More than 100 people are missing and at least one has died after a cloudburst triggered devastating flash floods in the northern Indian state of Uttarakhand.

Rescue operations are under way in Uttarkashi district after a massive wave of water surged down the mountains into Dharali village on Tuesday, submerging roads and buildings in its path.

Some army teams have been stationed in Dharali since Tuesday, but other disaster response forces and district officials have been unable to reach the area due to damaged roads and heavy rainfall.

Heavy rains have been lashing the Himalayan state of Uttarakhand over the past few weeks.

Uttarkashi, where Dharali village is located, has been particularly affected, with flooding reported in many places.

Around 130 people have been rescued so far in Uttarkashi, Uttarakhand Chief Minister Pushkar Singh Dhami told reporters on Wednesday morning.

A cloudburst is an extreme, sudden downpour of rain over a small area in a short period of time, often leading to flash floods.

It took place on Tuesday around 13:30 India time (08:00 GMT), causing the Kheerganga river to swell dramatically, sending tonnes of muddy water crashing down the hilly terrain.

Dharali, a popular tourist destination in the summer, is located 2km (1.24 miles) from Harsil, which has a huge Indian army base. A camp of the paramilitary Indo-Tibetan Border Police is also located near the area.

At least 10 soldiers stationed at the Harsil base are also missing, officials said.

Rescue operations are progressing at a slow pace as there is a large amount of sludge and debris covering the area.

Heavy rains which have continued into Wednesday have also complicated rescue efforts. Many routes on the main highway have been closed after they were heavily damaged in the downpour. There are gaping, jagged cracks running down many roads in Uttarkashi district.

A few teams of the national and state disaster response forces stationed in Gangotri – about 18km from Dharali – have been at the site since Tuesday afternoon, but officials have been unable to contact them because of poor network connectivity and prolonged power outages.

India’s weather department has forecast heavy rainfall in the region over the coming days and has advised people to avoid travelling to areas prone to landslides. Schools have also been closed in some parts of the state.

The sludge has also blocked part of the Bhagirathi river – which becomes India’s holiest river Ganges once it travels downstream – forming an artificial lake that has submerged large areas, including a government helipad.

Officials worry that if this water is not drained out quickly, it can pose a serious threat to towns and villages downstream.

In the past few days, officials had issued multiple rain alerts, discouraging tourists from visiting the region.

Dharali, a busy summer stop on the Char Dham Yatra pilgrimage, sees fewer visitors in monsoon season. The low footfall and warnings likely kept tourists safe during the deluge. Residents warn that a full crowd could have turned the incident into a far worse disaster.

Uttarakhand, located in the western Himalayas, is highly vulnerable to flash floods and landslides.

In 2021, more than 200 people died in flash floods triggered by a cloudburst.

One of the worst disasters to hit Uttarakhand was in 2013, when a cloudburst caused devastating floods and landslides that destroyed several villages and towns. Much of the damage took place in Kedarnath town, which is popular with Hindu pilgrims. Thousands of people were swept away, and many bodies were never recovered.

A Chinese fighter jet plane crashes in the waters off Taiwan’s coast, prompting Chinese warships to blockade the island for a “search and rescue”.

Taiwanese soldiers manning Dadan Island, a rocky outcrop mere kilometres from China’s coast, begin vanishing mysteriously.

Then one night, a fishing boat lands on Dadan. A signal flare arcs into the inky sky – and illuminates Chinese soldiers who have spilled out of the boat and amassed on the beach.

This is the key scenario in Zero Day Attack, a new Taiwanese television show about a fictional Chinese military invasion. Beijing has long viewed self-ruled Taiwan as part of its territory, vowing to “reunify” with it some day while not ruling out the use of force.

The series, which aired its first episode over the weekend, was partially funded by the Taiwanese government, which hopes to raise awareness about the threat China poses.

But the show has also landed at a highly divisive moment in Taiwan and attracted criticism of fear-mongering.

Zero Day Attack focuses on how various parts of Taiwanese society grapple with the invasion, from the president to rural villagers.

The anthology series features several scenarios on how an invasion could unfold, provided by defence experts consulted by the production team.

These include the disruption of Taiwan’s communication lines; Chinese disinformation campaigns; “fifth column” supporters of China stirring up unrest; and military officials turned collaborators who conspire against Taiwan.

