret is often downplayed. Johanna Olson-Kennedy, a prominent pediatrician and advocate of medical interventions for gender-confused children, said girls who have undergone mastectomies but want breasts later in life can “go and get them!” That statement alone reveals the depth of the deception. Natural breasts are not interchangeable with silicone implants, which lack natural sensation and cannot breastfeed. Olson-Kennedy is misleading young women and girls in service of an ideology.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

The industry wants patients to believe that nothing is truly lost. But tell that to me now: after giving birth to a beautiful baby and wanting more children, I have to live knowing that I cannot breastfeed because of my double mastectomy or feel the sensation of my baby’s skin on my chest. Doctors also fail to adequately warn patients about vaginal atrophy — or deterioration of the pelvis, uterus, and hips. They somehow do not see it as a problem when normal functioning body parts are lost, and see more silicone and surgery as the solution.

Activist doctors hide the consequences of their practices while continuing to sell false hope to new victims.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Now, the tide is turning. Also, this week, detransitioner Fox Varian won a landmark case, receiving a $2 million verdict after she sued her psychologist and surgeon for misleading her and her parents into believing that removal of her healthy breasts was necessary to save her life. Experts testified that surgery does not, in fact, prevent suicide. I share Fox Varian’s pain, having lived through a strikingly similar story — lied to and manipulated at a young age.

Real compassion tells children the truth: that their bodies are not broken, not up for trade, and not interchangeable parts on a plastic toy. If we truly want to protect children, we must stop treating them like experiments and start honoring the reality that childhood is not something you get back once it’s been taken apart.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM PRISHA MOSLEY

MIKE DAVIS: 2 assassination plots, 2 judges and 2 brands of justice

This is a tale of two federal judges — one Trump appointee and one Biden appointee—who separately sentenced two men for their attempted assassinations of a former (and future) president of the United States and a current Supreme Court justice. The Trump judge correctly followed the facts and the law, sentencing the would-be President Trump assassin to life; the Biden judge dangerously followed her political and ideological agenda, sentencing the would-be Justice Kavanaugh assassin — because he now pretends he’s a woman — to less than one-third of the recommended sentence.

On Sept. 15, 2024, Ryan Wesley Routh took his position in a sniper’s nest at Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach, Florida.  He chambered a round into his SKS rifle, which, as a convicted felon, he had no legal right to possess. He then aimed at President Trump and his entourage. By the grace of God, a Secret Service agent saw the rifle barrel poking through the bushes and saved Trump’s life from his second assassination attempt in just two months. On Tuesday, South Florida U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon sent Routh to rot in a cage for the rest of his miserable life. Cannon understood the gravity of the moment and passed the test.

A few months ago, radical leftist Biden-appointed Judge Deborah Boardman, sitting in Maryland, failed a similar test — and failed miserably. Nicholas Roske, a pet store employee, was very angry after the leak of the draft Supreme Court opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. Roske learned the Court was poised to return abortion to its proper place for debate: the states. So Roske decided he wanted to assassinate three justices to change the Court’s outcome. Roske posted about his barbaric desires on social media, yet the Biden Justice Department failed to pursue him.

Shortly after the draft leak, Roske flew across the country from his home in California to Maryland, where Justice Kavanaugh, his wife Ashley and their two young daughters lived. Roske had procured Kavanaugh’s address and planned to carry out his sick goal of altering American legal history. He brought two unloaded guns so as to be able to transport them on the plane. He also brought zip ties, a knife, lockpicking tools and boots with soles specially altered so that he could move stealthily about the Kavanaugh residence. He took a cab to his target’s home and got out, assassination kit in tow. Then, his plan hit a snag. Because of threats as a result of the shameful Dobbs leak, a larger number of law enforcement officers were protecting Justice Kavanaugh’s home. Roske could not complete his evil mission, so he quickly strategized.

