MORNING GLORY: Just say no to the ‘Talking Filibuster’ — it’s a waste of time

Time is not fungible.  The time you spend reading this column cannot be “reclaimed.”  It is gone and it won’t be back.

 Which is why the “talking filibuster” proposal for the United States Senate is such an awful idea.

I wrote the first paragraph fully aware of the jests it will bring forth — thank you for underscoring my point by posting a comment along the lines of “That’s five minutes I will never get back.” You are correct. You won’t get it back. Hold that thought. It applies to the United States Senate too.

TRUMP TAKES AIM AT SENATE ‘BLUE SLIP’ TRADITION AS GOP RESISTS CHANGE

Another debate has come around about the rules of the United States Senate. The debate is welcome provided it occurs in columns and in studios and doesn’t take up “floor time” in the Senate. “Floor time” in the Senate is a subset of time, a particularly valuable subset. It, too, cannot be gotten back once it passes.

“Floor time” in the Senate is a precious commodity. It is the “rare earths minerals” of the legislative process. Nothing, absolutely nothing, gets done in the Senate unless it is done out in the open, on the Senate floor, after every procedural hurdle is crossed, and there are many such hurdles. The Senate’s rule book evolved over the 161 years since the Civil War ended to protect the rights of the minority party as well as some prerogatives of individual senators. These rules are many and obscure, but they all act together to slow down everything the Senate and thus the Congress does.

The Senate is anti-majoritarian and purposefully so. It was an essential element to the founding of the country. The only part of the Constitution that cannot be amended is the makeup of the Senate. Article V ends with the absolute statement “that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.” Thus, states like Delaware and Wyoming get two seats in the Senate and so does California. In a recent interview, former President Barack Obama said this needed to be amended, but the former constitutional law professor had forgotten Article V. The Framers set up the Senate to “check” the population-driven House. The two senators per state provision? That cannot be amended without the consent of every state.

Among the Senate’s many traditions is one protecting “unlimited debate,” a feature, not a bug, woven deep into the institution’s fabric. The House has strict time limits on debate but not the Senate. Everything procedural done in the Senate must proceed by unanimous consent or, lacking that, very, very slowly if at all.

GOP ACCELERATES TRUMP JUDGE CONFIRMATIONS AS PRESSURE BUILDS TO KILL SENATE BLUE SLIP

For most of our country’s history, the Senate is where milestone legislation is forged because the tradition of unlimited debate and the rules protecting the power of the minority party force compromise.

That is a good thing. The Senate’s rules on debate and legislation force those compromises or, when an important compromise doesn’t appear, an impasse becomes visible to the public that may tilt elections, depending on just how much visibility is generated by the deadlock and how that deadlock appears to the electorate. The Senate doesn’t have to be passing bills to move the country’s debates forward.

Democrats tried to argue in 2024 that the Republicans had blocked legislation necessary to close the border. Their argument not only failed, it failed spectacularly, and President Donald Trump and a 53-47 Republican Senate and a GOP House majority resulted from the November 2024 election. Voters are smart.

(It also turned out that legislation wasn’t necessary to close the border. President Trump did that without any new grant of authority from Congress.)

Whenever one group of activists from either side of the political spectrum really, really, really wants something, the Senate rule requiring 60 votes to proceed to consideration of a bill causes heartburn among those activist groups and the senators who agree with them. That 60-vote threshold is routinely called “the filibuster.” Like clockwork, calls from the most frustrated Democrats or the most frustrated Republicans are issued to do away with or at least “reform” the filibuster whenever frustration over stalled legislation peaks.

Right now, many Republican senators really, really want to pass the “SAVE Act” — the “Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act” — and some of them are demanding that Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., either do away with the rules which protect the minority party by ending the filibuster, or at least change the rules under which the filibuster operates. Utah Sen. Mike Lee is arguing for such a change right now. Lee wants to require that filibusters be “talking filibusters.”

The Wall Street Journal’s Kimberly Strassell explained at length why the “talking filibuster” is a spectacularly bad idea and I recommend her work to you. (The Journal is a sister publication to this one.) Strassel’s piece is dispositive on why the talking filibuster is a terrible idea. But I have a shortcut to the “No. Not now. Not ever. No” answer on the talking filibuster.

Fourteen years ago, it was Oregon Democrat Jeff Merkley who was arguing for “The Talking Filibuster” in a Dec. 12, 2012, memo to his 99 colleagues. (Merkley routinely scores as among the 10 most liberal members of the Senate.) If Merkley is arguing for a rules change, just vote no. It’s that easy.

“When the filibuster is used routinely, it becomes an instrument of mass legislative destruction,” Merkley argued more than a decade ago. The Republicans were in the minority then, and they used the filibuster to slow down or stop President Obama’s legislative agenda. “This paralysis is unacceptable,” Merkley argued.

Not only was that “paralysis” not unacceptable. It was urgently needed, and bravo to then-GOP Senate Leader Mitch McConnell for organizing the Republican caucus to block the radical agenda of Obama, the man who used his party’s fleeting 60-vote majority to inflict Obamacare on a trusting nation.

Merkley argued and argued in 2012, but he did not persuade. The legislative filibuster — the 60-vote threshold — remains in place and there is no “talking filibuster.”

Eventually, the late Harry Reid, then the majority leader of the Senate, would invoke “the nuclear option” to change the Senate’s rules on voting on judicial nominees to a simple majority vote. The result of Reid’s raw power play was the most spectacular backfire in Senate history, with three nominees of President Trump confirmed to the Supreme Court with less than 60 votes.

McConnell warned Reid not to change the rules. Reid ignored him, and we have the “originalist” majority on the court as a result.  Every time a progressive vents over a Supreme Court decision, remind them it is all because of Harry Reid.

Which brings me back to “floor time” in the United States Senate. Candid proponents of the talking filibuster will admit a change to their vision for the Senate would eat up huge gobs of the very limited “floor time.” The majority leader of the Senate controls the calendar and thus the floor time. A talking filibuster would wrest that control from him or her and vest it in the minority party for slabs of the time the Senate is in session. “Like sands in the hourglass” the hours and then days and weeks the Senate would have to do its business would slip away.

Business that includes lifetime appointments to the federal courts. There are at present 37 total vacancies on the federal courts. Only three of the 37 have nominees, but President Trump never met a judicial vacancy he didn’t try to fill because he knows that serious judges are the cement holding his domestic policy agenda in place. He and the judicial nominations team have to pick up their pace and when they do, every federal district court judicial nominee will require at least two hours of floor time and every appellate court nominee will require up to 30 hours of floor debate. If there is a retirement — or two — from the Supreme Court this spring? Thirty hours of debate after cloture for each would be required and would begin only after what would inevitably be excruciatingly long and contentious hearings and procedural maneuvers.

That’s just the time required for judges and justices. Every nominee to every job requiring Senate confirmation will take time as well, from two hours for the obscure appointees to 30 hours for the highest-profile Cabinet nominees. If President Trump is to continue to staff the executive branch, he’s going to need Majority Leader Thune to control floor time in the Senate.

President Trump and Majority Leader Thune have worked very well together since “45” returned as “47.” The enormously successful “Working Families Tax Cut,” aka the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” is the best evidence of that, but so too are the 11 of 12 appropriations bills the president has signed — a triumph of “regular order” not seen in decades. The enormous expenditure of funds to rebuild the military has just begun. It absolutely needs another National Defense Authorization Act and another Department of War funding bill. These and other urgent, but ordinary, business of the Senate is all before the Senate GOP.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Should the “talking filibuster” ever make it through a rules change — very, very unlikely, but concede that point for a moment — the GOP will regret it as much as the Democrats rue the “Reid Rule” changing the votes needed for judicial confirmation. The “talking filibuster” would haunt the GOP conference just as the ghost of Harry Reid haunts the Democrats’ every conversation about the Supreme Court.

Reclaim your reading time now, but if the topic of the “talking filibuster” comes up, remember it was originally a Democrat idea put forward in service of Barack Obama’s hard left vision for the country. And just say, “No.”

RICHARD FOWLER: I ran into Jesse Jackson —and into history: the man who shaped a nation

I once ran into Rev. Jesse Jackson. Literally.

It was either 2003 or 2004 at the NAACP Fort Lauderdale Freedom Fund Dinner. I was a high school student and a member of the NAACP Youth Council, running late — moving too fast across the parking lot, out of breath and worried about missing the start.

Then I collided with him.

I looked up, and there he was: the Rev. Jesse Louis Jackson Sr.

REV JESSE JACKSON, CIVIL RIGHTS LEADER AND RAINBOW PUSH FOUNDER, DIES AT 84

When you’re a teenager and you unexpectedly bump into someone whose voice has shaped American public life for decades, it recalibrates your sense of scale.

For many Americans, Jackson was a political figure — debated, dissected, sometimes polarizing. But in foreign capitals and in parts of America often overlooked or mischaracterized by the mainstream media, he occupied a different role. He was a bridge.

Abroad, when American hostages were detained and formal diplomacy stalled, Jackson stepped into rooms the U.S. State Department couldn’t enter. He helped secure the release of Americans in Syria, Cuba and elsewhere when official channels had reached their limits. Governments that distrusted Washington still engaged him. He wasn’t viewed merely as a partisan emissary but as a moral interlocutor.

At home, through Operation Breadbasket and later the Rainbow PUSH Coalition, Jackson built campaigns that used shareholder pressure and economic leverage to move corporate America. With disciplined strategy and an unflinching voice, he pushed Fortune 500 companies to hire Black executives, expand minority contracting and invest in some of the nation’s most diverse communities — opening economic doors that had long been closed. He understood that protest without leverage rarely changes systems.

When family farmers faced foreclosure in the 1980s, Jackson showed up in rural America, forging alliances that cut across race, ethnicity and region. In his view, economic justice wasn’t confined to one community — it was a shared national interest.

His presidential campaigns in 1984 and 1988 reshaped the Democratic Party’s coalition and the nation’s political system. He energized young voters, working-class voters and Black voters who had long felt peripheral to power.

FROM SELMA TO CHICAGO, MLK’S LEGACY IS BEING BETRAYED BY GRIEVANCE POLITICS

At the 1988 Democratic National Convention, Jackson framed the broader vision plainly, saying, “Our flag is red, white and blue, but our nation is a rainbow — red, yellow, brown, Black and White — and we are all precious in God’s sight.”

For many Americans, Jackson was a political figure — debated, dissected, sometimes polarizing. But in foreign capitals and in parts of America often overlooked or mischaracterized by the mainstream media, he occupied a different role. He was a bridge.

That wasn’t just rhetoric. He laid out a plan steeped in electoral math. Jackson articulated what he called a Rainbow Coalition, a multiracial, multi-class governing majority. When Black voters turned out in large numbers, Hispanics gained influence. When Black, Hispanic and progressive White voters showed up together, women gained ground. And when women gained ground, children and workers benefited, Jackson said in that same 1988 address.

That coalition model would later become a winning strategy for Bill Clinton’s victories in the 1990s, Barack Obama’s wins in 2008 and 2012, and Joe Biden’s coalition in 2020.

Often remembered for the tears he shed on that cold November night in Grant Park as Barack Obama became the nation’s first Black president-elect, few know what was running through Jesse Jackson’s mind. But it is not hard to imagine that it included a memory of April 4, 1968 — the balcony of the Lorraine Motel, where Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

Without Jackson’s courage, his electoral roadmap and his push to open American politics to those long excluded, there may not have been a President Obama or the tangible fulfillment of King’s unfinished dream. Jackson spent much of his life trying to bend the country — and in many ways the world — toward what King called the Beloved Community, a democracy expansive enough to include everyone, even when inclusion was unpopular.

That is why he was among the first national leaders to confer dignity on those confronting HIV/AIDS at a time when stigma silenced too many. It is why he insisted LGBTQ Americans were part of the democratic project, not outside of it, as that project now approaches its 250th year.

And whether it was the striking American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees sanitation workers in Memphis in 1968 or educators, healthcare workers and public servants on modern picket lines, Jackson stood with them — not only in speeches but in the places where dignity and livelihood were on the line.

Some will debate his tactics. Some will critique his politics. But none can deny his reach.

As the son of immigrants, I’ve long believed America works best when it expands the circle of belonging rather than shrinking it. Out of many, one. Jackson lived that tension — imperfectly, loudly but persistently.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

That afternoon in Fort Lauderdale, I was a high school kid trying not to be late. He was composed, steady, unhurried. I thought I was rushing into history. In reality, I had just run into a man who had already helped shape it — in neighborhoods, in rural towns and in diplomatic spaces most Americans never see.

And whether you agreed with him or not, Jesse Jackson spent his life insisting that America could be larger than its divisions — at home and abroad. And for that, we thank him by simply saying, “Keep Hope Alive.”

Italy cheers faith and flag in Milan after Paris’ ‘woke’ Olympic spectacle sparked culture clash, experts say

Paris and Milan-Cortina delivered two sharply different Olympic spectacles, one that ignited culture-war backlash and another that leaned into heritage and national pride, a contrast some observers say mirrors the political paths of Emmanuel Macron and Giorgia Meloni.

Olympic opening ceremonies rank among the world’s most-watched cultural broadcasts, making them powerful stages for nations to project how they see themselves and how they want to be seen. “Paris tried to reinterpret tradition. Milan showcased tradition,” Hugh Dugan, an Olympic Truce advocate and former U.S. diplomat, told Fox News Digital, framing the contrast between the ceremonies as part of a broader debate over the role of culture, politics and identity in the Games.

Dugan described the 2024 Paris ceremony as “a deliberately disruptive, decentralized, urban spectacle… visually bold but polarizing,” built around a narrative collage of modern France, diversity and reinterpretation of history. He said choreography and costuming “often carried explicit social commentary,” fueling debate over whether parts of the ceremony were intentionally provocative or ideologically driven.

OLYMPICS INTERNATIONAL SKATING UNION DEFENDS CONTROVERSIAL OLYMPIC JUDGING THAT DENIED AMERICANS ICE DANCE GOLD MEDAL

The 2024 Paris opening ceremony, staged along the Seine, sparked controversy after a segment widely interpreted as referencing Leonardo da Vinci’s “Last Supper” drew criticism from Christian groups and conservative commentators before organizers clarified the intent and apologized for any offense. 