Showrunner Chen Hsin-mei told the BBC she wanted to make the series to “warn the Taiwanese people that the war is really coming,” citing China’s rising use of “disinformation campaigns and grey zone warfare to put our society in chaos and make us confused about our identity”.

Zero Day Attack’s message echoes the rhetoric of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government and its leader President William Lai, who have warned about China’s threat and preached the need to raise the island’s defences.

Taiwan’s culture ministry has partially funded Zero Day Attack, while the military provided support for filming and production. Chunghwa Telecoms, Taiwan’s largest telecommunications company in which the government has a minority stake, also contributed funding.

Other private investors include billionaire Robert Tsao, a well-known supporter of Taiwanese independence who has funded civil defence efforts.

Ms Chen told the BBC that at no point did the authorities try to influence the show. She also said she was not a member of the DPP or any political party.

But even before a single episode was broadcast, Zero Day Attack has become a political lightning rod, given the charged topic.

A 17-minute trailer posted online last year by the production team swiftly racked up hundreds of thousands of views and comments.

While some praised it for its message, others criticised it for sowing anxiety and discord with China.

This debate has intensified with the series premiere, which was the most-watched show on several platforms on Saturday, according to the production company.

In recent days Wang Hung-wei, a prominent lawmaker from the opposition Kuomintang party, criticised Zero Day Attack as “selling dried mangoes”, a Taiwanese euphemism that means stoking unnecessary fear about the destruction of one’s country.

Pointing to the government’s funding of the show, Ms Wang said the DPP was “using the state apparatus to achieve its political goals”.

A commentary by Wang Kunyi of the Taiwan International Strategic Study Society accused the show of pushing Taiwan independence “so that Taiwan becomes a place that never knows peace”.

He added that it was evidence of Lai’s government “once again using all kinds of channels to play the ‘anti-Communist card’ and stir up anxiety of war”.

The DPP and Lai are often accused by their critics, including the opposition and China, as pushing for Taiwan’s independence. Any formal declaration as such would be considered as an act of war by Beijing.

While Lai has in the past described himself as a “pragmatic worker for Taiwan’s independence”, he has also insisted Taiwan has no need to formally declare independence because it is already a sovereign nation.

Zero Day Attack has also garnered positive reviews. One published by the public broadcaster PTS said it “expresses the worries and anxieties of Taiwanese from various political camps in a highly realistic and reasonable way”.

“It’s a good watch,” said one commenter on Zero Day Attack’s Facebook page. “The Taiwanese people can relate to it as it reflects our current situation, the Chinese Communist Party must be repulsed as their tactics have been exposed.”

Some have praised the first episode, which depicts the invasion quietly beginning amid a contentious presidential election marked by violence and political fighting.

They were struck by how uncannily that episode reflected the current fractious mood in Taiwanese politics. Last month the island held a controversial failed recall vote of Kuomintang lawmakers accused of being too friendly with China. Another round will take place later this month.

This has led to questions about the show’s timing and if it was meant to influence the recall votes. Ms Chen told the BBC that the show’s production had begun long before the recall movement started.

The discussion around the show goes to the heart of one of Taiwan’s most existential questions: how real is the threat of a Chinese invasion?

Taiwan has had its own government since the end of the Chinese Civil War in 1949. In the following decades, the island saw largely peaceful relations and stronger economic ties with China.

Polls show that most Taiwanese do not believe Beijing will attack imminently, and prefer the “status quo” in Taiwan’s relationship with China, which means neither unifying with Beijing nor formally declaring independence.

But the question of a Chinese invasion has become sharper and more political in recent years.

Chinese grey zone warfare has spiked, raising fears that Chinese warplanes and ships repeatedly entering Taiwan’s airspace and waters could trigger a conflict.

The US warned this year that China poses an “imminent threat” to Taiwan. American officials have repeatedly claimed that Chinese President Xi Jinping is building up his military to be capable of invading Taiwan by 2027.

Beijing has never confirmed this date. But it is a warning that Lai takes seriously.

He has pledged to increase Taiwan’s military spending, his government has carried out reforms in the army, and last month Taiwan staged its largest and longest ever Han Kuang drills aimed at defending against a possible Chinese attack.