Roske called his sister and then 911. He told the dispatcher of his plan and claimed that he was suicidal. Police quickly arrived and arrested him. The case was a slam dunk in light of Roske’s confession, assassination kit, and gruesome trail of social media posts. The Trump Justice Department recommended a sentence of 30 years in prison.  Judge Boardman, however, had a different plan. She focused on Roske’s claim that he identified as a female named Sophie. Boardman whined during the sentencing that Roske’s time would be harder because he would have to serve it at a men’s prison. Unbelievably, even for Democrat judicial standards, Boardman handed down a sentence of merely eight years to someone who had attempted to kill a Supreme Court justice. Several defendants received far harsher sentences for their conduct in the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot. Former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters shockingly received nine years for a nonviolent election offense where no votes had been altered; no attempt had even been made to alter votes. Even Trump would-be assassin Routh’s lawyer requested of Cannon a 27-year sentence for his monstrous client in Florida. Despicably, Boardman’s deranged transgender fanaticism allowed Roske to skate with a mere eight-year sentence.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

Just imagine if Roske had succeeded. No Supreme Court justice ever has been assassinated; the only prior attempt occurred in the nineteenth century. President Joe Biden would have taken full advantage of Roske’s act of domestic terrorism, appointing a hardcore leftist to replace Kavanaugh with the eager help of the Democrat-controlled Senate.  Roe would have survived, and Roske would have gotten his wish. Boardman’s sickening sentence sends a crystal-clear message that terrorism will not be treated harshly if the terrorist has a story that tugs at a leftist judge’s heartstrings — or worse.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Those suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome likely do not care because their hatred is all-consuming, but every rational American should understand the gravity of Routh’s act. Cannon plainly did, as she sent Routh to rot in a cage for the rest of his pathetic life. Boardman just as plainly did not grasp the gravity of the moment. She allowed her radical ideology to contaminate her judgment. She had a chance to send a message to the country that attempting to murder Supreme Court justices will not be tolerated. Instead, she did the opposite. Boardman is a disgrace who should be impeached. Cannon deserves strong consideration for elevation to a court of appeals and, perhaps, to become Justice Cannon one day.

CLICK FOR MORE FROM MIKE DAVIS

BROADCAST BIAS: ‘Public’ media furious Washington Post cut back on anti-Trump crusade

The broadcast outlets that were most upset about The Washington Post announcing they were cutting 300 jobs were NPR and PBS. It makes sense, since the journalists at these outlets have no intention of trying to make money. They expect people to hand them endless millions so they can make the kind of “news”/commentary that attempts to change the world in their ideological direction.

They have internalized the trauma of President Donald Trump and the Republicans taking away an annual half-billion dollars in taxpayer subsidies.

On the Saturday before the layoffs, NPR media reporter David Folkenflik explained the view from Post staffers: “They’re saying that readers of The Washington Post deserve sophisticated, contextualized reporting that requires a sophisticated, contextualized reporting team.” These are buzzwords for liberal bias, the same way Dan Rather always told people CBS gave you “context and perspective.”

Weekend anchor Scott Simon asked Folkenflik: “The Washington Post — it’s a paper woven into U.S. history. Has it really come to this?” The media reporter naturally thought of taking down President Richard Nixon, as liberals do: “Well, obviously, you think of Watergate and the Pentagon Papers and other historic moments, but they’re also doing things at the moment. They are holding power to account.”

2025 LOOKBACK: TRUMP YANKS FEDERAL FUNDING FROM NPR IN MOVE CONSERVATIVE ADVOCATES SAID WAS LONG OVERDUE

This being NPR, no one was going to consider conservatives suggesting that pandering to the left-wing base of the Democrat Party might not be a stellar business strategy. One of the amusingly tone-deaf moments before the Post job cuts came when staffers were hoping to enlist actors Meryl Streep and Tom Hanks to lobby the paper’s owner Jeff Bezos. They had starred in the 2017 movie “The Post,” which glamorized the paper’s war on Nixon.

When liberal journalists blather about “holding power to account,” they really should ask if outlets like the Post energetically worked to hold the Biden administration to account. The Post wasn’t going to win a Pulitzer Prize for exposing Hunter Biden. Instead, in 2022, the Post won a prize for its reporting on the January 6 riot. Even the prize system is all about holding only one party accountable.  

Instead, we remember Post front-page articles like this Eli Saslow banger weeks after Barack Obama won in 2008. Obama “was photographed looking like the paradigm of a new kind of presidential fitness, one geared less toward preventing heart attacks than winning swimsuit competitions. The sun glinted off chiseled pectorals sculpted during four weightlifting sessions each week, and a body toned by regular treadmill runs and basketball games.” You could make a movie out of this, but it might be NC-17.

