Angela Rayner reveals why she’d never want to be prime minister
Angela Rayner has said she would never want to be prime minister because “it would age me by 10 years within six months”.
“Have you ever seen a prime minister after a year or two in government?” the deputy prime minister joked.
The morning after Sir Keir Starmer scraped through a major rebellion over his watered-down welfare reforms, Ms Rayner was asked whether she is waiting in the wings to take the embattled PM’s place.
“Not a chance,” she told ITV’s Lorraine.
She said: “It would age me by 10 years within six months, it does, anyone who has been prime minister it is a very challenging job.”
Amid mounting questions about the prime minister’s future following a disastrous first year in power, she defended Sir Keir, saying he is “doing the job for Britain”, adding “there’s been a lot going on” in the 12 months since the PM entered Downing Street.
She said: “He’s been all around the world trying to repair the relationships in Europe. We’ve got the trade deals that the previous government wasn’t able to do, tackling the things like the tariffs that the president in the US wanted to put onto the UK, which would have damaged our economy again.
“There’s a lot going on, and the prime minister’s been […] here, there and everywhere, doing the job for Britain.”
It comes after polling expert Professor Sir John Curtice referred to Sir Keir’s first year in office as “the worst start for any newly elected prime minister”.
He told Times Radio that the prime minister was “never especially popular” and that “the public still don’t know what he stands for.”
Asked if she would be interested in being prime minister at some point, Ms Rayner told the ITV programme: “No”.
She said that she is “passionate” about issues including workers’ rights and council housing.
“I’m very interested in delivering for the people of this country, because … to be elected as an MP from my background was incredible,” she said.
“Having that opportunity to serve my community that have raised me, looked after me, given me opportunities, and I don’t forget that. And to be deputy prime minister of this country … it’s got to count for something.”
Djokovic praises ‘miracle pills’ for helping him after mid-match turn
Novak Djokovic admitted to feeling his ‘absolute worst’ on court until the doctor’s ‘miracle pills’ restored eased a stomach issue and helped him fight past Alexandre Muller in four sets.
The first round clash was delicately poised at one set each when Djokovic asked for the doctor following the third game of the third set.
Muller had just taken a 2-1 lead with the set on serve when Djokovic explained an issue he was having in his stomach. The Serb attempted to stretch out his stomach muscles and ease some slight swelling when he was given the tablets by the medical professional.
It took a while for them to kick in but once they did Djokovic flew through the rest of the set, and quickly swept through the fourth to clinch a 6-1 6-7 6-2 6-2 victory and a place in the second round.
Speaking on court following his win, the seven-time Wimbledon champion explained the niggle he felt and praised his opponent for ‘the battle’.
“It’s great to be back in Wimbledon and obviously I have to say that first and acknowledge the sacredness of this court,” Djokovic began.
“This tournament has always meant a lot to me and to many other players, it’s a childhood dream so I never take stepping out on this court for granted. I enjoyed myself, obviously a bit less in the second set but I went from feeling my absolute best for a set and a half to my absolute worst for about 45 minutes, whether it was a stomach bug, I don’t know what it is.
“I struggled with that but the energy kicked back after some doctor’s miracle pills and I managed to finish the match on a good note.”
The Serb was asked whether he thought about retiring from the match when the stomach bug was at its worst but claimed that wasn’t an option.
Get 4 months free with ExpressVPN
Servers in 105 Countries
Superior Speeds
Works on all your devices
Try for free
ADVERTISEMENT. If you sign up to this service we will earn commission. This revenue helps to fund journalism across The Independent.
Get 4 months free with ExpressVPN
Servers in 105 Countries
Superior Speeds
Works on all your devices
Try for free
ADVERTISEMENT. If you sign up to this service we will earn commission. This revenue helps to fund journalism across The Independent.
He added: “I honestly wasn’t thinking about that [retiring from the match] or taking that as an option. I knew that something is off with the stomach so hopefully when that came down the energy will come back – and that’s what happened.
“Credit to Alex [Muller} for playing some really good tennis. He fought in the second set and deserves a round of applause for the battle.”
In the next round Djokovic will take on Great Britain’s Dan Evans who defeated fellow Brit Jay Clarke on Tuesday and he is excited for the opportunity to potential win an eighth Wimbledon title.
“I wouldn’t be here if I didn’t think I had a chance. I think I always have a chance and have earned my right to feel that I can go all the way to the title,” Djokovic revealed.
“I’ve always enjoyed myself playing on this court, except when I’ve played Alcaraz the last couple of years, apart from that it was great.
“It is just the beginning of the tournament. There are many fantastic players in the draw. I look forward it, I always felt grass is the surface where I play my best tennis so why not do it again?”