The moment became a flashpoint in France’s wider culture-war debate over identity, religion and the meaning of public symbolism. The Conversation reported that the ceremony triggered a national discussion over “woke ideology” and France’s cultural direction.

Emma Schubart, a research fellow at the U.K.-based Henry Jackson Society, told Fox News Digital, “The Olympics have become a stage for cultural politics as much as sport.”

She continued, “President Emmanuel Macron’s France leaned into progressive, ‘woke’ politics and post-national symbolism, while Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s Italy emphasized heritage, tradition and unapologetic national pride. These aesthetic choices reflect a widening divide over Europe’s cultural and political future.”

Dugan praised the Italian games, saying the Milan-Cortina Winter Games ceremony highlighted “tradition, harmony, co-existence and the Olympic truce,” emphasizing heritage, landscapes and the athlete procession over political messaging. He called the Italian approach “panoramic, heritage-driven, classical,” compared with Paris’ “maximalist, narrative-driven, experimental” style.”

IOC CHIEF LAMENTS ‘DISTRACTING’ NEWS CYCLE AHEAD OF 2026 WINTER OLYMPICS

Reporting on the Milan ceremony described it as a unity-focused event celebrating Italian culture, design and scenery while pushing past pre-Games tensions and highlighting the Olympic ideal of connection and peace. Coverage emphasized tradition and spectacle rather than ideological symbolism, with performances rooted in classical imagery and national identity.

Dugan, who recently launched a Truce Compliance Index tracking how countries observe the tradition, argued the difference reflected two distinct philosophies about what Olympic ceremonies should represent.

Paris leaned into modern identity and pluralism, he said, presenting an ambitious cultural narrative that some audiences found bold while others viewed it as politically charged. Milan, by contrast, centered its message on timeless themes tied to heritage, human connection and the Olympic truce.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The contrast between the ceremonies highlights a broader evolution of the Olympics themselves. Host nations increasingly use opening ceremonies to project national identity and values, whether through modern reinterpretation or traditional symbolism.

Mississippi’s school miracle shames failing Chicago leaders on education

As I walk across Mississippi in my “Walk Across America” campaign to help reverse the fortunes of my South Side Chicago neighborhood, I see something powerful unfolding. This state, often dismissed by other parts of America as backward, has turned its schools into engines of progress. Children are no longer trapped in failing schools but are moving toward promising futures. Meanwhile, back in Chicago’s South Side, schools in my own neighborhood continue to let kids down. The contrast couldn’t be starker, and it forces a hard question: If Mississippi can make such dramatic gains, why does a city like Chicago, with far greater resources, continue to fail its children?

The stereotype that the South is ignorant while the North is enlightened is crumbling before my eyes.

Mississippi’s transformation, often called the “Mississippi Miracle,” is not an accident. In 2013, the state ranked 49th in fourth-grade reading on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, or NAEP. By 2024, fourth graders ranked ninth in the nation in reading and 16th in math. Adjusted for demographics and poverty, Mississippi fourth graders ranked first nationally in reading and math, according to the Urban Institute. The state achieved its highest-ever rates of students scoring proficient or advanced across tested grades and subjects. Fourth-grade reading proficiency reached levels where Mississippi students outperformed the national average for the first time. Black fourth graders rose to third in the nation in both reading and math, while low-income and Hispanic students ranked among the top performers nationally in key categories.

HERE’S THE SECRET BEHIND MISSISSIPPI’S EDUCATION MIRACLE — AND WHY IT’S NO ACCIDENT

The foundation? The 2013 Literacy-Based Promotion Act, which mandated evidence-based phonics instruction, early identification of struggling readers, literacy coaches and retention in third grade for students not reading at grade level.

We can’t wait for broken systems to fix themselves. At Project H.O.O.D. in Chicago we will be working to create a model that equips kids with skills, faith and opportunity — something Mississippi proves is possible when priorities align.

Former State Superintendent Dr. Carey Wright emphasized the deliberate work behind it: “Educators do not call these achievements a ‘miracle’ because we know Mississippi’s progress in education is the result of strong policies, the effective implementation of a comprehensive statewide strategy, and years of hard work from the state to the classroom level.”

CHICAGO KIDS ARE DYING WHILE MAYOR JOHNSON FIGHTS TRUMP, ICE AND REALITY

Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves has celebrated the sustained gains, noting how conservative reforms and a focus on phonics have made Mississippi a national model. Even with a slight dip in 2024-25 state accountability grades — 80.1% of schools and 87.2% of districts earning a C or higher, down from the previous year — the long-term trajectory shows what evidence-based reform can achieve, even in a state with high poverty.

By contrast, Dulles Elementary School in Chicago’s Woodlawn neighborhood —right in the heart of the community I serve — presents the opposite picture. The school, serving mostly Black and low-income students in grades pre-K through 8, ranks in the bottom 50% of Illinois elementary schools. In recent data, only about 1% to 5% of students scored proficient in math, and 3% in reading, on state assessments. In the 2024-25 school year, just 3.9% were proficient or better in mathematics and 13.8% in English language arts — far below Chicago Public Schools district averages (27.3% in math, 42.8% in ELA) and state averages (38.5% in math, 53.1% in ELA). Chronic absenteeism remains high, often between 25% and 40%, and the school struggles across student subgroups. It is labeled “Commendable” in Illinois’ system, but those numbers don’t lie. Far too many children are leaving without the foundational skills they need to thrive.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

That’s why Project H.O.O.D. is building the Leadership and Economic Opportunity Center down the block from this elementary school. The $45 million center will include a private Christian school for boys from single-parent households, and I am working to learn as much as possible from Mississippi’s success so that our school can follow a similar model. I am driven by the urgent need to reverse these fortunes. We can’t wait for broken systems to fix themselves. We will be working to create a model that equips kids with skills, faith and opportunity — something Mississippi proves is possible when priorities align.

The contrast between Mississippi and Chicago is so stark that I am tempted to call what’s happening in Chicago criminal. It borders on educational malpractice. Mississippi succeeded with clear standards, teacher retraining in the science of reading, accountability through letter grades and the courage to hold students back until they master the basics — policies rooted in what works, not ideology. Chicago, despite vast funding and talent, remains mired in bureaucracy, diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) mandates, resistance to proven methods and excuses about poverty. It doesn’t help that Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson focuses on blaming phantoms of White supremacy instead of doing the real work and confronting academic failure head-on.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

That’s the true backwardness — not the South, which has shown wisdom in embracing evidence over excuses. From these Mississippi roads, the message is clear: The chains of low expectations can be broken anywhere — with bold policy, hard work and faith in children’s potential. 

Mississippi is proof. Chicago can follow. Project H.O.O.D. will help lead the way.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM PASTOR COREY BROOKS

DAN GAINOR: From secretary of state to secretary of memes, Rubio wins over MAGA

The social media star of the Trump administration is naturally President Donald Trump. What’s surprising is the one who comes in second place — Secretary of State Marco Rubio. You can hardly visit an online platform without seeing our new secretary of memes, even more often than the memeworthy vice president. It will probably happen even more now that he is fresh off a major speech to the Munich Security Conference that Politico called part of “America’s charm offensive.” 

Rubio has become such a social media celebrity that Trump bought into the fun. One Truth Social poster wrote that “Marco Rubio will be president of Cuba.” Trump responded, “Sounds good to me!” That set in motion a regional freakout as Cuba’s communist government gets increasingly worried it will go the way of Venezuela.

But the No. 1 way Rubio is making his mark is with what is known as the “Marco Rubio realizing” meme, where a picture of Rubio sitting on a couch is doctored with him wearing every costume imaginable as he takes on even more roles for the administration. His list of potential jobs is seemingly endless — president of Venezuela, the ayatollah of Iran, even the new food pyramid. Following Trump’s post about the Obamas, another poster had Rubio realizing he was taking over the president’s social media accounts.

MARCO RUBIO EMERGES AS KEY TRUMP POWER PLAYER AFTER VENEZUELA OPERATION

“Marco Rubio after being told he has to run Greenland now,” has him decked out in a furry, hooded parka and mittens, like the clothes worn in “The Empire Strikes Back” from “Star Wars.” Another has him dressed like Frodo Baggins from “The Lord of the Rings” with the caption, “Rubio realizing that only he can destroy the ring of power.”

Rubio memes were flying fast and furious across the internet in time for the Super Bowl. Rubio dressed as a U.S. Olympic skier in response to the whines from the ski team. “Marco Rubio realizes he needs to replace the entire US Olympic ski team because they’ve been seditious overseas.” Another had him dressed as a one-man band to perform the half-time show to replace lefty weirdo Bad Bunny.

Rubio is clearly living his best life and enjoying the meme-ish notoriety. At one point, he responded to one of the sports memes like this: “I do not normally respond to online rumors but feel the need to do so at this moment I will not be a candidate for the currently vacant HC and GM positions with the Miami Dolphins.”

That’s downright Trumpian in his sense of humor.

DAVID MARCUS: WHAT JD VANCE TOLD ME ABOUT 2028, RUBIO AND THE FUTURE OF MAGA

As with many things on social media, there’s a method to the madness. At one point, Rubio held four different jobs under the Trump administration — secretary of state, national security advisor, head of the National Archives and interim head of USAID. To underscore that point, the Miami Herald ran this headline in August: “Marco Rubio hands off one of his four jobs in Trump administration.”

In early January, new “CBS Evening News” anchor Tony Dokoupil did a piece about the rise of Rubionic memes. “Only in America: the many lives and many jobs of Marco Rubio.” As Dokoupil explained, “now AI memes have added to that portfolio, casting Secretary Rubio as the new governor of Minnesota, the new Shah of Iran, the prime minister of Greenland and the new manager of Manchester United.” The chyron called it “Marco Rubio’s ‘Moment.’”

Newsweek declared, “Marco Rubio Memes Conquer the internet.” Counting him virtually in charge of at least three enemies of the U.S. — Iran, Venezuela and Cuba — throw in Greenland, Minnesota and maybe they are right.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

But Rubio might be conquering far more than many realize. He might also have won over MAGA conservatives to his side. It wasn’t long after Trump’s re-election in November 2024 that the press was reporting on opposition among the base voters. Politico declared, “Rubio news triggers MAGA backlash.” And the Hill went a similar route, claiming, “Trump’s Rubio pick divides Republicans.”

That no longer seems the case. Rubio has earned his many jobs because he’s been a reliable and successful proponent for America First. Voters might have been skeptical, but many now share the memes both for fun and because they’d be comfortable with the secretary of state taking on almost any job.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Dokoupil said, “These memes might not add up to much.” That could prove incorrect. The 2028 election still seems decades away, but Rubio’s popularity might signal conservative voter support for him to at least have one more job — a spot on the ticket, perhaps with his meme popularity partner Vice President JD Vance.

No matter what, Rubio won’t ever sit on a couch without someone declaring it a seat of power.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM DAN GAINOR

LIZ PEEK: At Munich showdown AOC serves word salad as Rubio channels strength

Secretary of State Marco Rubio and New York Democrat Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are both hopeful about becoming their party’s presidential nominee in 2028. They both have a shot. Odds-makers place the New York congresswoman second only to California Gov. Gavin Newsom in the race to be the Democratic nominee, while President Donald Trump, asked whether Vice President JD Vance is his chosen successor, has more than once suggested that Rubio is also in the running.

Recently, both spoke at the Munich Security Conference. While Rubio earned well-deserved applause from policymakers at home and abroad for his speech, Ocasio-Cortez showed she was not ready for prime time — not even close.

In what may prove a preview of the presidential race two years from now, Rubio and Ocasio-Cortez squared off on geopolitics. For Rubio, the occasion was another opportunity to articulate President Trump’s foreign policy vision — one that embraces American leadership powered by a strong military, a forceful trade agenda, energy independence and a robust economy. And, as we have seen, the Trump White House is not shy about using that military.

SEN MCCORMICK: SECRETARY RUBIO SETS THE COURSE FOR NATO’S FUTURE. WILL EUROPE LISTEN?

Trump has also declined to surrender national sovereignty to global treaties such as the Paris climate accord or institutions such as the United Nations and the World Health Organization — bodies he has deemed anti-American. In the case of the United Nations, the recent elevation of Abbas Tajik, Iran’s representative to the United Nations, to serve as vice chair of the 65th Session of the Commission for Social Development — a group purportedly “tasked with promoting democracy, gender equality, tolerance and non-violence,” as one critic described it — proves once again the debasement of the institution’s integrity. Iran, which only recently crushed protests and slaughtered tens of thousands of its own innocent, unarmed citizens, should be thrown out of the U.N., not rewarded. And certainly not congratulated by U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres on the anniversary of the 1979 Islamic Revolution — which he did even as his own Human Rights Council passed a resolution condemning the mass murders.

Rubio’s speech was challenging, calling out European allies for succumbing to climate zealotry, encouraging mass migration, exporting industrial self-sufficiency and investing “in massive welfare states at the cost of maintaining the ability to defend themselves.” But it was also conciliatory, emphasizing that “we are connected spiritually and we are connected culturally,” and reviewing the many bonds that link the United States and Europe. It was an inspiring call for unity and progress, assuring the appreciative audience that “our destiny is and will always be intertwined with yours.”

The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board described Rubio’s speech as drawn from Ronald Reagan’s playbook, arguing that Trump’s “greatest failure as president is that he won’t, or can’t, articulate his larger principles.” I would argue that Trump is putting those principles into action, coherently and consistently, and that Rubio brilliantly summarized the Trump doctrine.

DAVID MARCUS: WHAT JD VANCE TOLD ME ABOUT 2028, RUBIO AND THE FUTURE OF MAGA

Meanwhile, Ocasio-Cortez delivered remarks at a forum on the sidelines of the Munich conference and reminded us why she should not be allowed anywhere near the Oval Office. Former Vice President Kamala Harris introduced Americans to the magic of word salads — the endless spewing of language that says nothing while helpfully obscuring vast pits of ignorance — but AOC has perfected the art.

Ocasio-Cortez is known as a fierce critic of Israel but otherwise is not known for her geopolitical views, having largely spent her career railing against corporations and the evil rich. But if she wants to run for president, it is important for her to demonstrate some basic foreign policy chops. Hence, the trip to Munich. Unhappily for her, the foray into the world of diplomacy did not go well. Even The New York Times had to admit that she had some “shaky moments.”