Lai has stressed that these efforts are aimed at protecting Taiwan and not to seek war. His political opponents however say he is antagonising Beijing which reviles Lai as a “separatist”, and that he is leading Taiwan towards greater conflict with China.

Beijing has repeatedly emphasised that it seeks “peaceful reunification” with Taiwan. It has dismissed any talk of a Chinese invasion as a pretext manufactured by those in favour of Taiwan independence to drum up support.

Zero Day Attack has been seen as one such provocation. Last week, Chinese defence ministry spokesman Zhang Xiaogang accused the DPP government of using the show to “peddle anxieties and attempting to provoke war”.

He said Zero Day Attack was “plunging Taiwan into the flames of war and using the Taiwan people as cannon fodder for ‘Taiwan independence’.

Ms Chen however insisted that her show is “not talking bad about China or depicting it as evil”.

“We are talking about war, and how Taiwanese people struggle and respond to it. And that’s because the terror of war has never stopped, all over the world.”

A silent prayer was held in Japan on Wednesday morning as it marked 80 years since the United States dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima.

Japanese prime minister Shigeru Ishiba attended the ceremony on Wednesday, along with officials from around the world and the city’s mayor Kazumi Matsui.

Matsui warned of a global “accelerating trend toward military build-up… [and] the idea that nuclear weapons are essential for national defence”, saying this was a “flagrant disregard [of] the lessons the international community should have learned from the tragedies of history”.

World War Two ended with Japan’s surrender after the dropping of the bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The bombs killed more than 200,000 people – some from the immediate blast and others from radiation sickness and burns.

The legacy of the weapons continues to haunt survivors today.

“My father was badly burned and blinded by the blast. His skin was hanging from his body – he couldn’t even hold my hand,” Hiroshima survivor Shingo Naito told the BBC. He was six years old when the bomb struck his city, killing his father and two younger siblings.

Mr Naito has been sharing his story with a group of students in Hiroshima, who are turning his memories of the tragedy into art.

In 2024, Nihon Hidankyo, a Japanese group of atomic bomb survivors won the Nobel Peace Prize for their efforts to rid the world of nuclear weapons.

In a speech on Wednesday, mayor Matsui said that the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which aims to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and promote the peaceful use of nuclear energy, was “on the brink of dysfunctionality”.

He also called on the Japanese government to ratify the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons – an international agreement banning nuclear weapons that came into force in 2021.

More than 70 countries have ratified the treaty, but nuclear powers like the US and Russia have opposed it, pointing to the deterrence function of nuclear arsenals.

Japan has also rejected such a ban, arguing that its security is enhanced by US nuclear weapons.

The nuclear issue is a divisive one in Japan. On the streets leading up to the Peace Memorial Park, there were small protests calling for the abolition of nuclear weapons.

Satoshi Tanaka, another atomic bomb survivor who suffered multiple cancers from radiation exposure, said that seeing the bloodshed in Gaza and Ukraine today conjures up his own suffering.

“Seeing the mountains of rubble, the destroyed cities, the children and women fleeing in panic, it all brings back memories of what I went through,” he told the BBC. “We are living alongside nuclear weapons that could wipe out humanity multiple times over.”

“The most urgent priority is to push the leaders of nuclear-armed countries. The people of the world must become even more outraged, raise their voices louder, and take massive action.”

Russia has more than doubled the number of drones and missiles fired towards Ukraine since President Donald Trump returned to the White House in January, a BBC Verify analysis has found, despite his calls for a ceasefire.

Attacks had already been rising under former President Joe Biden in 2024 but climbed sharply after Trump’s election victory in November. Since he returned to office in January, recorded aerial attacks from Moscow have reached their highest levels of the war.

Throughout his campaign Trump vowed to bring an end to fighting in just one day if returned to office. He claimed during his 2024 campaign that Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine could have been averted had a president who the Kremlin “respected” held office.

However, in his efforts to achieve a ceasefire he has been accused at times of favouring Russia by critics, and his administration has paused deliveries of air defence munitions and other military supplies to Ukraine on two separate occasions.

The pauses – announced in March and July and since reversed by the president – came as Russia steadily increased missile and drone production. According to Ukrainian military intelligence, ballistic missile construction in Russia grew by 66% over the past year.