US decision to halt some weapons shipments ‘painful’, says senior Ukrainian MP
Washington’s decision to partially suspend arms transfers to Ukraine is “painful” and leaves Kyiv in an “unpleasant situation”, a senior Ukrainian MP has said.
The Pentagon has halted some shipments of air defence missiles and other precision munitions to Ukraine over concerns about low stockpiles at home, a significant setback for Ukraine as it tries to fend off escalating attacks from Russia.
Air defence interceptors are among the items whose shipment has been delayed. In an email, the Pentagon said it was providing president Donald Trump with options to continue military aid to Ukraine in line with the goal of ending Russia’s war there.
“This decision is certainly very unpleasant for us,” Fedir Venislavskyi, a lawmaker from the ruling Servant of the People party and a member of parliament’s defence committee, told reporters in Kyiv.
“It’s painful, and against the background of the terrorist attacks which Russia commits against Ukraine…it’s a very unpleasant situation.”
The decision comes one day after a Ukrainian drone struck an industrial plant 800 miles inside Russia with “surgical precision”, one of the deepest strikes inside Russian territory.
What did Putin and Macron discuss in their first exchange since September 2022?
Vladimir Putin held a “substantial” phone call with French president Emmanuel Macron on the Iran-Israel conflict and Ukraine, the Kremlin said on Tuesday, the first discussion between the two leaders since September 2022.
Mr Macron’s office said the call lasted two hours and that the French leader had called for a ceasefire in Ukraine and the start of negotiations on ending the conflict.
The Russian president reiterated his position that any possible peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine should have a “comprehensive and long-term character” and be based on “new territorial realities,” the Kremlin quoted Putin as saying.
Putin has previously said Ukraine must accept Russia’s annexation of swaths of its territory as part of any peace deal. Mr Macron has said Ukraine alone should decide on whether or not to accept territorial concessions.
During Tuesday’s call, Mr Macron’s office said, “the president emphasised France’s unwavering support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity”.
The pair aim to continue their discussions, the French president’s office said. He also spoke with Volodymyr Zelensky before and after the exchange.
Russia fires 118 drones and missiles at Ukraine overnight
In its daily update, the Ukrainian air force has said Russia fired 118 drones and missiles at Ukraine’s territory overnight.
Four of these were S-300 anti-aircraft missiles, fired alongside 114 Shahed drones and various types of decoy drones, the air force said.
As of 9am local time, air defence units had destroyed 79 of the drones in northern, eastern and southern areas.
Russian munitions struck 14 locations and debris from downed drones fell in two areas, the air force added according to Ukrainska Pravda.
In pictures: Pope Leo meets leaders of Ukrainian Catholic Church in Vatican
North Korea set to send up to 30,000 troops to fight against Ukraine, Kyiv claims
North Korea is set to send up to 30,000 additional troops to support Russia’s war effort against Ukraine, an intelligence assessment by Kyiv has claimed.
The troops could arrive in the coming months, CNN reported after seeing the assessment. It would be an addition to the roughly 12,000 sent in November who helped Russia push Ukrainian forces out of its Kursk region.
“There is a great possibility” the troops would fight in parts of Russian-occupied Ukraine, the report states. This would be an escalation after Pyongyang’s troops were previously restricted to fighting on Russian territory.
North Korean troops will be used “to strengthen the Russian contingent, including during the large-scale offensive operations”, the document adds. Moscow, it says, is capable of providing the necessary equipment and weaponry for the extra troops.
Only in late April 2025 did Vladimir Putin publicly admit North Korean troops had been deployed to fight alongside Russian forces.
Which other countries are arming Ukraine, other than the US?
As we reported earlier, the US is Ukraine’s largest military aid supplier, providing 64.5 per cent of the support it has received so far.
With a handful of weapons transfers being halted by Washington, which countries are Ukraine’s next largest supporters?
Following the US is the UK at 14.5 per cent, then Germany, Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden, France, and a host of further European countries.
The UK has committed to spending £18 billion on Ukraine, including £13bn on military support and £5bn on non-military.
The EU, meanwhile, has provided huge tranches of humanitarian and financial support, but as an economic bloc it does not provide direct military support.
Ukraine has been supplied with British Storm Shadow missiles, F-16 fighter jets built in the US, Leopard 2 tanks from Germany – despite years of hesitation from Berlin – British challenger tanks, and Polish drones.
You can read more on who is arming Russia and Ukraine here.
Kyiv calls US envoy to foreign ministry over partial weapons suspension
Kyiv has called the acting US envoy to the foreign ministry to stress the need for continuing military aid to fight Russia’s invasion.
It comes after Washington halted some deliveries of ammunition and missiles to Kyiv.