Asked whether the United States should come to Taiwan’s aid if China attempted to seize the island, Ocasio-Cortez hesitated for several uncomfortable minutes. Even the description from anti-Trump left-wing Bloomberg, whose reporter had posed the question, said the response was “flubbed,” and wrote: “Normally quick to respond, Ocasio-Cortez was at a loss for words, saying, ‘this is such a, a, you know, I think that, this is a, um, this is of course, a, ah, a very longstanding, um, policy of the United States.’” Hilariously, the piece added that AOC regrouped with what it called a “cogent response,” saying the United States should “avoid any such confrontation and for that question to even arise.” That’s cogent?

TRUMP HAILS RUBIO AS DIPLOMATIC MENTOR AS SECRETARY OF STATE’S POWER GROWS

The Times, too, admitted the Munich outing “demonstrated the relative foreign policy inexperience of Ms. Ocasio-Cortez”, and that she “struggled at times to formulate succinct answers.” But the Times excused her incapacity, describing the questions posed as “probing and specific.” Asking her policy vis-à-vis Taiwan is hardly “probing”; this issue is, along with our relationship with Israel, fundamental.

Ocasio-Cortez also mixed up the trans-Atlantic partnership, referring to it as the “Trans-Pacific Partnership,” and scoffed at Rubio’s claim that American cowboy culture came from Spain. (It did.) But the corker was another response she gave, enthusiastically endorsed by the Times, about President Trump’s foreign policy, “They are looking to withdraw the United States from the entire world so that we can turn into an age of authoritarians that can carve out a world where Donald Trump can command the Western Hemisphere and Latin America as his personal sandbox, where Putin can saber-rattle around Europe.”

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

Yes, AOC, Trump is withdrawing the U.S. from the “entire world” by trying to end the war between Ukraine and Russia, deliver the people of Iran, Venezuela and Cuba from authoritarian regimes, confront China, protect Christians in Nigeria, strengthen Western defense capabilities and pursue peace in the Middle East. Former President Joe Biden declared that “America is back,” but did nothing to protect our interests around the globe.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Under President Trump, the U.S. is not only “back,” it is also in the lead and moving persuasively forward.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM LIZ PEEK

AI out of control? How a single article is sending shock waves with an apocalyptic warning

Be afraid. Be very afraid.

That’s the message that has caught fire in the media-tech world when it comes to artificial intelligence (AI).

This column, for what it’s worth, is being written by a fallible human being on a battered keyboard with no technological assistance.

It’s extremely rare–once in a blue moon–that I read a piece that completely changes my view of an issue.

Like most people, I have viewed the rise of AI with a mixture of concern, skepticism and bemusement.

DEMOCRATS ARE LOSING AI BECAUSE OF A BIG MESSAGING PROBLEM

It’s fun to conjure up images on ChatGPT, for instance, and I get that some people use it for hyperspeed research. But then you hear anecdotes about AI screwing up math problems or spewing stuff that’s simply untrue.

Sure, we’ve all seen warnings that this fast-growing technology will cost some people their jobs, but I assumed that would be mainly in Silicon Valley. The era of plane travel didn’t wipe out passenger trains or buses, though it was curtains for the horse-and-buggy business.

But now comes Matt Shuman, who works in AI, and he’s not simply joining the prediction sweepstakes. He tells us what is happening right now.

Last year, he says, “new techniques for building these models unlocked a much faster pace of progress. And then it got even faster. And then faster again. Each new model wasn’t just better than the last… it was better by a wider margin, and the time between new model releases was shorter. I was using AI more and more, going back and forth with it less and less, watching it handle things I used to think required my expertise.”

On Feb. 5, two major companies, OpenAI and Anthropic, released new models that Shuman likens to “the moment you realize the water has been rising around you and is now at your chest.”

Bingo: “I am no longer needed for the actual technical work of my job. I describe what I want built in plain English, and it just … appears. Not a rough draft I need to fix. The finished thing. I tell the AI what I want, walk away from my computer for four hours, and come back to find the work done. Done well, done better than I would have done it myself, with no corrections needed. A couple of months ago, I was going back and forth with the AI, guiding it, making edits. Now I just describe the outcome and leave.”

Wait, there’s more. The new GPT model “wasn’t just executing my instructions. It was making intelligent decisions. It had something that felt, for the first time, like judgment. Like taste. The inexplicable sense of knowing what the right call is that people always said AI would never have. This model has it, or something close enough that the distinction is starting not to matter.”

This goes well beyond the geeky world of techies, in case you were feeling immune. “Law, finance, medicine, accounting, consulting, writing, design, analysis, customer service. Not in ten years. The people building these systems say one to five years. Some say less. And given what I’ve seen in just the last couple of months, I think ‘less’ is more likely.”

AI RAISES THE STAKES FOR NATIONAL SECURITY. HERE’S HOW TO GET IT RIGHT

My knee-jerk reaction is, well, I’ll be okay because no super-smart bot could talk about news on TV or podcasts with the same attitude and verve that I do. Then I remember, even as a writer, that news organizations are increasingly relying on AI.

What about musicians who bring soul to their rock ’n roll or bop to their pop? Well, the most popular AI singer is Xania Monet. Some fans were stunned to discover she wasn’t real, though created by an actual poet, Telisha “Nikki” Jones, and most listeners didn’t care. In fact, “Xania” now has a multimillion-dollar recording deal.

One other sobering thought: “Dario Amodei, who is probably the most safety-focused CEO in the AI industry, has publicly predicted that AI will eliminate 50% of entry-level white-collar jobs within one to five years.”

Gulp.

This has really hit the media echo chamber, reverberating from Axios to The New York Times to The Wall Street Journal, among others.

The fact that Matt Shuman presents this in a measured tone, not a sky-is-falling shout, adds to his credibility.

Anthropic, for its part, released a study that defended its Claude Opus model, “against any attempt to autonomously exploit, manipulate, or tamper” with a company’s operations “in a way that raises the risk of future catastrophic outcomes.”

The report added: “We do not believe it has dangerous coherent goals that would raise the risk of sabotage, nor that its deception capabilities rise to the level of invalidating our evidence.”

95% OF FACULTY SAY AI MAKING STUDENTS DANGEROUSLY DEPENDENT ON TECHNOLOGY FOR LEARNING: SURVEY

Meanwhile, National Review provides a counterweight to what’s called “doomerism.”

For one thing, “most predictions anticipate that AI will be a top-down disruption rather than a bottom-up phenomenon.”

For another, writes Noah Rothman, “there is almost no room in the discourse for undesirable outcomes that fall short of catastrophism. After all, modesty and prudence do not go viral.”

And what about the positive impact?

“Rather than wiping out whole sectors, it is just as possible that the workers displaced by AI will be retained in the sectors in which they’re already employed.

SUBSCRIBE TO HOWIE’S MEDIA BUZZMETER PODCAST, A RIFF ON THE DAY’S HOTTEST STORIES

“It defies logic to assume that an industry that grows as rapidly as AI is predicted to will not need human data scientists, research analysts, specialized engineers, and, yes, even support and administrative staff. In addition, sectors such as health care, agriculture, and emerging industries will require as much, or even more, human talent than they currently employ.”

The conservative magazine is also annoyed that “participants in this debate default to the assumption that the only solution to AI’s disaggregating potential, whatever its scale, is big government.”

Well, take your pick.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

If AI, which can now code well enough to reproduce itself, doesn’t wipe out zillions of jobs, or society finds ways to adapt, we can all breathe a very human sigh of relief.

And if artificial intelligence is as destructive as Shuman’s alarming article says it already is, we can’t say we weren’t warned–but perhaps we can harness it to do our jobs for us while we work three days a week with three-hour lunches.

I’m agnostic at this point, except to say it’s going to be a wild ride.

It’s not students organizing ICE walkouts — here’s who’s really behind the nationwide protests

Across the country, mass chaos is erupting in classrooms. Students are being encouraged and aided in walking out during school hours to protest American law enforcement. 

And we’re told these “demonstrations” are organic expressions of “student voice” and civic engagement.

They are not.

Public schools are being used as indoctrination camps to turn children into social justice foot soldiers to carry out a Marxist agenda and cause maximum disruption for President Donald Trump and his administration.

CONSERVATIVE ICON RIPS TEACHERS’ UNIONS AS SCHOOLS TURN INTO ‘PROPAGANDA AGENCIES’

If one thing is clear, it should be: Children do not design national protest strategies, coordinate messaging across states or time walkouts for political effect. Adults do.

To be specific, what is being represented as an organic, grassroots movement is being orchestrated by adults who run the same teacher unions and activist networks that have blurred, and now erased, the lines between education and political warfare.

This distinction matters because when schools across the country become staging grounds for political demonstrations, students aren’t being empowered to speak their mind.

JOHNNY CAN’T READ — EVEN IN COLLEGE. I LEAD A UNIVERSITY AND IT’S TERRIFYING

They’re being used.

Student proficiency scores in reading and math have never been lower, yet the people in charge of education have taken it upon themselves to encourage students to leave the classroom. 

This is not harmless symbolism; it’s negligence.

According to the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), U.S. high school reading and math scores are at their lowest levels in decades, with only 35% of seniors proficient in reading, and 22% proficient in math.  

Nearly a third of students can’t even read “basic” level, while 45% fall below basic in math. 

These aren’t abstract numbers. They are the direct result of an education system that has overlooked academics and replaced it with ideology.

CAMPUS RADICALS: DEMS TARGET MILITARY SCHOOL, CHICAGO TEACHERS WREAK HAVOC, COLLEGE NURSE’S VIRAL SCANDAL

But the damage doesn’t stop there.

Chronic absenteeism has become a national crisis, and it did not happen by accident. 

Before COVID-19, 15% of students were chronically absent.

WASHINGTON POST RIPS CHICAGO TEACHERS UNION FOR PURSUING SOCIAL JUSTICE INITIATIVES AS STUDENTS STRUGGLE

Public schools are being used as indoctrination camps to turn children into social justice foot soldiers to carry out a Marxist agenda and cause maximum disruption for President Donald Trump and his administration.

Then, teachers unions forced schools to shut down, kept classrooms closed long after evidence said it was safe to reopen, and taught an entire generation of children that school was optional. 

Today, chronic absenteeism has doubled to around 30%, meaning millions of students now miss a month or more of school every year. 

The “student” walkouts against ICE follow the exact same playbook unions used during Trump’s first term with COVID-19 — disrupt, destabilize and weaponize public institutions against our government.

PRESIDENT OF LARGEST TEACHERS UNION SET TO SPEAK AT ‘POLITICAL REVOLUTION’ EVENT TARGETING ICE

Promoting walkouts — whether it’s over COVID, ICE, Venezuela or whatever political conflict comes next — sends a message that skipping school is not only acceptable, it is virtuous, as long as your politics are “correct.”

If parents encouraged their child to miss class repeatedly, schools would call it truancy. 

When unions do it, they call it activism and applaud anyone who dares.

CHICAGO TEACHERS UNION SPARKS BACKLASH WITH VIDEO HARASSING TARGET EMPLOYEES OVER ICE AS TEST SCORES PLUMMET

You cannot claim to care about student outcomes while actively pulling students out of classrooms to fight your political battles.

Here is the hard truth unions refuse to admit: Public schools do not belong to unions or political movements. They belong to families and taxpayers. 

Student proficiency scores in reading and math have never been lower, yet the people in charge of education have taken it upon themselves to encourage students to leave the classroom. 

Parents trust schools to educate their children, not to recruit them into national political battles or leverage them as pawns against our government.

NEA INSIDER BLOWS WHISTLE ON ‘TOXIC’ CULTURE AND FAR-LEFT POLITICS INSIDE TEACHERS UNION: ‘IT’S A CULT’

The reason unions don’t want parents involved in education is because parental involvement would complicate their narrative, and unions know it.

These ICE walkouts are not neutral. They are protests designed to mobilize students against our government.  

Portraying law enforcement officers as villains to developing minds, while encouraging them to protest during school hours, is at the very least reckless.

MINNEAPOLIS TEACHERS UNION CHIEF ADMITS ELECTED OFFICIALS IN ANTI-ICE SIGNAL CHATS

And as parents — as American citizens — we need to recognize these walkouts are not isolated incidents. They are a part of a bigger plan to politicize classrooms, coordinate protests and turn our children against our country and president.

The goal has never been better education. It has always been maximum disruption. And we are just now seeing it play out. 

Students have become the most effective tool in their strategy because criticism is immediately framed as “anti-student” or “anti-democracy.”

TEACHERS UNION PRESIDENT CALLS TRUMP A ‘DICTATOR’ ON UNEARTHED CALL WITH ANTIFA-LINKED GROUP

That rhetorical shield is intentional; they took it right out of Karl Marx’s playbook.

If unions truly believed in authentic student voices, they wouldn’t script it.

If they respected parents, they’d ask permission.

And if they cared about education, they wouldn’t keep a system in place that only benefits them.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

Students need more time in classrooms, not less. They need teachers focused on reading, writing, math and science, not organizing protests. They need schools that prioritize learning over headlines.

If these protests teach us one thing, it is that our children deserve better.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

And that is something that will never be able to happen with our schools under union control.

The only way to stop the destruction we are seeing on the news is to defund the people who are inciting it. 

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM RYAN WALTERS

I went from preacher’s kid to meth addict — then everything changed

I grew up as the son of a traveling evangelist. My mom is truly one of the kindest people you’ll ever meet. Sadly, beneath her elegant facade was a deep fear-driven need to appear as though everything was OK. Our life was far from it. The man I grew up watching speak behind a pulpit was not the same man at home behind closed doors, where I had a front-row seat to the physical abuse he heaped on my mother.

Keeping the secret of Dad’s abuse was our No. 1 rule as a family. No one could ever know. I remember a time when someone at a camp meeting asked my mom about her black eye. I was young, barely tall enough to come up to her elbow, and I was overcome by dread. Would our family secret be exposed? Before my mom could reply, my dad jumped in: “She fell in the shower.” As I heard those words, my whole body trembled with disbelief and anger. Watching my father tell a cowardly lie to protect his image — and my mom sheepishly pretend she was a dumb wife who fell in the shower — was unbearable to watch. At such a young age, I didn’t know how to process any of it.

As I stepped into my preteen years, I became a wrecking ball of bad decisions. In my mind, both my earthly and heavenly fathers were the villains in my story. By the time I was 11 and 12 years old, I was smoking cigarettes, stealing and drinking alcohol. 