The data reviewed by BBC Verify – based on daily incident reports issued by the Ukrainian Air Force – showed that Russia launched 27,158 munitions between 20 January – when Trump’s presidency began – and 19 July, compared with 11,614 over the final six months of Biden’s term.

“This brutal war was brought on by Joe Biden’s incompetence, and it has gone on for far too long,” White House deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly said in a statement to BBC Verify.

“President Trump wants to stop the killing, which is why he is selling American-made weapons to Nato members and threatening Putin with biting tariffs and sanctions if he does not agree to a ceasefire.”

In the opening weeks of the new administration, the White House issued a series of warm statements seemingly intended to entice President Vladimir Putin towards a settlement. During this period, Russian attacks on Ukraine briefly fell when compared with the final weeks of the Biden administration.

But by February, when US diplomats led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio met Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov’s delegation for a summit in Riyadh, attacks had started to climb again.

The talks, which Rubio said were a starting point to bring an end to the war, have been followed by mediated discussions between Ukrainian and Russian officials in Turkey.

Attacks peaked early last month, when Moscow launched 748 drones and missiles towards Ukraine on 9 July, according to the Ukrainian Air Force data. More than a dozen people were reportedly injured by the barrage and two were killed.

While Trump has expressed anger at the escalating Russian attacks on several occasions, his mounting frustration does not appear to have had an impact on Moscow’s strategy.

On 25 May, Russia launched its then-largest recorded barrage, prompting Trump to angrily ask: “What the hell happened to him [Putin]?”

Since then, Russia has exceeded that number of reported launches on 14 occasions. Trump has responded by demanding that the Kremlin reach a peace deal with Ukraine by 8 August.

The number of Russian munitions penetrating Ukrainian air defences appears to be increasing, with explosions around the capital Kyiv becoming a daily part of life for residents of the city.

“Every time you go to sleep, you don’t know if you’re going to wake up the next morning, and that’s just not a normal way to live,” Dasha Volk, a journalist living in the city, told the BBC’s Ukrainecast programme in June.

“Every time you hear an explosion or a missile flying over your head, lots of thoughts are going through my mind – I’m going to die now, things like that.”

Senator Chris Coons, a senior Democrat on the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told BBC Verify that Trump’s decision to suspend weapons supplies on two occasions and his broader approach to Russian relations may have convinced the Kremlin that it had the freedom to increase attacks.

“It’s clear Putin feels emboldened by Trump’s weakness and has increased his vicious assault on the Ukrainian people, repeatedly attacking hospitals and maternity wards, the Ukrainian power grid, and other civilian sites,” he said.

The growing attacks have renewed calls for the US to send fresh supplies of Patriot anti-air batteries to Ukraine. The Patriots are the most capable and expensive air defence systems that Ukraine has. Each Patriot battery costs around $1bn (£800m), and each missile costs nearly $4m.

Trump has overturned the previous supply pauses and agreed to sell weapons to Nato members, who will in turn supply them to Kyiv. Trump appeared to imply that the deal would include fresh supplies of Patriot batteries.

Justin Bronk, an analyst focussing on the Russian military at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), said restrictions on the supply of military equipment imposed by the White House had made Ukraine “vulnerable” to missile and drone attacks.

But he also noted that Russia has ramped up the production of missiles and so-called ‘kamikaze’ drones such as the Geran-2 – a domestically produced version of the Iranian Shahed drone. Mr Bronk said that Russia’s increased stockpiles, coupled with “significant reductions” in supply of US interceptor missiles had encouraged Moscow to escalate its air campaign.

Ukraine’s Military Intelligence agency (HUR) recently told domestic media that Russia was now producing up to 85 ballistic missiles per month, up from 44 in April 2024.

Russia is reportedly producing 170 Geran drones per day, having established a massive manufacturing facility at Alabuga in the south of the country.

In a recent interview with Russian military TV, the facility’s director Timur Shagivaleyev boasted that Alabuga had become “the largest combat drone production plant in the world”, adding that his workers were producing nine times more units than initially expected.

Satellite images show the facility has expanded significantly since mid-2024, with a number of new warehouses built on the site.

Other structures, including what appear to be expansions to worker dormitories, remain under construction.