In a statement, it said deputy foreign minister Mariana Betsa expressed gratitude to deputy chief of mission John Ginkel for US support, but warned that a cut-off in aid, particularly air-defence systems, would embolden Russia.
“The Ukrainian side emphasised that any delay or procrastination in supporting Ukraine’s defense capabilities will only encourage the aggressor to continue the war and terror, rather than seek peace,” it said.
Kremlin: US decision to halt some arms will bring quicker end to conflict
The Kremlin has welcomed the news that the US has halted some weapons deliveries to Ukraine, saying it will bring a quicker end to the conflict.
“The fewer weapons are delivered the sooner the conflict will end”, the Kremlin said in response to the news.
Washington halted some shipments of air defence missiles and other precision munitions to Ukraine over concerns that US stockpiles are too low, two people familiar with the matter told Reuters news agency on Tuesday.
A senior Ukrainian lawmaker called Washington’s decision “painful”.
In pictures: Kharkiv in flames after Russian attack
Fires sparked and building destroyed in Russian attack on Kharkiv
Another night of aerial bombardment by Russia has seen a building destroyed in the northeastern city of Kharkiv, and prompting fires to erupt.
Two people were evacuated form the building by the Red Cross and no casualties have been reported, the head of the Kharkiv military administration Ihor Terekhov said on Telegram.
“As a result of the attack on the Novobavarsky district, a one-story non-residential building is on fire,” Mr Terekhov said.
“In addition to the fire at the arrival site in the Novobavarsky district, windows in nearby houses were broken. Fortunately, no casualties.”
US decision to halt some arms shipments ‘painful’ for Kyiv, says senior MP
The US decision to halt some arms shipments to Ukraine including air-defence missiles is “painful” for Kyiv, a senior Ukrainian lawmaker said on Wednesday.
“This decision is certainly very unpleasant for us,” Fedir Venislavskyi, a lawmaker from the ruling Servant of the People party and a member of parliament’s defence committee, told reporters in Kyiv.
“It’s painful, and against the background of the terrorist attacks which Russia commits against Ukraine…it’s a very unpleasant situation.”
Lions flex muscles after sloppy start to thrash Reds
The British and Irish Lions overcame a sloppy start to flex their muscles as they thrashed the Queensland Reds 54-12 in Brisbane.
The Lions bounced back from defeat to Argentina in their tour curtain-raiser by beating the Western Force in Perth in their opening match on Australian soil, and very nearly matched their tally at Suncorp Stadium. They did not, however, have things all their own way as the Reds began with real physicality, surging twice into an advantage in a first half in which the errors came a little too regularly for the tourists.
Andy Farrell will, though, be much more pleased with the second half showing as his side pulled away with 31 unanswered points, with Finn Russell and Fin Smith both tidy at 10 and the attacking game starting to click. A worry, though, will be an injury for Elliot Daly, who had heavy strapping and ice on his forearm after leaving the field in clear discomfort late on.
Follow all of the latest from Brisbane with our live blog below:
Andy Farrell speaks to Sky Sports
“It was a bit of everything. I don’t think it was flowing from us, it was a little stop-start at times, but when we are on I thought we played some really good stuff. It was a bit of a slow start. The Reds came out of the blocks really aggressively and dominated the first 10-15 minutes, but that’s good for us, and we settled down pretty well and played some good stuff. When the game was won, the continuity of our game wasn’t quite what we wanted it to be.
“This is where we are at now with the tour, the games are coming thick and fast and we are using those games to fast-track ourselves to the place we want to be. There are constant learnings there.
[On Elliot Daly] “He’s pretty sore in there. We’ll get him an X-ray. It looks like he’s took a knock to his forearm, so fingers crossed for him.”
“Some lads today were desperate for another crack to get out there today. May the competition continue. We’ll enjoy the win, celebrate that, and then we’ve got a three-day turnaround. That’s Lions tours for you, it’s brilliant, isn’t it?”
FT: Lions 52-12 Reds
We await further news on Elliot Daly, though he was unlikely to feature on Saturday after being called in late for this game. Andy Farrell does have a decision to make regardless: Blair Kinghorn was surely pencilled in to start at full-back against the Waratahs having finally joined up with the squad, but Hugo Keenan is also still yet to feature after falling ill today to be denied a Lions debut. Could we see the Scot on the wing with Keenan in the 15 shirt in Sydney?
And here’s Lions skipper Maro Itoje
“We’re happy, it was a good all-round performance,” the lock says to Sky Sports. “The first half was a bit tough, heavily contest, back-and-forth for the first 25 or 30 minutes. But we stayed consistent and were generally better.