WASHINGTON POST REELING FROM BUYOUT EXODUS AS BOSSES HOPE TO TURN THE PAGE AT EMBATTLED PAPER

When the Post announced the job cuts, CBS anchor Jessi Mitchell summarized on its early-morning newscast: “Outrage sparked online after the announcement, calling out the publication’s billionaire owner, Jeff Bezos, for the decision.”

On NPR, Folkenflik recalled that Bezos used to be a role model (for lefties). He “was seen as a savior, a champion of tough and intense journalism, has not interfered with the newsroom, but he’s apparently had enough.”

Now, he argued, “You’ve seen both Marty Baron and Marcus Brauchli — two distinguished former executive editors of The Washington Post — just in the last hour or two share information with me, saying basically there seems to be no strategy. The Washington Post, its readers and the country deserve better.”

Baron is a poster boy for crusading liberal journalism. He was glamorized for The Boston Globe’s war on the Catholic Church in the 2015 movie “Spotlight.” Now he’s starred in several PBS segments lamenting Bezos. On “Amanpour & Co.” on January 23, he suggested Bezos was far too “tepid” toward Trump and no longer lives up to the Post’s drama-queen motto, “Democracy Dies in Darkness.”

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

After the cuts were announced, “PBS News Hour” interviewed Baron for seven minutes, and he said the cuts did “enormous damage” to the paper. Baron uncorked the entire leftist critique. Bezos drove away the leftist subscribers by killing the paper’s endorsement of Kamala Harris in 2024, and then Bezos appeared on stage at Trump’s inauguration. He bought rights to Trump’s reality show “The Apprentice” for Amazon Prime and bankrolled a big documentary on Trump’s wife and First Lady, “Melania.”

When the Post announced the job cuts, CBS anchor Jessi Mitchell summarized on its early-morning newscast: “Outrage sparked online after the announcement, calling out the publication’s billionaire owner, Jeff Bezos, for the decision.”

Baron was so upset he added the Post bosses were “completely changing the opinion pages so that essentially they have no columnists who are really left of center. And they’re very deferential to Trump. And I think they lack a moral core.” This would come as a surprise to their Trump-haters like Max Boot, David Ignatius, Kathleen Parker and Fareed Zakaria, to name a few.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof (last seen running for office as a Democrat in his native Oregon), tweeted out the NPR/PBS mindset: “Jeff Bezos, who could keep the Wash Post a pillar of American democracy with the change dug out from his limousine seats, sets an example of surrender to authoritarianism for every other business person and institution in America.”

Everything is very black and white for these journalists. You are either raging against the Trump machine or you are collaborating with their imaginary Hitler. Their hurt feelings at Bezos feel like a tsunami of moral superiority and entitlement.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM TIM GRAHAM

Benghazi arrest delivers long-overdue justice and reminds America who failed our fallen

After 13 years of pursuit, one of the terrorists who allegedly murdered four Americans in Benghazi has arrived on U.S. soil to face justice.

Zubayr al-Bakoush was flown to Joint Base Andrews early Friday morning following an FBI overseas operation. Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel and U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro announced that he faces eight federal counts, including murder, terrorism and arson for his alleged role in the Sept. 11, 2012, attack that killed Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, State Department officer Sean Smith and CIA contractors Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty.

“For 13 hours, Americans waited for help that never came,” Pirro said, referring to personnel defending the nearby CIA annex under sustained attack. “Today, American justice has arrived.”

BENGHAZI TERROR SUSPECT EXTRADITED TO FACE US CHARGES

The families of the fallen deserved this moment. But Benghazi was always about more than catching terrorists. It exposed fundamental leadership failures and an administration that prioritized narrative control over accountability.

Security failures nobody owned

The State Department’s own Accountability Review Board delivered a devastating verdict in December 2012. The board found “systemic failures and leadership and management deficiencies” that resulted in “grossly inadequate” security in Benghazi. While the board did not assign criminal liability, it made clear that leadership failures in Washington materially contributed to the tragedy.

Despite extensive intelligence warnings about deteriorating security and al Qaeda’s expanding operations, State Department officials in Washington repeatedly denied requests for additional security from personnel on the ground. The CIA, by contrast, increased security at its Benghazi facilities.

This is what American resolve looks like when clarity replaces spin and persistence replaces defensiveness.