As a teenager, I stayed up almost every night, snorting cocaine, drinking, smoking pot and, finally, taking painkillers to get to sleep. When I was 17, someone introduced me to a drug called crystal meth. This was a new low. Looking back, it feels like an out-of-body experience. How could I have made such monumentally destructive choices? I had built an entire life around my trauma, my hurt, my anger and my addiction.

CHRIS PRATT ON FINDING GOD DURING SON’S LIFE-THREATENING CRISIS AND HOW IT TRANSFORMED HIS SPIRITUAL LIFE

At 3 a.m. one night, I was in a dark place when Jesus revealed himself to this wounded preacher’s kid. Right there, that night, I put my faith in Jesus. I share more about my transformation — and how Jesus changed my life overnight — in my new book,“Radically Restored: How Knowing Jesus Heals Our Brokenness.”

This is why I believe God heals, and that He still performs miracles. I believe because I follow the same Jesus who “cast out the evil spirits with a simple command, and he healed all the sick” (Matt. 8:16 NLT). But what about deep wounds left by trauma? What if those wounds are caused by a parent or a spouse — someone we should have been able to trust, someone who should have been a safe place? We all know those wounds go much deeper.

ANCIENT CHRISTIANS LIVED ALONGSIDE FOLLOWERS OF MYSTERIOUS FAITH 1,500 YEARS AGO, ARCHAEOLOGISTS SAY

When asked whether God can heal emotional trauma, Christians might give a knee-jerk church answer: “Yes — and won’t He do it!” We want to assure others — and maybe ourselves — that we’re saved and believe without doubts. We tend to avoid asking difficult questions because, as Christians, we’re not sure it’s allowed. 

As I stepped into my preteen years, I became a wrecking ball of bad decisions. In my mind, both my earthly and heavenly fathers were the villains in my story. By the time I was 11 and 12 years old, I was smoking cigarettes, stealing, and drinking alcohol. 

My perspective is that honest faith does ask questions, but it doesn’t question who God says He is. That might sound contradictory, but it’s not. God wants authenticity, yet we must trust Him even in painful experiences. When we are authentic and we trust, God reveals the chains that bind us so we can lay them at the foot of the cross and walk away in freedom.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

That’s easier said than done — especially if those chains were put there by people we once considered safe, or by a parent or spouse we should have been able to trust. Unresolved trauma became my prison. I didn’t know how to be set free. The hardest part is that even after the physical abuse stopped, my father never addressed what happened. In my childhood, his presence was massive and terrorizing. But throughout my teens and early 20s, he was there — but not really there. In the movie of our lives, he became less of a monster and more of an extra who blended into the background. His absence during those years was a new and different kind of wound.

I wonder whether my father’s detachment was because he believed that, after all he’d done, he no longer had the right to be my father. Maybe he didn’t talk about the past abuse or make amends because he would have had to own what happened. He would have had to drag it out of the shadows and into the light. I don’t know the answer for my dad; I only know he pretended it never happened.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

But it did happen. And at some point — for my father and for the rest of us — everything we try to hide will be laid bare. Jesus said, “For everything that is hidden will eventually be brought into the open, and every secret will be brought to light” (Mark 4:22 NLT). Everything — even the things we want to keep hidden in the dark — will be brought into the light. That might sound scary, but it doesn’t have to be. When we willingly bring those hidden things into the light to confess, repent and make amends, they begin to lose their power.

Unfortunately, my dad could never bring himself to face what he had done. I believe this kept him imprisoned by guilt and shame. If you relate, please know Jesus loves you and is fighting to set you free and heal every broken piece of you. This promise isn’t just for sons and daughters who have been hurt. It’s also for the father, mother, spouse or anyone who has harmed others. Jesus doesn’t just heal and restore the bad things that happened to us. He also mends the unthinkable things we may have done to others. When we feel chained to guilt and shame, real healing and freedom await on the other side of something called repentance.

EPA ADMINISTRATOR ZELDIN: We finally demolished the Democrat climate insanity

For 16 years, the so-called Endangerment Finding has been the weapon of choice for climate change zealots in Washington. Created by the Obama EPA in 2009, it justified trillions of dollars in regulations, restricted which cars could be manufactured, and drove up the cost of living for American families. It pushed this country toward an unpopular electric vehicle mandate, imposed crushing compliance requirements, and promoted a new level of government overreach that has made hardworking Americans’ blood boil.

On Thursday, standing alongside President Trump in the White House, I was proud to announce that the Endangerment Finding has been eliminated — and with it, all federal greenhouse gas emissions standards for vehicles and engines that followed.

This is the single largest deregulatory action in U.S. history, and it will save American taxpayers over $1.3 trillion. The action will result in an average savings of more than $2,400 per vehicle. By eliminating regulatory compliance costs, we are making it easier for families to buy the car they actually want — improving affordability and helping Americans reach jobs, grow small businesses and participate fully in the transportation and logistics systems that power the U.S. economy.

OBAMA-ERA GREENHOUSE GAS RULES GONE AS EPA’S ZELDIN SIGNS ‘SINGLE LARGEST DEREGULATORY ACTION’ IN HISTORY

As an added bonus, the incentive for one of the most unpopular features in modern vehicles — the automatic start-stop system — has been eliminated. I heard how much Americans hate this feature while visiting all 50 states this past year. The system shuts off the engine at red lights, drains batteries faster and delivers no meaningful environmental benefit. It was nothing more than a climate participation trophy — a regulatory incentive that let automakers claim green credits on paper without delivering real-world results.

Automakers should never be forced to adopt — or be rewarded for — technologies Americans don’t want. The Trump EPA will choose consumer choice over climate posturing every time.

Let me be clear about why we took this action: The American people demanded it, and the law required it. The Obama administration stretched the Clean Air Act beyond recognition to claim that carbon dioxide from tailpipes — combined with five other gases, some of which vehicles do not even emit — constituted “air pollution” that contributed to global climate change and endangered public health and welfare. For decades, the EPA understood that the Clean Air Act addressed pollution that directly harms people’s health in their communities — not global climate policy. But the Obama-Biden administration twisted the law to seize power it was never given, and the Endangerment Finding was its weapon of choice.

Since then, the Supreme Court has made clear in landmark decisions such as Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and West Virginia v. EPA that agencies cannot twist statutes to seize power Congress never granted. Major policy decisions of this magnitude belong to Congress, not unelected bureaucrats. Unlike our predecessors, the Trump EPA follows the law as written and as Congress intended — not as climate activists might wish it to be.

TRUMP ESCALATES BATTLE WITH NEWSOM, SHUTTING DOWN GOVERNOR’S LEFT-WING RULES ROCKING CAR INDUSTRY

These same activists do not want Americans to know that their wildly unfounded predictions never came true. The Endangerment Finding was built on projections and assumptions that did not materialize over the past 16 years. The same types of models relied on by previous administrations and climate activists to bolster the Endangerment Finding failed to withstand scrutiny. The Trump EPA now finds that even if the United States eliminated all greenhouse gas emissions from every vehicle on the road, there would be no material impact on global climate change — the core assumption used in 2009 to justify these regulations.

Let that sink in: Trillions of dollars in unnecessary costs were imposed on American families. Americans lost freedoms that should never have been taken away. The Trump EPA creates policy rooted in reality, not ideology.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

This was not a decision we made lightly. We conducted a transparent rulemaking process with a 52-day public comment period, four days of virtual public hearings where more than 600 people testified, and roughly 572,000 public comments. We listened, made substantial updates and delivered.

Affordable vehicle ownership is at the heart of the American Dream. It is how families get to work, how small businesses move goods and how millions of Americans in rural communities without public transit access health care, education and opportunity. It remains one of the primary drivers of economic mobility in the United States.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The regulations built on the Endangerment Finding placed new vehicles further out of reach for American families. The Obama and Biden administrations’ push toward EV mandates pressured automakers to scale back traditional gasoline and diesel trucks and reengineer fleets toward technologies they argue are uneconomic and infeasible. The cost of these climate policies fell hardest on Americans who could least afford it.

President Trump promised to unleash American energy, revive the American auto industry and put the American people first. Today, we delivered on that promise in what we believe is the largest deregulatory action and cost-saving measure for Americans in U.S. history. The era of government-knows-best climate regulation is over. The American Dream is back. Promises made, promises kept.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM EPA ADMINISTRATOR LEE ZELDIN

Teachers have a lot to learn from Trump’s education secretary

Education Secretary Linda McMahon just dropped a bombshell video that’s got teachers’ unions scrambling. In it, she lays out the facts plain and simple: “Teachers, did you know you are not obligated to pay union dues no matter what state you live in? In 2018, the Supreme Court ruled that public employees, including teachers, cannot be required to join or pay a union as a condition of employment.”

She’s talking about the landmark Janus v. AFSCME decision, where the Supreme Court affirmed that public employees can’t be compelled to subsidize union speech they disagree with. McMahon drives the point home: “If you choose to stay, that’s your call. The point is: the choice is yours.”

If public school teachers are tired of their hard-earned money funding radical agendas, it’s time for them to opt out and take back control of their paychecks.

Teachers unions like the National Education Association (NEA) and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) aren’t prioritizing educators or their students. They’re bloated bureaucracies more interested in politics than pedagogy. Take the NEA – less than 10% of its more than $400 million annual budget actually goes toward representing teachers in the workplace.

TEACHERS UNION PRESIDENT ANGERED BY TRUMP’S EFFORT TO DISSOLVE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, CALLS IT ‘ILLEGAL’

The rest is funneled into lobbying, executive perks and ideological crusades that have nothing to do with improving classrooms. In the last election cycle, 99.9% of the AFT’s political contributions – under the leadership of President Randi Weingarten – went straight to Democrats. That reeks of money laundering for Democrats, siphoned right out of teachers’ paychecks.

These unions are partisan, and they’re also pushing extreme propaganda into schools. Teachers’ unions have been blasting out anti-ICE materials, urging educators to rally against immigration enforcement and turn classrooms into partisan battlegrounds. The NEA and its affiliates are encouraging teachers to post immigration-related political posters and attend anti-ICE trainings, all while schools should be focused on reading, writing and arithmetic – not indoctrinating kids with far-left activism.

Look at the NEA’s annual convention in Portland, Ore. Their resolutions read more like a declaration of war on the Trump administration than an education policy meeting. They labeled Trump a “fascist,” railed against his education policies and vowed to fight every step toward accountability and choice.

RANDI WEINGARTEN QUITS X OVER PLATFORM’S ‘DISINFORMATION,’ ACCUSES SITE OF SPREADING HATE

Meanwhile, NEA President Becky Pringle, who is an at-large member of the Democratic National Committee, and AFT’s Weingarten, who announced a partnership between her union and the World Economic Forum to create curriculum, are raking in about half a million dollars each year, extracted from the dues of hardworking teachers who make a fraction of that. That’s a racket.

Most teachers don’t even align with this radicalism. According to an Education Week survey, a majority identify as either Republican or independent, outnumbering Democrats. Teachers should not keep funding their political opponents. It’s time for them to stop bankrolling the very people working against their values and start keeping more of their salaries for themselves and their families.

The good news is that teachers don’t have to go it alone when they leave the union. Alternatives like the Teacher Freedom Alliance (TFA) offer free membership and personal liability insurance for educators who opt out. TFA’s coverage is superior – $2 million per occurrence, twice the union’s typical $1 million limit, and it’s in the teacher’s name, not the union’s. That means teachers are protected individually, without the union deciding whether to defend them based on its agenda.

TEACHER UNION SENDS MAP ERASING ISRAEL TO ITS MILLIONS OF MEMBERS FOR ‘INDIGENOUS PEOPLE’S DAY’

Unions claim to protect teachers, but they really shield the worst performers while penalizing the best. Uniform salary schedules and blocks on merit pay mean great teachers are dragged down by dead weight. Without the union’s monopoly, top educators could negotiate their own salaries based on performance, free from low performers holding everyone back. The system rewards seniority over excellence, and it’s time to stop shortchanging great educators.

Choice is key. But more and more teachers are choosing freedom. Just this month, Washington state teachers went viral for speaking out against their union’s overreach. Fifth-grade teacher Travis Reep accused the Washington Education Association of bullying and silencing educators who support parental rights, saying union leaders are driven by “activists” with an agenda. He added, “I’m not the only teacher that knows that parents love their kids far more than I ever could.”

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

Look at the NEA’s annual convention in Portland, Ore. Their resolutions read more like a declaration of war on the Trump administration than an education policy meeting. 

Matt Bell, who left after 29 years, revealed how teachers are banned from informing parents about their child’s gender transition or pronoun changes: “I’m forced to keep secrets from the parents.” Bell explained his decision to leave: “When I saw my union trying to go against protecting female athletes and go against parental rights, I said, ‘I’m done.'” These brave voices show the tide is turning.

And that’s not all. In Florida, two union bosses – Teresa Brady and Ruby George – were just sentenced to prison for stealing millions from hardworking educators. Brady got 27 months, George 12 months, after embezzling more than $2.4 million through fraudulent leave schemes.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

In Chicago, the Liberty Justice Center locked arms with union members to sue the Chicago Teachers Union for failing to produce required financial audits for five years in a row. Congress is now investigating, and it turns out the CTU failed at least two of those audits, with serious flaws in their financial statements.

When teachers exit en masse, it forces union bosses to refocus on education instead of activism. Teachers have the power to starve the beast by keeping their hard-earned paychecks when unions overstep. Opting out means saving money and reclaiming the profession from political hacks.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE BY COREY DEANGELIS

JILLIAN MICHAELS: Big Tech built a digital drug — and our kids are hooked

“Those who ignore history are condemned to repeat it.”

In the 1990s, America watched tobacco executives raise their right hands before Congress and swear nicotine was not addictive. We now know they were lying through their teeth. Internal documents later proved cigarettes were chemically engineered to maximize dependency and deliberately marketed to children to create “replacement smokers” for a dying customer base.

Today, we are watching the same lie unfold in real time. Only now, the product is not Marlboro. It is the algorithm.

STANFORD PSYCHIATRIST TESTIFIES IN CALIFORNIA TRIAL THAT SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS ARE DESIGNED TO BE ADDICTIVE

A new class of titans – Meta, TikTok, Snap and Google – have built digital machines designed to addict our kids. The damage is not in their lungs. It is in the wiring of their developing brains.