“It’s probably a bit of a blessing in disguise that we have so many games in quick succession. ‘Just be better,’ was the message today. For Saturday, we need to be better rugby players, sharper, more accurate. We just need to be better.
“I’m loving being a part of the team. I’m enjoying the challenge, spending time with all these great players after years spent battling. Long may it continue.”
Lions flanker Jac Morgan speaks to Sky Sports
“It was a good game. It was very physical with the way the Reds started in the first half and the intent they brought in the collisions. It was a tough match and good to get the win.
“I enjoyed it, but it was a full team performance. We spoke about how it would take a full 80 minutes and we stuck in it and kept on building during the game.
“We’ve got to keep on building now. We’ll look ahead to Sydney and learn from things.”
FT: Lions 52-12 Reds
Another half-century, then, for the Lions, overcoming that really worrying opening quarter to pull away. The pace, physicality and intensity with which they played in the second half was very impressive and, perhaps, to be expected of a side with such depth, but 31 unanswered points will be very pleasing after a few early clunks and stutters.
Of concern? 14 handling errors, even amidst the clear ambition with which they want to play, and that injury to Elliot Daly, whose forearm remains wrapped in ice.
FULL TIME: Lions 52-12 Reds
TRY! LIONS 52-12 Reds (Garry Ringrose, 85 minutes)
Garry Ringrose finishes the job!
The Lions’ scrum draws advantage and that affords Fin Smith the chance to unfurl something more expansive, a wide ball finding the centre-cum-wing with chalk on his boots and Ringrose in untouched. Smith can’t convert, meaning the Lions fall two short of their tally against the Force, but after a shaky start that was a fine second half performance.
Lions 47-12 Reds, 83 minutes
Another penalty, this time for a deliberate knock-on from Tim Ryan. Nothing more, referee James Doleman says, with sufficient cover beyond the Reds wing to prevent a yellow card or penalty try.
Maro Itoje requests a scrum.
Lions 47-12 Reds, 82 minutes
A penalty comes. The Lions waste little time tapping it and assembling the carrying parties.
Lions 47-12 Reds, 80 minutes
Hunter Paisami is some player. You wonder if we may yet see the centre involved for the Wallabies, the standout Reds performer tonight coming up with another big moment as he strips a rampaging Ellis Genge. The Reds try to go the length but are felled 40 metres from their own line, with Jac Morgan feasting on the carrion.
Back to the corner for what will actually be the final shot as the hooter blares.
‘I went on Mounjaro with my husband – this is what happened next’
With just a few days to go before a friend’s wedding this weekend, Amanda* has done some last-minute shopping. “I was planning on wearing a dress with straps,” says the 54-year-old. “But then I realised I’d get so many comments about how much weight I’ve lost that I decided to buy another outfit to cover me up more. No one ever said to me when I was big that I shouldn’t get any bigger. But now I’m back to the weight I was when friends first knew me, it feels as if my weight loss has brought out a competitive streak in some of them. It makes me feel quite uncomfortable.”
Amanda, who lives in London, decided to go on Mounjaro a year ago after weighing herself for the first time in years and realising she was five stone heavier than she had been in her thirties.
“My husband and I love good food, so we’d eat out at least a couple of times a week. My portion sizes were too big, I snacked a lot and also the menopause hit,” she says. “We’d both complained about our weight but had done nothing about it, so when I heard about Mounjaro, I decided to try it.
“It wasn’t just a case of injecting and the weight miraculously falling off. I have had to give up things and be mindful. But it’s completely reset my brain when it comes to food and I eat much more healthily, don’t drink nearly so much alcohol and my sleep has improved. I’m now on a maintenance dose and feel better than I have in years.”
But the Mounjaro effect hasn’t just been physical. Amanda’s husband David* also started the drug soon after she did, and a year on, their marriage is in a better place.
“Doing it together has helped a lot,” says Amanda. “David struggled a bit more than me with minor side effects and worried that we’re becoming boring because we’re no longer the last to leave a party.
“But we still socialise and eat out at restaurants together and I honestly feel like I’m a far calmer and nicer person now. We’re both more confident and complimentary of each other too so our emotional relationship has definitely improved.”
While Amanda told only a few close friends that she was taking Mounjaro, David was more open with male friends.
“They’ve all been really positive about his weight loss,” says Amanda. “But while most of my female friends were really positive at the start, it’s got more complicated as time has gone on. One friend for instance has started constantly asking what size I’m wearing or buying the same new clothes as me and then telling me she doesn’t look good in them.
“I’ve ended up wondering if she was happier when I was the fat friend. Who knew that losing weight could cause such a furore?”