FBI DIRECTOR KASH PATEL HAILS TRANSFER OF MOST WANTED FUGITIVE ALEJANDRO ROSALES CASTILLO AFTER MEXICO ARREST

Four State Department officials were cited for their failures by the Accountability Review Board. They were placed on administrative leave with pay, then returned to government service in other roles rather than being dismissed. Two eventually retired voluntarily. More than a year after the attack, no official had been fired, demoted or otherwise held personally accountable for decisions that left Americans vulnerable.

The YouTube video that wasn’t

In the days following the assault, senior Obama administration officials blamed a spontaneous protest sparked by an anti-Islam video. That explanation collapsed under scrutiny. Intelligence agencies understood almost immediately that this was a coordinated terrorist attack by extremist militias, including the designated terror group Ansar al-Sharia.

DEADLY STRIKE ON US TROOPS TESTS TRUMP’S COUNTER-ISIS PLAN — AND HIS TRUST IN SYRIA’S NEW LEADER

When Hillary Clinton appeared before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in January 2013, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., pressed her on why evacuees who could confirm there was no protest were not immediately contacted. Clinton’s response became infamous.

“What difference, at this point, does it make?” she said.

To critics, her remark symbolized an administration more focused on managing political fallout than confronting hard truths about security and responsibility.

Those five words crystallized critics’ view that the administration prioritized public messaging in the weeks preceding a national election over candor. Clinton later said, “I take responsibility,” yet she simultaneously distanced herself from operational security decisions, and no disciplinary action followed. President Obama took no steps to remove her from office.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

Congress launched multiple investigations. The House Select Committee on Benghazi, after two years and $7 million, found bureaucratic failures and ignored security warnings but no definitive evidence of personal wrongdoing by Clinton.

That contrast between evasion then and resolve now explains why this arrest matters.

Why this arrest matters

The capture of al-Bakoush sends an unmistakable message: America does not forget its fallen, and justice will be pursued regardless of time or politics. 

As Pirro emphasized, “There are more of them out there. Time will not stop us from going after these predators, no matter how long it takes.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

This is what American resolve looks like when clarity replaces spin and persistence replaces defensiveness. The terrorists who attacked Americans that September night made a calculation that they could kill with impunity. Friday’s arrest proves that calculation wrong.

Benghazi remains a painful chapter marked by loss and leadership failures. But this arrest demonstrates something essential. When America commits to justice, we finish what we start. The families who waited more than a decade understand the difference that makes. It also sends a message to adversaries worldwide that America’s commitment to justice — and to its people — does not expire.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM ROBERT MAGINNIS

The sun is stronger than our electric grid — and we are defenseless against it

Imagine being a telegraph operator in September 1859. You’re sitting at your station, using cutting-edge technology to tap out messages hundreds and thousands of miles away. Suddenly, brilliant auroras light up the night sky from the tropics to the poles.

Then chaos.

Sparks shower from your equipment, shocking you with a jolt strong enough to knock you out of your chair, while igniting your telegraph message papers. You later find out that some of your fellow operators could still send messages even after disconnecting their batteries — not knowing that the telegraph wires were being energized by massive currents induced in the wires by the most powerful geomagnetic storm in recorded history.

WALL STREET UTILITY TAKEOVERS MAY MEAN HIGHER BILLS AHEAD

That storm, triggered by a colossal solar flare observed by British astronomer Richard Carrington, unleashed a coronal mass ejection (CME) that slammed into Earth’s magnetic field. Such a massive solar storm is known as a Carrington Event.

A telegraph operator in 1859 could only wonder at today’s technology — technology that is far more vulnerable to the sun than was the case then.

The sun has an 11-year cycle, and this year is the peak of the cycle. On Feb. 1, giant sunspot AR4366 — a behemoth that grew rapidly from nothing to nearly half the size of the monster behind the Carrington Event — unleashed an X8-class solar flare, the strongest of Solar Cycle 25 so far.

In the preceding 24 hours, this unstable region hurled 23 M-class and four X-class flares earthward. Extreme ultraviolet radiation from the X8 blast ionized the upper atmosphere, blacking out shortwave radio communications across the South Pacific for hours.