On Feb. 9, a landmark jury trial began in California Superior Court that could fundamentally reshape how social media is regulated. In his opening statement, attorney Mark Lanier put it plainly:

“These companies built machines designed to addict the brains of children, and they did it on purpose.”

INSTAGRAM CHIEF COMPARES ‘ADDICTIVE’ PLATFORM TO NETFLIX BINGE-WATCHING DURING TRIAL TESTIMONY: REPORT

The plaintiff, known as K.G.M., is suing Meta (Instagram) and YouTube, alleging severe mental health harm caused by social media addiction. Snap and TikTok were originally defendants but settled last month, avoiding a public trial that would have forced executives to testify and exposed internal documents.

The case is groundbreaking because it bypasses Big Tech’s usual shields, including Section 230 and First Amendment defenses, by arguing the harm comes not from user content but from defective product design: algorithms, notifications and behavioral hooks engineered to maximize “time on device.”

Just as Big Tobacco added ammonia to cigarettes to spike nicotine absorption, Big Tech engineered dopamine loops to override impulse control.

CALIFORNIA MOM SAYS CHATGPT COACHED TEEN SON ON DRUG USE BEFORE HIS FATAL OVERDOSE: REPORT

This is not speculation. It is documented.

Platforms deliberately deploy intermittent variable rewards, the same psychological mechanism that makes slot machines addictive. When a child refreshes their feed, they do not know what they will get. That uncertainty triggers dopamine, training the brain to keep pulling the lever.

Infinite scroll removes stopping cues. Autoplay erases choice. Push notifications are timed to pull users back the moment attention drifts. These are not communication tools. They are behavior modification systems.

AFTER AUSTRALIA PASSES SOCIAL MEDIA BAN LAWMAKERS PROBED ON WHY CONGRESS HASN’T DONE MORE TO PROTECT KIDS

Meta’s own employees warned internally that “Instagram is a drug.” They knew the platform worsened body image issues for one in three teen girls. But “time on device,” the metric that drives ad revenue, won anyway. Every time.

Infinite scroll removes stopping cues. Autoplay erases choice. Push notifications are timed to pull users back the moment attention drifts. These are not communication tools. They are behavior modification systems.

Some of those employees quit. Then they blew the whistle. And they brought receipts. Internal research showed 32% of teen girls who already felt bad about their bodies felt worse after using Instagram. Forty percent of teen boys experienced harmful social comparison. Even more disturbing, when young users consuming eating disorder content became more depressed, they used the app more.

Depression drove engagement. Engagement drove revenue. That is the business model. And when those findings became public, unsealed communications revealed leadership debating whether they should even continue studying teen harm because the research itself was getting them in trouble.

LAWMAKERS UNVEIL BIPARTISAN GUARD ACT AFTER PARENTS BLAME AI CHATBOTS FOR TEEN SUICIDES, VIOLENCE

They were not asking how to fix it. They were asking how to hide it.

Former Meta engineering director Arturo Béjar later confirmed what parents already feared. After his own daughter began receiving sexual solicitations on Instagram, Béjar conducted large-scale internal surveys. The results were staggering.

More than half of users reported harmful experiences. Nearly a quarter of teens received unwanted sexual advances. Only about 2% of reported harmful content was removed.

CHILDREN ARE AT RISK OF FORMING ROMANTIC BONDS WITH AI CHATBOTS, EXPERTS WARN

He warned top executives directly. Nothing improved. In fact, protections were rolled back.

Independent testing later found most of Instagram’s advertised teen safety tools were nonexistent or ineffective. Kids could still access suicide and self-harm content. Autocomplete recommended searches related to drugs and self-injury. Children under 13 accessed the platform easily despite age limits.

Parents were given a false sense of security while Meta knew harm was occurring.

BIG TECH’S TOBACCO MOMENT IS HERE — AND THE TRUTH ABOUT HARMING KIDS IS OUT

Even the U.S. surgeon general sounded the alarm in 2023, warning of profound risks to youth mental health.

And the damage does not stop at anxiety and self-harm.

Social platforms have become digital drug markets for teenagers. Snapchat and TikTok function as modern open-air exchanges, where dealers advertise pills using emojis and disappearing messages. Kids think they are buying Percocet or Xanax. Instead, they receive counterfeit pills laced with fentanyl.

HOUSE MOVES TO PROTECT CHILDREN FROM ONLINE PREDATORS AS AUSTRALIA CLAMPS DOWN ON SOCIAL MEDIA

Emergency rooms know the outcome.

So do morgues.

More than 40 states are now suing tech giants as the fallout piles up in hospitals, schools and homes across America.

WHY PARENTS MAY WANT TO DELAY SMARTPHONES FOR KIDS

This is exactly how Big Tobacco collapsed. Denial. Internal documents. Whistleblowers. Lawsuits. Then a national reckoning.

We are there now.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

While Congress dithers and courts grind forward, parents are the last line standing between their children and products designed to outsmart them. Here are four steps that the experts suggest:

1. Delay smartphones as long as possible.
2. Disable autoplay and push notifications.
3. Explain the manipulation.
4. Support litigation and legislation demanding a real duty of care.

Big Tech made a bet that it could addict our kids faster than the law could stop it. For a long time, that bet paid off. But the smoke is clearing. Now we can finally see the fire.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

It is time to stop pretending these platforms are neutral public squares. They are dangerous products and they must be treated that way, with warning labels, transparency requirements, age appropriate design and real accountability when design choices foreseeably harm children.

Big Tobacco had its reckoning. Big Tech is next.

Corporate America has decided that DEI needs to DIE

A new report from the far-left Human Rights Campaign shows a remarkable shift: a 65% drop in Fortune 500 companies publicly communicating commitments to diversity and inclusion initiatives. Just a few years ago, corporations raced to outdo one another with ever-expanding DEI pledges. Today, many are quietly stepping back.

This is not a retreat from fairness. It is a return to sanity.

For years, corporate America embraced an ideological experiment that blurred the line between equal opportunity and preferential treatment. What began as a push for broader inclusion morphed into quota-driven mandates, demographic scorecards and internal political signaling exercises that often had little to do with business performance.

Now, the legal system — and, increasingly, federal regulators — are pushing back.

INVESTIGATION OF NIKE’S DEI PRACTICES COULD HAVE MAJOR NATIONWIDE IMPACT ON HIRING, SAYS ALAN DERSHOWITZ

Consider the recent lawsuit against Starbucks, where Missouri’s attorney general alleged “systemic discrimination” in hiring and promotion practices tied to DEI goals. While a federal judge dismissed the case on procedural grounds, the filing itself signaled growing scrutiny over whether corporate diversity initiatives cross into unlawful discrimination.

Nike is currently facing a federal investigation by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission over allegations that certain DEI-related employment practices may have resulted in race-based discrimination against White employees. Whether the agency ultimately finds wrongdoing or not, the investigation underscores a new reality: DEI programs are no longer insulated from legal challenge.

And JPMorgan Chase has been sued over allegations of “systemic” race bias, including claims that the bank conducted “fake interviews” to satisfy internal diversity targets. That allegation — that a company might go through the motions of interviewing candidates solely to hit demographic benchmarks — illustrates how performative compliance can undermine both fairness and trust.

But the scrutiny does not stop at employment law.

CONSERVATIVE LEGAL GROUP TARGETS CFPB RULE MANDATING RACE, SEX DATA IN HOME LOANS

In recent weeks, the Federal Trade Commission reportedly sent letters to 42 of the largest and most profitable law firms in the United States, warning that racially discriminatory hiring practices — even if adopted under the banner of DEI — could constitute unfair or anti-competitive conduct. According to reporting, the firms were participating in a program overseen by the Diversity Lab that required at least 30% of leadership candidates to come from underrepresented groups.

That kind of industry-wide coordination raises serious questions.

First, there is the obvious Civil Rights Act concern: employment decisions cannot be made on the basis of race, period. But there is also a broader antitrust dimension. When competitors collectively adopt demographic quotas or coordinated hiring mandates, they may be engaging in collusive conduct — effectively setting industry standards through cooperation rather than competing freely for the best talent.

This theory is not new. Federal antitrust authorities have previously warned climate and ESG coalitions that there is no “ESG exception” to the antitrust laws. As former FTC Chair Lina Khan stated plainly: competitors are not permitted to coordinate with one another simply because the coordination is framed as socially beneficial. The same logic applies here. There is no DEI exception to the Sherman Antitrust Act.

For years, corporate America embraced an ideological experiment that blurred the line between equal opportunity and preferential treatment. 

The implications are enormous.

Retailers such as Nordstrom, Macy’s, Bloomingdale’s, Ulta and Sephora signed the “Fifteen Percent Pledge,” committing to reserve 15% of shelf space exclusively for Black-owned brands. More than seventy major corporations — including competitors like Nike, Levi Strauss, Ralph Lauren and American Eagle — signed the “Count Us In” pledge, coordinating around policies that include funding transgender surgeries for employees and engaging in shared lobbying efforts.

The legal question is no longer just whether these initiatives are politically popular. It is whether they create exposure under antitrust law by reducing competition or creating coordinated market standards among competitors.

Corporate America is beginning to recognize the risk.

Public companies exist to create shareholder value — not to serve as enforcement arms for shifting social movements. When executives adopted DEI mandates that required race-based hiring targets, demographic quotas, or coordinated pledges with competitors, they exposed their companies to multi-front liability: discrimination claims from employees, regulatory investigations, shareholder lawsuits and now potential antitrust scrutiny.

The 65% drop in DEI messaging suggests something important: boards and CEOs are recalibrating.

That recalibration is healthy. 

There is nothing wrong with expanding opportunity, recruiting broadly, or fostering a respectful workplace culture. But the law demands equal treatment — not equal outcomes engineered through quotas or industry collusion. When companies forget that distinction, they risk violating both civil rights statutes and competition laws designed to protect markets.

Markets function best when companies compete — for customers, for innovation, and, yes, for talent. The moment competitors coordinate around hiring mandates or collective pledges, they drift away from competition and toward centralized standard-setting. That is precisely what antitrust law exists to prevent.

The pendulum is swinging back toward merit.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

Employees want to know they were hired because of their ability. Shareholders want disciplined capital allocation. Customers want quality products at fair prices. None of those priorities require demographic quotas or public virtue declarations.

The retrenchment we are witnessing is not an attack on diversity. It is a rejection of coercion and coordination masquerading as virtue. It is a reminder that equal opportunity under the law applies to everyone — White, Black, male, female — and that industry competitors are not allowed to suspend antitrust principles simply because the goal sounds noble.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Corporate America is finally rediscovering a simple truth: treat people equally, compete vigorously, and let merit determine outcomes.

That is not only legally sound. It is economically sound. And it is long overdue.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM ANSON FRERICKS

DAVID MARCUS: Trump hits the links with a chance to bring in an ace

A rather interesting foursome teed off for a round of golf in Florida this weekend: President Donald Trump was joined by college football coaching legends Urban Meyer and Nick Saban, and perhaps more importantly, a former rival by the name of Gov. Ron DeSantis.

It would go too far to say that Trump and DeSantis have had bad blood, but there has been a rift since the Florida governor’s 2023 primary challenge to Trump, which petered out in New Hampshire before primary votes had even been cast.

To see Trump and DeSantis spending a few hours engaged in what Mark Twain once called a “good walk spoiled” leads to an interesting question: After the ace Florida governor leaves office next year, could he be a hole in one for the Trump administration?

DeSantis is the kind of guy who Trump could put in charge of basically anything in the federal government and fully expect not just his signature competence, but his calm and no-nonsense manner.

YOUNGKIN BACKS JD VANCE FOR 2028, CALLS VICE PRESIDENT A ‘GREAT’ GOP NOMINEE

In recent weeks, calm is something the administration has been thirsting for.

After DeSantis dropped out in early 2024, the schism in the conservative commentariat more or less was cleaved, notwithstanding some fairly bitter vitriol that had consumed the previous year, and the governor can still be an important buttress to GOP unity.

There has been a frustration, especially from former DeSantis supporters, of late, that the White House has been too tolerant of extreme views from figures in its orbit. The best answer to that is not to cancel supposed cancers but to bolster the administration’s credibility.

TRUMP HAILS RUBIO AS DIPLOMATIC MENTOR AS SECRETARY OF STATE’S POWER GROWS

I don’t know what DeSantis’s middle name is, but I would not be surprised to find that it is “crediblity.” With the possible exception of Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, no leader in America, maybe the world, handled COVID better.

The knock on DeSantis is that, credible though he may be, he’s not particularly compelling. He does not, in the parlance of entertainment, chew up the scenery. I remember spending much of the spring of 2023 thinking, as he geared up for the presidential run, “Less talking, more throwing the baseball around.”

But, to be frank, the Trump administration has a sufficient current supply of colorful characters. It needs more competence, more Lee Zeldins and Scott Bessents.

DAVID MARCUS: WHAT JD VANCE TOLD ME ABOUT 2028, RUBIO AND THE FUTURE OF MAGA

In a column for the Washington Examiner this week, Byron York asked whether it is time for Trump to shake up his Cabinet. Wherever one stands on that interesting political question, you do have to ask, who could the Senate confirm as a new member?

Let’s say Attorney General Pam Bondi, or Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who have been lightning rods for criticism, leave their positions. I’m not advocating for that, but should it happen, DeSantis is one of a few prominent Republicans who could sail through Senate confirmation.

The subtext to all of this, including the round of golf that I’m just going to go ahead and assume Trump won, is the 2028 presidential election, in which DeSantis is one of only a handful of figures who rate among the public.

RUBIO DOWNPLAYS 2028 TALK, TOUTS VANCE AS TRUMP’S SUCCESSOR

The polls, early though they are, show Vice President JD Vance with a big lead, especially given that Secretary of State Marco Rubio has all but endorsed him. But for now, DeSantis is the most viable GOP option who is not already in the administration or related to Trump.

While politically this may be a reason for the Florida governor to eschew an administration position, to remain the Republican who isn’t seen in the Oval Office day after day fawning over Trump, a national position could be great for him, and for the party.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

And honestly, where is DeSantis supposed to go after leaving office, if not Washington?

Whether the 19th hole of this golf outing with Trump and football royalty turns out to be a position in the administration or not, Republicans should rejoice to see these two conservative leaders hanging out.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Unity must be the watchword for Republicans both in this year’s midterms and in the presidential race of 2028. In both cases, DeSantis can be a voice for common sense, competence and American values.