Amanda isn’t alone in experiencing a shift in the long-term emotional dynamics of relationships as she experiences a physical change. And with an estimated 1.5 million people in the UK now taking the new generation of GLP1 drugs, which include Wegovy, Ozempic and Mounjaro, mental health professionals say they are beginning to see the impact in their treatment rooms.
“Weight loss drugs weren’t even a thing a couple of years ago, but I’m seeing them impacting relationships more and more now,” says Dr Linda Papadopoulos, a chartered member of the British Psychological Society.
“If two siblings have always looked similar and one suddenly loses weight for instance, it can create a new sense of competition. Or, if two friends are trying to lose weight and one is on the drug but the other isn’t, there can be accusations of ‘cheating’ to reach a lower weight.
“It’s a whole new area and I think we’ll be seeing more and more of this moving into the future because these drugs seem set to become so widely used.”
Secrecy, driven by stigma around the new generation GLP1 drugs and complex attitudes to weight, self-control and the “right” route to weight loss, is another potential cause of conflict.
On internet forums including Mumsnet and Reddit, multiple threads are devoted to discussions between “secret jabbers” who say judgment from spouses, friends or colleagues is their main reason for concealing their use of medication.
Repeated threads deal with how to hide drugs like Mounjaro, which comes in a pen that needs to be kept cool. One user advised building a “fortress of cheese blocks” at the back of the fridge, another hides the pen in a spare drinks fridge and injects themselves in the garage. One even told a curious husband that the family cat had developed diabetes and needed new medication.
Forty-year-old Bethany* is among the spouses who’ve decided to conceal their use of Mounjaro from their partner.
“I’ve got some face masks that I keep in the fridge, which I know my husband would never look at, so I hide the pen in there,” she says. “I know it’s terrible, but he’d go on and on if he knew about big pharma just selling a drug you constantly need to buy as a moneymaking thing.
“But for me, it has meant finally taking control of my weight, which had been out of control all my life after trying everything from diet to exercise.
“And while I worried a bit at the beginning about my husband finding out and seeing it as a betrayal of trust, I’m pretty sure now that ultimately he’d let it go. We have a good relationship and I now feel very confident it was the right decision for me.”
Bethany started the drug a year ago and, conscious about not losing weight too quickly, took the lowest dose of Mounjaro before upping it slightly and dropping back to a maintenance dose. She has lost 1.5 stone in a few months.
“My husband definitely noticed that I was eating less and losing weight, but put it down to healthier lifestyle choices,” she says. “He likes that I’ve lost weight and our sex life has definitely improved because I feel more confident.
“My mum knows I’m on it and thinks it’s terrible I haven’t told my husband. But what he doesn’t know doesn’t hurt him.”
There’s no doubt that the fallout of using GLP1 drugs can be complex, says Dr Rose Aghdami, a chartered psychologist and resilience specialist. “The initial phase can often have a mostly positive impact on relationships,” she says. “The couple re-experiences interest in each other and they both enjoy the resulting closeness.
“Or the partner who has recently started having the jabs often feels a renewed zest for life, they start new hobbies and activities, socialise more, and this can result in more shared enjoyment for the couple. But over time, the negative impact of weight loss jabs can certainly take its toll on relationships.
“Food for instance is often important in relationships and can be a way of showing love to each other as well as building up a store of shared special experiences, so the loss of these can lead to upset, arguments, and feelings of guilt.
“Or the now slimmer partner may attract – and perhaps enjoy – increased interest and attention from others and this can evoke insecurities and jealousy within the couple. Doubt and trust issues can emerge, which can be very difficult to live with, for both partners.”
So, how do those taking the drugs navigate the new landscape that GLP1s have created?
“Any medication can have emotional as well as physical impact,’ says Ammanda Major, clinical quality director, Relate at Family Action. “We get into habits in long-term relationships, so anything that transforms them is going to have a knock-on effect because things don’t exist in vacuums and how we look and our weight are intimately attached to how we see ourselves, and how others see us too.
“But what we do know is that key to any life change – whether it’s a job move or weight loss – is about communication and explaining how you’re both feeling. That’s the key.”
*Names have been changed
Have your relationships been affected by these drugs? Tell us how…
How to host a Macmillan Coffee Morning like you’ve never seen before
What comes to mind when you think of a fundraising coffee morning? Soggy digestives, weak tea and sitting in a school hall having forced fun? Think again.
Macmillan Cancer Support are celebrating 35 years of the iconic Coffee Morning fundraiser, and we’re here to help you give your next Coffee Morning a glow-up. Behind the fun, Coffee Mornings help raise vital funds for people facing one of the toughest challenges of their lives.