SNOWSTORM COULD’VE SPARKED GRID CATASTROPHE IF BIDEN CLIMATE POLICIES WEREN’T REVERSED: ENERGY DEPT

More concerning is the potential CME. The explosion ejected dense plasma that could be Earth-directed. If it arrives with sufficient force, it will compress Earth’s magnetosphere and induce powerful geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) — in other words, electrify the Earth’s surface. GICs, in turn, can impart a current to the high-voltage transmission lines that form the backbone of our electric grid. And that can be a problem.

Modern society is infinitely more dependent on electricity than in the telegraph era. A Carrington-level event today wouldn’t just spark a few fires in telegraph offices. It would risk melting or destroying hundreds of massive high-voltage transformers, triggering widespread blackouts that could last months or years. Supply chains would collapse, water systems would fail, fuel pumps would go dark, communications would vanish and refrigeration would cease. Estimates of economic damage range from $600 billion to $2.6 trillion in the United States alone, with untold loss of life from lack of heat, medicine and emergency services.

Yet despite clear warnings, America’s grid remains dangerously vulnerable.

WHY AI IS CAUSING SUMMER ELECTRICITY BILLS TO SOAR

In my 2023 report for the Texas Public Policy Foundation, Texas Defense, I detailed how both natural geomagnetic disturbances (GMDs) and man-made electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attacks pose existential risks to the grid.

A severe event could damage or destroy effectively irreplaceable extra-high-voltage (EHV) transformers, leading to prolonged outages across the state and beyond.

But there is good news: Proven, cost-effective hardware solutions exist today. Neutral Blocking Devices equipped with capacitors, installed in the grounded neutral of high-voltage transformers, can prevent catastrophic damage. These devices block the quasi-direct current (quasi-DC) GICs induced by solar storms or the E3 component of an EMP blast, while allowing normal 60 Hz AC power to flow unimpeded. These devices buffer harmful ground currents, preventing overheating, destructive harmonics, voltage collapse and eventual meltdown.

RAPID RISE OF AI PUTS NEW URGENCY ON CONGRESS TO UNLEASH AMERICAN ENERGY

As a bonus, these devices also mitigate lower-level GICs that currently shave years off transformer life and cost industry billions annually in reactive power losses.

Costs for these devices have fallen dramatically as technology has matured. A nationwide deployment protecting the most vulnerable 6,000 transformers would require a one-time investment of roughly $4 billion — a fraction of the trillions at risk.

Yet utilities and transmission companies remain reluctant, wary of passing even modest costs to ratepayers. Regulators, meanwhile, have dragged their feet, relying on standards derived from studies that dramatically underestimate the threat.

TRUMP’S ENERGY PRICE PROMISE IS COMING DUE. HE HAS THE POWER TO SOLVE THE CRISIS

Many of these vulnerability assessments trace back to European research conducted more than 30 years ago, during an unusually calm solar period. Those models assumed lower GIC intensities and failed to account for today’s more interconnected, higher-voltage grid — or the far more active sun we’re experiencing now in Cycle 25.

Compounding the problem is the fact that most large power transformers are no longer made in America. The majority come from China, South Korea, and Germany, with typical delivery lead times stretching to four years or more under normal conditions. If dozens or hundreds are destroyed in a severe solar storm, replacement could take a decade or longer — time we wouldn’t have in a prolonged blackout.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

With sunspot AR4366 still crackling and more explosions likely in the coming days, the warning couldn’t be clearer. Congress and state legislatures must act swiftly to mandate or incentivize installation of neutral blocking devices. Utilities must prioritize grid resilience over short-term rate concerns. And regulators must update standards to reflect real-world risks, not Pollyannaish assumptions from a sleepy sun.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The Carrington Event literally shocked telegraph operators. A repeat could shock an entire civilization into the pre-industrial age.

We have the technology to prevent it. We should act on it.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM CHUCK DEVORE

From the Olympic Village to Little League fields, sports still hold America together

Divisions are intensifying across the nation, with a recent poll finding that over half of Americans fear the U.S. is on a path toward civil war and two-thirds believe that American democracy is under serious threat. More than ever, both politicians and everyday Americans need a reminder that we are still one country, and that competition without guardrails quickly becomes something else entirely.

While not erasing complicated geopolitical realities, the upcoming Winter Olympics from Feb. 6 to Feb. 22 in Milan, Italy, can be a reminder of the power of unity. Sports can offer a counterweight to divisions at home and abroad. Rather than a distraction from politics, they can be an example of how to do it better. On the world stage and in our own communities, athletic participation shows us the value in finding common ground.