America needs all the good leadership it can get in Washington, and DeSantis is the poster child for it. Trump should seriously consider giving him a prominent national platform.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM DAVID MARCUS

DANIEL HOFFMAN: What my family learned from a 12-year-old about inner strength

On a Saturday afternoon earlier this month, I had the privilege of spending quality time with my friend and Fox News colleague John Roberts in the most unlikely of places: the basketball court at the Onelife Fitness in Tysons Corner, Virginia. That’s where staff from the Jessie Rees Foundation led a group of about 100 volunteers who stuffed 3,000 Joy Jars to support kids in the fight for their lives against pediatric cancer.

That’s the same number of Joy Jars Jessie Rees distributed to children stricken with cancer before she passed away at age 12 from terminal brain cancer. Empathetically thinking of other children like her, Jessie knew how to build a young patient’s resilience with a Joy Jar filled with gifts, toys and — because so many children lose their hair during treatment — hats. The Jessie Rees Foundation honors her legacy by holding Mobile Joy Jar events across the country and distributing hundreds of thousands of Joy Jars to children around the world.

Jessie’s motto was “Never Ever Give Up” (NEGU).

MY LATE WIFE KIM TAUGHT ME HOW TO HONOR OUR LOVED ONES BY FOCUSING ON SOMETHING THAT WILL OUTLAST US

My sons and I have supported the Jessie Rees Foundation since my wife, Kim, passed away from cancer almost five years ago. We will always be grateful to Jessie for showing us the path to philanthropy, which has helped soothe our broken hearts. We are also deeply thankful to the generous corporate sponsors who make this mission possible.

We understood that this day mattered more than most to kids fighting cancer. We bonded over connecting with something larger than ourselves. And we learned a profound lesson from Jessie: The joy flows in both directions — from the child who opens the Joy Jar right back to the person who stuffed it.

John Roberts is a busy man. He brought along his wife and two children, who no doubt had plenty of other things they could have been doing that day but chose instead to join our mission. As did my dear friend and former CIA colleague Alan, whom I’ve known for almost 40 years; my son Nathan’s soccer teammates and their parents; Leo, a high school senior basketball star who underwent 60 chemotherapy treatments for a benign but invasive desmoid tumor in his back; and so many other family members and friends.

Nathan’s elementary school teacher, herself undergoing treatment for cancer while raising two young children, stuffed Joy Jars for the entire three-hour morning shift, as did a mom whose son had received a Joy Jar years ago when he was fighting pediatric cancer.

HE LOST HIS DAUGHTER TO CHILDHOOD CANCER. BUT HIS LOVE AND HER LEGACY ARE STRONGER THAN EVER

A U.S. Army officer who happened to be working out in our gym — and demonstrated the sort of situational awareness one would expect from a member of the armed services — spotted our group and immediately volunteered. He stuffed Joy Jars all day. Married with three children of his own, he took the time to thank Nathan for his public service and gave him an Army challenge coin.

When I met Erik Rees before our first Mobile Joy Jar event back in 2022, we shared a heartfelt moment over losing our loved ones to cancer. “I miss my daughter every day,” Erik told me, “but she’d be super proud.”

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

Jessie would indeed have been proud of us, as would my Kim, who told our children before she passed away that she would be their guardian angel, watching over them.

Jessie Rees brings out the best in us.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

That Saturday, we had a common purpose. We understood that this day mattered more than most to kids fighting cancer. We bonded over connecting with something larger than ourselves. And we learned a profound lesson from Jessie: The joy flows in both directions — from the child who opens the Joy Jar right back to the person who stuffed it.

It’s always a great day when I get a call from an “America Reports” producer that I’ll have the honor of sharing the big screen with John Roberts and his esteemed co-anchor, Sandra Smith. But on this day, it felt right to take time away from analyzing the national security challenges of the day to appreciate and embrace our shared humanity.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM DANIEL HOFFMAN

Wall Street could seize your retirement savings in the next financial crash — and it’s perfectly legal

Recessions and stock market crashes are inevitable in a market-based economy, but few Americans realize that their investments face risks far greater than falling stock prices.

Because of largely unknown legal changes, millions of Americans could temporarily or even permanently lose their retirement and other investment savings in the next major financial crash, all while too-big-to-fail Wall Street firms and banks are protected.

That might sound like a wild conspiracy theory, but the danger is real and well documented.

How Wall Street centralized ownership of your investments

STEPHEN MOORE: FROM DOW 800 TO 50,000–REAGAN, TRUMP AND THE SUPPLY-SIDE MIRACLE

Beginning in the 1970s, at the request of powerful Wall Street and banking institutions, state lawmakers quietly adopted a series of changes to the Uniform Commercial Code, a body of law enacted in all 50 states. These changes effectively allowed financial institutions to reassign direct ownership of most securities away from individual investors, including those holding retirement accounts and traditional brokerage accounts.

Under the revised legal framework, direct ownership of securities such as stocks and bonds was centralized within a single financial institution controlled by Wall Street’s largest firms and banks: the Depository Trust Company, or DTC.

Today, DTC “provides custody and asset servicing for 1.44 million security issues from more than 170 countries and territories valued at more than US $100 trillion as of 2025.” To put that figure in perspective, the entire federal budget is roughly $7 trillion.

In January, I released a new book, “The Next Big Crash: Conspiracy, Collapse, and the Men Behind History’s Biggest Heist,” to explain how this legal framework was constructed, why it poses grave risks to consumers today, and to uncover the remarkable conspiracy behind DTC’s creation. The book is the culmination of years of research, and the evidence it presents is nothing short of stunning.

Why this system exists and what it replaced

The Depository Trust Company sits at the center of the modern securities ownership model. Major banks and broker-dealers, with the help of a mysterious figure with a long history of working for and alongside the CIA, created DTC in the early 1970s with the stated goal of alleviating Wall Street’s growing paperwork crisis.

CAROL ROTH: THE MONEY IN YOUR ‘SAFE’ SAVINGS ACCOUNT COULD VANISH OVERNIGHT

At the time, buying and selling securities was a slow, paperwork-heavy process. By centralizing registered ownership of securities in a single institution, transfers could be executed simply by changing records, which today occurs electronically. What once took several days could be completed almost instantly. 

Lawmakers were told this shift was a technical modernization designed to improve efficiency and reduce risk. In many respects, it did exactly that. The cost and time required to do business on Wall Street dropped dramatically after DTC’s creation. But these gains came at a steep price. Centuries of property law were effectively discarded. Traditional securities ownership, grounded in clear title and constitutional protections, was replaced.

Who benefits and who bears the risk?

Under the current DTC model, most investors no longer directly own their securities. Instead, they hold what the law refers to as a “security entitlement.” This arrangement is contractual in nature. It grants certain rights and protections, but it does not confer direct registered ownership. When you buy stock in a company, you do not actually acquire the stock itself. You get a set of investment rights tied to that stock.

NICKI MINAJ TO DONATE THOUSANDS TO TRUMP ACCOUNTS PROGRAM

This system raises serious ethical concerns. It delivers enormous benefits to the most powerful financial institutions while weakening the ownership rights of ordinary investors.

Centralized ownership allows securities transactions to be processed at extraordinary speed, fueling ever-increasing activity and on Wall Street. That activity generates massive fee revenue for large institutions.

In recent years, institutions have also reaped enormous profits from riskier practices such as stock lending and derivatives trading. These activities could not have occurred at anything close to their current scale under the stronger ownership framework that existed prior to DTC’s creation. Centralized ownership made them possible.

Worse still, Wall Street and lawmakers did not stop there. In the 1990s, they leveraged centralized ownership to implement further changes to regulatory and legal codes designed to protect large financial institutions during systemic crises.

Under Article 8 of the Uniform Commercial Code, if a brokerage firm collapses during a financial crisis, secured creditors, including banks, may seize securities used as collateral in lending arrangements with broker-dealers. This can include customer securities, such as stocks and bonds, if they were pledged as collateral for those loans. 

As a result, during the next major crash, investors could lose their entire portfolios if their broker-dealer pledged customer assets to obtain financing.

Current regulations generally prohibit investment firms from using most customer securities as collateral, other than for margin accounts. However, Article 8 permits secured creditors to seize customer assets pledged as collateral if a firm cannot pay its debts, even if the securities were improperly pledged.

Moreover, as I document in the book, existing emergency powers laws could be invoked during a crisis to alter or suspend rules meant to protect customers. Lawmakers could also enact new legislation that weakens current consumer safeguards.

A problem that can still be fixed

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

The good news is that this problem is not irreversible.

Because the Uniform Commercial Code is state law, state legislatures have the authority to restore investor priority. A small number of lawmakers across the country have begun to recognize the danger and push back, but sustained public pressure will be required to achieve meaningful reform.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The next financial crash could arrive sooner or later, and its precise trigger is impossible to predict. What is predictable is the legal structure waiting on the other side. Unless Americans demand change now, many could discover too late that many of the rules governing their retirement savings were not designed to protect them.

SEN McCORMICK: Secretary Rubio sets the course for NATO’s future. Will Europe listen?

Europe stands at a crossroads. To save itself and our cherished Transatlantic alliance, it must not only change policy but also recommit itself to the common inheritance of Western civilization.

That was the message Secretary of State Marco Rubio delivered this weekend at the Munich Security Conference in a defining foreign policy speech of our time. 

At an affair best known for platitudes and navel-gazing, he diagnosed the roots of Europe’s decline and provided a clear vision for how America and its European allies can unite, again, to preserve the most important alliance in human history. It could not have come at a better time.

Formed in the shadow of the Iron Curtain, the NATO alliance has underpinned American, European and even global security for decades. It held back the march of Communism. It brought peace to a continent reeling from centuries of brutal warfare. It reunified Europe.

NATO CHIEF PRAISES TRUMP AT DAVOS, SAYS HE FORCED EUROPE TO ‘STEP UP’ ON DEFENSE

It is an alliance bonded by sacrifice and history. Like generations of American soldiers before and since, I fought alongside our NATO allies in the 82nd Airborne, crossing into Iraq with a French unit at the outset of the first Gulf War. And when America was attacked on 9/11, our NATO allies answered our call. They spilled blood in the mountains of Afghanistan and streets of Iraq alongside our young men and women in uniform.

That bond remains, but, Secretary Rubio warned, it has grown weaker as our allies have pursued policies of managed decline. They have crippled their productive capacity with so-called “green energy” policies, allowed deindustrialization to neuter their defense capabilities and neglected the very fabric of their own societies through mass, uncontrolled immigration. They have failed to live up to their end of the bargain in the alliance, and the marriage between the United States and Europe now needs fixing.

However, the roots of decline run deeper than policy choices, to the very soul of Western society. Secretary Rubio sees this truth, and that’s why all Americans should hear his speech.

The remarks remind us what leaders in the United States and throughout Europe are tasked with defending: a sacred inheritance from the forebears of Western civilization, the civilization that gave us Beethoven, established the rule of law, built the Sistine Chapel, sustained a rich philosophical tradition and took us to the moon — but which now faces grave and existential threats.

RUBIO STEPS INTO MUNICH SPOTLIGHT AS TRUMP LEANS ON HIM TO CARRY VANCE’S POPULIST MESSAGE ABROAD

It is this shared bond of history and cultural inheritance — alongside the cold realities of geopolitics — that holds our nations together. Not vague abstractions, impotent international organizations, or even transatlantic trade.

Our European allies have forgotten this fact. Too often, they have traded national interest and hard power for vague and moralistic appeals to international institutions and a bloated welfare state. The Trump administration, as articulated in Secretary Rubio’s speech, has rejected that failed status quo and championed an honest, hard-nosed view of foreign policy designed to promote our national interests.

Under President Donald Trump, this administration put that policy to action. It has reasserted American sovereignty and our nation’s exceptional role as a leader on the world stage. American leadership, not the United Nations or any other international body, has brought peace to the Middle East, toppled Iran’s nuclear program and ended the reign of a narco-terrorist dictator.

This isn’t a divorce from Europe, retreat from the world stage or an abdication of America’s role as a world leader. Nor is it the misguided doctrine of internationalists who were eager to spend blood and treasure to export ideology to far-off lands. It’s a sober understanding of the realities of power and what it takes to secure the United States and Europe as we face a changing world together.

Secretary Rubio’s speech marks a defining moment for the U.S.-led global order. Just as crucially, it serves as a powerful call for the champions of the West to defend a shared civilization with a beautiful past — and a future that must be met by an alliance built on this deep and enduring bond.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

I trust many in Europe will heed the call. On a recent visit to Norway, Finland, Estonia and Denmark with several of my U.S. Senate colleagues, we met with leaders laser-focused on rebuilding their hard power, deterring the Russian bear on their borders and restoring the heart and soul of the NATO alliance. Many of those I spoke to understood what is at stake. They had learned the hard lessons of the War in Ukraine and Europe’s inept response.

I hope those voices will trumpet Secretary Rubio and be “unapologetic in our heritage and proud of this common inheritance.”

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM SEN. DAVID McCMORICK

DAVID MARCUS: Democrats’ Munich meltdown exposes left’s intellectual void

When I was growing up in the 1980s, there was a galaxy of left-wing, even socialist, intellectual stars such as Noam Chomsky, Michel Foucault and Gore Vidal whose works were like an inkwell that politicians and commentators could draw from. Judging from the Munich Security Conference this weekend, that inkwell has run dry.

Take this gem of a comment on global order from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, queen of the democratic socialists: “What we are seeking is a return to a rules-based order that eliminates the hypocrisies around when too often in the West we look the other way for inconvenient populations, to act out these paradoxes.”

Allow me to translate this into English: “The West is bad and mistreats the marginalized rest of the world.”

The use of 25-cent words and highfalutin sentence structure cannot hide the banality of what AOC is saying. Not even the assuring allure of assonance would help, given the asinine simplicity of her word salad.

SOCIALIST WINS PILE UP AFTER GOP’S BRUTAL 2025 OFF-YEAR ELECTION LOSSES

Not to be outdone, Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, after apologizing for being less well-versed in foreign policy than AOC, offered this take on the war in Ukraine: “Ukraine’s independence, keeping their land mass, I mean, um, the support of all the allies, I think is the goal, from my vantage point.”

There is just nothing here but empty words that paint a picture of the facile progressive worldview, completely divorced, not only from reality on the ground, but from any sound intellectual framework whatsoever.

The American right has a core of intellectuals, from Christopher Rufo to Victor Davis Hanson to Mark Dubowitz and on and on, who can be referred to or drawn on in policy debates both foreign and domestic.

MARK PENN: DEMOCRATS WIN THE MOMENT, BUT LEFT-WING TILT THREATENS THEIR FUTURE

In fact, about a decade ago we had the Intellectual Dark Web phenomenon with figures like Jordan Peterson and Bari Weiss, who are broadly seen, if not as conservative, as right-leaning. Who are their counterparts on the far left?

Who is the contemporary socialist intellectual who AOC could have referenced to support her claim that what is needed is massive global redistribution of wealth? 

I would posit that outside of the very narrow corridors of race and gender, such far-left public intellectuals no longer exist and for two very important reasons.

EVILS OF COLLECTIVISM ARE JUST WARMING UP. ‘RUGGED INDIVIDUALISM’ BETTER BE READY

The most obvious cause for the current dearth of popular far-left, socialist intellectuals is the collapse of the Soviet Union in the late 1980s. At least for the next two decades, the game was up, the experiment had failed and nobody wanted to be called a socialist.

The second reason is what took the place of outright socialism, which was cultural Marxism, specifically in the form of critical race theory. 

In their brilliant 2013 Harvard Education Review study, “McIntosh as Synecdoche: How Teacher Education’s Focus on White Privilege Undermines Antiracism,” the Midwestern Whiteness Collective, a left-wing group of teachers, argued that centering race and identity in everything was stifling intellectual discourse.

WHEN TRUMP MEETS MAMDANI: FIVE CAPITALIST MESSAGES THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST SHOULD HEAR

This was clearly true because the shibboleths of race and identity, what was allowed and not allowed to be expressed, went completely unchallenged. In fact, challenging them was punished.

So, once race and identity became a part of everything, then nothing could be legitimately questioned. It was equity, not equality, over everything else.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

We saw this in practice this month at Sarah Lawrence College, where non-socialist liberal intellectual Ezra Klein was shouted down during a discussion about Israel. The position of the protesters was not that Klein should be disagreed with but that he should be silenced, that his ideas are too dangerous to utter.

Why do AOC and Whitmer sound like babbling idiots when they seek to defend their positions against even the slightest criticism? Because they have never had to. In all the rooms and meetings they’ve experienced, their nonsense is greeted with grins and finger snaps of approval.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The danger here is of the highest order because we may be electing socialists who literally do not know how to make things work. Zany Zohran Mamdani has been mayor of New York City for just over a month. He couldn’t handle the snow, he can’t remove the trash and people are freezing to death on the streets.

The sad bottom line is that the American left, which has taken over the Democratic Party, has no true intellectual underpinnings. Like Seinfeld, it is ultimately a political ideology about nothing and the clearest danger to American values that exists today.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM DAVID MARCUS

San Francisco residents band together to shut down reparations fund, claiming it’s ‘dividing’ the city

Richie Greenberg, one of the plaintiffs suing San Francisco over its reparations fund, claimed the measure is divisive because it solely favors Black residents.

“It is dividing the city rather than trying to unite. So, what we really need is to be focusing on how to uplift everybody rather than focusing on one group giving everything to that one group. And then everyone else is then responsible for paying for that one group,” Greenberg told Fox News Digital. 

Greenberg formerly identified as a Republican and currently identifies as a centrist-conservative Democrat.

The city was sued over its reparations fund on grounds its taxpayer money is being “unlawfully” used for a policy that allegedly violates the equal protection clause.

WATCHDOG GROUP SUES ILLINOIS CITY’S REPARATIONS PROGRAM OVER GIVING MONEY BASED ON RACE

According to the Pacific Legal Foundation, several San Francisco residents and Californians for Equal Rights Foundation sued San Francisco Thursday, challenging an ordinance that establishes a fund for Black residents. 

The lawsuit alleges that the ordinance is discriminating on the basis of race because it allows taxpayer money to be funneled into the fund. The plaintiffs said a win would protect taxpayers from supporting a government-based racially motivated program and establish boundaries for other cities implementing similar policies.

“Acknowledging past injustice does not give the government license to spend public resources on programs that sort people by race and ancestry today,” said Andrew Quinio, an attorney with the Pacific Legal Foundation. 

“The Constitution requires the city to address proven harm directly, not through sweeping racial and ancestral classifications. This lawsuit is about ensuring that all Americans are treated as individuals under the law and not forced to subsidize government policies that collectively bind them to history that they did not experience or inflict.”

Greenberg led the effort in shutting down the fund when he heard buzz about the fund being revived after it was initially put aside for some time. He ended up creating a website, rejecttheplan.com, calling for residents to band together to stop the approval of the plan. 

However, their efforts were futile.

“The reality is that much of the media — both local, state and federal, national media outlets — did not pay much attention to this. They didn’t think that it would actually go through,” Greenberg said.

“It was being pushed through regardless of its legality, so I went ahead, and I set up a website.”

San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie signed a measure to create the fund. 

ILLINOIS CITY HANDS OUT $25K CASH PAYMENTS TO 44 BLACK RESIDENTS THROUGH REPARATIONS PROGRAM

The ordinance, passed by the Board of Supervisors in December, was signed by Lurie two days before Christmas. It establishes the legal framework for the fund but does not allocate funds or guarantee payments. The fund can be financed with private donations, foundations and other non-city sources. Any taxpayer-funded reparations payouts would require separate legislation, an identified funding source and mayoral approval. 

Lurie told Fox News Digital in December that no taxpayer money would be paid into the potential pot, citing the city’s $1 billion budget deficit. 

“I was elected to drive San Francisco’s recovery, and that’s what I’m focused on every day,” Lurie said in a statement to Fox News Digital. “We are not allocating money to this fund. With a historic $1 billion budget deficit, we are going to spend our money on making the city safer and cleaner.”

NO CLEAR CHAMPION OF CASH PAYMENT REPARATIONS AMONG DEMOCRATS IN CALIFORNIA GUBERNATORIAL RACE

The plaintiffs allege a “misuse of government power” because the city’s Human Rights Commission administers the program.

According to the complaint, “By directing an agency funded almost entirely by taxpayer dollars to administer funding solely dedicated to implement race-exclusive benefits, the city is using public money, public employees, and public authority to carry out an unconstitutional racial spoils system that allocates benefits and opportunities based on race and ancestry.”

“Taxpayer funds cannot be used to manage the assets of an unlawful program,” Quinio said in a statement to Courthouse News.

“We need to stop this because it is a tremendous, tremendous amount of funding that would, eventually, basically kill the city. It would destroy the city of San Francisco, and it would set up an unworkable situation of who within the city gets preference as opposed to everyone else that would not,” Greenberg said.

Fox News Digital reached out to the mayor’s office, the reparations committee and the city attorney for comment but did not immediately hear back. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

As America turns 250, Trump should restore Washington, DC’s original borders

Virginia Democrats just proposed an electoral map that would potentially give Democrats 10 of the state’s 11 representatives in the House. In a state that voted 46% for Trump, it is outlandish to only give Republican voters roughly 9% of the state’s representation. Virginia should be careful though. 

The only reason it has that much representation is because of its racist past. Perhaps President Trump should rectify that historical wrong with a long overdue fix.

You see, 179 years ago, Arlington, once part of the District of Columbia, was given to Virginia for the express purpose of continuing slavery in Northern Virginia. 

Now, Arlington, once part of the District of Columbia, is home to nearly 200,000 Virginians, a great many of whom are D.C. bureaucrats who now enjoy the benefits of living in the states while also exerting disproportionate influence over the federal government. They receive essentially double representation. 

VIRGINIA JUDGE VOIDS REDISTRICTING PUSH, RULES LAWMAKERS OVERSTEPPED AUTHORITY

If Arlington residents want to influence Washington, they should be in Washington, just as the founders intended.

Some history: In 1790, the District of Columbia was created. Its location was seated directly in between Maryland and Virginia, with both states ceding 5 miles of their land. 

But in 1847, after the District pressed for abolition of slavery, Alexandria, now Arlington County, was officially retroceded after President James K. Polk issued a proclamation and the Virginia legislature accepted.

Like the Civil War that followed, while there were financial, strategic and voting interests at stake at the time, it is hard to argue that slavery was not the primary motivator. Virginians were afraid that “slaves” would simply walk across the boundary into the District and become free. 

With the physical barrier of the Potomac River parting Virginia from the District, slaves would be unable to gain their freedom. And, indeed, as a result of retrocession, slavery expanded in Virginia even after the District abolished it.

The Supreme Court never weighed in on whether this maneuver was constitutional. It did acknowledge the transfer but in a tax dispute. 

The D.C. Circuit issued a ruling that presumed constitutionality, but in an estate case.

As a result, legitimate constitutional questions have been left to linger for 179 years. The contract clause of Article I of the Constitution states, “No state shall enter into any … law impairing the obligation of Contracts.” 

In Virginia’s agreement with the United States, it “forever ceded and relinquished … in full and absolute right and exclusive jurisdiction ….” The land was given for the “permanent seat” of government. If the agreement was “permanent” and “forever,” how then could a state initiate a law that impairs that contractual agreement?

There are additional constitutional concerns. Numerous agencies are housed in Arlington County. Yet, Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution describes the “seat of government” as a tract of land that had been “by cession of particular states.” In other words, the Constitution contemplated the seat of government to be independent of any state.

BATTLE FOR THE HOUSE RUNS THROUGH VIRGINIA AS COURT OKS HIGH-STAKES REDISTRICTING VOTE

This makes sense. By placing a substantial portion of the federal government in a single state, that state, by logical extension, gains more power than the rest. That is precisely why separate land was so important to the founders. Everything was about balance and separating power and influence.

An attempt to restore the District would not be unique to President Trump. Subsequent presidents, like Abraham Lincoln, called for undoing retrocession. President William Taft, who said it was not even constitutional, called for restoring the land back to the District. 

An article at the time noted that the entire effort for retrocession was “to prevent fugitive slaves escaping from Virginia.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

In a time of efforts to undo historical injustices around race, it is hard to understand how this has not been revisited, but not for racist motives. The land would have remained a part of the District “permanently” and “forever,” just as both the states and President George Washington intended. 

Thus, practically, legally and from a historical injustice perspective, it makes sense that “recession” (i.e. restoring the original cession) be revisited.

President Trump should consider issuing an executive order directing the DOJ (or other agencies) to explore the constitutionality of the 1847 retrocession and, potentially, actions that could be taken to restore the District to its original intended boundaries and purposes. 

As we prepare to celebrate America’s 250th birthday, it would be a fitting moment for him to return Arlington residents to their constitutionally-approved residence. Virginians could also sleep better knowing they had righted a centuries’ old wrong.

No date? No worries; why friends are the real Valentine’s lifesaver

My friend recently told me that her favorite Valentine’s Day was a few decades ago in second grade, when her playground crush called to say he loved her. 

“It’s been all downhill from there,” she joked.

Another friend said her most cherished memory was when her fifth-grade love interest bought her a bracelet. “And nothing positive since,” she told us, in jest, during the same conversation.

While Valentine’s Day can be a meaningful reminder to celebrate a cherished romantic relationship — even after elementary school — it can also be fraught with dread, obligation and the letdown of unrealistic expectations.

FEELING LONELY? SIMPLE 5-3-1 RULE COULD HELP YOU MAKE MORE CONNECTIONS

A male friend once told me he refuses to celebrate Valentine’s Day because he resents being told by a calendar when to be thoughtful. Instead, he programs his phone to remind him to buy his wife flowers every 45 days. He admits the irony without hesitation but insists it’s different because his wife doesn’t know about the alerts and is genuinely surprised every time.

He might be onto something. If his wife is genuinely surprised — and actually enjoys flowers — research suggests the unexpected treat triggers a stronger dopamine response. Husbands and boyfriends, however, are often stuck navigating the delicate balance between the joy of surprise and the risk of disappointment when flowers or gifts are expected and fail to appear.

On the other hand, people not in romantic relationships might dread the heart and candy day, when grocery store aisles are overrun with pink and red chaos because it’s a not-so-subtle reminder of their singleness — and, for some, a pang of loneliness.

But there’s hope. Celebrating Valentine’s Day — or any festive occasion — with good friends can boost your well-being and even increase your longevity. In an article last month, oncologist and former Obama White House Special Advisor for Health Policy Ezekiel Emanuel argued that the key to living longer is close friendships. Citing the Health and Retirement Study, he noted that people with the most close friends — an average of 7.8 — had a 17% lower risk of depression and a 24% lower risk of death than those with fewer close friends, who averaged just 1.6.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

When I was in high school, my father told me I’d be lucky to have five real friends over the course of my lifetime. I thought he was completely out of his mind and assured him I had dozens. Now it turns out he wasn’t pessimistic. He was practically doing longevity math. Five may be fewer than 7.8, but it’s close enough to feel medically reassuring.

One of my favorite memories is celebrating Valentine’s Day with close college friends a few years before I married. We went to dinner, where we very publicly unwrapped unexpected — and absolutely humiliating — gifts from my friend, who would later become my maid of honor. Then we danced like fools until the club kicked us out. By the time we returned home, my sides hurt from laughing so hard I thought I might cry. I’d like to think we can bank that kind of happiness and draw on it during life’s duller phases.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

I can’t imagine my husband, father or brother ditching their, ahem, better halves to grab dinner and go dancing with their buddies on Valentine’s Day. Still, the freezing, midwinter Hallmark holiday offers a perfect excuse to pick up the phone and tell friends how much they matter.

Maybe that’s the real gift Valentine’s Day has to offer — not roses on demand or perfectly timed romance, but a reminder to notice the people who show up again and again, the friends who make us laugh until our sides hurt, who know our embarrassing stories and who stick around long after the candy is gone. 

Romantic love can come with pressure and high expectations, but friendship — including the kind we share with our spouses — has a way of surprising us quietly, reliably and over a lifetime.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM STEPHANIE LUNDQUIST-ARORA

Welcome to the dating recession: Why young Americans are giving up on love

Remember “Netflix and chill?” About 10 years ago, the slang emerged like a Gen Z mating call: “Wanna come over and … hang out?”

Maybe it wasn’t the most elegant dating scene, but at least it was a dating scene. According to new study from the Wheatley Institute and the Institute for Family Studies, today’s young adults are in a “dating recession” — 2026 is all Netflix and no chill.