Almost one in two people in the UK will get cancer in their lifetime, and no two experiences are the same. Where you live, who you are, or whether you have another health condition can all affect the care you receive – and that’s not fair. Macmillan is working to change that, doing whatever it takes to make sure everyone gets the best possible care, whoever and wherever they are.
So while tasty treats and fundraising fun of course get to stay, we’re leveling up the atmosphere with fresh ideas to keep everyone entertained.
Want to be a Coffee Morning Host?
Best of all, these new ways of raising vital funds don’t have to be expensive. In fact, they might even save you a bit of time, wardrobe space and money. Here’s how to host a Macmillan Coffee Morning like you’ve never seen before…
Organise a ‘style swap shop’
Clear out your wardrobe, raise money and bring your community together all at the same time by organising a ‘style swap shop’ – with all your finest, unworn or unwanted clothes and accessories.
Pack up the majestic hats you bought for a wedding but only wore once, the satin gloves that make you feel like Audrey Hepburn but don’t go with anything you own, or maybe that lace vintage dress your aunty wore to Glastonbury in the 70s, which now lives in an unexplored drawer in your bedroom.
Fill up a bag with your best cast-offs and get your friends, family and neighbours to do the same. Everyone pays £5 entry to the ‘style swap shop’ and then you all get to browse through each other’s preloved treasures – grabbing what takes your fancy.
One person’s hand-me-down is another person’s new look – so elbows at the ready! Want to raise extra cash? Add a £1-£2 price tag on each item that’s been donated.
Strut your stuff at a cake walk
We know that staying healthy and being physically active can reduce the risk of cancer, so why not combine the classic Coffee Morning with a walk around the block? Creative costumes, silly hats and streamers at the ready as we leave behind the school hall and instead take our cakes and cookies for a little jaunt to stretch our legs.
Up the fun, and the stakes, by upgrading from a cake walk to a cake race – the bigger and messier the dessert, the better! And get the kids involved in the baking and racing too.
Or if you want to keep it indoors, turn your catwalk into a cake walk and give your best strut with your favourite pudding in hand. It’s giving egg and spoon race, jelly wobbling on a plate and doubling over with laughter as you sashay along clutching a platter filled with your finest roulade.
Dance away the morning at a sober rave
Why sit or stand when you can dance? Sober raves are all the rage – and ideal for a morning of fun with friends, family and neighbours. There’s no hangover, no late night and the kids can join in too – so, no need for a babysitter.
Grab your glow sticks for a Coffee Morning like no other, and you can still eat cake and have a brew or a cold drink. It’s a club night where nobody has to worry about the morning-after-the-night-before! You can host it in any hall, all you need is music and a disco ball.
You might feel silly at first, but soon you’ll be grinning with joy as dancing is proven to release endorphins (natural painkillers and mood boosters) as well as reducing stress and keeping you fit. Now, who does a good Big fish, little fish, cardboard box?
Run an Is it cake? competition
If you haven’t seen the Netflix hit Is it cake? – an American game show-style cooking competition, you’re missing a treat. Contestants compete to both identify and recreate their best version of everyday items – in cake form.
That could be fire hoses made from vanilla sponge and icing, kitchen utensils that cut open to reveal red velvet cake, replica designer handbags that are actually edible, and even other food items such as burgers, which are of course, cake.
Up the baking ante by running your own cake lookalike competition inspired by the show. The best thing about it is that even if your cake looks like a pair of stinky old sports shoes, it’ll still taste great!
Whether you’re swapping styles, raving sober or sculpting a sponge handbag, every slice of fun helps Macmillan Cancer Support do whatever it takes to help everyone living with cancer.
Signing up to host your own Macmillan Coffee Morning this year couldn’t be easier! Find out more today on the Macmillan website
Macmillan Cancer Support, registered charity in England and Wales (261017), Scotland (SC039907) and the Isle of Man (604). Also operating in Northern Ireland.
UK accused of hypocrisy at landmark UN foreign aid conference
The UK has been accused of “hypocrisy” over its lack of high-level participation at a key global development finance summit, on top of cuts to Britain’s aid budget – while talking up its role in helping lower-income nations.
The accusations have been made at the fourth Financing for Development Conference (FfD4), a once-a-decade summit happening all week in Seville, Southern Spain, where delegates are aiming to tackle the perennial problem of how to help developing countries access the money they need.
Thirty-two African countries currently spend more on debt repayments than on healthcare, and 25 African countries spend more on debt payments than on education, an issue that activists say needs urgent action.
Some 50 world leaders are due at FfD4, including Emmanuel Macron of France, Mark Carney of Canada, and Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission. The UK, however, has only sent a government minister in the form of Baroness Chapman, the international development minister.
“A level of ambition from the UK government would have been demonstrated clearly by sending higher level participation such as the prime minister or Foreign Secretary,” Lydia Darby, a senior policy advisor at Save the Children, told The Independent.