As we watch the world’s great athletes gather in Milan, we should carry the Olympic spirit beyond our television screens and into our Little League fields, school gyms, community leagues and even our most contentious civic spaces. Our legislators should carry that spirit into the halls of Congress and their state capitols. We should apply its lessons of rivalry without hatred and national pride without resentment to how we live alongside one another at home.

The Olympics began in ancient Greece over 2,000 years ago as an opportunity for the citizens of Greek city-states to come together, display their athletic prowess and trade truly violent conflict — ubiquitous at the time — for rules-based sport. Rulers instituted the “Olympic Truce,” ensuring safe participation for the duration of the games.

UN URGES COUNTRIES TO HONOR TRUCE DURING WINTER OLYMPICS, NOT DENY VISAS TO ANY NATION’S ATHLETES

The first modern Olympic Games took place in 1896 in Athens, Greece, mirroring the spirit of unity, cultural exchange and excellence exemplified by their historical predecessor. Beginning in the 1990s, the United Nations General Assembly even revived the tradition of the Olympic Truce, adopting a resolution before each Summer and Winter games that calls on member nations to suspend hostilities during the Olympic period.

The Games do not deny conflict, of course, but they show how it can be bound. And they reveal how sports can be a diplomatic language when politics fail.

A recent example comes from the 2018 Winter Olympics, when North Korean and South Korean athletes competed together on the same women’s ice hockey team and marched under the same Korean Peninsula flag in the opening ceremonies, amidst ongoing political tensions between the two nations.

SEAHAWKS STAR JAXON SMITH-NJIGBA WANTS TOM BRADY TO PLAY FLAG FOOTBALL FOR 2028 LA OLYMPICS

Sports serve diplomatic ends by bringing countries together and facilitating conversations. Such meetings don’t resolve disputes head on, but they lower threat perception between rivals and reopen channels of communication. They show us how common ground can be found even with people very different from ourselves.

North Koreans and South Koreans have vast cultural differences, but they also share a history, language and a desire for dignity for their people. Teamwork on the ice briefly brought these shared interests into focus.

Viewers can likewise find common ground with their fellow countrymen from watching athletes of all different backgrounds compete together. It’s natural to feel patriotic watching your country’s great athletes walk together, compete and raise the national flag in victory. Global sporting events show how a shared national pride can flourish and rise above prejudice or divisions.

NEW NETFLIX DOCUMENTARY EXPLORES HOW THE ‘MIRACLE ON ICE’ UNITED AMERICA IN 1980

Competing fiercely while respecting rules is consistent with American constitutional values. The principles we can learn in sports — discipline, respect for our adversaries, fair play, restraint in victory and defeat — carry over in other elements of our lives. These same habits make elections hard-fought but respectable, with the most rough-and-tumble matches ending in a handshake.

While a sports event with the global scale of the Olympics or World Cup only takes place every few years, what happens among nations during the Games reflects what is already happening — quietly — in American communities every weekend. At Little League baseball and softball fields and Friday night high school football games, church leagues and rec centers, our children learn how to compete without hating their opponents, how to follow rules even when emotions run high and how, by working as teams, we can achieve more than by ourselves.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

The Games do not deny conflict, of course, but they show how it can be bound. And they reveal how sports can be a diplomatic language when politics fail.

Just as the Olympic village is a microcosm of the globe, a 12-and-under girls basketball team is a microcosm of a local community. Different backgrounds, different beliefs, different family stories, all bound together by love of the sport and shared rules and goals.

Sports create civic habits that are so needed in our civility-starved world: restraint, respect, discipline and team-focused cooperation. Whether in our small towns or on the world’s stage, shared athletic rituals sustain our nation and remind us that all Americans play for the same team, under the same flag.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

In times of great division, our leaders need reminders that another way is possible. Polarization is not inevitable. Civility can wane, but it can also flourish.

It’s important that we protect the global institutions that allow us to compete without hostility and participate in the local ones that do the same thing. The next time you watch a global sporting event or participate in a local one, remember that the spirit on display is not reserved for the world’s greatest athletes. It’s a model for how free people, at every level of society, can live, compete and still recognize one another as fellow citizens.