Our 2026 “State of our Unions” report, which surveyed 5,275 single adults between the ages of 22 and 35, found that only one in three of eligible young adults are actively dating. Nearly three quarters of women (74%) and two-thirds of men (64%) had not a single date, or dated only a few times, in the last year.

So, what’s throwing cold water on what’s supposed to be the most sexually charged phase of adult life?

FOX NEWS POLL: BEYOND RED VS. BLUE, FINDING ME + YOU ACROSS THE POLITICAL DIVIDE

One of the most significant barriers to dating is an epidemic loss of self-confidence among young adults. Only about one in three said they felt comfortable approaching someone they were interested in, and less than 40% said they felt confident in their ability to talk about their feelings with a dating partner. 

That’s not altogether alarming — vulnerability with a new person is always uncomfortable. Dating has always been a high-risk, high-reward game. What’s more alarming than that fear of intimacy is our finding that only 36% of young adults say they’re confident they can read social cues on dates. They don’t know how to be with someone else.

This hints at a bigger cause: kids aren’t just avoiding dates, they aren’t socializing at all. Last year, the Institute for Family Studies found that the average time young adults spent in person with friends in a given week has fallen by 50% since 2010. Other research has found that American adults are spending more time alone today — even post-pandemic — than ever before.

American teens spend an average of nearly four hours a day on social media and even longer on their smartphones generally. Is it any wonder that kids buried in a virtual world don’t know how to make eye contact or read body language? You can’t learn to read social cues unless you try reading social cues. Maybe Netflix actually killed the chill. 

KRISTIN CAVALLARI’S STRICT 6-MONTH DATING RULE SHE FOLLOWS AFTER PAST RELATIONSHIP MISTAKES

Social psychologist Jonathan Haidt believes so much smartphone use also arrests development of resilience. Young people who don’t take risks don’t learn how to weather failure. Our research found another significant reason (48%) that young people aren’t asking each other out is their fear of repeating a painful past dating experience.

Still, the ‘dating recession’ is not for lack of desire. Despite their loner tendencies, 86% of our survey respondents said they hope to get married one day. 

That, at least, is encouraging: our research also suggests married adults, particularly married parents, consistently report the highest levels of personal well-being and happiness. Recent research found married mothers and fathers 18 to 55 are almost twice as likely to be “very happy” with their lives, compared to their single and childless peers. 

CANDACE CAMERON BURE SAYS ‘MEN ARE SCARED TO TALK TO WOMEN’ IN TODAY’S DATING WORLD

Unfortunately, if today’s trends continue, at least one in three adults who are in their twenties today will never marry. That means fewer people will have children, too. A dating recession will make those numbers even bleaker.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

One of the most significant barriers to dating is an epidemic loss of self-confidence among young adults. 

That means more young adults risk the fate of Elizabeth, a charming and ambitious young lawyer living in Texas. Elizabeth says she’s always desired marriage, but didn’t prioritize dating in her college years. “I thought, let’s wait until I’m established, and have gotten through my education and I’m settled somewhere long-term for my career before I really look for someone,” she said.

Fast-forward to Elizabeth’s graduation from law school, when she finally came up for air and found that marriage seemed farther away than ever. “Having not been in any serious relationship before, I didn’t really know how to do it,” she said.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

By pop-culture standards, Elizabeth did everything right: she worked hard, built an impressive career, and didn’t get ‘tied down’ too early. But visiting her sister recently, who took the opposite path — got married young, and had just had her third baby — Elizabeth said she was gutted to realize she’d have given “every dollar in [her] bank account” to have her sisters’ life.  

This Valentine’s Day, young adults who desire a relationship should embrace the risk. They might not feel particularly confident, but there’s good news: according to our research, neither does anyone else. That’s ok. Love is messy. But it’s what makes life worthwhile. 

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM BRAD WILCOX

BROADCAST BIAS: ‘The View’ isn’t news — it’s Democratic talking points on repeat

Too often, watching the ladies on ABC’s “The View” is like finding the five more partisan Democrat accounts on Instagram or X. You’ll get every Democratic National Committee talking point, with an emphasis on how the left is amazing and the right will end democracy as we know it.

This week, “The View” crew repeatedly gushed over the allegedly marvelous Super Bowl halftime show of Puerto Rican rapper Bad Bunny, because he hates President Donald Trump and ICE. The fact that it was almost entirely in Spanish (except for a Lady Gaga interlude) was a point of pride and proved that Americans are backward people. “This country seems to be one of the only countries in the world that is so proud of being monolingual and not being able to communicate in more than one language,” Co-host Sunny Hostin complained. “And, the fact of the matter is, in about 20 years, multi-ethnic people will be the majority in this country! So, if you don’t understand Spanish, maybe start taking a little Duolingo course!”

Co-host Joy Behar added disdain to the Bad Bunny critics: “These are not exactly the same people that go to the opera where they speak Italian and French. But let’s not go there. The country, in my opinion, has a misplaced set of values.”

Try to imagine Behar feeling morally superior as she goes to the Metropolitan Opera in New York to see the new woke version of Bizet’s “Carmen,” where the setting is MAGA – “an industrial American town” in flyover country – and the villains are ICE agents. Then it doesn’t matter if it’s in French.

JIMMY KIMMEL CALLS OUT LIBERALS FOR NOT ACTUALLY BEING FANS OF BAD BUNNY DESPITE HAILING HALFTIME SHOW

The only hope in the coming weeks is that Alyssa Farah Griffin’s maternity leave results in a little more conservative dissent on this remarkably one-sided program. Already, fans of the show are up in arms that Elisabeth Hasselbeck is going to pop in, as if she was unacceptably ultraconservative in her decade on the show. It’s easier for the liberals to feel smart when nobody calls them out for sounding stupid.

On Thursday, after Attorney General Pam Bondi testified before Congress, Hostin accused Bondi of ruining the Department of Justice, which had supposedly never been a partisan agency under Democrat Presidents Bill Clinton or Barack Obama or Joe Biden. “The Justice Department is in shambles. So, the people of the United States have that person who is deeply unqualified, who is deeply unserious as their protection, as the person that is the chief law enforcement officer of the United States of America! I am so disgusted! I am so saddened by what is the destruction of one of the biggest and strongest institutions in our country!” Nobody pushes back on these speeches.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

Then Behar typically came unglued: “By the way, you know, just a little history, during the Watergate scandal President Nixon did not go to jail but John Mitchell did. John Mitchell was his attorney general. So, at the end of the day, Miss Bondi, you’re looking at some prison time.” For what? Who needs to look it up? Emotion in search of an applause line is everything.

Minutes later, she played historian again, in the fight between Trump and Democrats in Congress like Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly, who nudged military personnel to defy Trump: “Again, I hate to bring up history again but there’s something called the Nuremberg defense, which basically states that acting under orders, illegal orders does not relieve a person of responsibility under international law.” They always have to compare Trump to Hitler and his Nazi underlings.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

She continued: “These people were saying, you do not have to obey an illegal order. And the illegal orders are the following,” she said, reading from a paper. “Telling generals to send members into major cities to use them as training grounds. Suggesting that troops shoot protesters in the legs. Ordering unlawful military strikes on boats in international waters…. the Nuremberg Trial proved that going against an illegal order is legit.”

Nobody should want these ladies as their experts on history or politics or culture. But they are reliable robots on the social-media memes and themes that the Democrats use in their efforts to win every news cycle. It’s shocking that this show is under the ABC News umbrella, because there’s nothing in this show that sounds like journalism. 

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM TIM GRAHAM

Some states have let unqualified foreign drivers on the road and Americans pay the price

Once again, America is mourning because our commercial driver’s licensing (CDL) system failed.

Federal authorities say a Kyrgyz national behind the wheel of a semitruck crossed into oncoming traffic in Jay County, Indiana, killing four people and injuring several others. ICE has since arrested the driver. But for the families of those lost, enforcement after the fact is cold comfort.

Operating an 80,000-pound commercial vehicle is not a right. It’s a responsibility. And when that responsibility is handed to someone who is not properly vetted nor qualified to operate it, the results can be catastrophic.

The state of Pennsylvania issued this truck driver a non-domiciled CDL, a credential given to someone who is legally allowed to work in the U.S. but doesn’t permanently live in the state issuing the license — often foreign nationals working under temporary U.S. work authorization. But they must meet the same rigorous federal standards as all CDLs.

DOT CRACKDOWN PULLS HUNDREDS OF ENGLISH-ILLITERATE, ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT TRUCKERS OFF ROADS AS CRASHES MOUNT

Federal audits have repeatedly shown that some states are cutting corners. Weak oversight and poor enforcement have allowed unqualified drivers to slip through the cracks and onto America’s highways, putting law-abiding motorists and professional truck drivers at risk.

We’ve seen the consequences before. Last summer in Florida, a driver who was in the country illegally killed three people after making an illegal U-turn on the busy Florida Turnpike. That driver had failed his commercial driver’s test 10 times yet still held a CDL, rightfully triggering the need for enhanced state review and federal legislation to create new safeguards around how CDLs are issued. 

Investigations have exposed glaring systemic failures in states like California, where audits found a staggering share of non-domiciled CDLs were issued in ways that failed to comply with federal safety and immigration standards, including instances tied to a fatal Ontario, Calif., highway crash in October that claimed three lives.

Professional truck drivers endure intensive training, strict drug and alcohol testing, English proficiency requirements, and continuous oversight. These are core safety protocols designed to protect everyone on our roads. When it comes to highway safety, rules and regulations only matter if they’re enforced.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

Allowing individuals who do not meet these standards to operate big rigs is not just irresponsible. It’s outright dangerous, and the preventable crashes in Florida and California, and now this latest crash in Indiana are stark reminders of what can — and does — go wrong.

The Trump administration deserves credit for stepping in where states failed. Under President Donald Trump and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, the federal government has tightened oversight of non-domiciled CDLs, expanded audits of state licensing agencies and held states accountable when they fail to verify legal status, qualifications and basic safety requirements. But we can’t stop there. As I testified on Capitol Hill in January, Congress has an opportunity to take decisive action and build on the Department of Transportation’s ongoing efforts to restore nationwide uniformity, improve the integrity of driver vetting and credentialing, and rebuild public confidence in the safety and reliability of the commercial driving workforce.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Too many families have already suffered unimaginable loss. We must not wait for the next tragic headline to drive reform. Ensuring every CDL holder is qualified is essential and states must be held accountable when they fail to uphold federal law.

America’s highways demand professionalism and accountability. Anything less is a disservice to the American people.

Cuba is approaching its Berlin Wall moment — America must help them break through

The brutal regime in Cuba is collapsing in real time. Its economy is in free fall, its people are starving, and its communist dictatorship is running out of money, fuel and legitimacy. After more than six decades of repression, the regime is weaker today than at any point in my lifetime — and I know that personally. I lived under it. I fled it. And today, I am the only Cuban-born member of the United States Congress.

This moment demands clarity and resolve from the United States. We are closer than ever to ending the tyranny in Havana, but only if we act decisively and refuse to repeat the failed policies of the past.

The situation on the island is dire by every measure. Cuba faces severe shortages of food, medicine, electricity and fuel. Hospitals lack basic supplies. Power outages last for days. Families ration meals and struggle simply to survive.

RUBIO SCHEDULED TO APPEAR BEFORE SENATE TO OUTLINE TRUMP’S VENEZUELA POLICY

Make no mistake: this crisis is solely the responsibility of the regime. It is the inevitable result of socialism, corruption and decades of catastrophic mismanagement by a cynical dictatorship that prioritizes regime survival over human dignity.

For years, the regime survived by exporting repression and importing lifelines — Venezuelan oil, remittances, tourism dollars and shoddy business deals that funneled hard currency directly into the hands of the military and intelligence services. Those lifelines are finally being cut off.

Thanks to President Donald Trump’s decisive leadership and the aggressive enforcement of U.S. law — championed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio — the regime is being hit where it hurts most: its ability to finance repression. Oil shipments are drying up. International partners are pulling back. Havana is running out of options.

That is exactly why this time is different.

TRUMP ULTIMATUM TO CUBA: ‘MAKE A DEAL, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE’ OR FACE CONSEQUENCES

History teaches us that dictatorships do not reform when they are weak. They crack down harder. When faced with collapse, the Cuban regime does what it has always done: silence dissent, jail protesters, and search for new patrons abroad.

Increasingly, the Cuban regime’s new patron is Communist China.

Beijing has disturbingly expanded its intelligence and strategic footprint on the island, just 90 miles away from Florida, turning Cuba into a base of operations aimed directly at the United States. A collapsing dictatorship aligned with America’s greatest geopolitical adversary is not just a humanitarian tragedy — it is a serious national security threat.

The United States must not provide any lifeline to the Castro regime.

First, we must enforce existing law — fully and without exception. No licenses. No loopholes. No fake “humanitarian” carve-outs that enrich regime-controlled entities while ordinary Cubans see none of the benefit. President Obama pursued engagement. It failed — spectacularly.

Second, we must cut off any remaining financial flows that prop up the dictatorship, including remittances and travel mechanisms captured by the military’s business conglomerates. These funds do not empower the Cuban people; they empower their oppressors.

Sanctions do not hurt the Cuban people more than the regime already does. As history showed with South Africa, sustained pressure weakens dictatorships and accelerates FREEDOM.

Ronald Reagan once said that communism “is not a permanent condition. It will end because it is against human nature.” We saw that truth when the Berlin Wall fell — not because dictators suddenly reformed, but because FREEDOM proved much stronger than fear.

Cuba is approaching its Berlin Wall moment.

SENATE REPUBLICAN PREDICTS THE FALL OF THE CUBAN REGIME

I lost my homeland as a child. I was raised in Miami’s Cuban exile community — exceptional men and women who had everything stolen from them, yet built new lives in the greatest nation on Earth. We are deeply grateful to America, and unwavering in our belief that FREEDOM is worth fighting for. My community overwhelmingly backed President Trump because we know strength, not appeasement, is exactly what puts America First.

Finally, we must speak directly to the Cuban people: America stands with you — not with your jailers. Our goal is not chaos or suffering. It is FREEDOM.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The communist regime is on its knees. This is not the time to blink. It’s time to finish the job — by enforcing the law, applying maximum pressure, and standing proudly on the side of FREEDOM.

President Trump, the time for a free Cuba is now.