Ahead of fDf4, writing in The Independent, Baroness Chapman called for a “new era for global aid and development”, that would see developing countries helped in building their own tax systems, and greater investment in developing countries from the private sector, among other measures.
Hannah Bond, Co-CEO at ActionAid UK, said that it is “hypocritical” for the UK to talk about “fair finance” while cutting overseas aid.
“If the UK truly cares about fair finance, it must honour its overseas aid commitments, tackle unfair debts, and pay its fair share in addressing the climate crisis,” Bond said. “Without this, talk of fair finance is nothing more than empty PR.”
Baroness Chapman’s appearance comes off the back of the UK cutting its foreign aid budget from 0.5 per cent to 0.3 per cent of Gross National Income (GNI) – which is expected to reduce foreign aid by £6.2 billion by 2025.
Alex Farley, from advocacy group Bond, said that it is “impossible” to see how the UK can deliver on existing funding commitments, respond to humanitarian crisis, and tackle climate change, following he 0.5 to 0.3 per cent cut.
“Let alone undo the damage these cuts have done to our reputation and credibility with countries,” he added.
“It would be nice to hear the government expressing regret for its cuts to the aid budget, rather than blithely claiming that they are somehow doing developing countries a favour,” Michael Jacobs, from the think tank ODI, told The Independent.
Mr Jacobs added that the claim that private sector money can substitute public funds is “silly at best, disingenuous at worst”.
This is because “the private sector wants returns, while much aid – for health, schools, sanitation, climate adaptation – doesn’t make a profit, so is not investable”, he said.
Catherine Pettengell, executive director of NGO network Climate Action Network UK concurred that the UK had “failed to sufficiently support developing countries’ calls for fairer debt, tax, international cooperation, and climate finance” in build-up to the conference.
“It’s a crushing blow that only compounds the recent UK aid cuts,” she added.
Attendees of FfD4 say, however, that it is not all doom and gloom in Seville.
The final agreement of the talks – the Compromiso de Sevilla – was in fact agreed to just ahead of this week’s conference. According to Save the Children’s Ms Darby, there is notably positive language on matters including international tax cooperation and an agreement to initiate an intergovernmental process on debt.
“The document is an important step with plenty to build on in the months and years to come,” Darby said – though she acknowledged it has inevitably fallen short of “the transformative ambition that civil society and vulnerable communities worldwide had called for”.
While the UK, along with the EU, has been accused of watering down key priorities for low-and-middle-come countries, these countries have at least contributed much more positively than the US, which withdrew from talks ahead of the conference over the refusal from the rest of the world to delete the goal of “sustainable development” from the text.
This story is part of The Independent’s Rethinking Global Aid series
Diddy jury to return after split on final, most serious count
Jurors are set to deliberate for a third day after reaching a partial verdict in the high-profile sex-trafficking case of Sean “Diddy” Combs.
After more than 12 hours of deliberations, the jury informed Judge Arun Subramanian on Tuesday afternoon that it was in agreement over four of the five counts – two each of sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution.
However, the eight men and four women on the jury said there were members “with unpersuadable opinions on both sides” concerning the final, most serious charge: racketeering conspiracy. Jurors are set to return to Manhattan federal court at 9 a.m. Wednesday morning.
Combs was arrested in September 2024 as federal authorities alleged he threatened, abused, and coerced victims “to fulfill his sexual desires” between 2004 and 2024. He has denied any accusations of wrongdoing.
Combs faces up to life in prison if he is convicted on the RICO charge, another statutory minimum sentence of 15 years if found guilty of sex trafficking, while transportation to engage in prostitution typically carries a maximum sentence of 10 years.
Where do Diddy’s business ventures stand?
Before Combs was arrested and charged last year, his major business ventures had collapsed.
He stepped down and later fully divested from Revolt TV, which was founded in 2013. The network offered a mix of programming focused on hip-hop culture, R&B music, social justice and documentaries.
He also reportedly lost a Hulu reality series deal and saw his once-iconic fashion brand Sean John vanish from Macy’s shelves.
After surveillance footage surfaced last year showing Combs physically assaulting singer Cassie, his then-girlfriend, in 2016, consequences mounted.
New York City revoked his ceremonial key, Peloton pulled his music, Howard University rescinded his honorary degree and his charter school in Harlem cut ties.
Last year, Combs settled a legal dispute with Diageo, relinquishing control of his lucrative spirits brands, Ciroc and DeLeón. While many of his ventures have unraveled, his music catalog — for now — remains intact.
The Associated Press contributed to this post.