Senator Coons warned that the increase in production meant that Washington must make clear that it is not preparing to walk away from the conflict as some administration officials have threatened he could do, emphasising that peace can only be achieved through “surging security assistance”.

He added that President Trump must make it clear to Russia that it “cannot simply try to outlast the West”.

“In order to do that, he needs to maintain a consistent and sustained position on the war.”

Meanwhile, Ms Volk said that every day the Russian campaign drags on and Ukrainian interceptions fall public morale is hammered.

“People are getting tired because of these attacks, they really affect our lives,” she said.

“We know what we are fighting for, but it becomes more difficult every year because everyone is getting exhausted. That’s the reality.”

What do you want BBC Verify to investigate?

Two adverts by fashion brand Zara have been banned for featuring models who appeared “unhealthily thin”.

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) said shadows and a slick back bun hairstyle made one model appear “gaunt” while the pose and low cut design of a shirt in another image showed the model’s “protruding” collarbones.

The watchdog ruled that the “irresponsible” adverts must not appear again in their current form and that Zara must ensure all its images were “prepared responsibly.”

Zara has removed the adverts and said that both models in question had medical certification proving they were in good health when the pictures were taken.

The two banned adverts previously appeared on the retailer’s app and website in a carousel of images showing clothes on and off models.

One advert was for a short dress and the ASA felt shadows were used to make the models legs look “noticeably thin”.

It also said the positioning of her upper arms and elbow joints made her look “out of proportion.”

The other banned advert was for a shirt and the model was said to be in a position that made “protruding” collarbones a “focal feature” of the advert.

The ASA investigated two other Zara adverts but neither were banned.

Zara chose to remove all the images flagged and said it had not received any direct complaints.

The retailer told the ASA that none of the images had been modified beyond “very minor lighting and colouring edits”.

It added that it followed recommendations of a report called Fashioning a Healthy Future, which was published in 2007 by the UK Model Health Inquiry.

Zara said it specifically complied with recommendation three of that report which said models “should provide a medical certificate attesting their good health from doctors with expertise in recognising eating disorders.”

It comes after adverts by other retailers were banned earlier this year for models being too thin.

In July, an advert by Marks & Spencer was banned because the model appeared to be “unhealthily thin”.

The ASA said the pose of the model and the choice of clothing – including “large pointed shoes” which emphasised “the slenderness of her legs” – made the advert “irresponsible”.

Earlier this year, fellow retailer Next also had an advert for blue skinny jeans banned.

The ASA said the advert emphasised the thinness of the model’s legs using camera angles, and deemed it “irresponsible”.

Next said it disagreed with the advertising watchdog’s decision and said the model, while slim, had a “healthy and toned physique”.

The Next advert ban left BBC readers asking why adverts showing models who appear unhealthily overweight are not banned.

Get our flagship newsletter with all the headlines you need to start the day. Sign up here.

The body of a man missing for 28 years has been found in a melting glacier in Pakistan’s remote and mountainous Kohistan region.

A shepherd stumbled upon the body, which was remarkably well-preserved, with its clothing intact, in the so-called Lady Valley in the country’s east.

Along with the body was an ID card with the name Naseeruddin. Police were able to trace it to a man who disappeared in the area in June 1997 after falling into a glacier crack during a snowstorm.

The region has seen decreased snowfall in recent years, exposing glaciers to direct sunlight, making them melt faster. Experts said the body’s discovery shows how changing climate has accelerated glacial melt.

“What I saw was unbelievable,” the shepherd who found the body, Omar Khan, told BBC Urdu. “The body was intact. The clothes were not even torn.”

As soon as police confirmed that it was Naseeruddin, locals began offering more information, Mr Khan added.

Naseeruddin had a wife and two children. He was travelling with his brother, Kathiruddin, on horseback on the day he went missing. Police said a family feud had forced the two men to leave their home.

Kathiruddin told BBC Urdu that they had arrived in the valley that morning, and sometime around afternoon, his brother stepped into a cave. When he did not return, Kathiruddin says he looked for him inside the cave – and went and got help from others in the area to search further. But they never found him.

When a human body falls into a glacier, the extreme cold freezes it fast, preventing decomposition, said Prof Muhammad Bilal, head of the Department of Environment at Comsats University Islamabad.

The body is then mummified due to a lack of moisture and oxygen in the glacier.