Yesterday in photos: Diddy’s family rallies around music mogul
What are the charges against Diddy?
Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs could soon learn his fate in a trial that has accused him of racketeering and sex trafficking.
It comes nearly 10 months after prosecutors in Manhattan initially unveiled a three-count criminal indictment against Combs, accusing him of engaging in transportation for prostitution and conspiracy over the course of more than 17 years.
A jury of 12 continues to deliberate the RICO charge against the mogul after hearing seven weeks of testimony in a New York federal courtroom.
Ariana Baio outlines the charges against Diddy and what they mean:
Explaining the charges against Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs
The jurors who will decide Diddy’s fate
With jury deliberations to continue this morning, here’s a look at the 12-member panel tasked with deciding the music mogul’s fate.
Eight men and four women comprise the dozen New Yorkers selected to sit for the trial.
Ranging in age from 30 to 74, the jurors come from Manhattan, the Bronx, and nearby Westchester County. Their professions vary from a massage therapist to an investment analyst.
Several of the younger jurors said they listen to hip-hop and R&B music, genres aligned with Combs.
Some of the jurors said before the trial began that they were familiar with the 2016 surveillance footage of Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura in a Los Angeles hotel.
What is Diddy’s life like in jail?
Sean “Diddy” Combs, the music mogul at the center of a bombshell sex trafficking trial in New York, has been behind bars for nearly 300 days.
Combs, 55, has spent the last nine months at the notorious Metropolitan Detention Center in New York City. The prison, which has been described as “hell on Earth,” has held several high-profile individuals. Accused United Healthcare CEO shooter Luigi Mangione is being held there, and so was disgraced crypto founder Sam Bankman-Fried until March.
Other detainees have included convicted sex trafficker R. Kelly and Jeffrey Epstein’s former associate Ghislaine Maxwell.
Katie Hawkinson details what we know about Combs’s life behind bars:
What is Diddy’s life like in jail?
If guilty, Diddy faces up to life in prison
Sean Combs is facing two charges of sex trafficking, two charges of transportation to engage in prostitution and a racketeering conspiracy charge.
The jury reached a partial verdict yesterday, with the panel claiming there were “unpersuadable opinions” on both sides concerning the RICO charge.
Combs faces up to life in prison if he is convicted on the racketeering conspiracy charge.
If he is found guilty of sex trafficking, he faces another statutory minimum sentence of 15 years.
Transportation to engage in prostitution typically carries a maximum sentence of 10 years.
How do jury deliberations work?
Judge Arun Subramanian gave instructions to the jurors on Monday before sending them off to deliberate inside the Manhattan federal courthouse.
The jury of 8 men and 4 women, all hailing from New York, must unanimously decide guilty or not guilty on each count.
That means all 12 jurors must agree. If jurors don’t reach an agreement, they could come back and say they are deadlocked.
That is what we saw in the partial verdict delivered Tuesday: jurors in agreement on two counts each of sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution, but split on the racketeering conspiracy charge.
As we saw yesterday, if the jury remains deadlocked, the judge will urge them to continue deliberations. However, if they still can’t reach a consensus, the judge may decide to declare a mistrial.
In sketches: Defense surrounds a flustered Diddy over jury note
Explained: The racketeering conspiracy charge against Diddy
The jury was deadlocked Tuesday over the most serious charge Combs faces: racketeering conspiracy.
The jury told Judge Arun Subramanian in the afternoon that there were members “with unpersuadable opinions on both sides.” Deliberations are due to continue this morning.
The RICO Act defines “racketeering activity” as any act or threat that involves different crimes like bribery, arson, extortion, kidnapping, and dealing in a controlled substance. The DoJ website describes conspiracy as “two or more persons” who agree to commit a crime and take steps to further the plan.
The government has proposed 10 predicate acts – a specific crime that forms part of a larger criminal pattern – that support the RICO count.
The jury must unanimously agree that at least two of those acts listed were committed to convict Combs of the specific charge.
One of the predicate acts is sex trafficking, which, if jurors agree happened, they must specify it involved either of Combs’s ex-girlfriends Cassie Ventura – between 2009 and 2018 – or the woman who testified under the pseudonym “Jane” – between May 2021 and 2024.
The many faces of the ‘freak-off’-loving impresario
For many criminal defendants, courtroom reveals boil down to a nice business suit, occasional facial expressions and few words being uttered in public.
For Sean “Diddy” Combs, it’s not that simple.
Fame and fixers had long shrouded some of the darker, more salacious aspects of a life the mogul managed to keep hidden for decades, but his sex trafficking trial dragged all the many faces of Diddy firmly into public view.
From cheater to charmer, Kelly Rissman looks at the many faces of Diddy on view during his sex-trafficking trial: